Calorie restriction regime enhances physical performance of trained athletes.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2018;15:12
Full text from:

Plain language summary

Athletes commonly aim to reduce body weight to improve their strength-to-mass ratio. In this study caloric restriction (CR) of 33% was achieved through alternate day fasting in trained athletes, which the authors hypothesised to be more easy to adhere to than daily reduced energy intake. The macronutrient composition remained the same as prior to calorie reduction. Study participants lost an average of 4.4% in body weight over 6 weeks, most of which came from fat, 15.1%. Despite also losing some lean mass (2.9%), exercise performance of the athletes improved, as did energy efficiency, possibly due to increased mitochondrial efficiency. Nutritional record analysis revealed that athletes ingested less than the RDA for several nutrients prior to the CR intervention, and intake was even lower with CR. The authors conclude that CR may be a good way for athletes to achieve weight loss as, unlike other body weight reduction techniques, the alternate day fasting CR improved physical performance. They suggest though that to ensure adequate micronutrient intake, supplementation may be required.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Caloric restriction induces mitochondrial biogenesis and improves physical fitness in rodents. We aimed to provide evidence of how caloric restriction affects the body composition and physical performance of trained athletes and to evaluate the possible impact of an every-other-day feeding diet on nutritional deficiencies of micronutrients and essential fatty acids. METHODS The study was performed with 12 healthy male athletes by carrying out a 33% caloric restriction with respect to their usual diet. Athletes performed a maximal exercise stress test both before and after the caloric restriction period. Blood samples were taken before and after the caloric restriction at basal conditions and 30 min post-exercise. Although energy intake was reduced by about 33%, the contribution of carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids to total energy intake during the caloric restriction was similar to the original diet. RESULTS The caloric restriction reduced the daily specific micronutrient intake to values lower than 90% of recommended dietary allowances. No effects were observed in blood parameters related to iron metabolism and tissue damage, glucose levels, lipid profiles, or erythrocyte fatty acid composition. In addition, oxidative damage markers decreased after the nutritional intervention. The caloric restriction intervention significantly reduced body weight and trunk, arm, and leg weights; it also caused a decrease in fat and lean body mass, the energy expenditure rate when performing a maximal exercise stress test, and the energy cost to run one meter at various exercise intensities. Furthermore, the intervention ameliorated the onset of the anaerobic phase of exercise. CONCLUSION A caloric restriction improves athletes' performance and energy efficiency, but reduces the daily intake of micronutrients; so, when caloric restriction programs are implemented micronutrient supplementation should be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION The project was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02533479).

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Structural
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/caloric restriction
Environmental Inputs : Diet ; Nutrients ; Physical exercise
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition ; Exercise and movement
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood
Bioactive Substances : micronutrients

Methodological quality

Allocation concealment : Not applicable
Publication Type : Clinical Trial ; Journal Article

Metadata