Plain language summary
Multiple factors, including toxic accumulation of fatty acids in adipose tissue; impaired microbial functioning of the gut; and an imbalance of inflammatory mediators, contribute to a progressed inflammatory state in the liver. The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative effect of evidence regarding the effect of dietary intervention, with or without cointerventions, on the inflammatory profile of adults diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of forty-four randomised controlled trials. A total of 2579 participants with NAFLD were enrolled in the studies, of whom 2497 participants were analysed. Results (meta-analysis) showed that a hypocaloric diet, when used alone or with supplementation, was the most effective dietary intervention for the improvement of NAFLD-implicated inflammatory markers, adiponectin, and leptin. Whereas isocaloric or energy-balanced dietary interventions provided improvements to the same inflammatory cytokines and adipokines when coupled with supplementation but the benefit was less. Authors conclude that larger sample sizes and longer duration studies are needed in order to better determine the effectiveness of dietary intervention on a NAFLD population.
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a spectrum of disease from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, with inflammatory cytokines and adipokines identified as drivers of disease progression. Poor dietary patterns are known to promote an inflammatory milieu, although the effects of specific diets remain largely unknown. This review aimed to gather and summarize new and existing evidence on the effect of dietary intervention on inflammatory markers in patients with NAFLD. The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched for clinical trials which investigated outcomes of inflammatory cytokines and adipokines. Eligible studies included adults >18 y with NAFLD, which compared a dietary intervention with an alternative diet or control (no intervention) group or were accompanied by supplementation or other lifestyle interventions. Outcomes for inflammatory markers were grouped and pooled for meta-analysis where heterogeneity was allowed. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Criteria. Overall, 44 studies with a total of 2579 participants were included. Meta-analyses indicated intervention with an isocaloric diet plus supplement was more effective in reducing C-reactive protein (CRP) [standard mean difference (SMD): 0.44; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.68; P = 0.0003] and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (SMD: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.02, 1.46; P = 0.03) than an isocaloric diet alone. No significant weighting was shown between a hypocaloric diet with or without supplementation for CRP (SMD: 0.30; 95% CI: -0.84, 1.44; P = 0.60) and TNF-α (SMD: 0.01; 95% CI: -0.43, 0.45; P = 0.97). In conclusion, hypocaloric and energy-restricted diets alone or with supplementation, and isocaloric diets with supplementation were shown to be most effective in improving the inflammatory profile of patients with NAFLD. To better determine the effectiveness of dietary intervention alone on a NAFLD population, further investigations of longer durations, with larger sample sizes are required.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
