-
1.
Effects of Probiotics in Adults with Gastroenteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Mitra, AK, Asala, AF, Malone, S, Mridha, MK
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;11(4)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally and symptoms can range from mild to life-threatening. Some studies have suggested benefits of probiotics in the treatment of gastroenteritis in children whilst in adults, results are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics on acute and chronic gastroenteritis in adults. 35 clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. Of these, 23 dealt with inflammatory bowel disease, 5 with pouchitis, 3 with antibiotic-induced diarrhoea, 2 with Helicobacter pylori infection and one each with diverticulitis and acute watery diarrhoea. 27 (77%) of studies showed some benefits of probiotic administration. The meta-analysis of 22 studies did not show a statistically significant benefit of probiotics. Although statistical analysis showed the studies to be homogenous, the authors point out that studies differed widely in aetiologies and probiotics used. A subgroup analysis of 8 studies in patients with ulcerative colitis also showed no benefit. In all studies, probiotics were well tolerated and no adverse side effects were reported. The authors concluded that further research is needed to help identify the most appropriate use of probiotics for the different types of gastroenteritis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- For chronic inflammatory gastroenteritis conditions in adults, probiotics were effective in treating and preventing relapse
- In ulcerative colitis, probiotics were not effective and adverse events outweighed the benefits
- No safety concerns were found for probiotic use in any studies
- Aetiologies, disease severity and duration as well as the type of probiotics used were widely diverse.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
To date, evidence has been mixed for probiotic effectiveness in gastrointestinal syndromes associated with gastroenteritis. The aim of this study was to review current evidence on the effect of probiotics on gastroenteritis in adults.
Methods
This was a systematic review (n=35; total sample size 4577, median 44) and meta-analysis (n=22) of randomised controlled trials. Quality was assessed using CADIMA as per a rating scale (0 to 4) and standards of critical appraisal.
Results
All 35 studies on gastroenteritis included participants with chronic diarrhoea of diverse aetiologies such as IBD, antibiotic-associated, except one which had acute watery diarrhoea.
51% (n=18) of studies assessed the effects of probiotics in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). 60% (n=21) used multiple strains of probiotics while the rest used single strains. Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, Escherichia and Streptococcus were the most common and only a few studies administered probiotics with another conventional treatment.
19 studies (55%) rated highly in terms of quality while 15 (43%) scored moderately. The majority (63%) of the 27 studies where probiotics were shown to be effective were of high quality.
Systematic review results:
- 27/53 studies (77%) showed a favourable response after using probiotics (resolution, improvement, remission or no relapse), mostly in patients with IBDs
- 7 studies (20%) found probiotics to be ineffective
- 1 study was inconclusive
- Multiple strain probiotics (VSL #3) was found to be most effective in IBD
- All administered probiotics were well tolerated with no adverse side effects although caution in immunocompromised patients was mentioned in several studies.
The meta-analysis results:
- Overall effectiveness for 22 studies (p=0.37) highlighted there was not enough evidence that the intervention was more protective than controls.
- Probiotics were not effective in UC (p = 0.28), and adverse events caused by probiotics may outweigh the benefits in studies with UC patients.
Conclusion
While benefits of effectiveness were found for probiotic use in gastroenteritis in adults, results from the systematic review and meta-analysis showed a mixed effect.
Clinical practice applications:
- Based on the systematic review, probiotics may be an effective treatment or adjuvant treatment for gastroenteritis but ineffective for around 20% of patients
- It is worth noting that combined therapy with standard treatment showed effective results
- Beneficial effects of probiotics in other key clinical outcomes including disease prevention, relapse, quality of life, morbidity were found
- While the results are interesting it is difficult to apply them in practice as the type of probiotics used were widely different as were the causes, severity and duration of gastroenteritis.
Considerations for future research:
- Further and larger studies would be beneficial to understand the benefits of probiotics in terms of single therapy or in combination with standard treatment particularly for UC, CDs, gastroenteritis not due to viral infection
- Individual-level data instead of aggregated data could give a better idea of effectiveness of probiotics in the future
- In this study aetiologies and the type, dosage, duration of probiotics used were widely diverse therefore systematic reviews and meta-analysis on specific conditions, specific probiotic strains and combinations would be beneficial.
Abstract
Probiotics have been widely used in gastroenteritis due to acute and chronic illnesses. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of probiotics in different health conditions is inconclusive and conflicting. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the effects of probiotics on gastroenteritis among adults. Only original articles on clinical trials that demonstrated the effects of probiotics in adults with gastroenteritis were used for this analysis. Multiple databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Scopus databases, were searched for the data. The study followed standard procedures for data extraction using a PRISMA flow chart. A quality appraisal of the selected studies was conducted using CADIMA. Finally, a meta-analysis was performed. Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria; of them, probiotics were found effective in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in 17 (49%), and the treatment of pouchitis in 4 (11.4%), antibiotic-induced diarrhea in 3 (8.6%), Helicobacter pylori infection in 2 (5.7%) and diverticulitis in 1 (2.9%), while the remaining 7 (20%) were ineffective, and 1 study's results were inconclusive. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant protective effects of probiotics. Having a τ2 value of zero and I2 of 6%, the studies were homogeneous and had minimum variances. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBDs and other chronic bowel diseases.
-
2.
Diet as an Optional Treatment in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Jaramillo, AP, Abaza, A, Sid Idris, F, Anis, H, Vahora, I, Moparthi, KP, Al Rushaidi, MT, Muddam, M, Obajeun, OA
Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42057
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are linked with significant morbidity and higher healthcare costs. The current model of CD pathogenesis implies that environmental variables and the gut microbiota interact in those who are genetically predisposed to the condition. The aim of this study was to investigate a treatment based on the diet of IBD patients. This study was a systematic review of nine studies. Results showed that following a diet that reduces inflammation may prevent its recurrence in UC patients in clinical remission. In fact, there were significant systemic changes in the intestinal microbiota of anti-inflammatory diet patients. Authors concluded that a four-week FODMAP diet combined with professional counseling and regular follow-up will be helpful in the therapy of persistent gastrointestinal symptoms in quiescent IBD, although care should be used in the long run.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Whilst concise, this limited review highlights the current lack of evidence supporting stand alone dietary strategies in preventing relapse for IBD patients. At the very least an anti-inflammatory diet should ideally be implemented alongside specific medical care and counselling to minimise risk of disease relapses.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of diet as a preventative therapeutic treatment for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).
Methods
A total of 9 studies (published in the last 5 years) were chosen. The articles included 6 randomised controlled trials (RCT), one systematic literature review (SLR) and two SLR and meta-analysis. The authors used the Assessment Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) approach and an unspecified Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool.
Results
(The following refers to the original RCT articles as the review article data was sparse).
- A 6-month, open-label, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of 53 adult Ulcerative Colitis (UC) patients compared response to an Anti-inflammatory Diet (AID) with Canada’s Food Guide (CFG). The outcome showed that the faecal calprotectin value (<150 µg/g at the endpoint) was significantly higher in the AID group (69.2 vs. 37.0%, p = 0.02) (Keshteli et al., 2022).
- The Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD) was not superior to the Mediterranean Diet (MD) in terms of achieved symptomatic remission at 6 weeks (SCD 46.5%, MD 43.5%; p = .77) (Lewis et al., 2022).
- A single-blind, 4-week trial concluded significant relief from gut symptoms was achieved when comparing a low FODMAP diet (14/27, 52% of positive patient feedback) to a control diet (4/25, 16%, p=.007) (Cox et al., 2020).
- A 7-day trial of 28 volunteers compared individualised food-based diet (CD-TREAT), with similar composition to Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN) and found a change in relative abundance in faecal microbiome genera of 58 (49.3%) and 38 (32.3%) following both feeding practices respectively (Svolos et al., 2019).
- Substantial reduction in red and processed meat was not significant in reducing time to symptomatic relapse in Crohn’s Disease (CD) patients when comparing 115 high red meat consumers with 87 low red meat CD patients (p = 0.61 any relapse and p = 0.50 for moderate to severe relapse) (Aldenberg et al., 2019).
Conclusion
An anti-inflammatory diet may prolong clinical remission for UC patients. CD patients, with mild to severe symptoms, may tolerate both the MD and SCD equally well. The authors advise a low FODMAP diet for a 4-week period combined with professional counselling and regular follow-up sessions to delay flare-up episodes. However the findings were based on a very limited number of scientific material that requires extensive further assessment prior to deriving any firm conclusions.
Clinical practice applications:
- In order to delay relapse in IBD it is imperative that foods that support anti-inflammatory mechanisms are incorporated and maintained
- Whilst limited, the papers reviewed highlight potential for an initial low FODMAP diet followed by a longer term MD or SCD combined with constant monitoring
- From one study, red meat consumption did not appear to exacerbate symptoms.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include larger cohorts to ascertain the efficacy of dietary interventions as a stand alone treatment option for IBD
- Longer periods of intervention are needed to confirm dietary intervention efficacy and safety in this population.
Abstract
While the exact cause of IBD is unknown, there are a number of factors that are thought to contribute to its development, including environmental and genetic factors. While exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is a promising therapy for Crohn's disease (CD), it is not yet considered a first-line treatment. Additionally, the efficacy of EEN compared to corticosteroid treatment is still being investigated. EEN is suggested as a first-line therapy by which guidelines and in which age groups, as it may differ in pediatric and adult recommendations. Another finding was that dietary changes involving an increase in anti-inflammatory foods and decreased intake of foods high in inflammatory compounds are linked to a beneficial outcome both metabolically and microbiologically in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in remission. For relevant medical literature, we examined PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar as examples of medical databases. The articles were identified, evaluated, and eligibility applied, and nine publications were found. The finished articles investigated the role of several diet alternatives for patients with IBD. Some others have shown that following a normal low-fat diet may be effective in reducing the occurrence of subclinical colitis. The EEN and partial enteral nutrition (PEN) indicated no significant differences between both regimens, but both had good outcomes during active IBD. Other strict diets, such as the specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) versus the Mediterranean diet (MD), demonstrate excellent outcomes in patients with IBD. Fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) dietary counseling improves gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in IBD patients. Based on the above, we concluded that more studies determining which component of the diet is not clear (proteins, carbs balanced) or diet types are required to establish a particular diet employed as a treatment intervention in these individuals.
-
3.
The Role of Genetically Engineered Probiotics for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.
Zhang, T, Zhang, J, Duan, L
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), largely classified as Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic intestinal inflammatory disorder mediated by genetic, immune, microbial, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to summarise the efficacy of different genetically modified probiotics compared to wild-type probiotics in the treatment of IBD in animal models and patients and to investigate the specific effects and main mechanisms involved. This study was a systematic review of forty-five preclinical studies and one clinical study. Results showed a protective effect of genetically modified organisms (gm) probiotics in colitis. Several protective mechanisms have been identified: reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of the activity of oxidative stress in the colon, improvement of intestinal barrier integrity, modulation of the diversity and composition of gut microbiota, and production of favourable metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids, by beneficial bacteria. Authors concluded that gm probiotics are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics, to facilitate clinical translation.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Conclusions of this review were largely based on mouse models and although treatment using probiotics is generally considered safe in humans, with only minor side-effects (flatulence), practitioners need to be aware that in an IBD population the use of GM formulations might not be completely without risk.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This paper summarises the efficacy of specific genetically modified (GM) probiotic formulations for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) when compared to wild type probiotics. The aim was to ascertain what specific effects and mechanisms such probiotics have on IBD symptomatology.
Methods
- A total of 46 published articles were included; 45 mouse experimental models (induced acute or chronic colitis) (n=15-130) and 1 human IBD population clinical trial (n=10)
- The effect of GM probiotics were compared to placebo and wild-type probiotics in trials including preclinical studies, randomised controlled trials and cohort studies
- Animals received probiotics via gastric gavage (105 - 4 x 1012 CFU) for 3-6 weeks
- The human placebo-uncontrolled trial lasted 7 days and patients received 10 GM capsules of L.lactis (1 x 1010 CFU) twice daily.
Results
- GM probiotics that secrete immunoregulatory cytokines such as IL-10 appear to reduce intestinal damage
- The human trial using GM L.lactis resulted in 5 patients who went into complete clinical remission (CDAI, <150) with 3 patients exhibiting a clinical response (decrease in CDAI, >70). with only minor adverse events (flatulence)
- However, human cytokines that promote intestinal barrier function and epithelial restitution were not enhanced with oral administration of probiotics
- Two studies concluded that GM L.lactis and S.boulardii, that secrete atrial natriuretic peptide, might be the most effective options in supporting colitis
- GM L.casei resulted in faster recovery from weight loss in acute colitis models
- Superoxide dismutase (SOD) producing GM L.fermentum increased SOD activity by almost eightfold compared to the wild type
- GM Lact. fermentum furthermore showed a higher survival rate and lower disease activity index (P <0·05) in colitis models
- GM L.lactis improved gut microbial composition and GM S.cerevisiae improved microbial diversity whilst reducing the Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio
- GM E.coli significantly reduced weight loss, colon shortening plus lower disease activity and histological changes (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Despite the heterogeneity of the trials, GM probiotics appear to play a notable part in ameliorating IBD symptomatology and disease severity when compared to wild-type probiotics. Human efficacy and potential adverse effects require more in-depth trials to ascertain safety and optimal dosages.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotics species used in the trials included S.thermophilus, E.coli, L.lactis, B.ovatus, S.boulardii, L.fermentum, B.longhum, L.casei, L.plantarum, and S.cerevisiae. Wild-types of some of these are already available to use in clinical practice
- Note that oral administration in the human trial showed no significant health outcome, therefore efficacy and safety need to be ascertained on an individual patient level
- Colonisation of beneficial bacteria in the gut of IBD patients might be difficult and any form of supplementation therefore needs to be closely monitored.
Considerations for future research:
- More evidence is needed to demonstrate that GM probiotic formulations result in significantly improved outcomes when compared to wild-types
- Future randomised placebo-controlled trials need to include larger cohorts to determine supplement efficacy
- Longer periods of intervention are needed to confirm efficacy, safety, and tolerance for both Crohn’s Disease and Colitis
- Optimal GM probiotic formulation, doses, and means of application need to be identified.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many preclinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of genetically modified probiotics (gm probiotics) in animal models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). OBJECTIVE This systematic review was performed to investigate the role of gm probiotics in treating IBD and to clarify the involved mechanisms. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Medline were searched from their inception to 18 September 2022 to identify preclinical and clinical studies exploring the efficacy of gm probiotics in IBD animal models or IBD patients. Two independent researchers extracted data from the included studies, and the data were pooled by the type of study; that is, preclinical or clinical. RESULTS Forty-five preclinical studies were included. In these studies, sodium dextran sulfate and trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid were used to induce colitis. Eleven probiotic species have been genetically modified to produce therapeutic substances, including IL-10, antimicrobial peptides, antioxidant enzymes, and short-chain fatty acids, with potential therapeutic properties against colitis. The results showed generally positive effects of gm probiotics in reducing disease activity and ameliorating intestinal damage in IBD models; however, the efficacy of gm probiotics compared to that of wild-type probiotics in many studies was unclear. The main mechanisms identified include modulation of the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota, production of regulatory metabolites by beneficial bacteria, reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of oxidative stress activity in the colon, and improvement of intestinal barrier integrity. Moreover, only one clinical trial with 10 patients with Crohn's disease was included, which showed that L. lactis producing IL-10 was safe, and a decrease in disease activity was observed in these patients. CONCLUSIONS Gm probiotics have a certain efficacy in colitis models through several mechanisms. However, given the scarcity of clinical trials, it is important for researchers to pay more attention to gm probiotics that are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics to facilitate further clinical translation.
-
4.
Physical Training and Healthy Diet Improved Bowel Symptoms, Quality of Life, and Fatigue in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Scheffers, LE, Vos, IK, Utens, EMWJ, Dieleman, GC, Walet, S, Escher, JC, van den Berg, LEM
Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2023;77(2):214-221
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, characterised by periods of remission and relapse of symptoms. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a tailored lifestyle intervention on physical fitness (maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, strength, and core stability), the patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, and fear), clinical disease activity, and nutritional status. This study was a prospective single-centre randomised semi-crossover-controlled trial. Children were randomized into group A (start exercise) or group B (start control period). Results showed improved physical fitness, quality of life, and parent-reported fatigue. Additionally, a combination of lower clinical disease activity scores accompanied by fewer IBD symptoms suggests positive effects on intestinal inflammation. Authors concluded that based on the findings of their study, children and adolescents with IBD should be motivated and supported to acquire and maintain a healthy lifestyle.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- IBD is a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract, characterised by periods of abdominal pain, severe diarrhoea, and fatigue
- This clinical trial suggests that a 12-week program of physical training plus personalised healthy dietary advice may improve physical fitness, quality of life, and fatigue in children with IBD.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A randomised semi-crossover controlled trial was conducted to investigate the impact of a 12-week lifestyle program (3 physical training sessions per week plus personalised healthy dietary advice) in children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).
Method
- Sixteen children with a median age of 15 [IQR: 12–16]) that were diagnosed with IBD (CD, UC, or IBD-unclassified) were randomized to group A (start exercise) or group B (start control period). Group A started the intervention immediately after the first assessment and did not have a control period. Group B started after a control period (this was planned to last for 6 weeks but due to the COVID-19 lockdown extended to 6 months)
- The lifestyle intervention lasted 12 weeks and consisted of 3 physiotherapist-supervised training sessions per week, lasting 60 minutes each. In addition, all participants received a recommended caloric intake per day based on measured rest energy expenditure and a brochure regarding healthy diet in children
- Endpoints were physical fitness (maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, strength, and core stability), patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, and fears for exercise), clinical disease activity (faecal calprotectin and disease activity scores), and nutritional status (energy balance and body composition)
- A total of 15 out of 16 participants (93%) completed the program, one patient dropped out after one training session due to motivational problems.
Results
The primary findings of this study were as follows:
- While medical treatment remained unchanged, Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index decreased versus the control period (15 [3–25] vs 2.5 [0–5], P = 0.012)
- The number of patients in clinical remission increased from 5 to 12 (P < 0.001), compared to the control period
- Quality of life (IMPACT-III) improved on 4 out of 6 domains and the total score (+13 points) versus the control period including a large improvement in bowel-related symptoms, P= 0.029)
- Fecal calprotectin decreased, but not compared to the control period, mainly due to relatively large intra-patient fluctuations (400 μg/g [57.1–1662.7] vs 128 μg/g [23.8–642.3], P = 0.016)
- Parents reported an improvement in the quality of life versus the control period on the child health questionnaire and total fatigue score (PedsQoL • Multidimensional Fatigue Scale) (+14 points, P = 0.048)
- Walking distance improved after the 12-week program, compared to the control period (P = 0.001).
Conclusion
This study revealed that a 12-week physical training program and personalised dietary advice improved bowel symptoms, quality of life, and fatigue in children with IBD.
Clinical practice applications:
- The mechanism behind the anti-inflammatory effects of exercise has not been clarified
- Multiple theories have been suggested in previously published studies such as a reduced release of adipokines due to less visceral fat, increased secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, and reduced transient stool time
- This clinical trial demonstrated that a 12-week program of physical training sessions plus personalised healthy dietary advice resulted in improved physical fitness, quality of life, and parent-reported fatigue.
Considerations for future research:
- A sample size calculation was not provided in the study report and it is therefore assumed that the sample size of 16 children in this trial was too small to draw a definite conclusion. A larger study over a longer period is therefore needed across diverse age and ethnic population groups to draw better conclusions
- This study did not measure mucosal inflammation before and after the intervention due to the invasive nature of the procedure. It would however be useful that future research investigate this to gain more insight into the effect of lifestyle interventions on IBD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Physical activity programs have been suggested as adjunctive therapy in adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. We assessed the effects of a 12-week lifestyle intervention in children with IBD. METHODS This study was a randomized semi-crossover controlled trial, investigating a 12-week lifestyle program (3 physical training sessions per week plus personalized healthy dietary advice) in children with IBD. Endpoints were physical fitness (maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, strength, and core stability), patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, fatigue, and fears for exercise), clinical disease activity (fecal calprotectin and disease activity scores), and nutritional status (energy balance and body composition). Change in maximal exercise capacity (peak VO 2 ) was the primary endpoint; all others were secondary endpoints. RESULTS Fifteen patients (median age 15 [IQR: 12-16]) completed the program. At baseline, peak VO 2 was reduced (median 73.3% [58.8-100.9] of predicted). After the 12-week program, compared to the control period, peak VO 2 did not change significantly; exercise capacity measured by 6-minute walking test and core-stability did. While medical treatment remained unchanged, Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index decreased significantly versus the control period (15 [3-25] vs 2.5 [0-5], P = 0.012), and fecal calprotectin also decreased significantly but not versus the control period. Quality of life (IMPACT-III) improved on 4 out of 6 domains and total score (+13 points) versus the control period. Parents-reported quality of life on the child health questionnaire and total fatigue score (PedsQoL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale) also improved significantly versus the control period. CONCLUSIONS A 12-week lifestyle intervention improved bowel symptoms, quality of life, and fatigue in pediatric IBD patients.
-
5.
The Gut Microbiome in Early Life Stress: A Systematic Review.
Agusti, A, Lamers, F, Tamayo, M, Benito-Amat, C, Molina-Mendoza, GV, Penninx, BWJH, Sanz, Y
Nutrients. 2023;15(11)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Children exposed to early life stress (ELS) show alterations in brain development and are at increased risk of developing mental illness. This study aims to clarify whether ELS influences the gut microbiome and whether this can be a predictor for the development of mental disorders. 13 articles were included in this systemic review. 4 looked at pre-natal stress and 9 at post-natal stress. Prenatal stress (via maternal stress) may be associated with an increase in Proteobacteria phylum and with a lower abundance of Bifidobacterium and lactic acid bacteria. In the postnatal group, greater microbiome diversity was related to lower depression and anxiety. In boys scores for adaptive skills were higher in those with good levels of Bifidobacterium. A positive association was found between EA (early adversity) experiences and gastrointestinal symptoms and anxiety. This review demonstrates links between ELS and gut microbiome changes. Further research will be necessary to draw more robust conclusions.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This systematic review consolidated and discussed existing evidence on the link between early life stress (ELS) and changes to the human microbiome
- Exposure to ELS, prenatal or postnatal during childhood and adolescence, may impact mental and physical health.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A systematic review was conducted to consolidate clinical evidence examining the impact of early life stress (ELS) on the human intestinal microbiome.
Method
Thirteen observational studies were included in the review, sourced from Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale (NOS), with most studies scoring seven or eight out of nine stars.
Study designs varied, including prospective prenatal studies, postnatal longitudinal studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies. Four prenatal studies were prospective in design. The other nine postnatal studies included one longitudinal study, five case-control studies, and three cross-sectional studies. All 13 studies were published between 2015 and 2022. Because study designs and outcome assessments varied, the results were presented in a narrative form. Data was extracted by 2 independent authors.
Results
The primary findings from the review were as follows:
- Four longitudinal stress studies indicated that pregnant mothers experiencing psychological stress, increased cortisol levels, HIV, and lack of social support exhibited a lower abundance of beneficial Bifidobacterium and an increased abundance of Enterobacter genus.
- One postnatal stress longitudinal study (n=260) demonstrated lower depression and anxiety and improved internalising behaviour in patients with high microbiome diversity.
- . One postnatal stress case-control study (n=344) showed changes in the microbiome and an abundance of several bacterial taxa in stressed groups, including genera Prevotella, Bacteroides (Bacteroidetes), Coprococcus, Streptococcus, and Escherichia.
- One cross-sectional study of 128 adults without psychiatric conditions revealed that higher stress correlated with increased levels of Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Rhodococcus, Methanobrevibacter, and Roseburia at the genus level, as well as lower Phascolarcto bacterium and Firmicutes at the phylum level.
- One large prospective study (n=446) found infants exposed to higher cumulative stress exhibited an increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria groups and lower Bifidobacterium.
Conclusion:
Due to the inconsistency of study designs and their results this review failed to find consensus microbiome signatures associated with pre- or postnatal stress, or both.
Clinical practice applications:
- Early life stress, and alterations in the gut microbiome, have been linked to mental health conditions
- Maternal prenatal stress may be linked to emotional, behavioural, and cognitive outcomes in infants.
Considerations for future research:
- Future research should standardise questionnaires, to ensure consistency and comparability across studies
- Additionally, future studies should consider using standard procedures and specific species and strain resolution shotgun metagenomics sequencing
- Consideration should be given to the influence of environmental variables (diet, physical activity, etc.) and sex in gut microbiome analysis.
Abstract
Exposure to early life stress (ELS), prenatal or postnatal during childhood and adolescence, can significantly impact mental and physical health. The role of the intestinal microbiome in human health, and particularly mental health, is becoming increasingly evident. This systematic review aims to summarize the clinical data evaluating the effect of ELS on the human intestinal microbiome. The systematic review (CRD42022351092) was performed following PRISMA guidelines, with ELS considered as exposure to psychological stressors prenatally and during early life (childhood and adolescence). Thirteen articles met all inclusion criteria, and all studies reviewed found a link between ELS and the gut microbiome in both prenatal and postnatal periods. However, we failed to find consensus microbiome signatures associated with pre- or postnatal stress, or both. The inconsistency of results is likely attributed to various factors such as different experimental designs, ages examined, questionnaires, timing of sample collection and analysis methods, small population sizes, and the type of stressors. Additional studies using similar stressors and validated stress measures, as well as higher-resolution microbiome analytical approaches, are needed to draw definitive conclusions about the links between stress and the human gut microbiome.
-
6.
Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum Reduces Perceived Psychological Stress in Healthy Adults: An Exploratory Clinical Trial.
Boehme, M, Rémond-Derbez, N, Lerond, C, Lavalle, L, Keddani, S, Steinmann, M, Rytz, A, Dalile, B, Verbeke, K, Van Oudenhove, L, et al
Nutrients. 2023;15(14)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psychosocial stress is a common issue and one way in which nutrition may modulate the stress response is via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This 6-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 45 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate stress evaluated the effects of Bifidobacterium longum (BL) NCC3001 on psychological and physiological markers of stress and the response to an acute stress test. Outcome measures included cortisol awakening response, heart rate, heart rate variability and various questionnaires assessing stress, anxiety, depression, sleep and gastrointestinal symptoms. Compared to placebo, probiotic intake led to a significant decrease in perceived stress and an improvement in subjective sleep after 6 weeks. There was no difference in cortisol awakening response. The subjects in both groups did not experience significant gastrointestinal symptoms and scored low on anxiety and depression at baseline. In response to the acute stress test, cortisol levels were higher in the probiotic than the placebo group, whilst no clear differences were seen in heart rate and heart rate variability. Subjects in the probiotic group had a lower pain experience during the stress test whilst subjects in the placebo group had an increase in positive mood following the test. The authors conclude that these results support their hypothesis that BL NCC3001 may alleviate stress and improve sleep in adults with moderate stress levels.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- There is mounting evidence to suggest that nutritional interventions can influence our stress responses. One of the routes by which nutrition can influence physiological and psychological stress responses involves the microbiota– gut–brain-axis.
- This exploratory trial suggests that supplementation with Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 leads to a beneficial effect on stress relief and improves subjective sleep quality in a healthy adult population reporting moderate levels of psychological stress.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A randomised, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel, double-blind exploratory clinical trial was conducted to investigate the effect Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 on stress-related psychological and physiological parameters and acute stress in healthy adults who typically experience mild-to-moderate-levels of stress.
Method
47 Participants between the ages of 25-65 years old with mild-to-moderate psychological stress received 1x1010 CFU of Bifidobacterium longum (BL) strain NCC3001 daily or a placebo for 6 weeks.
Participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HAD-A and HADS-D), the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRA), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6), the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) and the Visual Analog Scales (VAS, which measures pain intensity) during the clinical study. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-42) questionnaire was also used to depict the progression of the participants through the study.
Faecal samples were taken at baseline and 6 weeks and awakening saliva samples were taken at baseline, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks. At the endpoint, 45/49 (91%) of the subjects completed the study. One participant reported an adverse event and the other withdrew without an explanation. Two participants were excluded from the full analysis.
Results
The primary outcomes were:
- After 6-week of the probiotic intervention, there was a significant decrease in perceived stress in the probiotic group (21.4%) compared to the placebo group (-10.2%), p = 0.017.
- There was a significant improvement in subjective sleep in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.037).
- There was a significant decrease in the positive PANAS change score from the pre-stressor stage in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.01).
- There were lower pain values (VAS) scores from pre-stressor to post-stressor in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.05).
- There was no significant difference between groups in anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS_D) scores.
Conclusion
Oral supplementation with BL NCC3001 may have beneficial effects on stress relief and improves subjective sleep quality in a healthy adult population reporting moderate levels of psychological stress.
Clinical practice applications:
- While the mechanism underlying the correlation between the microbiota and the gut-brain-axis is not fully understood, it is thought to play a critical role in the links between the microbiota, mood, stress, and brain health.
- This exploratory trial additionally supports the potential of specific probiotics being used to reduce perceived stress and improve subjective sleep quality in healthy adults.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger, powered clinical trials are needed to provide further insights into the mechanisms underlying the stress-relieving and sleep-improving effect of Bifidobacterium longum.
- Furthermore, the dosage and duration of the probiotics need further investigation in a larger healthy population.
- Comparative research is needed to help investigate the effect of different probiotic strains on stress relief and sleep quality.
Abstract
Emerging science shows that probiotic intake may impact stress and mental health. We investigated the effect of a 6-week intervention with Bifidobacterium longum (BL) NCC3001 (1 × 1010 CFU/daily) on stress-related psychological and physiological parameters in 45 healthy adults with mild-to-moderate stress using a randomized, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel, double-blind design. The main results showed that supplementation with the probiotic significantly reduced the perceived stress and improved the subjective sleep quality score compared to placebo. Comparing the two groups, momentary subjective assessments concomitant to the Maastricht Acute Stress Test revealed a lower amount of pain experience in the probiotic group and a higher amount of relief at the end of the procedure in the placebo group, reflected by higher scores in the positive affect state. The awakening of the salivary cortisol response was not affected by the intervention, yet the reduction observed in the salivary cortisol stress response post-intervention was higher in the placebo group than the probiotic group. Multivariate analysis further indicated that a reduction in perceived stress correlated with a reduction in anxiety, in depression, and in the cortisol awakening response after the 6-week intervention. This exploratory trial provides promising insights into BL NCC3001 to reduce perceived stress in a healthy population and supports the potential of nutritional solutions including probiotics to improve mental health.
-
7.
Probiotics fortify intestinal barrier function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Zheng, Y, Zhang, Z, Tang, P, Wu, Y, Zhang, A, Li, D, Wang, CZ, Wan, JY, Yao, H, Yuan, CS
Frontiers in immunology. 2023;14:1143548
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intestinal barrier function is closely related to the pathogenesis of various immune and inflammatory diseases. The intestinal microbiota plays an essential role in maintaining gut homeostasis and functionality in the presence of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory microbes. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the role of probiotics in contributing to intestinal barrier function, and the related immune function, inflammatory status, and gut microbiota composition. This study was a systematic review of 28 articles (qualitative synthesis), and a meta-analysis of 26 randomised controlled trials. Results showed that probiotics could significantly improve intestinal barrier function according to specific indicators. The meta-analysis also indicated that probiotic supplementation could reduce inflammatory factors. Furthermore, it also demonstrated that probiotics could modulate gut microbiota compositions by elevating the abundances of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. Authors conclude that probiotics could improve intestinal barrier function to some extent, but more high-quality randomised controlled studies are needed to reach a solid conclusion.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
The probiotics Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus may be beneficial for health by addressing imbalances in gut bacteria (dysbiosis), reducing inflammation in the gut and improving the integrity and function of the gut barrier
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Probiotics are microorganisms that are considered beneficial to health. The aim of this study was to assess the role of probiotics in protecting intestinal barrier function as well as their effects on the composition of gut microbiota, inflammatory status, and immune function for reducing the risk of related diseases.
Methods
26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2005-2021 with a total population of n=1891 (n = 955 Intervention, n = 936 controls)) were included in the meta-analysis. Outcome measures were categorised under indicators relating to intestinal barrier function, inflammatory markers, immune function and microbiota composition. Studies were conducted worldwide with participants being healthcare patients or athletes. Study durations ranged from 3 days to 6 months. Different dosages and forms of probiotics were used. Data was pooled for Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus species.
Results
Gut barrier function in the probiotic groups was improved as measured by transepithelial resistance (TER) mean difference (MD) 5.27 {95% CI, 3.82 to 6.72, p = < 0.00001], lipopolysaccharide (LPS) standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.47 (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.09, p = 0.02), serum zonulin SMD -1.58 (95% CI,-2.49 to -0.66, p = 0.0007), and endotoxin SMD -3.20 (95% CI, -5.41 to - 0.98, p = 0.005).
The inflammatory markers interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) were also improved compared to control groups. Lactobacillus (95% CI p=0.02) and Bifidobacterium (95% CI, p=0.01) enhanced microbial composition, however, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus species did not. Immune function as measured by Immunoglobulin A (IgA), Immunoglobulin G IgG and Immunoglobulin M (IgM) were not improved.
Conclusion
The findings of this study suggest that intestinal barrier function and microbial composition could be improved using probiotics. They were also found to help alleviate inflammation. Further studies of high quality are however needed to confirm these results.
No conflicts of interest were reported.
Clinical practice applications:
The use of the probiotics Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus may be beneficial for:
- supporting the integrity of gut barrier function
- improving the composition of gut microbiota
- lowering inflammation
Considerations for future research:
High heterogeneity between studies may affect the applicability of the results. Future research development should focus on the following areas:
- testing methods
- study durations
- measuring indicators
- the type and dose of probiotics
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics play a vital role in treating immune and inflammatory diseases by improving intestinal barrier function; however, a comprehensive evaluation is missing. The present study aimed to explore the impact of probiotics on the intestinal barrier and related immune function, inflammation, and microbiota composition. A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted. METHODS Four major databases (PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, CENTRAL, and Embase) were thoroughly searched. Weighted mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), heterogeneity among studies was evaluated utilizing I2 statistic (Chi-Square test), and data were pooled using random effects meta-analyses. RESULTS Meta-analysis of data from a total of 26 RCTs (n = 1891) indicated that probiotics significantly improved gut barrier function measured by levels of TER (MD, 5.27, 95% CI, 3.82 to 6.72, P < 0.00001), serum zonulin (SMD, -1.58, 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.66, P = 0.0007), endotoxin (SMD, -3.20, 95% CI, -5.41 to -0.98, P = 0.005), and LPS (SMD, -0.47, 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.09, P = 0.02). Furthermore, probiotic groups demonstrated better efficacy over control groups in reducing inflammatory factors, including CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6. Probiotics can also modulate the gut microbiota structure by boosting the enrichment of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. CONCLUSION The present work revealed that probiotics could improve intestinal barrier function, and alleviate inflammation and microbial dysbiosis. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted to achieve a more definitive conclusion. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=281822, identifier CRD42021281822.
-
8.
The effects of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on inflammation, oxidative stress, and circulating adiponectin and leptin concentration in subjects with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a GRADE-assessed systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized clinical trials.
Naseri, K, Saadati, S, Ghaemi, F, Ashtary-Larky, D, Asbaghi, O, Sadeghi, A, Afrisham, R, de Courten, B
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(2):543-561
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
When acute, inflammation is a necessary function of the immune system allowing the body to recognise and remove foreign stimuli. However, when chronic inflammation occurs, it can contribute to and exacerbate diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). The gut microbiota and the use of probiotics has been shown to modulate processes within the body and decrease chronic inflammation, however research has not consistently shown this and an inverse relationship has been shown in some studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of probiotics and synbiotics on inflammation in individuals with prediabetes and T2D. A total of 32 randomised control trials were included in the meta-analysis and showed that certain, but not all inflammatory markers were reduced. Antioxidants were increased. The effect was especially pronounced in individuals with T2D as opposed to prediabetes. It was concluded that probiotics or synbiotics could be useful for individuals with T2D to reduce inflammation and reduce the risk for other associated diseases such as heart disease.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Probiotic and synbiotic supplementation may significantly reduce inflammation and oxidative stress, potentially lowering the risk of cardiovascular diseases in those with prediabetes and T2DM.
- These supplements may be particularly beneficial for individuals with T2DM and those who are overweight or obese.
- Incorporating probiotics and synbiotics into the diet could be a supportive strategy for improving metabolic health markers.
- The observed benefits vary depending on the type and duration of supplementation, suggesting that consistent, long-term use might be necessary to achieve noticeable health improvements.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review meta-analysis and meta-regression assessed the impact of probiotics and synbiotics on inflammation, antioxidants, oxidative stress, and adipokines in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.
Methodology
The methodology involved searching PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases without date or language restrictions until March 2022. Study quality was evaluated.
- Inclusion criteria: Adults 18+ with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes; interventions with probiotics or synbiotics versus placebo or other treatments; and reporting on inflammatory biomarkers, adipocytokines, and oxidative stress serum biomarkers in RCTs with parallel or cross-over designs.
Results
32 RCTs with 2074 participants were analysed, mostly in Asia (26 studies) and 5 in Europe, Africa, Oceania, and America, over 4 to 24 weeks. Dosages varied, including synbiotic bread with Lactobacillus sporogenes and inulin (1×10^8 CFU, 0.07g/g, thrice daily), 300ml/day fermented milk with L. helveticus, daily synbiotic and probiotic tablets, a probiotic mixture (120g/day), synbiotics (9g, thrice daily), multistrain probiotic yoghurt (300g/day), L. sporogenes-enriched bread (40g, thrice daily), and probiotic honey (2500mg/day). Measurements included CRP (31 RCTs), TNF-α (12 RCTs), GSH (13 RCTs), MDA (12 RCTs), TAC (11 RCTs), and NO levels (8 trials).
Effects of probiotics and synbiotics:
- significantly reduced CRP levels (-0.62 mg/L, 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.44, p < 0.001, 31 RCTs), showing greater efficacy in T2DM than prediabetes, particularly in individuals with overweight.
- TNF-α levels decreased in participants with T2D or overweight (-0.48 pg/mL, 95% CI: -0.81 to -0.15, p = 0.004, 12 RCTs).
- GSH levels significantly rose (69.80, 95% CI: 33.65 to 105.95, p < 0.001, 13 RCTs), independent of trial duration or baseline BMI.
- MDA levels were significantly reduced (-0.51, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.30, p < 0.001, 12 RCTs) in studies lasting ≥12 weeks.
- TAC significantly increased (73.59, 95% CI: 33.24 to 113.95, p < 0.001, 11 RCTs), with more pronounced effects in longer trials and with probiotics.
- NO levels improved significantly (7.49, 95% CI: 3.12 to 11.86, p = 0.001, 9 trials) in individuals with obesity.
- Positive impacts on CRP, TNF-α, MDA, and TAC were more marked in trials ≥12 weeks.
Conclusions
Probiotic or synbiotic intake may benefit those with prediabetes and T2DM, reducing CRP, TNF-α, MDA, and enhancing TAC, GSH, NO levels, especially in T2DM individuals. Effects are stronger in individuals with overweight or obesity.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic and synbiotic supplementation could be recommended to reduce inflammatory biomarkers like CRP and TNF-α, especially in individuals with T2DM.
- The improvements in oxidative stress markers, such as increased TAC and GSH and decreased MDA, support the use of probiotic and synbiotic supplements in managing oxidative stress in T2DM and prediabetes.
- Longer durations (≥12 weeks) of probiotic or synbiotic supplementation may offer a more pronounced effect on antioxidant capacity.
- The findings can guide personalised nutritional recommendations, as for example improvement in inflammation biomarkers and NO were more evident in individuals with T2DM or overweight suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect primarily in these groups. Moreover, markers related to antioxidant capacity were improved in those diagnosed with prediabetes or T2DM irrespective of BMI.
Considerations for future research:
- The beneficial effects on inflammatory and antioxidant/oxidative stress markers suggest a need for larger and longer-term studies to solidify the role of probiotics and synbiotics in benefiting chronic conditions like T2DM and prediabetes.
- There is potential for investigating the specific strains of probiotics that are most effective, considering varying outcomes observed across different studies.
- Research could explore the mechanisms by which probiotics and synbiotics exert their beneficial effects, contributing to a better understanding of gut-health interactions.
- The varying responses based on BMI categories indicate a need for personalised nutrition research to optimise probiotic therapy for individual needs.
- Future studies should consider standardising the dosage and formulation of probiotics to determine the most effective therapeutic doses and combinations.
Abstract
PURPOSE Probiotics or synbiotics consumption have been suggested to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) through a decline in inflammation and oxidative stress, however, the results from studies are conflicting. This study filled this knowledge gap by evaluating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating probiotics or synbiotics intake on adipokines, inflammation, and oxidative stress in patients with prediabetes and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS We systematically did search up to March 2022 in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane library. A random-effect model was applied to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for each outcome. RESULTS A total of 32 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. This intervention led to a significant decrease in levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (WMD - 0.62 mg/l; 95% CI - 0.80, - 0.44; p < 0.001), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (WMD - 0.27 pg/ml; 95% CI - 0.44, - 0.10; p = 0.002) and malondialdehyde (MDA) (WMD - 0.51 µmol/l; 95% CI - 0.73, - 0.30; p < 0.001), and also a significant increase in levels of glutathione (GSH) (WMD 69.80 µmol/l; 95% CI 33.65, 105.95; p < 0.001), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (WMD 73.59 mmol/l; 95% CI 33.24, 113.95; p < 0.001) and nitric oxide (NO) (WMD 7.49 µmol/l; 95% CI 3.12, 11.86; p = 0.001), without significant alterations in interleukin-6 (IL-6) and adipokines levels. CONCLUSION A consumption of probiotics or synbiotics could be a useful intervention to improve cardiometabolic outcomes through a reduced inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with prediabetes and T2DM.
-
9.
Efficacy and dose response of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Martoni, CJ, Srivastava, S, Damholt, A, Leyer, GJ
World journal of gastroenterology. 2023;29(28):4451-4465
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Probiotics are microorganisms that have been shown in previous research to improve symptoms of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). This randomised control trial of 307 individuals with IBS-D aimed to determine the tolerability and efficacy of varying doses of the microbiota Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. The results showed that the severity of symptoms improved with L. plantarum regardless of whether individuals were given a high or low dose. Improvements were seen as soon as 28 days following supplementation. Abdominal pain severity, duration, bloating, bowel movements, and quality of life were all improved. Individuals in the study largely tolerated the supplement, with only a few occurrences of nausea and vomiting. It was concluded that L. plantarum is effective and safe for improving symptoms associated with IBS-D. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend L. plantarum supplementation to individuals with hard to treat or persistent IBS-D.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, multi-centre, parallel-arm and dose-ranging study showed that L. plantarum may be a strong candidate for the management of IBS-D symptoms and associated mental health effects.
- L. plantarum may be of particular benefit to individuals who are suffering from stress because of IBS-D.
- L. plantarum is well tolerated and may be of benefit to individuals who have ceased pharmaceutical treatments as a result of side-effects.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This study aimed to determine the tolerability and efficacy of varying supplemental doses of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lpla33) in adults with irritable bowel syndrome of the diarrhoea predominant subtype (IBS-D).
Methods
This randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial recruited 307 females and males aged 18-70 years with IBS-D based upon the Rome IV diagnostic criteria with Bristol Stool Scale stools of type 6 or 7.
Individuals were randomised to receive an eight-week intervention in one of three study groups: Group 1B: Lpla33 at 1 × 109 vs group 10B: 1x1010 colony forming units (CFU) per day vs placebo.
Results
- Improvement was seen in the primary outcome of IBS-D symptom severity (IBS-SSS) with both Lpla33 doses compared to placebo at the end of the trial (P=<0.001).
- Improvements with both doses compared to placebo were seen as quickly as 28 days (P=<0.01).
- At the end of the study the higher dose Lpla33 was more effective at improving IBS-SSS compared to the lower dose (P=<0.05).
- Improvements to IBS remission or mild IBS were seen in 48.1% in group 1B, 72.6% in group 10B and only 11.1% of placebo (P=<0.001).
- Specific improvements were seen in 10B group compared to placebo in abdominal pain severity and duration, abdominal distension, bowel habits, and quality of life (QoL) (P=<0.001).
- Post-hoc analysis showed that supplementation prevented symptom development compared to placebo with 2.9% of group 1B, 2.1% of group 10B and 18.2% of placebo individuals reporting increased symptom severity (P=<0.001).
- QoL and perceived stress were improved with supplementation compared to placebo (P=<0.001 for both), with the higher dose being more beneficial than the lower dose in QoL (P=<0.001).
- Compliance to Lpla33 was comparable to placebo (P=>0.05), with adverse events related to the supplement including nausea and vomiting.
Conclusion
- L. plantarum at doses of 1 × 109 and 1 × 1010 CFU/day is a well-tolerated and efficacious therapy for the improvement of symptoms related to IBS-D, with benefits seen as quickly as 28 days after commencing supplementation.
- Symptoms such as abdominal pain severity and duration, QoL and perceived stress may all be improved.
- Stool normalisation may be seen in certain individuals.
Clinical practice applications:
- L. plantarum supplementation may be of benefit to the management and improvement of symptoms in individuals with IBS-D.
- Improvements may be seen physically and in mental health parameters.
- Metronidazole (400mg/day) was given as a rescue medication for individuals with severe pain and frequent loose stools and should be considered when interpreting results.
Considerations for future research:
- The authors concluded that future research should focus on understanding the mechanisms of action that may be involved.
- Studying the role of diet on the microbial community and metabolite profiles in IBS-D may be of interest.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics have shown promise in alleviating symptoms of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D); however, the certainty of evidence is low. Well-powered randomized controlled dose-ranging trials are warranted on promising single-strain candidates. AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) Lpla33 (DSM34428) in adults with IBS-D. METHODS This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, and dose-ranging study. Three hundred and seven adults, 18-70 years of age, with IBS-D, according to Rome IV criteria, were allocated (1:1:1) to receive placebo or L. plantarum Lpla33 at 1 × 109 (1B) or 1 × 1010 (10B) colony-forming units/d over an 8-wk intervention period. The primary outcome was the change in IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) total score after 8 wk, while secondary and exploratory outcomes included abdominal pain severity, IBS related quality of life, stool and microbial profile, and perceived stress. RESULTS IBS-SSS was significantly reduced, after 8 wk, in participants receiving L. plantarum 1B (-128.45 ± 83.30; P < 0.001) and L. plantarum 10B (-156.77 ± 99.06; P < 0.001), compared to placebo (-58.82 ± 74.75). Further, a dose-ranging effect was observed, with a greater absolute reduction in the L. plantarum 10B group (P < 0.05). A reduction in sub-scores related to abdominal pain, abdominal distension, bowel habits, and quality of life was observed in both L. plantarum groups compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Further, 62.5% and 88.4% of participants administered L. plantarum 1B and 10B, respectively, were classified as stool consistency responders based on a reduction in diarrheal stool form, as compared to 26.3% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant shifts were observed in microbial diversity. CONCLUSION L. plantarum Lpla33 (DSM34428) is well tolerated and improves IBS symptom severity with a dose-ranging effect and a corresponding normalization of bowel habits in adults with IBS-D.
-
10.
Efficacy of a Synbiotic Containing Lactobacillus paracasei DKGF1 and Opuntia humifusa in Elderly Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Oh, JH, Jang, YS, Kang, D, Kim, HS, Kim, EJ, Park, SY, Kim, CH, Min, YW, Chang, DK
Gut and liver. 2023;17(1):100-107
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affects 1 in 10 people globally and is a common health problem for the elderly. Recent studies have shown that changes in the gut microbiome may play an important part in IBS and there is evidence that using pre and pro biotics have positive effects on IBS. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to determine the effects of a new synbiotic formulation (L. paracasei DKGF1 and prebiotics extracted from O. humifusa) on GI symptoms in elderly patients with IBS. 67 participants were randomly divided into 2 groups. For 4 weeks one group took the synbiotic and the other group took a placebo. Symptoms were recorded via questionnaires. The consumption of the synbiotic combination was associated with overall relief of IBS symptoms in elderly patients. In particular, abdominal pain and psychological well-being noticeably improved. In conclusion this synbiotic is effective and safe to use in elderly patients with global IBS symptoms.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The management of IBS in elderly people is more complicated than in younger populations.
- Synbiotic formulations containing both probiotics and prebiotics have reported gastrointestinal health benefits.
- This randomized controlled trial indicated that the synbiotic containing L. paracasei DKGF1 and Optuntia humifusa extracts might be effective and safe for treating IBS symptoms in elderly patients.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This study involved a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the impact of a synbiotic combination, comprising of L. paracasei DKGF1 and prebiotics extracted from Optuntia humifusa, on Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) in elderly patients.
Method
Sixty-seven IBS patients (mean age: 64 years) were randomly assigned to either a synbiotic group (n=33) or a placebo group (n=34) for a 4-week intervention. The synbiotic group received a daily sachet containing one billion colony-forming units of L. paracasei DKGF1, 0.2g of O. humifusa extract and 1.59 grams of maltodextrin, while the placebo group received an identical sachet containing only maltodextrin.
During the study period
- Participants recorded the degree of symptom improvement using a Subject Global Assessment (SGA) scale.
- IBS symptoms, abdominal pain, gas, bloating, and psychological well-being were recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
- Stool form and consistency were assessed using a Bristol Stool Chart (BSC).
Results
The primary findings from the study were as follows:
- There was significant improvement in IBS symptoms as measured by the SGA score, in the synbiotic group versus the placebo group (+50.5% vs +23.5%, p=0.017). The synbiotic group consistently demonstrated improved response rates.
The secondary findings were as follows:
- Participants also reported an improvement in psychological well-being in the synbiotic group (from 1.3 to 1.0) compared to the placebo group (from 3.0 to 2.0) (p=0.003).
- Responders reported a significant improvement in stool form and consistency in the synbiotic group (+85.7%) compared to the placebo group (+22.2%) (p=0.04).
- Among the patients with IBS constipation, patients in the synbiotic group reported a positive response compared to the placebo group (0% and +100%, p=0.029).
- . However, there was no significant improvement among the patients with IBS diarrhoea in the synbiotic group compared to the placebo group (+33.3% and +66.6%,, p=0.52).
Conclusion:
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, reported that the synbiotic combination of L. paracasei DKGF1 and Optuntia humifusa, may be associated with the relief of IBS symptoms in elderly patients, particularly in terms of abdominal pain and psychological well-being.
Clinical practice applications:
- The human microbiota undergoes changes in diversity and variation with age, emphasising the importance of understanding age-specific interventions.
- Managing IBS in the elderly is challenging, and synbiotics, containing both probiotics and prebiotics, have reported gastrointestinal health benefits.
- Most clinical trials have excluded elderly patients, and there has been uncertainty about whether synbiotic use is safe for the elderly.
- This study focused exclusively on elderly patients with IBS, indicating the potential safety and effective use of a synbiotic containing L. paracasei DKGF1 and Optuntia humifusa in improving IBS symptoms.
Considerations for future research:
- Only elderly patients were included in this study, therefore further investigation is needed to explore the effects of synbiotics on participants of different age groups.
- Microbial analysis was not done in this study. It would be useful to include this in future research to gain more insight into the microbiome’s diversity in elderly patients with IBS.
- The study did not quantify food intake or variety which might have impacted the results, therefore future research needs to consider the impact diet has on the microbiome and IBS.
- Since patient reports are subjective, future research should consider involving researchers during patient-reported assessments to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is increasing evidence that supplementation with pre- and probiotics appears to have positive effects on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a new synbiotic formulation on gastrointestinal symptoms in elderly patients with IBS. METHODS Sixty-seven IBS patients aged ≥60 years were randomly assigned to either a placebo group (n=34) or a synbiotic group (n=33). During a 4-week intervention, subjects used a placebo or a synbiotic containing Lactobacillus paracasei DKGF1 and extracts of Opuntia humifusa once a day. Patients were evaluated with the subject global assessment, visual analog scale, and Bristol stool chart. The primary outcome was the overall responder rate and the secondary outcome was the responder rates for abdominal symptom reduction at week 4. RESULTS Overall, responder rates were significantly higher in the synbiotic group (51.5%) than in the placebo group (23.5%) (p=0.017). Abdominal pain (58.8% vs 81.8%) and psychological well-being (26.4% vs 60.6%) were noticeably improved in the synbiotic group (p=0.038 and p=0.004, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in gas and bloating symptoms (p=0.88 and p=0.88, respectively). In patients with constipation-dominant and diarrhea-dominant IBS (n=16), the synbiotic significantly improved abdominal pain and defecation symptoms (responder rates for the placebo vs the synbiotic: 22.2% vs 85.7%, p=0.04). There were no adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that this new synbiotic supplement can potentially relieve abdominal symptoms in elderly IBS patients.