-
1.
Effects of Probiotics in Adults with Gastroenteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Mitra, AK, Asala, AF, Malone, S, Mridha, MK
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;11(4)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally and symptoms can range from mild to life-threatening. Some studies have suggested benefits of probiotics in the treatment of gastroenteritis in children whilst in adults, results are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics on acute and chronic gastroenteritis in adults. 35 clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. Of these, 23 dealt with inflammatory bowel disease, 5 with pouchitis, 3 with antibiotic-induced diarrhoea, 2 with Helicobacter pylori infection and one each with diverticulitis and acute watery diarrhoea. 27 (77%) of studies showed some benefits of probiotic administration. The meta-analysis of 22 studies did not show a statistically significant benefit of probiotics. Although statistical analysis showed the studies to be homogenous, the authors point out that studies differed widely in aetiologies and probiotics used. A subgroup analysis of 8 studies in patients with ulcerative colitis also showed no benefit. In all studies, probiotics were well tolerated and no adverse side effects were reported. The authors concluded that further research is needed to help identify the most appropriate use of probiotics for the different types of gastroenteritis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- For chronic inflammatory gastroenteritis conditions in adults, probiotics were effective in treating and preventing relapse
- In ulcerative colitis, probiotics were not effective and adverse events outweighed the benefits
- No safety concerns were found for probiotic use in any studies
- Aetiologies, disease severity and duration as well as the type of probiotics used were widely diverse.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
To date, evidence has been mixed for probiotic effectiveness in gastrointestinal syndromes associated with gastroenteritis. The aim of this study was to review current evidence on the effect of probiotics on gastroenteritis in adults.
Methods
This was a systematic review (n=35; total sample size 4577, median 44) and meta-analysis (n=22) of randomised controlled trials. Quality was assessed using CADIMA as per a rating scale (0 to 4) and standards of critical appraisal.
Results
All 35 studies on gastroenteritis included participants with chronic diarrhoea of diverse aetiologies such as IBD, antibiotic-associated, except one which had acute watery diarrhoea.
51% (n=18) of studies assessed the effects of probiotics in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). 60% (n=21) used multiple strains of probiotics while the rest used single strains. Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, Escherichia and Streptococcus were the most common and only a few studies administered probiotics with another conventional treatment.
19 studies (55%) rated highly in terms of quality while 15 (43%) scored moderately. The majority (63%) of the 27 studies where probiotics were shown to be effective were of high quality.
Systematic review results:
- 27/53 studies (77%) showed a favourable response after using probiotics (resolution, improvement, remission or no relapse), mostly in patients with IBDs
- 7 studies (20%) found probiotics to be ineffective
- 1 study was inconclusive
- Multiple strain probiotics (VSL #3) was found to be most effective in IBD
- All administered probiotics were well tolerated with no adverse side effects although caution in immunocompromised patients was mentioned in several studies.
The meta-analysis results:
- Overall effectiveness for 22 studies (p=0.37) highlighted there was not enough evidence that the intervention was more protective than controls.
- Probiotics were not effective in UC (p = 0.28), and adverse events caused by probiotics may outweigh the benefits in studies with UC patients.
Conclusion
While benefits of effectiveness were found for probiotic use in gastroenteritis in adults, results from the systematic review and meta-analysis showed a mixed effect.
Clinical practice applications:
- Based on the systematic review, probiotics may be an effective treatment or adjuvant treatment for gastroenteritis but ineffective for around 20% of patients
- It is worth noting that combined therapy with standard treatment showed effective results
- Beneficial effects of probiotics in other key clinical outcomes including disease prevention, relapse, quality of life, morbidity were found
- While the results are interesting it is difficult to apply them in practice as the type of probiotics used were widely different as were the causes, severity and duration of gastroenteritis.
Considerations for future research:
- Further and larger studies would be beneficial to understand the benefits of probiotics in terms of single therapy or in combination with standard treatment particularly for UC, CDs, gastroenteritis not due to viral infection
- Individual-level data instead of aggregated data could give a better idea of effectiveness of probiotics in the future
- In this study aetiologies and the type, dosage, duration of probiotics used were widely diverse therefore systematic reviews and meta-analysis on specific conditions, specific probiotic strains and combinations would be beneficial.
Abstract
Probiotics have been widely used in gastroenteritis due to acute and chronic illnesses. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of probiotics in different health conditions is inconclusive and conflicting. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the effects of probiotics on gastroenteritis among adults. Only original articles on clinical trials that demonstrated the effects of probiotics in adults with gastroenteritis were used for this analysis. Multiple databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Scopus databases, were searched for the data. The study followed standard procedures for data extraction using a PRISMA flow chart. A quality appraisal of the selected studies was conducted using CADIMA. Finally, a meta-analysis was performed. Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria; of them, probiotics were found effective in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in 17 (49%), and the treatment of pouchitis in 4 (11.4%), antibiotic-induced diarrhea in 3 (8.6%), Helicobacter pylori infection in 2 (5.7%) and diverticulitis in 1 (2.9%), while the remaining 7 (20%) were ineffective, and 1 study's results were inconclusive. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant protective effects of probiotics. Having a τ2 value of zero and I2 of 6%, the studies were homogeneous and had minimum variances. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBDs and other chronic bowel diseases.
-
2.
The Efficacy of Self-Management Strategies for Females with Endometriosis: a Systematic Review.
Mardon, AK, Leake, HB, Hayles, C, Henry, ML, Neumann, PB, Moseley, GL, Chalmers, KJ
Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.). 2023;30(2):390-407
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Endometriosis is a gynaecological condition with symptoms of pelvic pain, fatigue, and stress. Decreased quality of life, impaired fertility and hinderances to carry out day to day tasks are all associated with endometriosis. Treatment options involve medications and surgery; however, both are associated with poorer outcomes than the initial disease itself. Self-management strategies that the individual can perform themselves, such as lifestyle changes, meditation, and rest have all been used to improve the quality of life of individuals with endometriosis, however their effectiveness has not been determined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of self-management strategies for the management of endometriosis. The study showed that many self-management strategies were no more effective than placebo or hormonal therapies for the management of endometriosis. It was concluded that many self-management strategies were no more effective than hormonal treatment at reducing endometriosis symptoms and the studies that did show a benefit were insufficient to base recommendations on due to poor design. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that currently the research on self-management strategies of endometriosis is poor and whilst some may be of benefit to individuals who cannot or do not want to take hormone therapy, more research is warranted.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
It is not possible to generalise the findings of this systematic review for the self-management of endometriosis due to the poor quality of evidence. Further studies of higher quality are needed.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Endometriosis is an inflammatory condition where endometrial-like tissue is found outside of the uterus. Diagnosis of endometriosis is made in around 6-10% of females of reproductive age. Endometriosis can adversely affect fertility, psychological well being and quality of life (QoL). Conventional interventions can have side effects and limited effectiveness. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to evaluate the efficacy of self-management interventions for pain-related symptoms and QoL.
Methods
Fifteen experimental studies were included in this SR. Ten evaluated dietary supplements, three evaluated dietary modifications, one evaluated over-the-counter (OTC) medication, and one evaluated exercise. Outcome measures were self-reported for dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, overall pain, non-menstrual pelvic pain, use of medications and QoL.
Results
- Most dietary supplements were no more effective than placebo or frequently recommended medical interventions, at reducing pain-related outcomes.
- Melatonin (one RCT n=30) performed better than placebo for managing dysmenorrhoea and overall pain but not for non-menstrual pelvic pain. PEA-transploydatin (one RCT n=20) performed better than placebo for dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain but not better than medical intervention.
- Resveratrol (one RCT n=22 & one intervention study n=12) plus the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) was more effective than the OCP alone for managing dysmenorrhoea.
- In one observational study, 75% of participants (n=295) reported a reduction in ‘high’ intensity pain scores following a 12-month gluten-free diet (p- value =<0.005). Similarly, a full dietary modification (one non randomised controlled trial , n=30) found less participants reporting pain at ‘high intensity’ (18%) compared to linseed and calcium oil supplements (41%) and placebo (62%).
- A metal trace element supplement was more effective than placebo for managing overall pain (one RCT p- value<0.001).
- Naproxen (one cross over trial, n=11) performed better than placebo at managing dysmenorrhoea (83% vs 41%, p- value 0.008).
- Hatha yoga (one RCT n=12) was found to be effective at reducing overall pain and improving QoL compared to no yoga (p-value <0.05).
Conclusion
Due to limited, low-quality evidence, high risk of bias and high levels of heterogeneity between studies, it was not possible to generalise the findings of the studies included in this systematic review. Further research of high-quality is needed in order to make self-management recommendations for females with endometriosis.
Notes: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
Evidence-based self-management interventions are considered critical for the management of endometriosis. However, the quality of evidence in this SR was considered of poor quality. Further high-quality research is needed in order to be able to make recommendations. Strategies that showed potential benefits included:
- Dietary modifications and a gluten-free diet may be effective for reducing the intensity of pain associated with endometriosis.
- Hatha yoga may be effective at reducing overall pain and supporting psychological wellbeing and QoL.
Considerations for future research:
High quality studies are needed as well as a ‘gold standard’ definition for self-management criteria. Understanding potential barriers to self-management interventions may also be beneficial.
Abstract
Self-management is critical for the care of endometriosis. Females with endometriosis frequently use self-management strategies to manage associated symptoms; however, the efficacy of such strategies is unknown. The aim of this review was to systematically appraise the evidence concerning efficacy of self-management strategies for endometriosis symptoms. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched from inception to March 2021. We included peer-reviewed experimental studies published in English evaluating the efficacy of self-management strategies in human females laparoscopically diagnosed with endometriosis. Studies underwent screening, data extraction, and risk of bias appraisal (randomised studies: Risk of Bias 2 tool; non-randomised studies: Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions tool). Of the fifteen studies included, 10 evaluated dietary supplements, three evaluated dietary modifications, one evaluated over-the-counter medication, and one evaluated exercise. Most studies had a high-critical risk of bias. Many self-management strategies were not more effective at reducing endometriosis symptoms compared to placebo or hormonal therapies. Where studies suggest efficacy for self-management strategies, no recommendations can be made due to the poor quality and heterogeneity of evidence. High-quality empirical evidence is required to investigate the efficacy of self-management strategies for females with endometriosis.
-
3.
Efficacy and dose response of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Martoni, CJ, Srivastava, S, Damholt, A, Leyer, GJ
World journal of gastroenterology. 2023;29(28):4451-4465
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Probiotics are microorganisms that have been shown in previous research to improve symptoms of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). This randomised control trial of 307 individuals with IBS-D aimed to determine the tolerability and efficacy of varying doses of the microbiota Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. The results showed that the severity of symptoms improved with L. plantarum regardless of whether individuals were given a high or low dose. Improvements were seen as soon as 28 days following supplementation. Abdominal pain severity, duration, bloating, bowel movements, and quality of life were all improved. Individuals in the study largely tolerated the supplement, with only a few occurrences of nausea and vomiting. It was concluded that L. plantarum is effective and safe for improving symptoms associated with IBS-D. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to recommend L. plantarum supplementation to individuals with hard to treat or persistent IBS-D.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, multi-centre, parallel-arm and dose-ranging study showed that L. plantarum may be a strong candidate for the management of IBS-D symptoms and associated mental health effects.
- L. plantarum may be of particular benefit to individuals who are suffering from stress because of IBS-D.
- L. plantarum is well tolerated and may be of benefit to individuals who have ceased pharmaceutical treatments as a result of side-effects.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This study aimed to determine the tolerability and efficacy of varying supplemental doses of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lpla33) in adults with irritable bowel syndrome of the diarrhoea predominant subtype (IBS-D).
Methods
This randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial recruited 307 females and males aged 18-70 years with IBS-D based upon the Rome IV diagnostic criteria with Bristol Stool Scale stools of type 6 or 7.
Individuals were randomised to receive an eight-week intervention in one of three study groups: Group 1B: Lpla33 at 1 × 109 vs group 10B: 1x1010 colony forming units (CFU) per day vs placebo.
Results
- Improvement was seen in the primary outcome of IBS-D symptom severity (IBS-SSS) with both Lpla33 doses compared to placebo at the end of the trial (P=<0.001).
- Improvements with both doses compared to placebo were seen as quickly as 28 days (P=<0.01).
- At the end of the study the higher dose Lpla33 was more effective at improving IBS-SSS compared to the lower dose (P=<0.05).
- Improvements to IBS remission or mild IBS were seen in 48.1% in group 1B, 72.6% in group 10B and only 11.1% of placebo (P=<0.001).
- Specific improvements were seen in 10B group compared to placebo in abdominal pain severity and duration, abdominal distension, bowel habits, and quality of life (QoL) (P=<0.001).
- Post-hoc analysis showed that supplementation prevented symptom development compared to placebo with 2.9% of group 1B, 2.1% of group 10B and 18.2% of placebo individuals reporting increased symptom severity (P=<0.001).
- QoL and perceived stress were improved with supplementation compared to placebo (P=<0.001 for both), with the higher dose being more beneficial than the lower dose in QoL (P=<0.001).
- Compliance to Lpla33 was comparable to placebo (P=>0.05), with adverse events related to the supplement including nausea and vomiting.
Conclusion
- L. plantarum at doses of 1 × 109 and 1 × 1010 CFU/day is a well-tolerated and efficacious therapy for the improvement of symptoms related to IBS-D, with benefits seen as quickly as 28 days after commencing supplementation.
- Symptoms such as abdominal pain severity and duration, QoL and perceived stress may all be improved.
- Stool normalisation may be seen in certain individuals.
Clinical practice applications:
- L. plantarum supplementation may be of benefit to the management and improvement of symptoms in individuals with IBS-D.
- Improvements may be seen physically and in mental health parameters.
- Metronidazole (400mg/day) was given as a rescue medication for individuals with severe pain and frequent loose stools and should be considered when interpreting results.
Considerations for future research:
- The authors concluded that future research should focus on understanding the mechanisms of action that may be involved.
- Studying the role of diet on the microbial community and metabolite profiles in IBS-D may be of interest.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics have shown promise in alleviating symptoms of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D); however, the certainty of evidence is low. Well-powered randomized controlled dose-ranging trials are warranted on promising single-strain candidates. AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) Lpla33 (DSM34428) in adults with IBS-D. METHODS This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, and dose-ranging study. Three hundred and seven adults, 18-70 years of age, with IBS-D, according to Rome IV criteria, were allocated (1:1:1) to receive placebo or L. plantarum Lpla33 at 1 × 109 (1B) or 1 × 1010 (10B) colony-forming units/d over an 8-wk intervention period. The primary outcome was the change in IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) total score after 8 wk, while secondary and exploratory outcomes included abdominal pain severity, IBS related quality of life, stool and microbial profile, and perceived stress. RESULTS IBS-SSS was significantly reduced, after 8 wk, in participants receiving L. plantarum 1B (-128.45 ± 83.30; P < 0.001) and L. plantarum 10B (-156.77 ± 99.06; P < 0.001), compared to placebo (-58.82 ± 74.75). Further, a dose-ranging effect was observed, with a greater absolute reduction in the L. plantarum 10B group (P < 0.05). A reduction in sub-scores related to abdominal pain, abdominal distension, bowel habits, and quality of life was observed in both L. plantarum groups compared to placebo (P < 0.001). Further, 62.5% and 88.4% of participants administered L. plantarum 1B and 10B, respectively, were classified as stool consistency responders based on a reduction in diarrheal stool form, as compared to 26.3% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant shifts were observed in microbial diversity. CONCLUSION L. plantarum Lpla33 (DSM34428) is well tolerated and improves IBS symptom severity with a dose-ranging effect and a corresponding normalization of bowel habits in adults with IBS-D.
-
4.
Effect of Chamomile on the Complications of Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Maleki, M, Mardani, A, Manouchehri, M, Ashghali Farahani, M, Vaismoradi, M, Glarcher, M
Integrative cancer therapies. 2023;22:15347354231164600
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cancer and its treatments are associated with a wide range of complications such as mucositis, nausea/vomiting and dermatitis as well as implication for mental health, such as anxiety and depression, which can reduce quality of life (QOL) of patients. Chamomile is a commonly used medicinal herbal that is used in various forms orally and topically. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of chamomile, in its various forms of administration, for complications of cancer (any type) and its treatments. 18 controlled intervention studies including 1099 patients were included in the review. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies a meta-analysis was not possible. Benefits were reported for locally applied forms of chamomile for prevention of mucositis (7 of 8 studies), topical application for prevention of dermatitis or phlebitis (4/5), aromatherapy massage for anxiety (2) and QOL (2), tea for depression but not anxiety (1). No effect was seen of syrup for QOL (1). No side effects were reported in the included studies. The authors conclude that chamomile is a safe method to help mitigate the suffering from cancer complications.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Oral use of chamomile infusion may be helpful for people receiving treatment for cancer.
- Studies of this intervention report no safety concerns.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review examined the use of chamomile in the support of people receiving treatment for cancer. Studies of a variety of chamomile preparations were considered.
Methods
- The authors retrieved 2240 studies from 5 on-line databases, from which 18 studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis.
- Fifteen of these studies were randomised control trials (RCT), three were non-randomised studies. German (Matricaria recutita) and Roman (Chamaemelum nobile) chamomile varieties were included. Studies using blends with other herbs were excluded.
- A narrative review was produced due to heterogeneous patient groups, preparations and trial protocols.
Results
- 1099 patients were included in the analysis, 57% female.
- Risk of bias assessment of 15 RCTs identified 2 RCTs with high risk of bias in blinding or in reporting outcome data.
- Studies in several cancer types were included, four in head and neck cancer (HNC), four in leukaemia, three in breast cancer, one in digestive system cancers, remaining in mixed cancer types.
- Eight studies reported the impact on oral mucositis of chamomile infusions used as mouthwash, or ice chips, or applied as an oral gel. Patients were receiving chemotherapy orstem cell transplantation, with interventions for up to 21 days after chemotherapy. Seven studies reported reduced severity and/or duration of mucositis and associated pain. One study of 14 days’ use after 5-fluorouracil treatment for colorectal cancer showed no impact on oral mucositis.
- One of three studies of psychological impact of cancer treatment used chamomile tea and reported no impact on anxiety but decreased depression. In comparison, two studies of weekly aromatherapy massage using chamomile oil reported reduced anxiety.
- One RCT in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia reported increased neutrophil count with 125mg chamomile in syrup versus placebo (p=0.019, 955 CI 15.076-171.324)
- One RCT in breast cancer randomised 45 women receiving usual antiemetics to additional chamomile capsules (500mg) or ginger (500mg) capsules, twice daily for 5 days before and after chemotherapy, or control group of no additional botanicals. Both botanical interventions reduced frequency of vomiting compared with the control group. Frequency of nausea was also reduced by ginger but not by chamomile.
- Five studies evaluated external treatments of chamomile on skin complications of radiotherapy. Reduction in radiation dermatitis in HNC patients with compresses soaked in chamomile infusion was reported.
- No side effects of using chamomile preparations were reported by the studies included in the systematic review.
Conclusion
Chamomile has been studied in a variety of preparations for people receiving treatment for cancer. Several RCTs reported significant amelioration of common side effects of cancer treatments, with reduced severity and/or duration of oral mucositis and associated pain.
Clinical practice applications:
- Chamomile infusion used in the mouth, as mouthwash or ice chips, may be useful for oral mucositis, a common side effect of cancer treatment
- Chamomile infusion may also be considered for mental wellbeing
- Several protocols for using chamomile preparations are described in the review and practitioners may refer to the individual studies cited
- This use of chamomile in the described applications appears to be safe
- (Reviewer’s note: allergy to ragwort would be a contraindication for use of chamomile preparations)
Considerations for future research:
- More detailed comparisons of chamomile preparations would be useful, for use in oral mucositis
- Topical applications may be studied further by researchers in aromatherapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Despite significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, many people across the world still suffer from this chronic disease and its complications. Chamomile as an herbal medicine has gained an increasing attention for relieving cancer complications. This study aimed to integrate and synthesize current international evidence regarding the effect of chamomile on cancer complications. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken. Five online databases including Web of Science, PubMed [including MEDLINE], Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase were searched and articles published from inception to January 2023 were retrieved. All clinical trials and similar interventional studies on human subjects examining the effects of chamomile on cancer complications were included in the review and research synthesis. Relevant data were extracted from eligible studies after quality appraisals using proper methodological tools. The review results were presented narratively given that meta-analysis was impossible. RESULTS A total of 2240 studies were retrieved during the search process, but 18 articles were selected. The total sample size was 1099 patients with cancer of which 622 participants were female. Fifteen studies used an RCT design. Various forms of chamomile were used such as mouthwash, topical material, tea, capsule, syrup and aromatherapy massage. Chamomile effectively reduced oral mucositis, skin complications, depression, and vomiting and also improved appetite and quality of life among cancer patients. CONCLUSION The use of chamomile as a non-pharmacologic and safe method can be helpful for mitigating cancer complications in patients with cancer. Therefore, it can be incorporated into routine care along with other therapeutic measures to reduce patients' suffering related to cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER (PROSPERO): CRD42022307887.
-
5.
Effect of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Acute Fracture Healing: A Phase II Screening Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.
Slobogean, GP, Bzovsky, S, O'Hara, NN, Marchand, LS, Hannan, ZD, Demyanovich, HK, Connelly, DW, Adachi, JD, Thabane, L, Sprague, S
JBMR plus. 2023;7(1):e10705
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Almost half of all adult patients with fractures are vitamin D deficient. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of different vitamin D regimens on the healing of acute tibia and femur fractures. 102 18-50-year-old patients were enrolled in the study and randomised to receive a) two high doses (150,000 IU) at time of injury and after 6 weeks, b) 4000 IU daily, c) 600 IU daily or d) placebo for 3 months. After 3 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the 3 intervention groups with respect to clinical or radiographic outcomes of fracture healing. The authors report a significantly better clinical, but not radiographic, outcome for 4000 IU per day versus placebo with a p-value of 0.15 (note: generally, to be considered statistically significant, p should be < 0.05). Similar results were observed after 12 months. There was no significant correlation between vitamin D levels and fracture healing. The authors concluded that high dose vitamin D may confer a modest benefit for fracture healing but that this requires confirmation from a larger clinical trial.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The evidence base for the use of vitamin D supplements in isolation to support fracture healing is weak.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
- Low levels of vitamin D can have negative effects on bone metabolism and healing of fractures
- Almost half of all adult fracture patients are vitamin D deficient
- The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of supplementing vitamin D3 (VD3) to improve tibia and femur fracture healing.
Methods
- Four-arm, double-blind, randomised, phase II screening, placebo-controlled trial
- 102 adult patients (aged 18-50 years) with a non-osteoporotic tibial or femoral shaft fracture were randomised into 1 of 4 treatment groups
- Just over half (56%) of participants were vitamin D3 deficient at baseline
- Intervention groups: 1) 150,000 IU VD3 loading dose at injury and at 6 weeks (high loading) plus daily placebo; 2) placebo loading doses plus 4000 IU VD3 daily (high dose); 3) placebo loading doses plus 600 IU VD3 daily (low dose); 4) placebo loading dose plus placebo daily
- Duration: 3 months intervention, further 9 months follow-up. Vitamin D levels were assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months.
Primary outcome measures at 3 months:
- Clinical assessment using the Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT)
- Radiographic assessment using the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST).
Secondary outcomes: as above at 6, 9 and 12 months.
Results at 3 months:
- No statistically significant difference between high loading and high dose, high and low dose or low dose and placebo for either clinical or radiological assessment (all p-values ≥0.4)
- Post-hoc analysis of any dose vs placebo showed no significant difference with either clinical or radiological assessment (all p-values ≥0.25)
- Post-hoc analysis of high dose vs placebo showed no significant difference for radiological assessment (p=0.76) whilst it was reported as statistically significant for clinical assessment with p=0.16, with a benefit of VD3 supplementation.
- Similar results were seen at 12 months with reported benefit of high dose VD3 for fracture healing with p=0.18
- Vitamin D levels improved in all 3 VD3 groups from baseline to 6 weeks
- There was no statistically significant correlation between fracture healing and vitamin D level.
Conclusion
The authors conclude that VD3 supplementation may be of modest benefit for fracture healing, but further, larger trials are needed to confirm this.
Clinical practice applications:
- When working with clients who present with a fracture, it should be noted that the evidence for benefit of vitamin D supplementation alone for fracture healing is weak.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger studies to increase the statistical power to detect smaller benefits are required
- Larger studies may also identify differences in potential benefits between patient populations with different baseline levels of vitamin D.
Abstract
Nearly half of adult fracture patients are vitamin D deficient (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels <20 ng/mL). Many surgeons advocate prescribing vitamin D supplements to improve fracture healing outcomes; however, data supporting the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplements to improve acute fracture healing are lacking. We tested the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation for improving tibia and femur fracture healing. We conducted a single-center, double-blinded phase II screening randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Patients aged 18-50 years receiving an intramedullary nail for a tibia or femoral shaft fracture were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive (i) 150,000 IU loading dose vitamin D3 at injury and 6 weeks (n = 27); (ii) 4000 IU vitamin D3 daily (n = 24); (iii) 600 IU vitamin D3 daily (n = 24); or (iv) placebo (n = 27). Primary outcomes were clinical fracture healing (Function IndeX for Trauma [FIX-IT]) and radiographic fracture healing (Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures [RUST]) at 3 months. One hundred two patients with a mean age of 29 years (standard deviation 8) were randomized. The majority were male (69%), and 56% were vitamin D3 deficient at baseline. Ninety-nine patients completed the 3-month follow-up. In our prespecified comparisons, no clinically important or statistically significant differences were detected in RUST or FIX-IT scores between groups when measured at 3 months and over 12 months. However, in a post hoc comparison, high doses of vitamin D3 were associated with improved clinical fracture healing relative to placebo at 3 months (mean difference [MD] 0.90, 80% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 1.79; p = 0.16) and within 12 months (MD 0.89, 80% CI, 0.05 to 1.74; p = 0.18). The study was designed to identify potential evidence to support the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation in improving acute fracture healing. Vitamin D3 supplementation, particularly high doses, might modestly improve acute tibia or femoral shaft fracture healing in healthy adults, but confirmatory studies are required. The Vita-Shock trial was awarded the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's (OTA) Bovill Award in 2020. This award is presented annually to the authors of the most outstanding OTA Annual Meeting scientific paper. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
-
6.
Effects of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris YRC3780 daily intake on the HPA axis response to acute psychological stress in healthy Japanese men.
Matsuura, N, Motoshima, H, Uchida, K, Yamanaka, Y
European journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;76(4):574-580
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is involved in the stress response and is linked to the microbiome through a number of possible mechanisms, including immune-related ones. Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris YRC3780 (YRC3780), a probiotic isolated from kefir, has been shown to have beneficial immune-modulatory properties. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which included 27 healthy young men, was to assess sleep quality, mental health, HPA axis activity (salivary cortisol) and response to an acute stress test during/after 8 weeks of supplementation with YRC3780. At 8 weeks, salivary morning cortisol levels were significantly reduced in the probiotic compared to the placebo group. The effect on the stress test depended on whether or not participants were considered “cortisol-responders” or not. Improvements in sleep quality were seen at 6 weeks (but not at any other time points) in 1 out of 2 sleep questionnaires in the YRC3780 group, whilst no significant differences were observed in actigraphy-measured sleep efficiency. There were no differences in mood between groups, but significant improvements in general health in the probiotic group. Interestingly, no changes in the microbiome of the probiotic group were seen, suggesting that the observed effects may be mediated via the immune system.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Research indicates a bidirectional interaction between the gut microbiome and the central nervous system, affecting the functions of the brain and spinal cord.
- This clinical trial suggests that daily intake of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (YRC3780) may enhance the HPA axis response to acute psychological stress, potentially linked to a reduction in morning cortisol levels.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted to investigate the influence of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (YRC3780), isolated from kefir, on stress response, sleep quality, and mental health.
Method
Twenty-seven healthy young men, with an average age of 23.5 years, and mean body mass index of 21.5 kg/m2 , were randomly assigned to either the YRC3780 group or the placebo group. Participants were administered YRC3780 or a placebo daily for 8 weeks.
Throughout the study, participants completed assessments, including the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), and the Profile of Mood States 2nd Edition-Adult Short, Total Mood Disturbance subscale (POMS 2 TMD), every 2 weeks. Additionally, diurnal rhythms of HPA axis activity were assessed every 2 weeks through saliva samples collected at 2-hour intervals during the day. At the end of the 8-week supplementation period, participants underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) to evaluate the effects of daily YRC3780 intake on the HPA axis stress response. In addition, three fecal samples were collected to analyse the gut microbiome (on the last day of baseline, and at 4 and 8 weeks).
A total of 27 out of 33 subjects (81%) completed the study, with six participants withdrawing without providing explanations.
Results
The primary findings of this study were as follows:
- At week 6 of YRC3780 supplementation, salivary cortisol levels at 2 hours and 6 hours after waking were significantly lower in the YRC3780 group compared to the placebo group (p=0.05).
- Salivary cortisol concentrations at 40 minutes after the TSST were significantly lower in the YRC3780 group (4.2 ± 4.4 nmol/L, mean ± SD) than in the placebo group (7.6 ± 4.7 nmol/L) (p=0.043).
- AIS scores at 6 weeks and GHQ-28 scores at 8 weeks were significantly lower in the YRC3780 group compared to the placebo group (AIS, p=0.031; GHQ-28, p=0.038) indicating better sleep quality and a better mental state.
Conclusion:
Oral supplementation with YRC3780 may have beneficial effects on the HPA axis response to acute psychological stress, potentially associated with a decrease in morning cortisol levels. Additionally, the study suggests that the lower basal activity and stress reactivity of the HPA axis may lead to improvements in subjective sleep quality and mental health.
Clinical practice applications:
- The precise mechanisms underlying the correlation between the gut microbiota and the gut-brain axis remain incompletely understood, emphasising the need for further research.
- This clinical trial demonstrated that daily intake of YRC3780 decreased morning salivary cortisol levels at 6 and 8 weeks and reduced the salivary cortisol response to acute psychological stress.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger, adequately powered clinical trials are required to provide deeper insights into the mechanisms responsible for the stress-reducing and sleep-improving effects of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris.
- Furthermore, investigations into optimal dosage and duration of probiotic supplementation are warranted for a more comprehensive understanding, particularly in diverse demographic groups.
- Comparative research is needed to explore the effects of various probiotic strains on objective stress responses.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (YRC3780), which is isolated from kefir, has been associated with anti-allergic effects in humans. However, it remains unknown whether daily intake of YRC3780 attenuates the response to psychological stress in humans in parallel with changes to the gut microbiome. We examined the fundamental role of YRC3780 in the gut microbiome, stress response, sleep, and mental health in humans. METHODS Effects of daily intake of YRC3780 on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis response to acute psychological stress were investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial involving 27 healthy young men (mean age and body mass index: 23.5 years and 21.5 kg/m2) who were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 13) or YRC3780 (n = 14) groups. The HPA axis response to acute psychological stress, the diurnal rhythm of HPA axis activity, and gut microbiome were assessed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS The results showed that daily intake of YRC3780 significantly lowered morning salivary cortisol levels compared with placebo. In addition, salivary cortisol levels following a social stress test significantly decreased +40 min after beginning the TSST in the YRC3780-treated group compared to placebo. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of actigraphy-based sleep quality, but the subjective sleep quality and mental health were significantly improved in the YRC3780-treated group compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that daily intake of YRC3780 improves the HPA axis response to acute psychological stress, which might be associated with a decrease in morning cortisol levels.
-
7.
Orthorexia nervosa: A behavioral complex or a psychological condition?
Strahler, J, Hermann, A, Walter, B, Stark, R
Journal of behavioral addictions. 2018;7(4):1143-1156
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is a condition characterised by an obsession for 'healthy eating' and avoidance of 'unhealthy food' with the violation of these rigid dietary rules being associated with shame, anxiety and distress. Whilst numerous studies have evidenced its existence, there is debate as to whether it is a behavioural phenomenon or a mental health condition like other eating disorders. Anecdotally, there are reports of physiological impacts (such as weight loss), psychological impacts (such as emotional instability) and social impacts (such as social isolation), which are similar to clinical eating disorders. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore whether ON is of clinical relevance, and if it can be distinguished from other mental health conditions. An online survey including orthorexic behaviours was completed by 713 subjects (80% female) aged 18-75 years. 4% showed significant orthorexic eating alongside lower levels of life satisfaction, wellbeing and higher levels of stress. Depression and obsessive compulsive tendencies were also found in 48% and 30% of those with ON respectively. The authors conclude that there are strong overlaps between ON, mental health conditions and disturbed eating behaviours, questioning whether it should be a mental health condition in its own right.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Orthorexia nervosa has been associated with other mental health conditions, including depression and obsessive compulsive disorder.
- Given this association, and the desire for individuals with the condition to seek validation of their orthorexic eating, healthcare practitioners should make appropriate referral to ensure the safety and wellbeing of these individuals.
- Debate continues on whether orthorexia nervosa should be viewed as a mental health condition and eating disorder or a behavioural phenomenon.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
X
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is gaining increasing interest in research and clinical practice. Whilst research has evidenced its existence, there is still an active debate of whether it should be viewed as a mental health condition and eating disorder in its own right. Diagnoses may be useful for some individuals to make sense of the symptoms they are experiencing, reduce their feelings of isolation and to help them take steps to get the right support needed to improve their health. In a similar way to other eating disorders, orthorexia nervosa has been associated with other mental health conditions including depression and obsessive compulsive disorder.
Clinical practice applications:
Whether defined as an eating disorder in its own right or not, orthorexia nervosa nevertheless is likely to have an impact on wellbeing, life satisfaction and stress. It is an important condition or behavioural phenomenon for practitioners to be aware of, particularly in nutrition fields that may attract those individuals looking for more information or endorsement of their desired orthorexic eating. Given its association with other mental health conditions, safety and appropriate referral should be made to ensure the wellbeing of these individuals.
Considerations for future research:
Research on orthorexia nervosa is considerably smaller compared to other eating disorder conditions and behaviours. Further empirical evidence is needed to support the debate as to whether it is an eating disorder in its own right, or a behavioural phenomenon, and further insight needed to establish its full impact on physical and psychological health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Numerous studies have provided evidence for orthorexia nervosa (ON), an eating pattern characterized by an almost manic obsession for and fixation on healthy eating, to be of epidemiological relevance. However, there is scientific debate on whether it is merely a behavioral or lifestyle phenomenon as compared to a mental disorder. Aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore whether ON is of epidemiological and clinical relevance, and whether ON can be distinguished from other mental health disorders and healthy lifestyle features. METHODS An online survey including a measure of orthorexic behaviors [Duesseldorf Orthorexia Scale (DOS)], well-being and distress, eating behaviors, pathological eating, anxiety and depression, addictive behaviors, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, personality, and health behaviors was completed by 713 subjects (79.8% women, 18-75 years, median age: 25 years). RESULTS Twenty-seven subjects (3.8%, 21 women) showed significant orthorexic eating (DOS ≥ 30). ON cases reported lower well-being, lower satisfaction with life, and higher current stress levels than non-ON cases. The highest percentage of variation in ON was explained by pathological eating (R2 = .380), followed by eating style, Mediterranean diet, compulsive symptoms, and subjective social status. Importantly, ON provided hardly any additional predictive value for well-being when also considering pathological eating. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Our data confirmed the epidemiological and clinical relevance of orthorexic behaviors, but the strong conceptual overlap with other mental health problems and pathological eating raise initial doubts as to whether ON is a distinct mental health disorder category. This co-occurrence, unique symptoms, and underlying processes need further exploration by comparing ON cases with patients with other mental disorders.
-
8.
The anxiolytic effect of probiotics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical and preclinical literature.
Reis, DJ, Ilardi, SS, Punt, SEW
PloS one. 2018;13(6):e0199041
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The microbiome-gut-brain axis in general and the possibility of altering the microbiome through administration of probiotics to support physical and mental health has received much attention in recent years. Here, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to evaluate the clinical and preclinical evidence for the use of probiotics in anxiety. 22 preclinical (rodent) studies were included in the meta-analysis and showed an overall significant anxiolytic effect of probiotics in diseased, but not healthy, animals. Studies were heterogenous with regards to species and strains of probiotic used. Subgroup analysis showed that only Lactobacillus rhamnosus significantly reduced anxiety-like behaviour. 14 human studies were included in the meta-analysis and overall no anxiolytic effect was observed. Only three out of the 14 studies showed a positive effect (vs 12 out of the 22 animal studies), one of which used L. rhamnosus. Due to the small number of trials no subgroup analysis could be performed. Apart from the small number and heterogeneity of human studies, the authors discuss further possible reasons for the discrepancy between animal and human studies: • Dose: Dosages were typically 100 times higher (per kg) in animals than in humans. • Diseased vs healthy subjects: In animal studies, only those which investigated animals displaying anxiety related behaviour improved with probiotic administration. None of the human studies specifically recruited anxious individuals, eight of the studies included healthy subjects, the other six selected participants for other disorders, including four for irritable bowel syndrome. The authors conclude that more research into an anxiolytic effect of probiotics in humans is warranted, especially using L. rhamnosus, studying patients with anxiety, and using higher dosages and longer study duration.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- While preclinical animal studies suggest that probiotics may help reduce anxiety, such findings have not yet translated to clinical research in humans.
- Further investigation of probiotic treatment for clinically relevant anxiety is warranted, particularly with respect to the probiotic species L. rhamnosus.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This review highlights how important it is for future studies to focus on clinically anxious patients and also to consider exploring the effects of differing doses of probiotics in this population.
Clinical practice applications:
Anxiety disorders affect as many as 3 in 10 people at some point during their lifetime. On that basis, it would be great to have a viable non-pharmaceutical option to help with some of the symptoms.
Considerations for future research:
If the results from the pre-clinical studies can be corroborated in human populations, this could have widespread clinical implications.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics have generated intensive research interest in recent years as a novel mode of treatment for physical and mental illness. Nevertheless, the anxiolytic potential of probiotics remains unclear. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical and preclinical (animal model) evidence regarding the effect of probiotic administration on anxiety. METHODS The PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were reviewed for preclinical and clinical studies that met the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The effects of probiotics on anxiety-like behavior and symptoms of anxiety were analyzed by meta-analyses. Separate subgroup analyses were conducted on diseased versus healthy animals, specific preclinical probiotic species, and clinical versus healthy human samples. RESULTS Data were extracted from 22 preclinical studies (743 animals) and 14 clinical studies (1527 individuals). Overall, probiotics reduced anxiety-like behavior in animals (Hedges' g = -0.47, 95% CI -0.77 --0.16, p = 0.004). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant reduction only among diseased animals. Probiotic species-level analyses identified only Lactobacillus (L.) rhamnosus as an anxiolytic species, but these analyses were broadly under-powered. Probiotics did not significantly reduce symptoms of anxiety in humans (Hedges' g = -0.12, 95% CI -0.29-0.05, p = 0.151), and did not differentially affect clinical and healthy human samples. CONCLUSIONS While preclinical (animal) studies suggest that probiotics may help reduce anxiety, such findings have not yet translated to clinical research in humans, perhaps due to the dearth of extant research with clinically anxious populations. Further investigation of probiotic treatment for clinically relevant anxiety is warranted, particularly with respect to the probiotic species L. rhamnosus.