-
1.
Micronutrients for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Youths: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.
Johnstone, JM, Hatsu, I, Tost, G, Srikanth, P, Eiterman, LP, Bruton, AM, Ast, HK, Robinette, LM, Stern, MM, Millington, EG, et al
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2022;61(5):647-661
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental condition that affects about 5-7% of children. Characteristics of ADHD are age-inappropriate hyperactivity, impulsivity, and difficulties in focusing attention which arise from an impaired ability to regulate executive and emotional functions. The condition often persists into adulthood, where it presents an increased risk for poor educational achievements, substance abuse, incarceration, and mental health problems. In many cases, drug treatment can improve ADHD symptoms, yet concern remains about the side effects of these treatments. Some research has investigated the impact of nutrient supplementation on ADHD management, as many nutrients are essential for healthy brain function and are also involved in the production of neurotransmitters. In previous studies, supplementation with nutrients has shown some benefits but likewise also inconsistent results. This eight-week randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated the effects of a multi-nutrient supplement in 135 children with ADHD, aged 6-12 years. The study specifically focused on irritable mood symptoms. The multi-nutrient formula contained vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and antioxidants. Outcomes were measured by scores rated by clinicians (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement aka CGI-I) and scores rated by parents (Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-5 aka CASI-5). The multi-nutrient formula showed overall benefit in the blinded clinician rating but not by parental reports. According to the parents, overall improvement was reported, both in the placebo and intervention groups. The authors discussed how this absence of difference can be explained. Yet, on a subscale, the multi-nutrient group parents were more likely to report improvements. In addition, children with the additional micronutrients demonstrated greater height growth during the intervention. The supplement was well tolerated with good adherence and the monitored blood markers demonstrated safety of use.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
This fully-blinded RCT of micronutrients addresses several concerns related to existing ADHD treatment, including the possibility of counteracting height suppression and treating associated irritable mood, emotional dysregulation, and aggression.
Although further research is needed, multinutrient supplementation should be considered for children with ADHD.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common psychiatric condition that can result in low educational performance and achievement. Around 5-7% of children are believed to be affected. Alongside inattention and hyperactivity, emotional dysregulation is a common feature of ADHD. Psychiatric problems can continue into adulthood and an increased risk of incarceration and substance abuse have been reported.
Treatment with prescription medications may improve symptoms of ADHD, however, potential side effects include mild growth suppression, and mood and emotional dysregulation. Non-pharmacological treatments are therefore being investigated.
Previous research on single nutrients have shown mixed results for emotional dysregulation and mood issues in ADHD. The aim of this study was to test whether supplementation with a multi-nutrient could be beneficial to children aged 6-12 years with ADHD and irritability.
Methods
126 unmedicated children from North America with ADHD (mean age 9.8 years) completed this 8-week study. All participants had at least 1 symptom of anger, irritability, peer conflict or Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD).
Randomisation was into an intervention (n=71) or placebo (N=55) group with a 3:2 ratio to promote enrolment. Participants were required to take 6-12 capsules daily, depending on age and tolerance, of micronutrients or a placebo. Micronutrient dosages were above the recommended dietary allowance (RDA). Outcomes were measured using clinician and parent rated assessments and by a further adult who knew the child well.
The trial was blinded to all participants, parents and study staff.
Results
The clinician-rated results found 54% of the micronutrient group and 18% of the placebo group had improvements in irritability symptoms (Risk ratio =2.97, 97.5% CI: 1.5, 5.90, p<0.001). This was not replicated in the parent/adult rated results. Children in the micronutrient group grew on average 6mm more than the placebo group (p=0.002). No serious adverse treatment effects were reported. Adherence to protocol was met by >74% of participants (n=93).
Conclusions
In this study, clinicians reported that micronutrients showed greater benefits than placebo for treating irritability and supporting growth in children with ADHD.
The study and authors received funding from several research and association bodies. However, no funder was involved in the study design or reporting. No conflicts of interest were declared.
Clinical practice applications:
- Multinutrient supplementation including vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and antioxidants may support height growth in children who take pharmacologic treatment
- Multi nutrient supplementation may also help with irritable mood, emotional dysregulation, and aggression in ADHD children
- Micronutrients given at doses between the Recommended Dietary Allowance and Upper Tolerable Intake Level appear safe and may be developed into an alternative or complementary treatment for ADHD.
Considerations for future research:
- Further large scale research is needed into the potential benefits of micronutrients for children with ADHD and irritability
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether micronutrients (vitamins/minerals) benefit attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and irritability in a North American pediatric sample. METHOD A 3-site, 8-week, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of micronutrients was conducted in nonmedicated children aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD and at least 1 impairing irritability symptom by parent report on the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory-5 (CASI-5). A priori-defined primary outcomes were Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) (CGI-I of 1 or 2 = treatment responder) and parent-rated CASI-5 composite score of ADHD, oppositional defiant, disruptive mood dysregulation, and peer conflict symptoms, including impairment scores. RESULTS Of 135 randomized (mean age 9.8 years), 126 youths (93%) comprised the modified intention-to-treat population. Blinding was maintained. For the CGI-I, 54% of the micronutrient and 18% of the placebo group were responders (risk ratio = 2.97, 97.5% CI = 1.50, 5.90, p < .001). CASI-5 composite scores improved significantly for both groups (p < .01), with a mean change of -0.31 (95% CI = -0.39, -0.23) in the micronutrient group and a mean change of -0.28 (95% CI = -0.38, -0.19) in the placebo group. However, the between-group difference was not significant (mean change = -0.02; 97.5% CI = -0.16, 0.12, effect size = 0.07, p = .70). The micronutrient group grew 6 mm more than the placebo group (p = .002). No serious adverse events or clinically significant changes from baseline in blood and urine tests occurred. CONCLUSION Micronutrients showed global benefit over placebo by blinded clinician rating, but not by parent-report CASI-5 composite rating in a population with ADHD and irritability. Micronutrients showed greater height growth. Micronutrients were well tolerated, and the majority of participants adhered to the number of capsules prescribed. This randomized controlled trial replicates safety and efficacy reported for ADHD in 2 smaller trials of a similar formula containing all vitamins and known essential minerals in amounts between the Recommended Dietary Allowance and Upper Tolerable Intake Level. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION Micronutrients for ADHD in Youth (MADDY) Study; https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03252522.
-
2.
Circulating levels of maternal vitamin D and risk of ADHD in offspring: results from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial.
Chu, SH, Huang, M, Kelly, RS, Kachroo, P, Litonjua, AA, Weiss, ST, Lasky-Su, J
International journal of epidemiology. 2022;51(3):910-918
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Acting as both a nutrient and a hormone, vitamin D has been found to play a critical role in neurodevelopment across sensitive periods in utero, infancy and early childhood. Among neurodevelopmental and behavioural disorders in early life, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common among children worldwide. Low levels of circulating 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] have been shown to associate with prevalent ADHD. The aims of this study were to (i) determine the association between maternal vitamin D levels in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy and the risk of offspring ADHD by age 6 years or later; and (ii) to identify potential sensitive periods in utero during which vitamin D levels might be most important for reducing risk of ADHD. This is an ancillary study of the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART). The VDAART was a randomised, double-blinded, multicentre, clinical trial in which 876 participating mothers were recruited between 10–18 weeks of gestation and assigned to receive either 4400 or 400 IU/day of vitamin D throughout pregnancy. Results show protective associations between maternal 25(OH)D sufficiency in the third trimester and child ADHD, but not at baseline. Furthermore, both at baseline and in the third trimester, there were higher odds of ADHD in male offspring as compared with female offspring with 25(OH)D insufficient mothers (analyses limited by small sample sizes) Authors conclude that higher levels of maternal vitamin D during pregnancy may play a protective role against risk of ADHD in offspring, but further studies are needed to confirm this association and any therapeutic potential therein.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Ensure that women in pregnancy, and possibly also those seeking to conceive, have adequate vitamin D status in order to reduce the risk of ADHD in offspring.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
This paper describes a secondary data analysis from an RCT that looked at the effect of prenatal vitamin D supplementation on risk of childhood asthma in offspring. Enrolled women aged 18–39 years with a history of asthma, eczema or allergic rhinitis, or whose partner (biological father of child) had a history of the aforementioned condition, received either 400 IU or 4400 IU vitamin D daily for the duration of their pregnancy. Offspring follow-up is still ongoing.
Aims
The current study aims were twofold: (i) to determine the association between maternal vitamin D levels in trimesters 1 and 3 and the risk of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in offspring diagnosed by age 6 years or later; and (ii) to identify potentially sensitive periods during gestation in which vitamin D levels may be especially important for reducing risk of ADHD.
Methods
The analytical sample included 679 mother-child pairs, from the original sample of 876 participating mothers. No sample size calculation was reported, though the sample was considered representative of the overall RCT study population.
Maternal vitamin D (serum 25(OH)D) was classified as follows
- Highly deficient <12 ng/mL
- Deficient 12 ng/mL to 19.9 ng/mL
- Insufficient 20 ng/mL to 29.9 ng/mL
- Sufficient ≥30 ng/mL
ADHD status was assessed through parental reporting between ages 6 and 9 years.
Results
No baseline associations between a vitamin D sufficient status and offspring ADHD in maternal samples collected during trimester 1 were observed (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.51–2.19; P.0.871), though this association became statistically significant at trimester 3 (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26–0.84; P.0.011). This translated to a 53% less chance of having a child with ADHD at age 6 or later among mothers with vitamin D sufficiency compared with children of mothers with vitamin D deficiency. There was also a linear trend in the protective association of vitamin D sufficiency (≥30 ng/mL) on reduced risk of offspring ADHD at age 6 years or later in data from trimester 3. Stratified analyses revealed a protective association for sufficient maternal vitamin D status and offspring ADHD among males (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.94).
Conclusions
The authors concluded that vitamin D sufficiency (≥30 ng/mL) in the 3rd trimester of gestation may decrease the risk of ADHD development in offspring.
Notes: The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
Ensuring a sufficient vitamin D status by the 3rd trimester of pregnancy may help to lessen the risk of ADHD in offspring. Nutritional therapists and other clinicians working with pregnant women or women looking to conceive should consider checking vitamin D status and providing corrective supplementation and lifestyle advice to augment vitamin D levels where indicated.
Considerations for future research:
The authors of this study postulated that the statistically significant protective association between vitamin D at trimester 3 and ADHD in offspring was not significant in trimester 1 due to a low observed variability in vitamin D status (>75% of women were vitamin D insufficient), and thus the statistical test being underpowered to see difference between groups with sufficient or insufficient status.
Further research could expand upon this hypothesis to test whether vitamin D status in trimester 1, or preconceptually, may offer a protective association for ADHD and other related neurological conditions that may manifest in early life.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low levels of circulating 25-hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D] have been shown to associate with prevalent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but few studies have examined the association between 25(OH)D during fetal development and risk of childhood ADHD. METHODS Maternal plasma 25(OH)D was measured at 10-18 and 32-38 weeks of gestation, with sufficiency defined as 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/ml. Offspring ADHD status between ages 6-9 years was measured by parent report of clinical ADHD diagnosis among 680 mother-child pairs from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial. Association between maternal 25(OH)D and child ADHD was assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for maternal age, race and ethnicity. Effect modification by offspring sex was also assessed. RESULTS No associations between maternal 25(OH)D at 10-18 weeks of gestation and offspring ADHD were observed. In the third trimester, we observed associations between maternal vitamin D sufficiency and offspring ADHD [odds ratio (OR) 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.84], in addition to maternal 25(OH)D sufficiency category, comparing the deficient (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.94), insufficient (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.15-1.10) and sufficient (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.54) categories against highly deficient 25(OH)D, respectively. Stratified analyses revealed a protective association for sufficient maternal 25(OH)D and child ADHD among males (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.94); the synergy index for additive effect modification of risk was 1.78 (95% CI 0.62-5.08). CONCLUSIONS Higher levels of maternal vitamin D in the third trimester are associated with lower risk of ADHD in offspring, with modest evidence for a stronger effect among male offspring. However, larger studies will be necessary to confirm these findings.
-
3.
Dose-response relationship between weight loss and improvements in obstructive sleep apnea severity after a diet/lifestyle interventions: secondary analyses of the "MIMOSA" randomized clinical trial.
Georgoulis, M, Yiannakouris, N, Kechribari, I, Lamprou, K, Perraki, E, Vagiakis, E, Kontogianni, MD
Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2022;18(5):1251-1261
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) represents one of the most common and serious sleep-related breathing disorders. Excess body weight has emerged as the strongest modifiable predictor of the onset and severity of OSA. The aim of this study was to explore the dose-response relationship between the degree of weight loss and improvements in OSA severity. This study is a secondary analysis of the Mediterranean diet/lifestyle Intervention for the Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MIMOSA) study, which was designed as a single-centre, single-blind, parallel, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Results show that respiratory events and oximetry indices improved only in patients who lost weight and improvements were proportional to the degree of weight loss. Authors conclude that their findings indicate a dose-response relationship between the degree of weight loss and improvement in OSA severity and symptoms. However, further research is needed to gather more data on the optimal degree of weight loss and appropriate weight-loss interventions for managing the wide spectrum of OSA severity to guide clinical practice.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Important from a public health perspective:
- This study has confirmed that even a small degree of weight loss can have a beneficial effect on respiratory events and oxygen desaturation in moderate-to-severe OSA, but clinicians should preferably aim at a ≥ 5% weight loss, and ideally a ≥ 10% weight loss, to achieve clinically meaningful reductions in OSA severity.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
OSA represents one of the most common and serious sleep-related breathing disorders, with a high worldwide prevalence of almost 1 billion people. OSA has numerous well-established cardiometabolic consequences.
The authors highlight that weight loss is essential for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management. However, the optimal degree of weight loss for improving OSA severity or eliminating sleep-disordered breathing has not been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to explore the dose-response relationship between the degree of weight loss and improvements in OSA severity.
Methods
This is a secondary analysis of the Mediterranean diet/lifestyle Intervention for the Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MIMOSA) study. This study was designed as a single-center, single-blind, parallel, randomised, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a weight-loss Mediterranean dietary/lifestyle intervention on managing OSA.
This 6-month long clinical trial included 180 adult, overweight/obese moderate-to-severe OSA patients (45 patients per study group plus a 29% dropout rate). All patients were prescribed the standard of care continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and were randomised to 3 arms: standard care; Mediterranean diet; Mediterranean lifestyle
Based on percent change in weight at 6 months, participants were categorised into a weight-stable/gain (WS/GG) group or one of 3 weight-loss groups (WLG): < 5%WLG; 5%–10%WLG; ≥ 10%WLG. Polysomnographic data and OSA symptoms were also evaluated preintervention and postintervention.
Results
Results confirm a dose-response relationship between the degree of weight loss achieved through a dietary/lifestyle intervention and improvements in OSA severity.
- Respiratory events and oximetry indices improved only in patients who lost weight. Improvements were proportional to the degree of weight loss.
- Median percent change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was −11.7%, − 37.9%, and − 49.3% in the < 5%WLG, 5%–10%WLG, and ≥ 10%WLG, respectively (P < .001).
- Compared to the WS/GG, the age-, sex-, baseline-, and CPAP use–adjusted relative risk (95% confidence interval) of severe OSA (AHI ≥ 30 events/h) was 0.45 (0.23–0.87) in the 5%–10%WLG and 0.32 (0.17–0.64) in the ≥ 10%WLG; the risk was also lower in the ≥ 10%WLG vs the < 5%WLG (0.42 [0.22–0.82]).
- Insomnia and daytime sleepiness also improved more in participants exhibiting ≥ 5% weight loss.
- The dose-response relationship between weight loss and improvement in OSA severity was evident regardless of self-reported CPAP use.
Conclusions
The authors conclude that even a < 5% weight loss was sufficient for improvements in respiratory events and oximetry indices, but the prevalence of severe OSA reduced only after a ≥ 5% weight loss, and patients achieving a ≥ 10% weight loss exhibited the greatest benefits compared to weight-stable/gain patients.
Clinical practice applications:
These findings might be useful for Nutritional Therapists and Clinical Practitioners:
- Clinicians should aim for a ≥ 5% weight loss, and ideally a ≥ 10% weight loss, to achieve clinically meaningful reductions in OSA severity.
- Improvements after weight loss were significant even though a healthy body weight was not achieved.
Considerations for future research:
- The study sample consisted of predominantly male, overweight, otherwise healthy patients with moderate-to-severe OSA. Therefore, findings cannot be generalised to the whole OSA population and further research is required with broader, diverse, study samples.
- 6 months is a short duration period, therefore longer trials are required.
- Self-reported CPAP use by participants is a limitation of this study. Further robust analysis methods should be considered for future trials.
- Participants were advised to abstain from CPAP therapy for 2 days prior to the follow-up PSG but this was not evaluated or confirmed in this study and should be in future research.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES Lifestyle-induced weight loss is a complementary therapeutic approach for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We aimed at identifying the dose-response relationship between weight loss and OSA severity improvement. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of a 6-month clinical trial in 180 adult, overweight/obese moderate-to-severe OSA patients. Participants were randomized to a standard care, a Mediterranean diet, or a Mediterranean lifestyle arm. All patients were prescribed with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), while intervention arms additionally participated in a weight-loss dietary/lifestyle intervention. Based on percent change in weight at 6 months, participants were categorized into a weight-stable/gain (WS/GG) group or 3 weight-loss groups (WLG): < 5%WLG, 5%-10%WLG, and ≥ 10%WLG. Polysomnographic data and OSA symptoms were evaluated preintervention and postintervention. RESULTS Respiratory events and oximetry indices improved only in patients who lost weight and improvements were proportional to the degree of weight loss. Median percent change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was -11.7%, - 37.9%, and - 49.3% in the < 5%WLG, 5%-10%WLG, and ≥ 10%WLG, respectively (P < .001). Compared to the WS/GG, the age-, sex-, baseline-, and CPAP use-adjusted relative risk (95% confidence interval) of severe OSA (AHI ≥ 30 events/h) was 0.45 (0.23-0.87) in the 5%-10%WLG and 0.32 (0.17-0.64) in the ≥ 10%WLG; the risk was also lower in the ≥ 10%WLG vs the < 5%WLG (0.42 [0.22-0.82]). Insomnia and daytime sleepiness also improved more in participants exhibiting ≥ 5% weight loss. CONCLUSIONS Even a < 5% weight loss can reduce respiratory events, but a ≥ 5% and ideally ≥ 10% weight loss is necessary for reducing the prevalence of severe OSA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Mediterranean Diet/Lifestyle Intervention in Obstructive Sleep Apnea; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02515357; Identifier: NCT02515357. CITATION Georgoulis M, Yiannakouris N, Kechribari I, et al. Dose-response relationship between weight loss and improvements in obstructive sleep apnea severity after a diet/lifestyle intervention: secondary analyses of the "MIMOSA" randomized clinical trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(5):1251-1261.
-
4.
A ketogenic drink improves cognition in mild cognitive impairment: Results of a 6-month RCT.
Fortier, M, Castellano, CA, St-Pierre, V, Myette-Côté, É, Langlois, F, Roy, M, Morin, MC, Bocti, C, Fulop, T, Godin, JP, et al
Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2021;17(3):543-552
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Brain energy rescue is emerging as a potential strategy to reduce cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The main aim of this study was to report the complete cognitive outcomes of the BENEFIC (Brain Energy, Functional Imaging, and Cognition) trial. The secondary objectives are to report plasma ketones (free caprylic and capric acids) levels; as well as the metabolic response, safety, and tolerability after the 6-month intervention. This study is a 6-month randomised, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 122 participants were enrolled and randomised into one of the two arms: ketogenic medium chain triglyceride (kMCT) or placebo arm. Results show that performance on widely used tests of episodic memory, executive function, and language improved over 6 months in MCI when consuming 30g/day of a kMCT drink relative to a matching placebo. Moderate to large effect sizes were observed on four cognitive tests in the kMCT group. Furthermore, it is safe and feasible for an MCI population to consume a 15g kMCT supplement twice daily for 6 months. Authors conclude that formulation of a kMCT drink improved four cognitive outcomes in MCI by increasing blood ketone levels.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- MCT supplementation is a promising strategy to rescue energy metabolism in the brain for those with MCIs by providing an alternative energy source
- Improvements in cognition were associated with increased blood ketone levels from MCT supplementation
- Practitioners should be mindful that higher intakes of MCTs (>30g/d) may lead to negative GI effects in some individuals.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This randomized controlled trial demonstrates that supplementation of a ketogenic drink containing medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs) is both safe and effective in improving cognitive outcomes in individuals with mild cognitive impairments (MCI), and does so through supporting energy metabolism in the brain.
Clinical practice applications:
These findings might be useful for Nutritional Therapists and Clinical Practitioners as follows:
- The results of this randomised controlled trial demonstrate that MCT supplementation (at 30g per day, split between two doses) is a viable strategy to support brain metabolism in individuals experiencing MCIs
- There was a dose-dependant response on elevated ketones and selected cognitive improvements which may have pertinent applications to therapeutic practice (either dietary or supplemental)
- The paper highlighted the involvement of energy metabolism in cognitive decline; this has potential therapeutic applications in terms of targeted nutritional support for mitochondrial function or energy signalling
- Some individuals experienced negative gastrointestinal effects when consuming MCTs at 30g/d for prolonged periods; practitioners should be mindful of this.
Considerations for future research:
Future research should consider:
- Whether dietary-induced ketosis can therapeutically impact MCI and support patient well-being
- Use of MCTs in those with severe cognitive impairments or those taking medication such as cholinesterase inhibitors
the role of glucose hypometabolism to determine alternative strategies for those who have GI issues with MCTs
- Whether APOE4 status has any impact on therapeutic outcomes to MCT supplementation
- Whether adjunct nutritional support for mitochondrial function alongside MCT could further impact on MCIs.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Counteracting impaired brain glucose metabolism with ketones may improve cognition in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS Cognition, plasma ketone response, and metabolic profile were assessed before and 6 months after supplementation with a ketogenic drink containing medium chain triglyceride (ketogenic medium chain triglyceride [kMCT]; 15 g twice/day; n = 39) or placebo (n = 44). RESULTS Free and cued recall (Trial 1; P = .047), verbal fluency (categories; P = .024), Boston Naming Test (total correct answers; P = .033), and the Trail-Making Test (total errors; P = .017) improved significantly in the kMCT group compared to placebo (analysis of covariance; pre-intervention score, sex, age, education, and apolipoprotein E4 as covariates). Some cognitive outcomes also correlated positively with plasma ketones. Plasma metabolic profile and ketone response were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS This kMCT drink improved cognitive outcomes in MCI, at least in part by increasing blood ketone level. These data support further assessment of MCI progression to Alzheimer's disease.
-
5.
Dietary alteration of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids for headache reduction in adults with migraine: randomized controlled trial.
Ramsden, CE, Zamora, D, Faurot, KR, MacIntosh, B, Horowitz, M, Keyes, GS, Yuan, ZX, Miller, V, Lynch, C, Honvoh, G, et al
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2021;374:n1448
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This study could be of interest to practitioners who are interested in dietary interventions that may decrease the incidence or severity of headaches in women. Omega 3 fatty acids such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are believed to be precursors for molecules that may have pain reducing properties. Whereas omega 6 fatty acids such as linoleic acid are believed to be precursors for molecules that may have pain promoting effects. The objective of this 3 armed randomised, double blinded controlled trial was to determine whether increasing dietary intake of omega 3 EPA and DHA, whilst either maintaining or decreasing omega 6 linoleic acid, may lead to a decrease in headache frequency and severity. 182 participants were assigned into one of 3 treatment groups, the first, H3 diet, increasing EPA and DHA to 1.5g/day and maintaining linoleic acid, the second, H3-L6 diet, increasing EPA and DHA to 1.5g/day whilst decreasing linoleic acid and the control group maintaining EPA, DHA and linoleic acid. Both the H3 and H3-L6 diets increased the levels of the molecule believed to be involved in reducing pain to a statistically significant level. This was found to be consistent with the results reported by the patients both in headache hours per day and days with headache in the month. The authors conclude that increasing levels of omega 3 fatty acids in the diet whilst decreasing levels of omega 6 fatty acids in the diet may decrease the frequency and severity of headaches. This study was for 16 weeks and predominantly women with a mean age of 38, further studies for longer and on other populations such as men, children and older populations, would be required to see if the same results could be obtained.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Important from a public health perspective
- Increasing n-3 levels and decreasing n-6 levels could be modified by dietary change and appear to reduce the frequency and duration of headaches in migraine sufferers
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
Circulating lipid mediators have been implicated in headache pathogenesis.
Objective
To determine whether dietary interventions that increase n-3 fatty acids with and without reduction in n-6 linoleic acid can alter circulating lipid mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis, and decrease headache in adults with migraine.
Study Design
Three arm, parallel group, randomized, modified double blind, controlled trial.
Participants
182 participants (88% women, mean age 38 years) with migraines on 5-20 days per month (67% met criteria for chronic migraine).
Interventions
Three diets designed with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and linoleic acid altered as controlled variables:
- H3 diet (n=61)—increase EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and maintain linoleic acid at around 7% of total energy intake
- H3-L6 diet (n=61)—increase n-3 EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and decrease linoleic acid to ≤1.8% of total energy intake
- Control diet (n=60)—maintain EPA+DHA at <150 mg/day and linoleic acid at around 7% of total energy intake
All participants received foods accounting for two thirds of daily food energy and 1/3rd from foods not provided by the Research Kitchen. For these foods participants rely on their training by the dietitian and website diet guides for shopping and choosing foods in restaurants. Participants were encouraged to continue seeing their headache physician and continue usual care.
Results
In intention-to-treat analyses (n=182) at 16 weeks
- The H3-L6 and H3 diets increased circulating 17-HDHA compared with the control diet (baseline-adjusted mean difference 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.9; 0.7, 0.4 to 1.1, respectively).
- The observed improvement in HIT-6 scores (quality of life) in the H3-L6 and H3 groups was not statistically significant (−1.6, −4.2 to 1.0, and −1.5, −4.2 to 1.2, respectively).
- Compared with the control diet, the H3-L6 and H3 diets decreased total headache hours per day (−1.7, −2.5 to −0.9, and −1.3, −2.1 to −0.5, respectively), moderate to severe headache hours per day, (−0.8, −1.2 to −0.4, and −0.7, −1.1 to −0.3, respectively) and headache days per month (−4.0, −5.2 to −2.7, and −2.0, −3.3 to −0.7, respectively).
- The H3-L6 diet decreased headache days per month more than the H3 diet, suggesting additional benefit from lowering dietary linoleic acid (−2.0, −3.2 to −0.8).
- The H3-L6 and H3 diets altered n-3 and n-6 fatty acids and several of their nociceptive oxylipin derivatives in plasma, serum, erythrocytes or immune cells, but did not alter classic headache mediators calcitonin gene related peptide and prostaglandin E2.
Conclusions
The H3-L6 and H3 interventions altered bioactive mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis and decreased frequency and severity of headaches, but did not significantly improve quality of life.
Clinical practice applications:
These findings might be useful for Nutritional Therapists and Clinical Practitioners:
- To inform practitioners of the benefits of assessing n-3 and n-6 fatty acids in migraine patients.
- Inform practitioners of the potential benefits to reducing n-6 as well as increasing n-3 levels in migraine patients
- Inform practitioners of the potential lack of correlation between headache duration and frequency and quality of life measures
Considerations for future research:
- Trialing larger doses of n-3
- Longer term follow up whilst maintaining these diets
- Attempting to validate an optimal serum level of 17-HDHA for these patients that could be used in clinical practice
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether dietary interventions that increase n-3 fatty acids with and without reduction in n-6 linoleic acid can alter circulating lipid mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis, and decrease headache in adults with migraine. DESIGN Three arm, parallel group, randomized, modified double blind, controlled trial. SETTING Ambulatory, academic medical center in the United States over 16 weeks. PARTICIPANTS 182 participants (88% women, mean age 38 years) with migraines on 5-20 days per month (67% met criteria for chronic migraine). INTERVENTIONS Three diets designed with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and linoleic acid altered as controlled variables: H3 diet (n=61)-increase EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and maintain linoleic acid at around 7% of energy; H3-L6 diet (n=61)-increase n-3 EPA+DHA to 1.5 g/day and decrease linoleic acid to ≤1.8% of energy; control diet (n=60)-maintain EPA+DHA at <150 mg/day and linoleic acid at around 7% of energy. All participants received foods accounting for two thirds of daily food energy and continued usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoints (week 16) were the antinociceptive mediator 17-hydroxydocosahexaenoic acid (17-HDHA) in blood and the headache impact test (HIT-6), a six item questionnaire assessing headache impact on quality of life. Headache frequency was assessed daily with an electronic diary. RESULTS In intention-to-treat analyses (n=182), the H3-L6 and H3 diets increased circulating 17-HDHA (log ng/mL) compared with the control diet (baseline-adjusted mean difference 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.9; 0.7, 0.4 to 1.1, respectively). The observed improvement in HIT-6 scores in the H3-L6 and H3 groups was not statistically significant (-1.6, -4.2 to 1.0, and -1.5, -4.2 to 1.2, respectively). Compared with the control diet, the H3-L6 and H3 diets decreased total headache hours per day (-1.7, -2.5 to -0.9, and -1.3, -2.1 to -0.5, respectively), moderate to severe headache hours per day (-0.8, -1.2 to -0.4, and -0.7, -1.1 to -0.3, respectively), and headache days per month (-4.0, -5.2 to -2.7, and -2.0, -3.3 to -0.7, respectively). The H3-L6 diet decreased headache days per month more than the H3 diet (-2.0, -3.2 to -0.8), suggesting additional benefit from lowering dietary linoleic acid. The H3-L6 and H3 diets altered n-3 and n-6 fatty acids and several of their nociceptive oxylipin derivatives in plasma, serum, erythrocytes or immune cells, but did not alter classic headache mediators calcitonin gene related peptide and prostaglandin E2. CONCLUSIONS The H3-L6 and H3 interventions altered bioactive mediators implicated in headache pathogenesis and decreased frequency and severity of headaches, but did not significantly improve quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02012790.
-
6.
Zinc supplementation affects favorably the frequency of migraine attacks: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Ahmadi, H, Mazloumi-Kiapey, SS, Sadeghi, O, Nasiri, M, Khorvash, F, Mottaghi, T, Askari, G
Nutrition journal. 2020;19(1):101
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Migraine is a chronic neurovascular disorder. Patients with this disorder suffer from severe headaches and also nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia during a migraine attack. Several supplementary treatments have been suggested for the management of migraine symptoms. Among these methods, there is the supplementation with micronutrients. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of zinc supplementation on characteristics of migraine attacks in migraine patients. This study is a double-blind randomized clinical trial which included migraine patients, with an age range between 20 and 60 years. Patients were stratified based on age (20–40 and 40–60 years), gender (male and female), and body mass index (18.5–24.9 and 25–30) into different blocks. Then, they were randomly allocated to the intervention or control groups. Results show that when compared to the placebo group, zinc supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in headache severity and migraine attacks frequency. However, the effect on headache severity became statistically non-significant when baseline values of headache severity and potential confounders were taken into account. Authors conclude that zinc supplementation was beneficial for migraine attack frequency but not for migraine attack duration and headache daily results.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Inadequate zinc intake may drive migraine frequency.
- Zinc supplementation may enhance the effectiveness of routine migraine treatment in reducing migraine frequency.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Migraines, characterised by severe headaches, nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia affect approximately 10-20% of the global population. The authors refer to observational studies that have identified a moderate rate of zinc deficiency amongst migraine sufferers.
Zinc, an essential trace mineral, may prove beneficial as a supplement to reduce migraine symptoms and frequency possibly due to its effects on the nervous system and its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory capacity..
This double blind randomised clinical trial analysed the effects of 220mg of zinc sulphate (50mg of elemental zinc) combined with a routine migraine treatment versus a control group receiving a placebo and the routine treatment on symptoms of migraine attacks. The study duration was 8 weeks occurring from January 2016 to April 2016. Each group consisted of 40 participants between the ages of 20 and 60 with >5 years of migraines or migraine symptoms.
When compared to the placebo group, zinc supplementation demonstrated:
- A reduction in headache severity (− 1.75 ± 1.79 vs. -0.80 ± 1.57; P = 0.01). This result became statistically non-significant when the analysis was adjusted for potential confounders and baseline values of headache severity.
- A reduction in migraine attacks frequency (− 2.55 ± 4.32 vs. -0.42 ± 4.24; P = 0.02).
Clinical practice applications:
This randomised controlled trial highlights that zinc supplementation combined with routine migraine treatment (200/500 mg sodium valproate (such as Depakin), 50/100 mg sumatriptan, or 1 mg ergotamine) may assist in the reduction of migraine attack frequency amongst migraine sufferers within 8 weeks.
Compliance rate for this study was very high at 100% and there were no adverse effects reported suggesting a potentially safe and convenient treatment for migraine sufferers.
Considerations for future research:
- Further trials with better dietary controls would be useful to eliminate potential confounders.
- Use of CONSORT guidelines for reporting randomised trials would strengthen research reporting.
- Analysis of biomarkers may assist in identifying the mechanisms in which zinc may relieve migraine symptoms..
- Larger randomised controlled trials with increased sample sizes and longer durations are needed in order to definitively determine the effect of zinc supplementation on migraine attacks and any differences between genders.
- Additional studies trialling various zinc dosages and forms may provide insight into an optimal zinc dose and form for migraine attacks.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational studies have shown a link between zinc deficiency and migraine headaches. We aimed to examine the effect of zinc supplementation on the characteristics of migraine attacks in patients with migraine. METHODS This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 80 patients with migraine. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either zinc sulfate (220 mg/d zinc sulfate) or placebo (lactose) for 8 weeks. Anthropometric measures, serum zinc concentrations, and characteristics of migraine attacks (headache severity, frequency and duration of migraine attacks, and headache daily results) were assessed at baseline and end of the trial. RESULTS Compared with the placebo, zinc supplementation resulted in a significant reduction in headache severity (- 1.75 ± 1.79 vs. -0.80 ± 1.57; P = 0.01) and migraine attacks frequency (- 2.55 ± 4.32 vs. -0.42 ± 4.24; P = 0.02) in migraine patients. However, the observed reduction for headache severity became statistically non-significant when the analysis was adjusted for potential confounders and baseline values of headache severity. Other characteristics of migraine attacks including the duration of attacks and headache daily results were not altered following zinc supplementation either before or after controlling for covariates. CONCLUSION Zinc supplementation had a beneficial effect on the frequency of migraine attacks in migraine patients. Additional well-designed clinical trials with a long period of intervention and different dosages of zinc are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION CODE IRCT20121216011763N23 at www.irct.ir .
-
7.
Gut feelings: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for depressive symptoms.
Chahwan, B, Kwan, S, Isik, A, van Hemert, S, Burke, C, Roberts, L
Journal of affective disorders. 2019;253:317-326
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Depression is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that is the leading cause of disability world-wide. Multiple causes of depression have been identified, including genetic, neurological, inflammatory, personality, cognitive, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of the multispecies probiotic Ecologic® Barrier for reducing symptoms in adults with mild to severe levels of depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups; probiotic and placebo. 71 participants with depressive symptoms were recruited and allocated sequentially over 12 months. Results indicate that all participants across both probiotic and placebo groups exhibited a reduction in depressive symptoms over the time-period of the trial. Thus, the routine involved with daily preparation and consumption of the probiotic and scheduled appointments, as well as involvement in these behaviours with the aim of seeking improvement in depressive symptoms had positive impacts on mood, irrespective of whether the probiotic or placebo was consumed. Authors conclude that their findings offer evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- This study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression.
- The study suggests that probiotics, rather than having a direct effect on depressive symptoms, potentially act on immune system activity, inflammation and gut barrier integrity which contribute to the expression of depression.
- Probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of other therapies, such as CBT.
- This study points to the validity of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
With evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depression, this study set out to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements on depressive symptoms from a sample of 71 participants with depression. The study was a triple-blinded parallel, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial conducted over 8 weeks in Australia. Pre and post intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota were compared alongside psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to non-depressed, placebo and probiotic groups. All the clinical trial participants demonstrated an improvement in symptoms – participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one of the metrics for depression.
Clinical practice applications:
This study was small and carried out over a short period of time. While significant results were found, which signify potential considerations for clinical practice, the results from this study do not offer evidence that the probiotics used had a direct effect on depressive symptoms – they suggest that probiotics potentially act on cognitive processes contributing to depression which may include immune system activity, inflammation, and gut barrier integrity. Overall, this study offers evidence to indicate that probiotic consumption can exert change on cognitive patterns associated with depression. In clinical practice, probiotics may be a useful adjunct to potentiate the effects of therapies, such as CBT. Finally, the use of probiotics promotes the concept of managing physical health as part of mental health treatment.
Considerations for future research:
These preliminary results are promising and offer a number of future research and clinical avenues to build upon. The results do however, indicate that a longer trial may be needed to fully assess the effects of probiotics on mood and the mechanisms by which probiotics may be influencing this. The study also suggests that further research using a range of concentrations in a dose response study may be warranted to determine the optimal dose; a greater dose over a longer period may produce detectable changes in microbiota as well as further differences in psychological data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide; with evidence suggesting that decreased gut barrier function and inflammation are correlated with depressive symptoms. We conducted a clinical trial to determine the effect of consumption of probiotic supplements (Winclove's Ecologic® Barrier) on depressive symptoms in a sample of participants with mild to severe depression. METHOD 71 participants were randomly allocated to either probiotic or placebo, which was, consumed daily over eight weeks. Pre- and post-intervention measures of symptoms and vulnerability markers of depression as well as gut microbiota composition were compared. Clinical trial participants were also compared on psychological variables and gut microbiota composition to a non-depressed group (n = 20). RESULTS All clinical trial participants demonstrated improvement in symptoms, suggesting non-specific therapeutic effects associated with weekly monitoring visits. Participants in the probiotic group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in cognitive reactivity compared with the placebo group, particularly in the mild/moderate subgroup. Probiotics did not significantly alter the microbiota of depressed individuals, however, a significant correlation was found between Ruminococcus gnavus and one depression metric. LIMITATIONS There was a high attrition rate, which may be attributed to weekly monitoring visits. Additionally, modulation of the gut microbiota may need more specific testing to distinguish subtle changes. CONCLUSIONS While microbiota composition was similar between all groups, probiotics did affect a psychological variable associated with susceptibility to depression. Further research is needed to investigate how probiotics can be utilised to modify mental wellbeing, and whether they can act as an adjunct to existing treatments.
-
8.
Microbiota Transfer Therapy alters gut ecosystem and improves gastrointestinal and autism symptoms: an open-label study.
Kang, DW, Adams, JB, Gregory, AC, Borody, T, Chittick, L, Fasano, A, Khoruts, A, Geis, E, Maldonado, J, McDonough-Means, S, et al
Microbiome. 2017;5(1):10
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) often suffer gastrointestinal problems, such as constipation or diarrhea, the severity of which often correlate with ASD severity. This open-label clinical trial evaluated the impact of Microbiota Transfer Therapy (MTT) on GI and ASD symptoms of 18 ASD-diagnosed children. Treatment involved 2 weeks of antibiotic treatment and a bowel cleanse, followed by extended fecal microbiota transplant using a high initial dose and lower maintenance doses for 7-8 weeks. Results showed significant improvements in GI symptoms, which persisted 8 weeks after treatment ended. Bacterial diversity also increased. Behavioural ASD symptoms also improved significantly and lasted 8 weeks after treatment finished. This exploratory study suggests a promising approach to alter the gut microbiome in ASD subjects, improving GI and behavioural symptoms of ASD. Further clinical research is required.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Fecal Microbiota Transfer Therapy demonstrates an effective clinical intervention in pediatric patients suffering with autistic spectrum disorder and associated gastrointestinal symptoms.
- Benefits of the therapy in this trail persisted even 2 months after treatment cessation.
- Future research on autistic spectrum disorder should address microbiota-gut-brain axis.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
X
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
The article describes an original clinical protocol in which microbiota transfer was used to ameliorate gastrointestinal (GI) and autism symptoms in pediatric patients. Common occurrence of GI pathology in patients affected by autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), poses a clinical challenge, since there is no standardised specific therapy. In light of recent insights on the importance of microbiota-gut-brain axis in health and disease, microbiota emerges as a salient treatment target in the aforementioned population.
Clinical practice applications:
Fecal microbiota transfer therapy (MTT) applied by the protocol described in the article demonstrates a longer-term effective clinical intervention in pediatric patients suffering from ASD and concomitant GI symptoms. Benefits of the therapy persisted even two months after actual treatment cessation, a highly important feature considering ASD.
Considerations for future research:
This modality could complement current treatments used for ASD-related symptomatology, but requires further validation through additional clinical experiments. The procedure also supports the efforts to focus more research on the role of microbiota in ASD pathophysiology. Further basic and clinical investigations on ASD should include addressing microbiota-gut-brain axis whenever possible, if not always.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are complex neurobiological disorders that impair social interactions and communication and lead to restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities. The causes of these disorders remain poorly understood, but gut microbiota, the 1013 bacteria in the human intestines, have been implicated because children with ASD often suffer gastrointestinal (GI) problems that correlate with ASD severity. Several previous studies have reported abnormal gut bacteria in children with ASD. The gut microbiome-ASD connection has been tested in a mouse model of ASD, where the microbiome was mechanistically linked to abnormal metabolites and behavior. Similarly, a study of children with ASD found that oral non-absorbable antibiotic treatment improved GI and ASD symptoms, albeit temporarily. Here, a small open-label clinical trial evaluated the impact of Microbiota Transfer Therapy (MTT) on gut microbiota composition and GI and ASD symptoms of 18 ASD-diagnosed children. RESULTS MTT involved a 2-week antibiotic treatment, a bowel cleanse, and then an extended fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) using a high initial dose followed by daily and lower maintenance doses for 7-8 weeks. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale revealed an approximately 80% reduction of GI symptoms at the end of treatment, including significant improvements in symptoms of constipation, diarrhea, indigestion, and abdominal pain. Improvements persisted 8 weeks after treatment. Similarly, clinical assessments showed that behavioral ASD symptoms improved significantly and remained improved 8 weeks after treatment ended. Bacterial and phagedeep sequencing analyses revealed successful partial engraftment of donor microbiota and beneficial changes in the gut environment. Specifically, overall bacterial diversity and the abundance of Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, and Desulfovibrio among other taxa increased following MTT, and these changes persisted after treatment stopped (followed for 8 weeks). CONCLUSIONS This exploratory, extended-duration treatment protocol thus appears to be a promising approach to alter the gut microbiome and virome and improve GI and behavioral symptoms of ASD. Improvements in GI symptoms, ASD symptoms, and the microbiome all persisted for at least 8 weeks after treatment ended, suggesting a long-term impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov, with the registration number NCT02504554.