-
1.
The effects of home-based exercise therapy for breast cancer-related fatigue induced by radical radiotherapy.
Mavropalias, G, Cormie, P, Peddle-McIntyre, CJ, Galvão, DA, Taaffe, DR, Schofield, C, Ray, S, Zissiadis, Y, Newton, RU
Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan). 2023;30(1):139-150
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Breast cancer (BCa) is the most common form of cancer among women. Radiotherapy (RT) treatment is an important component of breast cancer treatment and is used with curative intent as well as for palliation. One commonly reported adverse side effect of RT is cancer related fatigue (CRF). The aims of this study were to (a) examine the effects of a 12-week home-based resistance and aerobic exercise program on CRF, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and sleep quality and duration in BCa patients during and up to 12 months after RT, and (b) investigate how CRF, HRQoL, and sleep quality and duration affect the participants’ ability to follow their prescribed exercise program. This study was a two-arm, randomised controlled clinical trial. One hundred and six (n = 106) women with stage I-III BCa scheduled to receive radical RT were randomised into exercise (n = 51) or usual care (n = 55). Results show that CRF was present at baseline and persisted during RT. The exercise group had a quicker reduction in CRF compared to the usual care group. Moreover, there was a significant difference in the HRQoL during RT between groups, and a quicker HRQoL improvement post-RT for the exercise group, with no changes in sleep quality or duration. Additionally, less fatigue and less trouble sleeping were associated with greater weekly aerobic exercise duration and higher rating of perceived exertion during aerobic exercise. Authors conclude that home-based exercise during RT is safe and effective in reducing CRF and improving HRQoL
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) can lead to cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in breast cancer patients. The purpose of this trial was to examine the feasibility and efficacy of a home-based resistance and aerobic exercise intervention for reducing CRF and improving HRQoL in breast cancer patients during RT. METHODS Women with breast cancer (N = 106) commencing RT were randomized to 12 weeks of home-based resistance and aerobic exercise (EX) or usual care/control (CON). The primary endpoint was CRF, with secondary endpoints of HRQoL, sleep duration and quality, and physical activity. Measurements were undertaken prior to RT, at completion of RT (~ 6 weeks), at completion of the intervention (12 weeks), and 6 and 12 months after RT completion, while CRF was also measured weekly during RT. RESULTS Eighty-nine women completed the study (EX = 43, CON = 46). Over the 12-week intervention, EX completed 1-2 resistance training sessions and accumulated 30-40 min of aerobic exercise weekly. For CRF, EX had a quicker recovery both during and post-RT compared to CON (p < 0.05). Moreover, there was a significant difference in HRQoL between groups at RT completion, with HRQoL unchanged in CON and higher in EX (p < 0.05). There was no change in sleep duration or quality for either group and there were no exercise-related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS Home-based resistance and aerobic exercise during RT is safe, feasible, and effective in accelerating CRF recovery and improving HRQoL. Improvements in CRF and HRQoL for these patients can be achieved with smaller exercise dosages than stated in the generic recommendations for breast cancer.
-
2.
Improving health-related quality of life in women with breast, blood, and gynaecological Cancer with an eHealth-enabled 12-week lifestyle intervention: the women's wellness after Cancer program randomised controlled trial.
Seib, C, Anderson, D, McGuire, A, Porter-Steele, J, McDonald, N, Balaam, S, Sapkota, D, McCarthy, AL
BMC cancer. 2022;22(1):747
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Aging populations and the increased prevalence of other cancer risk factors have led to an increased incidence of cancer in women globally. Cancer treatments often leave women with a range of residual physical and psychological side effects. Comprehensive cancer rehabilitation can reduce symptom burden and health service utilisation, whilst generally improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The primary aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a multimodal, digitised lifestyle intervention on HRQOL of women treated for cancer. This study is a multi-centre, single-blinded, randomised controlled 12-week trial. Fifty-one women previously treated for breast, blood or gynaecological cancer were randomly assigned to either an intervention or usual care arm. Results indicate improvements in many HRQoL domains and in component summary scores. Particularly notable were the improvements in general health and bodily pain, vitality, mental health, and global physical and mental health summary scores among women in the intervention group. Authors conclude that the complex and synergistic effects of many modifiable health behaviours emphasise the need for bundled health behaviour interventions to optimise women’s health and wellbeing after completion of active cancer treatment.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The residual effects of cancer and its treatment can profoundly affect women's quality of life. This paper presents results from a multisite randomized controlled trial that evaluated the clinical benefits of an e-health enabled health promotion intervention (the Women's Wellness after Cancer Program or WWACP) on the health-related quality of life of women recovering from cancer treatment. METHODS Overall, 351 women previously treated for breast, blood or gynaecological cancers were randomly allocated to the intervention (WWACP) or usual care arms. The WWACP comprised a structured 12-week program that included online coaching and an interactive iBook that targeted physical activity, healthy diet, stress and menopause management, sexual wellbeing, smoking cessation, alcohol intake and sleep hygiene. Data were collected via a self-completed electronic survey at baseline (t0), 12 weeks (post-intervention, t1) and 24 weeks (to assess sustained behaviour change, t2). The primary outcome, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), was measured using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS Following the 12-week lifestyle program, intervention group participants reported statistically significant improvements in general health, bodily pain, vitality, and global physical and mental health scores. Improvements were also noted in the control group across several HRQoL domains, though the magnitude of change was less. CONCLUSIONS The WWACP was associated with improved HRQoL in women previously treated for blood, breast, and gynaecological cancers. Given how the synergy of different lifestyle factors influence health behaviour, interventions accounting for the reciprocity of multiple health behaviours like the WWACP, have real potential for immediate and sustainable change. TRIAL REGISTRATION The protocol for this randomised controlled trial was submitted to the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 15/07/2014 and approved on 28/07/2014 ( ACTRN12614000800628 ).
-
3.
Attitudes and adherence to changes in nutrition and physical activity following surgery for prostate cancer: a qualitative study.
Robles, LA, Shingler, E, McGeagh, L, Rowe, E, Koupparis, A, Bahl, A, Shiridzinomwa, C, Persad, R, Martin, RM, Lane, JA
BMJ open. 2022;12(6):e055566
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Prostate cancer is a leading cancer in men from the United Kingdom. Diet and exercise are recommended for men with prostate cancer however, few achieve the recommendations. Psychological and behavioural factors are often responsible for the lack of change and this qualitative study aimed to determine the most common, with a view to helping individuals to affect change. The results showed that several men believed that diet and physical activity had no association with cancer and those who did, maintained a healthy diet and took regular exercise. Most men thought they had a good diet before diagnosis, however evidence for this was mixed. Barriers to change were plentiful and included physical inability, taste of food, and side effects of supplements. It was concluded that behaviour change models could help with adherence to a better diet and exercise regime. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that it may not be enough to simply recommend diet and exercise to men with prostate cancer. Support and guidance may also be needed.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Interventions designed to improve men's diet and physical activity (PA) have been recommended as methods of cancer prevention. However, little is known about specific factors that support men's adherence to these health behaviour changes, which could inform theory-led diet and PA interventions. We aimed to explore these factors in men following prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS A qualitative study using semistructured interviews with men, who made changes to their diet and/or PA as part of a factorial randomised controlled trial conducted at a single hospital in South West England. Participants were 17 men aged 66 years, diagnosed with localised PCa and underwent prostatectomy. Interview transcripts underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS Men were ambivalent about the relationship of nutrition and PA with PCa risk. They believed their diet and level of PA were reasonable before being randomised to their interventions. Men identified several barriers and facilitators to performing these new behaviours. Barriers included tolerance to dietary changes, PA limitations and external obstacles. Facilitators included partner involvement in diet, habit formation and brisk walking as an individual activity. Men discussed positive effects associated with brisk walking, such as feeling healthier, but not with nutrition interventions. CONCLUSIONS The facilitators to behaviour change suggest that adherence to trial interventions can be supported using well-established behaviour change models. Future studies may benefit from theory-based interventions to support adherence to diet and PA behaviour changes in men diagnosed with PCa.
-
4.
Effects of a multicomponent resistance-based exercise program with protein, vitamin D and calcium supplementation on cognition in men with prostate cancer treated with ADT: secondary analysis of a 12-month randomised controlled trial.
Mundell, NL, Owen, PJ, Dalla Via, J, Macpherson, H, Daly, RM, Livingston, PM, Rantalainen, T, Foulkes, S, Millar, J, Murphy, DG, et al
BMJ open. 2022;12(6):e060189
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for local and advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is effective at reducing androgens, and thus inhibiting tumour progression. However, testosterone reduces the production of a highly neurotoxic protein (amyloid beta peptide 40), which is linked with the development of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a multi-component resistance-based exercise programme with daily protein, vitamin D and calcium supplementation on cognitive function compared with usual care in PCa survivors treated with ADT. This study is a secondary analysis of a 12-month single-blinded, two-arm randomised controlled trial. Participants (n = 70) were randomised (1:1 ratio) to either: (a) multi-component exercise intervention including progressive resistance training, body-weight impact and balance exercises, as well as a daily nutritional supplement containing whey protein, calcium and vitamin D, or (b) usual care control receiving 1000 IU vitamin D only. Results show that a multicomponent exercise training and nutritional supplementation intervention did not improve cognitive function in men treated with ADT for PCa compared with usual care. Authors conclude that cognitive decline associated with ADT may mechanistically differ to that of general age-related cognitive declines, thus it is important that future studies also examine other intervention modalities.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this preplanned secondary analysis of a 12-month randomised controlled trial was to investigate the effects of a multicomponent exercise programme combined with daily whey protein, calcium and vitamin D supplementation on cognition in men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). DESIGN 12-month, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. SETTING University clinical exercise centre. PARTICIPANTS 70 ADT-treated men were randomised to exercise-training plus supplementation (Ex+ Suppl, n=34) or usual care (control, n=36). INTERVENTION Men allocated to Ex + Suppl undertook thrice weekly resistance training with weight-bearing exercise training plus daily whey protein (25 g), calcium (1200 mg) and vitamin D (2000 IU) supplementation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Cognition was assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months via a computerised battery (CogState), Trail-making test, Rey auditory-verbal learning test and Digit span. Data were analysed with linear mixed models and an intention-to-treat and prespecified per-protocol approach (exercise-training: ≥66%, nutritional supplement: ≥80%). RESULTS Sixty (86%) men completed the trial (Ex + Suppl, n=31; control, n=29). Five (7.1%) men were classified as having mild cognitive impairment at baseline. Median (IQR) adherence to the exercise and supplement was 56% (37%-82%) and 91% (66%-97%), respectively. Ex + Suppl had no effect on cognition at any time. CONCLUSIONS A 12-month multicomponent exercise training and supplementation intervention had no significant effect on cognition in men treated with ADT for prostate cancer compared with usual care. Exercise training adherence below recommended guidelines does not support cognitive health in men treated with ADT for prostate cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12614000317695, registered 25/03/2014) and acknowledged under the Therapeutic Goods Administration Clinical Trial Notification Scheme (CT-2015-CTN-03372-1 v1).
-
5.
Multivitamins in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease: the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial.
Sesso, HD, Rist, PM, Aragaki, AK, Rautiainen, S, Johnson, LG, Friedenberg, G, Copeland, T, Clar, A, Mora, S, Moorthy, MV, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2022;115(6):1501-1510
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Multivitamin-multimineral (MVM) formulations are the most common dietary supplement. Numerous adults continue to take MVMs for general health and well-being or to reduce the risk of chronic diseases despite inconsistency among observational studies examining long-term MVM use and risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to test the effects of a common MVM in the prevention of cancer and CVD among women and men. This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial testing a cocoa extract supplement and a multivitamin supplement. A total of 21,442 participants underwent randomisation to one of the four groups. Results show that a daily MVM did not reduce the primary outcome of total invasive cancer. Furthermore, MVM supplementation did not have a significant effect on the secondary outcomes of total cardiovascular events, CVD death, or all-cause mortality. Authors conclude that their findings do not support the regular use of MVMs for cancer or CVD prevention among generally healthy older men and women. Future studies are needed to clarify the role of long-term MVM use on nutritional status and the balance of risks and benefits on cancer, CVD, and other aging-related outcomes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although older adults commonly take multivitamin-multimineral (MVM) supplements to promote health, evidence on the use of daily MVMs on invasive cancer is limited. OBJECTIVES The study objective was to determine if a daily MVM decreases total invasive cancer among older adults. METHODS We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-by-2 factorial trial of a daily MVM and cocoa extract for prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) among 21,442 US adults (12,666 women aged ≥65 y and 8776 men aged ≥60 y) free of major CVD and recently diagnosed cancer. The intervention phase was from June 2015 through December 2020. This article reports on the MVM intervention. Participants were randomly assigned to daily MVM or placebo. The primary outcome was total invasive cancer, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer. Secondary outcomes included major site-specific cancers, total CVD, all-cause mortality, and total cancer risk among those with a baseline history of cancer. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 3.6 y, invasive cancer occurred in 518 participants in the MVM group and 535 participants in the placebo group (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.09; P = 0.57). We observed no significant effect of a daily MVM on breast cancer (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.42) or colorectal cancer (HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.80, 2.12). We observed a protective effect of a daily MVM on lung cancer (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.92). The composite CVD outcome occurred in 429 participants in the MVM group and 437 participants in the placebo group (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.12). MVM use did not significantly affect all-cause mortality (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.81, 1.08). There were no safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS A daily MVM supplement, compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the incidence of total cancer among older men and women. Future studies are needed to determine the effects of MVMs on other aging-related outcomes among older adults. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02422745.
-
6.
Change in physical activity and quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors receiving a physical activity intervention.
Robertson, MC, Lyons, EJ, Song, J, Cox-Martin, M, Li, Y, Green, CE, Pinto, BM, Carmack, CL, Harrison, C, Baum, G, et al
Health and quality of life outcomes. 2019;17(1):91
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Endometrial cancer survivors suffer from high rates of obesity and physical activity-related co-morbidities that are related to cancer-specific and overall mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate how change in physical activity over time related to change in multiple, specific measures of quality of life for endometrial cancer survivors receiving a physical activity intervention. This study was a one-group, pre-post design which recruited 100 women diagnosed with stage I, II, or IIIa endometrial cancer. Each participant received a customized exercise prescription that was based on the results of baseline fitness tests. Results indicate change in physical activity was positively associated with change in SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey) subscale scores for role limitations due to physical health and general health. Furthermore, change in physical activity was negatively associated with change in pain and somatic distress. Authors conclude that increasing physical activity was positively associated with improvements in role limitation due to physical health, general health, pain, and somatic distress.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial cancer survivors are at an increased risk of poor quality of life outcomes. Physical activity is positively associated with general quality of life in this population, however, little is known about how changes in physical activity may be associated with changes in specific aspects of quality of life. The aim of this secondary data analysis was to explore the relationships between change in physical activity and change in physical, mental, social, and other aspects of quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors receiving a physical activity intervention. METHODS Endometrial cancer survivors (N = 100) participated in a telephone-based physical activity intervention for six months. At baseline and post-intervention we measured physical activity via accelerometry and ecological momentary assessment, and quality of life via the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Quality of Life of Adult Cancer Survivors instrument, the Brief Symptom Inventory, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Perceived Stress Scale. We conducted structural equation modeling path analyses to investigate how physical activity post-intervention was associated with the quality of life measures' subscales post-intervention, adjusting for baseline levels and potentially confounding covariates. RESULTS Increasing physical activity was positively associated with improvements in general health (p = .044), role limitation due to physical health (p = .005), pain (p = .041), and somatic distress (p = .023). There was no evidence to indicate that change in physical activity was associated with change in other aspects of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Endometrial cancer survivors are at higher risk for suffering from challenges to physical quality of life, and findings from this study suggest that increasing physical activity may alleviate some of these problems. Further research is needed to determine whether other aspects of quality of life are linked to change in physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration number: NCT00501761 Name of registry: clinicaltrials.gov Date of registration: July 16, 2007. Date of enrollment: June 16, 2005.
-
7.
A phase II randomized controlled trial of three exercise delivery methods in men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy.
Alibhai, SMH, Santa Mina, D, Ritvo, P, Tomlinson, G, Sabiston, C, Krahn, M, Durbano, S, Matthew, A, Warde, P, O'Neill, M, et al
BMC cancer. 2019;19(1):2
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Most men diagnosed with prostate cancer receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and they commonly experience adverse side effects. Exercise is one of the most effective interventions to counter ADT side effects. The main aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of conducting a large multi-centre non-inferiority RCT of three exercise delivery models in men with prostate cancer on ADT. The study is a randomized phase II non-inferiority trial recruited 59 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer at any stage. The study compared 1:1, site-based personal training with two less-resource-intense approaches: group, site-training and individual home-based training. Results indicate that exercise adherence, as measured through attendance, was high for supervised sessions but under 50% by self-report and accelerometery. There was no difference between the three groups in terms of satisfaction. Authors conclude that both group, site-training and individual home-based training interventions in men with prostate cancer on ADT appeared to be similar to 1:1, site-based personal training for multiple efficacy outcomes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing evidence demonstrates that 1:1 personal training (PT) improves many adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Whether less resource-intensive exercise delivery models are as effective remains to be established. We determined the feasibility of conducting a multi-center non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing PT with supervised group (GROUP) and home-based (HOME) exercise programs, and obtained preliminary efficacy estimates for GROUP and HOME compared to PT on quality of life (QOL) and physical fitness. METHODS Men with prostate cancer on ADT were recruited from one of two experienced Canadian centres and randomized 1:1:1 to PT, GROUP, or HOME. Randomization was stratified by length of ADT use and site. Participants completed moderate intensity aerobic and resistance exercises 4-5 days per week for 6 months with a target 150 min per week of exercise. Exercise prescriptions were individualized and progressed throughout the trial. Feasibility endpoints included recruitment, retention, adherence, and participant satisfaction. The efficacy endpoints QOL, fatigue, and fitness (VO2 peak, grip strength, and timed chair stands) in GROUP and HOME were compared for non-inferiority to PT. Descriptive analyses were used for feasibility endpoints. Between-group differences for efficacy endpoints were examined using Bayesian linear mixed effects models. RESULTS Fifty-nine participants (mean age 69.9 years) were enrolled. The recruitment rate was 25.4% and recruitment was slower than projected. Retention was 71.2%. Exercise adherence as measured through attendance was high for supervised sessions but under 50% by self-report and accelerometry. Satisfaction was high and there was no difference in this measure between all three groups. Between-group differences (comparing both GROUP and HOME to PT) were smaller than the minimum clinically important difference on most measures of QOL, fatigue, and fitness. However, two of six outcomes for GROUP and four of six outcomes for HOME had a > 20% probability of being inferior for GROUP. CONCLUSIONS Feasibility endpoints were generally met. Both GROUP and HOME interventions in men with PC on ADT appeared to be similar to PT for multiple efficacy outcomes, although conclusions are limited by a small sample size and cost considerations have not been incorporated. Efforts need to be targeted to improving recruitment and adherence. A larger trial is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02046837 . Date of registration: January 20, 2014.
-
8.
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and cancer risk: results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort.
Fiolet, T, Srour, B, Sellem, L, Kesse-Guyot, E, Allès, B, Méjean, C, Deschasaux, M, Fassier, P, Latino-Martel, P, Beslay, M, et al
BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2018;360:k322
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Foods that are heavily processed tend to have high levels of total fat, sugar and salt and low levels of fibre and vitamins. They also tend to have high levels of contaminants (caused for example by high heat treatment), food additives and plastic packaging exposure. This large prospective population-based cohort study assessed the association between ultra-processed food consumption and the incidence of cancer. The study found that ultra-processed food intake was associated with a higher overall cancer risk and a higher breast cancer risk. A 10% increase in the consumption of ultra-processed foods was associated with an increase of more than 10% greater risk of overall and breast cancer risk. The authors call for further studies to better understand the different elements of food processing and their association to cancer risk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the prospective associations between consumption of ultra-processed food and risk of cancer. DESIGN Population based cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS 104 980 participants aged at least 18 years (median age 42.8 years) from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort (2009-17). Dietary intakes were collected using repeated 24 hour dietary records, designed to register participants' usual consumption for 3300 different food items. These were categorised according to their degree of processing by the NOVA classification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Associations between ultra-processed food intake and risk of overall, breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for known risk factors. RESULTS Ultra-processed food intake was associated with higher overall cancer risk (n=2228 cases; hazard ratio for a 10% increment in the proportion of ultra-processed food in the diet 1.12 (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.18); P for trend<0.001) and breast cancer risk (n=739 cases; hazard ratio 1.11 (1.02 to 1.22); P for trend=0.02). These results remained statistically significant after adjustment for several markers of the nutritional quality of the diet (lipid, sodium, and carbohydrate intakes and/or a Western pattern derived by principal component analysis). CONCLUSIONS In this large prospective study, a 10% increase in the proportion of ultra-processed foods in the diet was associated with a significant increase of greater than 10% in risks of overall and breast cancer. Further studies are needed to better understand the relative effect of the various dimensions of processing (nutritional composition, food additives, contact materials, and neoformed contaminants) in these associations. STUDY REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03335644.