-
1.
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Jamshidi, P, Farsi, Y, Nariman, Z, Hatamnejad, MR, Mohammadzadeh, B, Akbarialiabad, H, Nasiri, MJ, Sechi, LA
International journal of molecular sciences. 2023;24(19)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder the cause of which is not yet fully elucidated. Probiotics, prebiotics and dietary changes have been shown to mitigate IBS symptoms whilst the results from studies of faecal microbiota transplants (FMT) have been inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomised controlled trials (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT in IBS. 7 RCTs with a low risk of bias and no publication bias were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, no statistically significant effect was observed. A subgroup analysis by treatment modality showed that benefits were seen with lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple-donor FMT. Abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhoea and bloating were the most common adverse events, with no severe or critical adverse events reported. The authors call for larger and longer clinical trials to fill existing knowledge gaps.
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) poses a significant challenge due to its poorly understood pathogenesis, substantial morbidity, and often inadequate treatment outcomes. The role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in managing IBS symptoms remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of FMT in relieving symptoms in IBS patients. A thorough search was executed on PubMed/Medline and Embase databases until 14 June 2023, including all studies on FMT use in IBS patients. We examined the efficiency of FMT in reducing patients' symptoms overall and in particular subgroups, classified by placebo preparation, FMT preparation, frequency, and route of administration. Among 1015 identified studies, seven met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The overall symptomatology of FMT-treated IBS patients did not significantly differ from the control group (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.99, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.39-2.5). Multiple doses of FMT compared with non-FMT placebo, or single-donor FMT therapy compared with autologous FMT placebo also showed no significant benefit (OR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.07-1.32), p = 0.11, and OR = 1.67, 95%CI (0.59-4.67), p = 0.32, respectively). However, a single dose of multiple-donor FMT administered via colonoscopy (lower gastrointestinal (GI) administration) significantly improved patient symptoms compared with autologous FMT placebo (OR = 2.54, 95%CI (1.20-5.37), p = 0.01, and OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.20-4.03), p = 0.01, respectively). The studies included in the analysis showed a low risk of bias and no publication bias. In conclusion, lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple-donor FMT significantly alleviates patient complaints compared with the autologous FMT used as a placebo. The underlying mechanisms need to be better understood, and further experimental studies are desired to fill the current gaps.
-
2.
Effects of Probiotics in Adults with Gastroenteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Mitra, AK, Asala, AF, Malone, S, Mridha, MK
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;11(4)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally and symptoms can range from mild to life-threatening. Some studies have suggested benefits of probiotics in the treatment of gastroenteritis in children whilst in adults, results are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics on acute and chronic gastroenteritis in adults. 35 clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. Of these, 23 dealt with inflammatory bowel disease, 5 with pouchitis, 3 with antibiotic-induced diarrhoea, 2 with Helicobacter pylori infection and one each with diverticulitis and acute watery diarrhoea. 27 (77%) of studies showed some benefits of probiotic administration. The meta-analysis of 22 studies did not show a statistically significant benefit of probiotics. Although statistical analysis showed the studies to be homogenous, the authors point out that studies differed widely in aetiologies and probiotics used. A subgroup analysis of 8 studies in patients with ulcerative colitis also showed no benefit. In all studies, probiotics were well tolerated and no adverse side effects were reported. The authors concluded that further research is needed to help identify the most appropriate use of probiotics for the different types of gastroenteritis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- For chronic inflammatory gastroenteritis conditions in adults, probiotics were effective in treating and preventing relapse
- In ulcerative colitis, probiotics were not effective and adverse events outweighed the benefits
- No safety concerns were found for probiotic use in any studies
- Aetiologies, disease severity and duration as well as the type of probiotics used were widely diverse.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
To date, evidence has been mixed for probiotic effectiveness in gastrointestinal syndromes associated with gastroenteritis. The aim of this study was to review current evidence on the effect of probiotics on gastroenteritis in adults.
Methods
This was a systematic review (n=35; total sample size 4577, median 44) and meta-analysis (n=22) of randomised controlled trials. Quality was assessed using CADIMA as per a rating scale (0 to 4) and standards of critical appraisal.
Results
All 35 studies on gastroenteritis included participants with chronic diarrhoea of diverse aetiologies such as IBD, antibiotic-associated, except one which had acute watery diarrhoea.
51% (n=18) of studies assessed the effects of probiotics in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). 60% (n=21) used multiple strains of probiotics while the rest used single strains. Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, Escherichia and Streptococcus were the most common and only a few studies administered probiotics with another conventional treatment.
19 studies (55%) rated highly in terms of quality while 15 (43%) scored moderately. The majority (63%) of the 27 studies where probiotics were shown to be effective were of high quality.
Systematic review results:
- 27/53 studies (77%) showed a favourable response after using probiotics (resolution, improvement, remission or no relapse), mostly in patients with IBDs
- 7 studies (20%) found probiotics to be ineffective
- 1 study was inconclusive
- Multiple strain probiotics (VSL #3) was found to be most effective in IBD
- All administered probiotics were well tolerated with no adverse side effects although caution in immunocompromised patients was mentioned in several studies.
The meta-analysis results:
- Overall effectiveness for 22 studies (p=0.37) highlighted there was not enough evidence that the intervention was more protective than controls.
- Probiotics were not effective in UC (p = 0.28), and adverse events caused by probiotics may outweigh the benefits in studies with UC patients.
Conclusion
While benefits of effectiveness were found for probiotic use in gastroenteritis in adults, results from the systematic review and meta-analysis showed a mixed effect.
Clinical practice applications:
- Based on the systematic review, probiotics may be an effective treatment or adjuvant treatment for gastroenteritis but ineffective for around 20% of patients
- It is worth noting that combined therapy with standard treatment showed effective results
- Beneficial effects of probiotics in other key clinical outcomes including disease prevention, relapse, quality of life, morbidity were found
- While the results are interesting it is difficult to apply them in practice as the type of probiotics used were widely different as were the causes, severity and duration of gastroenteritis.
Considerations for future research:
- Further and larger studies would be beneficial to understand the benefits of probiotics in terms of single therapy or in combination with standard treatment particularly for UC, CDs, gastroenteritis not due to viral infection
- Individual-level data instead of aggregated data could give a better idea of effectiveness of probiotics in the future
- In this study aetiologies and the type, dosage, duration of probiotics used were widely diverse therefore systematic reviews and meta-analysis on specific conditions, specific probiotic strains and combinations would be beneficial.
Abstract
Probiotics have been widely used in gastroenteritis due to acute and chronic illnesses. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of probiotics in different health conditions is inconclusive and conflicting. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the effects of probiotics on gastroenteritis among adults. Only original articles on clinical trials that demonstrated the effects of probiotics in adults with gastroenteritis were used for this analysis. Multiple databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Scopus databases, were searched for the data. The study followed standard procedures for data extraction using a PRISMA flow chart. A quality appraisal of the selected studies was conducted using CADIMA. Finally, a meta-analysis was performed. Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria; of them, probiotics were found effective in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in 17 (49%), and the treatment of pouchitis in 4 (11.4%), antibiotic-induced diarrhea in 3 (8.6%), Helicobacter pylori infection in 2 (5.7%) and diverticulitis in 1 (2.9%), while the remaining 7 (20%) were ineffective, and 1 study's results were inconclusive. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant protective effects of probiotics. Having a τ2 value of zero and I2 of 6%, the studies were homogeneous and had minimum variances. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBDs and other chronic bowel diseases.
-
3.
A randomized controlled trial of an oral probiotic to reduce antepartum group B Streptococcus colonization and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Hanson, L, VandeVusse, L, Forgie, M, Malloy, E, Singh, M, Scherer, M, Kleber, D, Dixon, J, Hryckowian, AJ, Safdar, N
American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2023;5(1):100748
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Streptococcus agalactiae (or group B Streptococcus [GBS]) is an encapsulated, gram-positive, beta-haemolytic anaerobe that asymptomatically colonizes the genitourinary tract. Vertical transmission of GBS during normal vaginal birth can lead to neonatal colonization and risk for early-onset GBS disease. The aim of this study was to present the findings of a phase II, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of an antenatal probiotic intervention to reduce GBS colonization. A secondary aim was to determine if the probiotic intervention reduces gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of pregnancy. Participants (n=107) were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: probiotic intervention (n=55) or placebo group (n=54). Results show that: - there weren’t any significant differences between the groups in demographic characteristics, perinatal or neonatal outcomes, or intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis doses. - there wasn’t any significant difference between groups in the presence of the probiotic bacteria on the rectal swabs, whereas the vaginal swabs showed a trend toward greater presence in probiotic group participants. - more probiotic participants took antenatal antibiotics (5/39) compared with controls (1/44). Authors conclude that probiotic bacteria colonisation of the genitourinary tract occurred more in the intervention group than in the control group and significantly reduced GI symptoms of pregnancy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics have been suggested as a strategy to reduce antenatal group B Streptococcus colonization. Although probiotics are known to improve gastrointestinal symptoms, this has not been studied during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a probiotic to reduce: (1) standard-of-care antenatal group B Streptococcus colonization and colony counts and (2) gastrointestinal symptoms of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN In a double-blind fashion, 109 healthy adult pregnant people were randomized to Florajen3 probiotic or placebo capsules once daily from 28 weeks' gestation until labor onset. Baseline vaginal and rectal study swabs for group B Streptococcus colony-forming units and microbiome analysis were collected at 28 and 36 weeks' gestation. Standard-of-care vaginal to rectal group B Streptococcus swabs were collected from all participants at 36 weeks' gestation and determined the need for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Data collection included solicitation of adverse events, demographic information, Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment score, yogurt ingestion, sexual activity, and vaginal cleaning practices. RESULTS A total of 83 participants completed the study to 36 weeks' gestation with no adverse events. Standard-of-care group B Streptococcus colonization was 20.4% in the control group and 15.4% in probiotic group participants (-5%; P=.73). The relative risk for positive standard-of-care vaginal-rectal group B Streptococcus colonization was 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-3.40) times higher in the control group than in the probiotic group (P=.55). There were no differences in median vaginal (P=.16) or rectal (P=.20) group B streptococcus colony-forming units at baseline or at 36 weeks (vaginal P>.999; rectal P=.56). Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment scores were similar at baseline (P=.19), but significantly decreased in probiotic group participants at 36 weeks (P=.02). No covariates significantly altered group B Streptococcus colonization. Significantly more Florajen3 bacteria components were recovered from the vaginal-rectal samples of probiotic group participants (32%; P=.04) compared with controls. CONCLUSION The findings of this study provided insufficient evidence for the clinical application of the Florajen3 probiotic intervention to reduce standard-of-care vaginal-rectal group B Streptococcus colonization. The prevalence of group B Streptococcus was lower than expected in the study population, and intervention adherence was poor. Probiotic bacteria colonization of the genitourinary tract occurred more in intervention group participants than in controls and significantly reduced gastrointestinal symptoms of pregnancy.
-
4.
Effect of an Immune-Boosting, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Food Supplement in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study.
Reino-Gelardo, S, Palop-Cervera, M, Aparisi-Valero, N, Espinosa-San Miguel, I, Lozano-Rodríguez, N, Llop-Furquet, G, Sanchis-Artero, L, Cortés-Castell, E, Rizo-Baeza, M, Cortés-Rizo, X
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread worldwide, reaching pandemic proportions. The symptoms caused by COVID-19 disease are nonspecific and may range from asymptomatic to severe pneumonia and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of a food supplement (probiotics, prebiotics, vitamin D, zinc and selenium) in patients admitted with COVID-19. This study was a prospective, randomised, non-blinded clinical trial. A total of 162 patients were enrolled at Sagunto Hospital, 42.0% of whom were women. Participants were assigned to one of the two groups: probiotic or control group. Results showed that higher mortality was found in men, older patients and those with severe radiological involvement. Furthermore, administration of the food supplement product Gasteel Plus®, as an adjuvant to the treatment established in the hospital for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-associated pneumonia, reduced the duration of digestive symptoms and hospital stay in patients with mild–moderate pulmonary involvement. Authors conclude that their findings demonstrate the importance of considering the use of the food supplement under review in the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2, including severe cases, which showed no side effects.
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 disease is a serious global health problem. Few treatments have been shown to reduce mortality and accelerate time to recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of a food supplement (probiotics, prebiotics, vitamin D, zinc and selenium) in patients admitted with COVID-19. METHODS A prospective randomized non-blinded clinical trial was conducted in a sample of 162 hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 recruited over eight months. All patients received standard treatment, but the intervention group (n = 67) was given one food supplement stick daily during their admission. After collecting the study variables, a statistical analysis was performed comparing the intervention and control groups and a multivariate analysis controlling for variables that could act as confounding factors. RESULTS ROC curve analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.840 (p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.741-0.939) of the food supplement administration vs. recovery indicated good predictive ability. Moreover, the intervention group had a shorter duration of digestive symptoms compared with the control group: 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 2.2 days (p = 0.001); patients with non-severe disease on chest X-ray had shorter hospital stays: 8.1 ± 3.9 vs. 11.6 ± 7.4 days (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS In this trial, the administration of a food supplement (Gasteel Plus®) was shown to be a protective factor in the group of patients with severe COVID-19 and allowed early recovery from digestive symptoms and a shorter hospital stay in patients with a normal-mild-moderate chest X-ray at admission (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04666116).
-
5.
The role of gut microbiome in inflammatory skin disorders: A systematic review.
Widhiati, S, Purnomosari, D, Wibawa, T, Soebono, H
Dermatology reports. 2022;14(1):9188
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gut-skin axis refers to the complex cross-talk between gut bacteria and skin. Although the exact mechanism underlying chronic inflammatory skin conditions is unknown, imbalances in the composition of gut microbes are believed to play a role. Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review to assess whether gut microbial imbalance may contribute to inflammatory skin conditions such as Psoriasis, Acne Vulgaris, Atopic Dermatitis, and Urticaria. According to this systematic review, immune stimulation, inflammation, and disruption of bacterial composition are common mechanisms in all these skin disorders. A western diet and environmental exposures are found to be contributing to the disruption of bacteria and the pathology of these skin disorders. It has been observed that friendly gut bacteria such as Bifidobacterium are reduced in people with inflammatory skin conditions, whereas elevated levels of pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli and Proteobacteria are present in the gut of patients with inflammatory skin conditions. The abundance of anti-inflammatory bacteria such as Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Clostridium leptum, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium may protect against inflammatory skin conditions. Further robust studies are required to evaluate the pathogenesis behind inflammatory skin conditions as well as the involvement of gut bacteria in the development and progression of the disease. Healthcare professionals can gain a deeper understanding of gut bacteria that contribute to the pathology of inflammatory diseases as well as how clinically using anti-inflammatory bacterial species may improve the condition of individuals suffering from inflammatory skin conditions.
Abstract
The close relationship between the intestine and the skin has been widely stated, seen from gastrointestinal (GI) disorders often accompanied by skin manifestations. Exactly how the gut microbiome is related to skin inflammation and influences the pathophysiology mechanism of skin disorders are still unclear. Many studies have shown a two-way relationship between gut and skin associated with GI health and skin homeostasis and allostasis. This systematic review aimed to explore the associations between the gut microbiome with inflammatory skin disorders, such as acne, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and urticaria, and to discover the advanced concept of this relationship. The literature search was limited to any articles published up to December 2020 using PubMed and EBSCOHost. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines for conducting a systematic review. Of the 319 articles screened based on title and abstract, 111 articles underwent full-text screening. Of these, 23 articles met our inclusion criteria, comprising 13 atopic dermatitis (AD), three psoriasis, four acne vulgaris, and four chronic urticaria articles. Acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and chronic urticaria are inflammation skin disorders that were studied recently to ascertain the relationship of these disorders with dysbiosis of the GI microbiome. All acne vulgaris, psoriasis, and chronic urticaria studies stated the association of gut microbiome with skin manifestations. However, the results in atopic dermatitis are still conflicting. Most of the articles agree that Bifidobacterium plays an essential role as anti-inflammation bacteria, and Proteobacteria and Enterobacteria impact inflammation in inflammatory skin disorders.
-
6.
Influence of timing of maternal antibiotic administration during caesarean section on infant microbial colonisation: a randomised controlled trial.
Dierikx, T, Berkhout, D, Eck, A, Tims, S, van Limbergen, J, Visser, D, de Boer, M, de Boer, N, Touw, D, Benninga, M, et al
Gut. 2022;71(9):1803-1811
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Early-life microbiome acquisition and development can be compromised by external perturbations such as delivery via caesarean section (CS), formula feeding and antibiotics. Currently, based on revised international guidelines, all infants born by CS are exposed to broad-spectrum antibiotics via the umbilical cord. Even though there was not an increase in the incidence of neonatal sepsis, the effects on the gut microbiota colonisation and long-term health consequences remain largely unknown. The hypothesis for this study was that exposure to antibiotics in children delivered by CS, related to the revised international guidelines, influences the microbial colonisation process and may impact health outcome. This study is a randomised controlled trial on the microbiome and health state of infants up to 3 years of age. The study enrolled women delivering via CS who received antibiotics prior to skin incision (n=20) or after umbilical cord clamping (n=20) and women who had a vaginal delivery (n=23). Results show that CS delivery in general leads to a profound impact on the initial microbial colonisation. Furthermore, maternal antibiotic administration prior to CS does not lead to a ‘second hit’ on the already compromised microbiome in CS born infants. Authors conclude that early-life microbiome development is strongly affected by mode of delivery.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Revised guidelines for caesarean section (CS) advise maternal antibiotic administration prior to skin incision instead of after umbilical cord clamping, unintentionally exposing the infant to antibiotics antenatally. We aimed to investigate if timing of intrapartum antibiotics contributes to the impairment of microbiota colonisation in CS born infants. DESIGN In this randomised controlled trial, women delivering via CS received antibiotics prior to skin incision (n=20) or after umbilical cord clamping (n=20). A third control group of vaginally delivering women (n=23) was included. Faecal microbiota was determined from all infants at 1, 7 and 28 days after birth and at 3 years by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and whole-metagenome shotgun sequencing. RESULTS Compared with vaginally born infants, profound differences were found in microbial diversity and composition in both CS groups in the first month of life. A decreased abundance in species belonging to the genera Bacteroides and Bifidobacterium was found with a concurrent increase in members belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria. These differences could not be observed at 3 years of age. No statistically significant differences were observed in taxonomic and functional composition of the microbiome between both CS groups at any of the time points. CONCLUSION We confirmed that microbiome colonisation is strongly affected by CS delivery. Our findings suggest that maternal antibiotic administration prior to CS does not result in a second hit on the compromised microbiome. Future, larger studies should confirm that antenatal antibiotic exposure in CS born infants does not aggravate colonisation impairment and impact long-term health.
-
7.
Effects of Hemp Sanitary Pads on the Vaginal Microecology.
Sun, Y, Li, C, Yan, Y, Lai, A, Peng, X, Yue, X, Li, Y, Liu, J, Liu, Y
Computational and mathematical methods in medicine. 2022;2022:4435722
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Under ideal situations, women have a variety of microbes that reside in the vagina which form the normal vaginal microbiome. When combined, the vaginal microbial flora, endocrine regulation system, anatomic structure of the vagina, and local endocrine system constitute the vaginal microecosystem, which is in turn part of the entire human microecosystem. In fact, the choice of appropriate sanitary pads is of high importance during the menstrual period. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hemp cotton sanitary pads on the vaginal microecology. The study is a randomised controlled field trial study which recruited women of childbearing age. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (experimental and control groups). The control group was further divided into 2 subgroups. The subjects in the experimental group used hemp sanitary pads. Results show that: - among women with a normal vaginal microecosystem or a vaginal microecologic imbalance at baseline, the vaginal cleanliness grade and overall vaginal microecologic status were better if hemp sanitary pads were used rather than the ordinary cotton sanitary pads. - there was no significant difference in the vaginal pH values between the two groups. - hemp sanitary pads had no therapeutic effect against vaginal infections. Authors conclude that the use of hemp cotton sanitary pads during menstruation, by women without vaginal inflammation, can help maintain balanced vaginal microecology which will help to prevent reproductive tract infections.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of hemp cotton sanitary pads on the vaginal microecology. METHODS A randomized controlled field trial was used to recruit 1002 community-based women of childbearing age. The women were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group used hemp cotton sanitary pads, while the control group used two types of cotton sanitary randomly chosen from the top five sanitary pads in terms of market share in China. The vaginal microecology was compared between the two groups after three months. RESULTS According to the vaginal microecologic examination results at baseline, 1002 women were included in 3 groups: normal vaginal microecologic, vaginal microecological disorders, and suspected vaginal infections. The number of patients in three groups were 39 (3.9%), 652 (65.1%), and 311 (31%), respectively. Three months later, the vaginal microecologic status and vaginal pH value of the suspected vaginal infection group were not significantly different between the experimental group and control group. The experimental group outperformed the control group with respect to vaginal cleanliness and vaginal microecology status in the women without a vaginal infection (normal vaginal microecology or microecological disorders group). The rate of abnormal cleanliness in the experimental group was lower than the control group (31.95% [108/338] vs. 43.62% [154/353]). The incidence of suspected vaginitis in the experimental group was lower than the control group (15.29% [51/338] vs. 23.51% [83/353]). CONCLUSION For women without vaginal inflammation, the use of hemp cotton sanitary pads during menstruation can help maintain the balance of the vaginal microecology to prevent reproductive tract infections.
-
8.
A Deep Look at the Vaginal Environment During Pregnancy and Puerperium.
Severgnini, M, Morselli, S, Camboni, T, Ceccarani, C, Laghi, L, Zagonari, S, Patuelli, G, Pedna, MF, Sambri, V, Foschi, C, et al
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2022;12:838405
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In healthy reproductive-aged women, the vaginal microbiome is generally dominated by members of the Lactobacillus genus. Lactobacilli promote the maintenance of the vaginal health, preventing the colonization and growth of adverse microorganisms through various mechanisms. The composition of the vaginal bacterial communities and related metabolites play a crucial role in maternal-foetal health. The aim of this study was to deepen the characteristics of the vaginal environment in a cohort of Caucasian women with a normal pregnancy throughout their different gestational ages (i.e., first, second, third trimester) and puerperium. This study is a prospective study of sixty-three Caucasian pregnant women. Participants were enrolled and sampled during all gestational ages; for 30 of them, clinical and microbiological data were also available for the puerperium. Additionally, 9 women who had a spontaneous miscarriage at the first trimester of pregnancy (gestational age: 11-13 weeks) during the study were included. Results show that: - irrespective of the period and type of pregnancy, bacterial vaginosis cases were characterised by a dramatic reduction of Lactobacillus and an increase of anaerobic bacteria. - the vaginal microbiome becomes more stable throughout the entire pregnancy, being less diverse and mainly dominated by lactobacilli. - women receiving an intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus were characterized by a vaginal abundance of Prevotella compared to untreated women. - at the puerperium, a significantly lower content of Lactobacillus and higher levels of Gardnerella, Prevotella, Atopobium, and Streptococcus were observed. Authors conclude that their findings may help implement ‘prognostic’ criteria (e.g., evaluation of the risk of spontaneous miscarriage based on the microbiome/metabolome profiles), as well as strategies for the prevention of early pregnancy loss, based on the ‘manipulation’ of the vaginal bacterial inhabitants.
Abstract
A deep comprehension of the vaginal ecosystem may hold promise for unraveling the pathophysiology of pregnancy and may provide novel biomarkers to identify subjects at risk of maternal-fetal complications. In this prospective study, we assessed the characteristics of the vaginal environment in a cohort of pregnant women throughout their different gestational ages and puerperium. Both the vaginal bacterial composition and the vaginal metabolic profiles were analyzed. A total of 63 Caucasian women with a successful pregnancy and 9 subjects who had a first trimester miscarriage were enrolled. For the study, obstetric examinations were scheduled along the three trimester phases (9-13, 20-24, 32-34 gestation weeks) and puerperium (40-55 days after delivery). Two vaginal swabs were collected at each time point, to assess the vaginal microbiome profiling (by Nugent score and 16S rRNA gene sequencing) and the vaginal metabolic composition (1H-NMR spectroscopy). During pregnancy, the vaginal microbiome underwent marked changes, with a significant decrease in overall diversity, and increased stability. Over time, we found a significant increase of Lactobacillus and a decrease of several genera related to bacterial vaginosis (BV), such as Prevotella, Atopobium and Sneathia. It is worth noting that the levels of Bifidobacterium spp. tended to decrease at the end of pregnancy. At the puerperium, a significantly lower content of Lactobacillus and higher levels of Gardnerella, Prevotella, Atopobium, and Streptococcus were observed. Women receiving an intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) were characterized by a vaginal abundance of Prevotella compared to untreated women. Analysis of bacterial relative abundances highlighted an increased abundance of Fusobacterium in women suffering a first trimester abortion, at all taxonomic levels. Lactobacillus abundance was strongly correlated with higher levels of lactate, sarcosine, and many amino acids (i.e., isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, valine, threonine, tryptophan). Conversely, BV-associated genera, such as Gardnerella, Atopobium, and Sneathia, were related to amines (e.g., putrescine, methylamine), formate, acetate, alcohols, and short-chain fatty-acids (i.e., butyrate, propionate).
-
9.
Cigarette Smoke Extract Disturbs Mitochondria-Regulated Airway Epithelial Cell Responses to Pneumococci.
Aghapour, M, Tulen, CBM, Abdi Sarabi, M, Weinert, S, Müsken, M, Relja, B, van Schooten, FJ, Jeron, A, Braun-Dullaeus, R, Remels, AH, et al
Cells. 2022;11(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cigarette smoking can affect airway epithelial cells, causing overproduction of mucus, damage, and inflammation, which may result in the progression of airway diseases. Airway epithelial cells (AEC) rely on mitochondria for energy, and mitochondrial dysfunction may affect innate immunity and the integrity of the airway epithelium. Cigarette smoking is found to accelerate mitochondrial damage within AEC. Maintaining a normal microbial composition within the respiratory tract is essential for maintaining immunity. There is evidence that smoking cigarettes disrupts the microbial composition and increases the spread of pathogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp) which causes inflammation. By exposing 16HBE cells to Sp and cigarette smoke extract (CSE), this study investigated the effect of cigarette smoking on mitochondrial dysfunction in ACE in an in vitro model. Additionally, the study examined the direct and indirect pathways involved in cigarette smoking-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and altered innate immune response to Sp infection. CSE exposure decreases mitochondrial complex protein levels and mitochondrial membrane potential, which affects energy production. It also increases mitochondrial oxidative stress and mitochondrial degradation. All these factors lead to mitochondrial dysfunction in ACE. CSE exposure to ACE was associated with altered gene expression in the tight and adherence junctions that serve as a protective barrier against pathogens and pollutants and reduced type I interferon immune responses to Sp. Using the results of this study, healthcare professionals can gain a better understanding of the impact of cigarette smoking on mitochondrial dysfunction and how it increases susceptibility to Sp-related immune responses. It is necessary to conduct further studies to evaluate the effects of cigarette smoking on mitochondrial dysfunction, microbial composition disruption, and the interaction between AECs and elevated immune responses.
Abstract
Mitochondrial functionality is crucial for the execution of physiologic functions of metabolically active cells in the respiratory tract including airway epithelial cells (AECs). Cigarette smoke is known to impair mitochondrial function in AECs. However, the potential contribution of mitochondrial dysfunction in AECs to airway infection and airway epithelial barrier dysfunction is unknown. In this study, we used an in vitro model based on AECs exposed to cigarette smoke extract (CSE) followed by an infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp). The levels of oxidative stress as an indicator of mitochondrial stress were quantified upon CSE and Sp treatment. In addition, expression of proteins associated with mitophagy, mitochondrial content, and biogenesis as well as mitochondrial fission and fusion was quantified. Transcriptional AEC profiling was performed to identify the potential changes in innate immune pathways and correlate them with indices of mitochondrial function. We observed that CSE exposure substantially altered mitochondrial function in AECs by suppressing mitochondrial complex protein levels, reducing mitochondrial membrane potential and increasing mitochondrial stress and mitophagy. Moreover, CSE-induced mitochondrial dysfunction correlated with reduced enrichment of genes involved in apical junctions and innate immune responses to Sp, particularly type I interferon responses. Together, our results demonstrated that CSE-induced mitochondrial dysfunction may contribute to impaired innate immune responses to Sp.
-
10.
Effects of early-life antibiotics on the developing infant gut microbiome and resistome: a randomized trial.
Reyman, M, van Houten, MA, Watson, RL, Chu, MLJN, Arp, K, de Waal, WJ, Schiering, I, Plötz, FB, Willems, RJL, van Schaik, W, et al
Nature communications. 2022;13(1):893
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Disturbances of the gut microbial community composition after birth are associated with a broad spectrum of health problems in early infancy and later in life. The ecological side effects of antibiotics may be even more pronounced and persistent when administered in the early assembly phase of the neonatal gut microbiome in the first weeks of life. The aim of this study was to identify the antibiotic regimen with the least ecological and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene selection effects. This study was a randomised controlled study in 147 infants who required broad-spectrum antibiotics for treatment of (suspected) early-onset neonatal sepsis (sEONS) in their first week of life. Infants were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to three most commonly prescribed intravenous antibiotic combinations. Results showed that antibiotic-treated infants show temporarily reduced gut microbial diversity, and major and prolonged ecological perturbations, compared with healthy term-born controls. Furthermore, there was also a shift in AMR gene profile. Authors conclude that there are significant long-term effects of broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment. In fact, their findings suggest that more emphasis should be put on reducing the number of neonates that receive broad-spectrum antibiotics for sEONS.
Abstract
Broad-spectrum antibiotics for suspected early-onset neonatal sepsis (sEONS) may have pronounced effects on gut microbiome development and selection of antimicrobial resistance when administered in the first week of life, during the assembly phase of the neonatal microbiome. Here, 147 infants born at ≥36 weeks of gestational age, requiring broad-spectrum antibiotics for treatment of sEONS in their first week of life were randomized 1:1:1 to receive three commonly prescribed intravenous antibiotic combinations, namely penicillin + gentamicin, co-amoxiclav + gentamicin or amoxicillin + cefotaxime (ZEBRA study, Trial Register NL4882). Average antibiotic treatment duration was 48 hours. A subset of 80 non-antibiotic treated infants from a healthy birth cohort served as controls (MUIS study, Trial Register NL3821). Rectal swabs and/or faeces were collected before and immediately after treatment, and at 1, 4 and 12 months of life. Microbiota were characterized by 16S rRNA-based sequencing and a panel of 31 antimicrobial resistance genes was tested using targeted qPCR. Confirmatory shotgun metagenomic sequencing was executed on a subset of samples. The overall gut microbial community composition and antimicrobial resistance gene profile majorly shift directly following treatment (R2 = 9.5%, adjusted p-value = 0.001 and R2 = 7.5%, adjusted p-value = 0.001, respectively) and normalize over 12 months (R2 = 1.1%, adjusted p-value = 0.03 and R2 = 0.6%, adjusted p-value = 0.23, respectively). We find a decreased abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. and increased abundance of Klebsiella and Enterococcus spp. in the antibiotic treated infants compared to controls. Amoxicillin + cefotaxime shows the largest effects on both microbial community composition and antimicrobial resistance gene profile, whereas penicillin + gentamicin exhibits the least effects. These data suggest that the choice of empirical antibiotics is relevant for adverse ecological side-effects.