0
selected
-
1.
Early life gut microbiota profiles linked to synbiotic formula effects: a randomized clinical trial in European infants.
Lagkouvardos, I, Intze, E, Schaubeck, M, Rooney, JP, Hecht, C, Piloquet, H, Clavel, T
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2023;117(2):326-339
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Microbial colonisation of the intestine after birth is a central event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Although improvement of hygienic conditions reduces infant mortality due to infections, environments with low microbial biomass counteract natural colonisation by commensal microbes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) on faecal microbiota. This study was a multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind intervention trial which enrolled 540 infants. Infants whose parents had chosen not to breastfeed or were not able to breastfeed prior to study inclusion were allocated randomly to 1 of 2 formula groups (n = 230 control formula, n = 230 IF). The infants in the breastfed reference group (n = 80) were mainly fed human milk. Results showed that synbiotic intervention influenced the gut microbiota and milieu parameters during early life to resemble some major characteristics found in breastfed infants (higher relative abundances of bifidobacteria, lower richness, lower faecal pH and butyrate concentrations), and effects depended on the ecosystem profile of the infants. Authors conclude that specific randomised, controlled studies that focus on infants born by Caesarean section and how early nutrition can support the beneficial development of their microbiota are needed.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Infant gut colonisation differs in vaginal versus cesarean section deliveries and between breastfed and infant formula practices.
- Both enriched strain-specific probiotic and standard infant formula were shown to have a marked effect on microbiota colonisation in infants at age 4 months.
- By the age of 2 years, however, there is no significant difference between breastfed and formula fed infants.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This randomised controlled intervention study compared gut health parameters with the use of a synbiotic pre- and probiotic strain enriched infant formula with human milk and standard formula at three intervals over a period of 2 years.
Methods
This was a double-blinded controlled study of 540 infants from France and Belgium. Participants were randomly allocated to 2 formula groups (n = 230 Control Formula (CF), n = 230 Intervention Formula (IF)) and the breastfed reference group (n = 80) as well as delivery mode (Cesarean and vaginal delivery). The synbiotic IF was a standard infant formula enriched with prebiotic GOS (0.02 g/g) and the probiotic strain L. fermentum CECT5716 (at least 1.0 × 106 cfu/g).
Stool analysis was conducted at three time intervals, 4, 12, and 24 months (infant age). Biomarkers included short chain fatty acids, pH, secretory IgA, calprotectin, and various bacterial phyla via microbiota analysis.
Results
- At 4 months, the IF group tested higher for Bifidobacterium spp., and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives compared to CF. They also had lower fecal pH and butyrate levels
- Both the formula cohorts had lower SigA and more basic pH values than the human milk cohort, as well as higher prevalence of anaerobes belonging to the bacterial genera Akkermansia, Collinsella, and Faecalibacterium.
- By age 24 months, the IF cohort exhibited increased levels of Akkermansia, Escherichia-Shigella, and R.gnavus. However there were no significant differences between the formula fed and human milk cohort at this time interval.
- The differences observed at 4 months disappeared over time, except for a significantly higher relative abundance of bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium spp. in IF infants at 12 months compared with CF infants.
Conclusion:
Although prominent differences between the cohorts were observed at 4 months, it appears that by the age of 2 years, there is little observable difference. This is most likely due to gut ecosystem maturation. The paper draws attention to the fact that changes to microbiota following treatment were more pronounced in infants who tested lower in occurrences of Bacteroides spp at age 4 months. Of note is the prevalence of cesarean birth deliveries in this cohort thereby indicating potential improved alternative feeding options when breastfeeding is not possible for these infants.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotic L.fermentum and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharide enriched infant formula appears to the improve infant microbiome, when compared to that of breastfed infants.
- The most receptive infants were those born via cesarean section.
Limitations to consider:
- The sample groups were from France and Belgium, with no indication as to culture, socio-economic, or sex distribution.
- The two infant formula groups were n=230 each with only 80 infants in the breastfed reference group.
- There was no indication of maternal diet practices pre-, during, and post- pregnancy.
- Stool samples were not collected from the infants at baseline visit prior to formula intervention.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include more diverse cultural and socio-economic cohorts to ascertain the potential influence of parental diet in baseline infant microbiome.
- It is imperative to establish what role solid food choices, generally introduced at 6 months, might have on gut ecosystem maturation.
- It would be useful to have a larger cesarean section birth cohort to compare to vaginal deliveries for more definitive results.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract after birth is an essential event that influences infant health with life-long consequences. Therefore, it is important to investigate strategies to positively modulate colonization in early life. OBJECTIVES This randomized, controlled intervention study included 540 infants to investigate the effects of a synbiotic intervention formula (IF) containing Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 and galacto-oligosaccharides on the fecal microbiome. METHODS The fecal microbiota from infants was analyzed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing at 4, 12, and 24 months of age. Metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids) and other milieu parameters (e.g., pH, humidity, and IgA) were also measured in stool samples. RESULTS Microbiota profiles changed with age, with major differences in diversity and composition. Significant effects of the synbiotic IF compared with control formula (CF) were visible at month 4, including higher occurrence of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillaceae and lower occurrence of Blautia spp., as well as Ruminoccocus gnavus and relatives. This was accompanied by lower fecal pH and concentrations of butyrate. After de novo clustering at 4 months of age, overall phylogenetic profiles of the infants receiving IF were closer to reference profiles of those fed with human milk than infants fed CF. The changes owing to IF were associated with fecal microbiota states characterized by lower occurrence of Bacteroides compared with higher levels of Firmicutes (valid name Bacillota), Proteobacteria (valid name Pseudomonadota), and Bifidobacterium at 4 months of age. These microbiota states were linked to higher prevalence of infants born by Cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS The synbiotic intervention influenced fecal microbiota and milieu parameters at an early age depending on the overall microbiota profiles of the infants, sharing a few similarities with breastfed infants. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02221687.
-
2.
Efficacy of a Synbiotic Containing Lactobacillus paracasei DKGF1 and Opuntia humifusa in Elderly Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Oh, JH, Jang, YS, Kang, D, Kim, HS, Kim, EJ, Park, SY, Kim, CH, Min, YW, Chang, DK
Gut and liver. 2023;17(1):100-107
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affects 1 in 10 people globally and is a common health problem for the elderly. Recent studies have shown that changes in the gut microbiome may play an important part in IBS and there is evidence that using pre and pro biotics have positive effects on IBS. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to determine the effects of a new synbiotic formulation (L. paracasei DKGF1 and prebiotics extracted from O. humifusa) on GI symptoms in elderly patients with IBS. 67 participants were randomly divided into 2 groups. For 4 weeks one group took the synbiotic and the other group took a placebo. Symptoms were recorded via questionnaires. The consumption of the synbiotic combination was associated with overall relief of IBS symptoms in elderly patients. In particular, abdominal pain and psychological well-being noticeably improved. In conclusion this synbiotic is effective and safe to use in elderly patients with global IBS symptoms.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The management of IBS in elderly people is more complicated than in younger populations.
- Synbiotic formulations containing both probiotics and prebiotics have reported gastrointestinal health benefits.
- This randomized controlled trial indicated that the synbiotic containing L. paracasei DKGF1 and Optuntia humifusa extracts might be effective and safe for treating IBS symptoms in elderly patients.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This study involved a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the impact of a synbiotic combination, comprising of L. paracasei DKGF1 and prebiotics extracted from Optuntia humifusa, on Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) in elderly patients.
Method
Sixty-seven IBS patients (mean age: 64 years) were randomly assigned to either a synbiotic group (n=33) or a placebo group (n=34) for a 4-week intervention. The synbiotic group received a daily sachet containing one billion colony-forming units of L. paracasei DKGF1, 0.2g of O. humifusa extract and 1.59 grams of maltodextrin, while the placebo group received an identical sachet containing only maltodextrin.
During the study period
- Participants recorded the degree of symptom improvement using a Subject Global Assessment (SGA) scale.
- IBS symptoms, abdominal pain, gas, bloating, and psychological well-being were recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
- Stool form and consistency were assessed using a Bristol Stool Chart (BSC).
Results
The primary findings from the study were as follows:
- There was significant improvement in IBS symptoms as measured by the SGA score, in the synbiotic group versus the placebo group (+50.5% vs +23.5%, p=0.017). The synbiotic group consistently demonstrated improved response rates.
The secondary findings were as follows:
- Participants also reported an improvement in psychological well-being in the synbiotic group (from 1.3 to 1.0) compared to the placebo group (from 3.0 to 2.0) (p=0.003).
- Responders reported a significant improvement in stool form and consistency in the synbiotic group (+85.7%) compared to the placebo group (+22.2%) (p=0.04).
- Among the patients with IBS constipation, patients in the synbiotic group reported a positive response compared to the placebo group (0% and +100%, p=0.029).
- . However, there was no significant improvement among the patients with IBS diarrhoea in the synbiotic group compared to the placebo group (+33.3% and +66.6%,, p=0.52).
Conclusion:
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, reported that the synbiotic combination of L. paracasei DKGF1 and Optuntia humifusa, may be associated with the relief of IBS symptoms in elderly patients, particularly in terms of abdominal pain and psychological well-being.
Clinical practice applications:
- The human microbiota undergoes changes in diversity and variation with age, emphasising the importance of understanding age-specific interventions.
- Managing IBS in the elderly is challenging, and synbiotics, containing both probiotics and prebiotics, have reported gastrointestinal health benefits.
- Most clinical trials have excluded elderly patients, and there has been uncertainty about whether synbiotic use is safe for the elderly.
- This study focused exclusively on elderly patients with IBS, indicating the potential safety and effective use of a synbiotic containing L. paracasei DKGF1 and Optuntia humifusa in improving IBS symptoms.
Considerations for future research:
- Only elderly patients were included in this study, therefore further investigation is needed to explore the effects of synbiotics on participants of different age groups.
- Microbial analysis was not done in this study. It would be useful to include this in future research to gain more insight into the microbiome’s diversity in elderly patients with IBS.
- The study did not quantify food intake or variety which might have impacted the results, therefore future research needs to consider the impact diet has on the microbiome and IBS.
- Since patient reports are subjective, future research should consider involving researchers during patient-reported assessments to enhance the accuracy and reliability of the data.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is increasing evidence that supplementation with pre- and probiotics appears to have positive effects on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a new synbiotic formulation on gastrointestinal symptoms in elderly patients with IBS. METHODS Sixty-seven IBS patients aged ≥60 years were randomly assigned to either a placebo group (n=34) or a synbiotic group (n=33). During a 4-week intervention, subjects used a placebo or a synbiotic containing Lactobacillus paracasei DKGF1 and extracts of Opuntia humifusa once a day. Patients were evaluated with the subject global assessment, visual analog scale, and Bristol stool chart. The primary outcome was the overall responder rate and the secondary outcome was the responder rates for abdominal symptom reduction at week 4. RESULTS Overall, responder rates were significantly higher in the synbiotic group (51.5%) than in the placebo group (23.5%) (p=0.017). Abdominal pain (58.8% vs 81.8%) and psychological well-being (26.4% vs 60.6%) were noticeably improved in the synbiotic group (p=0.038 and p=0.004, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in gas and bloating symptoms (p=0.88 and p=0.88, respectively). In patients with constipation-dominant and diarrhea-dominant IBS (n=16), the synbiotic significantly improved abdominal pain and defecation symptoms (responder rates for the placebo vs the synbiotic: 22.2% vs 85.7%, p=0.04). There were no adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that this new synbiotic supplement can potentially relieve abdominal symptoms in elderly IBS patients.
-
3.
Diet as an Optional Treatment in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Jaramillo, AP, Abaza, A, Sid Idris, F, Anis, H, Vahora, I, Moparthi, KP, Al Rushaidi, MT, Muddam, M, Obajeun, OA
Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42057
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are linked with significant morbidity and higher healthcare costs. The current model of CD pathogenesis implies that environmental variables and the gut microbiota interact in those who are genetically predisposed to the condition. The aim of this study was to investigate a treatment based on the diet of IBD patients. This study was a systematic review of nine studies. Results showed that following a diet that reduces inflammation may prevent its recurrence in UC patients in clinical remission. In fact, there were significant systemic changes in the intestinal microbiota of anti-inflammatory diet patients. Authors concluded that a four-week FODMAP diet combined with professional counseling and regular follow-up will be helpful in the therapy of persistent gastrointestinal symptoms in quiescent IBD, although care should be used in the long run.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Whilst concise, this limited review highlights the current lack of evidence supporting stand alone dietary strategies in preventing relapse for IBD patients. At the very least an anti-inflammatory diet should ideally be implemented alongside specific medical care and counselling to minimise risk of disease relapses.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of diet as a preventative therapeutic treatment for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).
Methods
A total of 9 studies (published in the last 5 years) were chosen. The articles included 6 randomised controlled trials (RCT), one systematic literature review (SLR) and two SLR and meta-analysis. The authors used the Assessment Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) approach and an unspecified Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool.
Results
(The following refers to the original RCT articles as the review article data was sparse).
- A 6-month, open-label, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of 53 adult Ulcerative Colitis (UC) patients compared response to an Anti-inflammatory Diet (AID) with Canada’s Food Guide (CFG). The outcome showed that the faecal calprotectin value (<150 µg/g at the endpoint) was significantly higher in the AID group (69.2 vs. 37.0%, p = 0.02) (Keshteli et al., 2022).
- The Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD) was not superior to the Mediterranean Diet (MD) in terms of achieved symptomatic remission at 6 weeks (SCD 46.5%, MD 43.5%; p = .77) (Lewis et al., 2022).
- A single-blind, 4-week trial concluded significant relief from gut symptoms was achieved when comparing a low FODMAP diet (14/27, 52% of positive patient feedback) to a control diet (4/25, 16%, p=.007) (Cox et al., 2020).
- A 7-day trial of 28 volunteers compared individualised food-based diet (CD-TREAT), with similar composition to Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN) and found a change in relative abundance in faecal microbiome genera of 58 (49.3%) and 38 (32.3%) following both feeding practices respectively (Svolos et al., 2019).
- Substantial reduction in red and processed meat was not significant in reducing time to symptomatic relapse in Crohn’s Disease (CD) patients when comparing 115 high red meat consumers with 87 low red meat CD patients (p = 0.61 any relapse and p = 0.50 for moderate to severe relapse) (Aldenberg et al., 2019).
Conclusion
An anti-inflammatory diet may prolong clinical remission for UC patients. CD patients, with mild to severe symptoms, may tolerate both the MD and SCD equally well. The authors advise a low FODMAP diet for a 4-week period combined with professional counselling and regular follow-up sessions to delay flare-up episodes. However the findings were based on a very limited number of scientific material that requires extensive further assessment prior to deriving any firm conclusions.
Clinical practice applications:
- In order to delay relapse in IBD it is imperative that foods that support anti-inflammatory mechanisms are incorporated and maintained
- Whilst limited, the papers reviewed highlight potential for an initial low FODMAP diet followed by a longer term MD or SCD combined with constant monitoring
- From one study, red meat consumption did not appear to exacerbate symptoms.
Considerations for future research:
- Future studies need to include larger cohorts to ascertain the efficacy of dietary interventions as a stand alone treatment option for IBD
- Longer periods of intervention are needed to confirm dietary intervention efficacy and safety in this population.
Abstract
While the exact cause of IBD is unknown, there are a number of factors that are thought to contribute to its development, including environmental and genetic factors. While exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is a promising therapy for Crohn's disease (CD), it is not yet considered a first-line treatment. Additionally, the efficacy of EEN compared to corticosteroid treatment is still being investigated. EEN is suggested as a first-line therapy by which guidelines and in which age groups, as it may differ in pediatric and adult recommendations. Another finding was that dietary changes involving an increase in anti-inflammatory foods and decreased intake of foods high in inflammatory compounds are linked to a beneficial outcome both metabolically and microbiologically in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in remission. For relevant medical literature, we examined PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar as examples of medical databases. The articles were identified, evaluated, and eligibility applied, and nine publications were found. The finished articles investigated the role of several diet alternatives for patients with IBD. Some others have shown that following a normal low-fat diet may be effective in reducing the occurrence of subclinical colitis. The EEN and partial enteral nutrition (PEN) indicated no significant differences between both regimens, but both had good outcomes during active IBD. Other strict diets, such as the specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) versus the Mediterranean diet (MD), demonstrate excellent outcomes in patients with IBD. Fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) dietary counseling improves gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in IBD patients. Based on the above, we concluded that more studies determining which component of the diet is not clear (proteins, carbs balanced) or diet types are required to establish a particular diet employed as a treatment intervention in these individuals.
-
4.
The Role of Genetically Engineered Probiotics for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.
Zhang, T, Zhang, J, Duan, L
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), largely classified as Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic intestinal inflammatory disorder mediated by genetic, immune, microbial, and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to summarise the efficacy of different genetically modified probiotics compared to wild-type probiotics in the treatment of IBD in animal models and patients and to investigate the specific effects and main mechanisms involved. This study was a systematic review of forty-five preclinical studies and one clinical study. Results showed a protective effect of genetically modified organisms (gm) probiotics in colitis. Several protective mechanisms have been identified: reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of the activity of oxidative stress in the colon, improvement of intestinal barrier integrity, modulation of the diversity and composition of gut microbiota, and production of favourable metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids, by beneficial bacteria. Authors concluded that gm probiotics are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics, to facilitate clinical translation.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Conclusions of this review were largely based on mouse models and although treatment using probiotics is generally considered safe in humans, with only minor side-effects (flatulence), practitioners need to be aware that in an IBD population the use of GM formulations might not be completely without risk.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This paper summarises the efficacy of specific genetically modified (GM) probiotic formulations for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) when compared to wild type probiotics. The aim was to ascertain what specific effects and mechanisms such probiotics have on IBD symptomatology.
Methods
- A total of 46 published articles were included; 45 mouse experimental models (induced acute or chronic colitis) (n=15-130) and 1 human IBD population clinical trial (n=10)
- The effect of GM probiotics were compared to placebo and wild-type probiotics in trials including preclinical studies, randomised controlled trials and cohort studies
- Animals received probiotics via gastric gavage (105 - 4 x 1012 CFU) for 3-6 weeks
- The human placebo-uncontrolled trial lasted 7 days and patients received 10 GM capsules of L.lactis (1 x 1010 CFU) twice daily.
Results
- GM probiotics that secrete immunoregulatory cytokines such as IL-10 appear to reduce intestinal damage
- The human trial using GM L.lactis resulted in 5 patients who went into complete clinical remission (CDAI, <150) with 3 patients exhibiting a clinical response (decrease in CDAI, >70). with only minor adverse events (flatulence)
- However, human cytokines that promote intestinal barrier function and epithelial restitution were not enhanced with oral administration of probiotics
- Two studies concluded that GM L.lactis and S.boulardii, that secrete atrial natriuretic peptide, might be the most effective options in supporting colitis
- GM L.casei resulted in faster recovery from weight loss in acute colitis models
- Superoxide dismutase (SOD) producing GM L.fermentum increased SOD activity by almost eightfold compared to the wild type
- GM Lact. fermentum furthermore showed a higher survival rate and lower disease activity index (P <0·05) in colitis models
- GM L.lactis improved gut microbial composition and GM S.cerevisiae improved microbial diversity whilst reducing the Firmicutes to Bacteroides ratio
- GM E.coli significantly reduced weight loss, colon shortening plus lower disease activity and histological changes (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Despite the heterogeneity of the trials, GM probiotics appear to play a notable part in ameliorating IBD symptomatology and disease severity when compared to wild-type probiotics. Human efficacy and potential adverse effects require more in-depth trials to ascertain safety and optimal dosages.
Clinical practice applications:
- Probiotics species used in the trials included S.thermophilus, E.coli, L.lactis, B.ovatus, S.boulardii, L.fermentum, B.longhum, L.casei, L.plantarum, and S.cerevisiae. Wild-types of some of these are already available to use in clinical practice
- Note that oral administration in the human trial showed no significant health outcome, therefore efficacy and safety need to be ascertained on an individual patient level
- Colonisation of beneficial bacteria in the gut of IBD patients might be difficult and any form of supplementation therefore needs to be closely monitored.
Considerations for future research:
- More evidence is needed to demonstrate that GM probiotic formulations result in significantly improved outcomes when compared to wild-types
- Future randomised placebo-controlled trials need to include larger cohorts to determine supplement efficacy
- Longer periods of intervention are needed to confirm efficacy, safety, and tolerance for both Crohn’s Disease and Colitis
- Optimal GM probiotic formulation, doses, and means of application need to be identified.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many preclinical studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of genetically modified probiotics (gm probiotics) in animal models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). OBJECTIVE This systematic review was performed to investigate the role of gm probiotics in treating IBD and to clarify the involved mechanisms. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Medline were searched from their inception to 18 September 2022 to identify preclinical and clinical studies exploring the efficacy of gm probiotics in IBD animal models or IBD patients. Two independent researchers extracted data from the included studies, and the data were pooled by the type of study; that is, preclinical or clinical. RESULTS Forty-five preclinical studies were included. In these studies, sodium dextran sulfate and trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid were used to induce colitis. Eleven probiotic species have been genetically modified to produce therapeutic substances, including IL-10, antimicrobial peptides, antioxidant enzymes, and short-chain fatty acids, with potential therapeutic properties against colitis. The results showed generally positive effects of gm probiotics in reducing disease activity and ameliorating intestinal damage in IBD models; however, the efficacy of gm probiotics compared to that of wild-type probiotics in many studies was unclear. The main mechanisms identified include modulation of the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota, production of regulatory metabolites by beneficial bacteria, reduction of the pro- to anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in colonic tissue and plasma, modulation of oxidative stress activity in the colon, and improvement of intestinal barrier integrity. Moreover, only one clinical trial with 10 patients with Crohn's disease was included, which showed that L. lactis producing IL-10 was safe, and a decrease in disease activity was observed in these patients. CONCLUSIONS Gm probiotics have a certain efficacy in colitis models through several mechanisms. However, given the scarcity of clinical trials, it is important for researchers to pay more attention to gm probiotics that are more effective and safer than wild-type probiotics to facilitate further clinical translation.
-
5.
The vaginal microbiome and the risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Gudnadottir, U, Debelius, JW, Du, J, Hugerth, LW, Danielsson, H, Schuppe-Koistinen, I, Fransson, E, Brusselaers, N
Scientific reports. 2022;12(1):7926
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Preterm birth is a major cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Many factors can trigger premature labour onset, including preterm premature rupture of membranes, infections and microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity. The vaginal microbiome is thought to protect from such infections. The aim of this study was to assess the association between the vaginal microbiome and the risk of preterm birth. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 cohort studies. The number of pregnancies per study ranged between 38 and 539, with 8 and 107 preterm births. Results show that women with a “low-lactobacilli” vaginal microbiome composition were at higher risk of preterm birth (spontaneous and overall) compared to women with L. crispatus (microbiome) dominant microbiome compositions. Authors conclude that the diversity of the vaginal microbiome seems to play a part in the risk of preterm birth.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The diversity of the vaginal microbiome is reported to play a part in the risk of preterm births.
- Practitioners could consider testing the virginal microbiome for low Lactobacilli or the dominance of Gardnerella and Prevotella and then recommending a probiotic supplement to pregnant patients who have low Lactobacilli vaginal microbiome.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association between vaginal microbiome and risk of preterm births.
Methodology
- Seventeen longitudinal cohort studies were included. Seven originated from North America, three from Europe, two from South America, three from Asia, and two from Africa. The number of pregnancies per study ranged between 38 and 539, with 8 and 107 preterm births. 16S Sequencing techniques were used to identify the microbial species. Preterm birth was defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation.
- Microbiome community state types (CSTs) were grouped into five categories based on dominating species: L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. iners,“low-lactobacilli” and L. jensenii. “Low-lactobacilli” was defined as an increased diversity of anaerobic or mixture of aerobe and facultative anaerobe bacteria (such as Gardnerella and Prevotella) based on the cut-offs and categorization used in the individual studies.
Results
Primary clinical outcomes were:
- Among women who delivered preterm, the pooled proportion with “low-lactobacilli” was 0.41 (95% CI 0.30-0.53) compared to 0.29 (95% CI 0.20-0.38) of women with full-term deliveries.
- The risk of preterm births was higher among women with “low-lactobacilli” compared to L. crispatus (OR 1.69, 95%CI 1.15 -2.49).”Low-lactobacilli” included Garnerella and Provotella, both of which are known to promote inflammatory cytokines and are commonly found in vaginal microbiome just before preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).
Clinical practice applications:
- The diversity of the vaginal microbiome is reported to play an important role in the risk of preterm births.
- Women with low Lactobacilli seem to be at a greater risk of delivering preterm compared to women with L. crispatus dominant microbiome.
- Based on this study, practitioners could therefore consider testing the vaginal microbiome of their patients for low Lactobacilli and/or the dominance of Gardnerella and Prevotella.
- Practitioners may also consider recommending specific probiotic supplementation during pregnancy to increase the dominance of Lactobacilli and L. crispatus vaginal microbiome.
Considerations for future research:
- In the past, researchers have grouped the microbiome into categories based on dominating species, which is not ideal. Therefore, further studies are needed where individual microbiome sequencing data is used to make comparisons.
- Additionally, longitudinal studies are needed with higher sample sizes to investigate the natural changes of the vaginal microbiome during pregnancy and the physiological mechanisms underlying these apparent different risk profiles.
- Furthermore, randomized-controlled trials are needed to establish if pregnant women could benefit from specific probiotic supplementation during pregnancy.
Abstract
Preterm birth is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Increasing evidence links the vaginal microbiome to the risk of spontaneous preterm labour that leads to preterm birth. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to investigate the association between the vaginal microbiome, defined as community state types (CSTs, i.e. dominance of specific lactobacilli spp, or not (low-lactobacilli)), and the risk of preterm birth. Systematic review using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane library was performed. Longitudinal studies using culture-independent methods categorizing the vaginal microbiome in at least three different CSTs to assess the risk of preterm birth were included. A (network) meta-analysis was conducted, presenting pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI); and weighted proportions and 95% CI. All 17 studies were published between 2014 and 2021 and included 38-539 pregnancies and 8-107 preterm births. Women presenting with "low-lactobacilli" vaginal microbiome were at increased risk (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.15-2.49) for delivering preterm compared to Lactobacillus crispatus dominant women. Our network meta-analysis supports the microbiome being predictive of preterm birth, where low abundance of lactobacilli is associated with the highest risk, and L. crispatus dominance the lowest.
-
6.
Microbiota Transfer Therapy alters gut ecosystem and improves gastrointestinal and autism symptoms: an open-label study.
Kang, DW, Adams, JB, Gregory, AC, Borody, T, Chittick, L, Fasano, A, Khoruts, A, Geis, E, Maldonado, J, McDonough-Means, S, et al
Microbiome. 2017;5(1):10
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) often suffer gastrointestinal problems, such as constipation or diarrhea, the severity of which often correlate with ASD severity. This open-label clinical trial evaluated the impact of Microbiota Transfer Therapy (MTT) on GI and ASD symptoms of 18 ASD-diagnosed children. Treatment involved 2 weeks of antibiotic treatment and a bowel cleanse, followed by extended fecal microbiota transplant using a high initial dose and lower maintenance doses for 7-8 weeks. Results showed significant improvements in GI symptoms, which persisted 8 weeks after treatment ended. Bacterial diversity also increased. Behavioural ASD symptoms also improved significantly and lasted 8 weeks after treatment finished. This exploratory study suggests a promising approach to alter the gut microbiome in ASD subjects, improving GI and behavioural symptoms of ASD. Further clinical research is required.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Fecal Microbiota Transfer Therapy demonstrates an effective clinical intervention in pediatric patients suffering with autistic spectrum disorder and associated gastrointestinal symptoms.
- Benefits of the therapy in this trail persisted even 2 months after treatment cessation.
- Future research on autistic spectrum disorder should address microbiota-gut-brain axis.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
X
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
The article describes an original clinical protocol in which microbiota transfer was used to ameliorate gastrointestinal (GI) and autism symptoms in pediatric patients. Common occurrence of GI pathology in patients affected by autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), poses a clinical challenge, since there is no standardised specific therapy. In light of recent insights on the importance of microbiota-gut-brain axis in health and disease, microbiota emerges as a salient treatment target in the aforementioned population.
Clinical practice applications:
Fecal microbiota transfer therapy (MTT) applied by the protocol described in the article demonstrates a longer-term effective clinical intervention in pediatric patients suffering from ASD and concomitant GI symptoms. Benefits of the therapy persisted even two months after actual treatment cessation, a highly important feature considering ASD.
Considerations for future research:
This modality could complement current treatments used for ASD-related symptomatology, but requires further validation through additional clinical experiments. The procedure also supports the efforts to focus more research on the role of microbiota in ASD pathophysiology. Further basic and clinical investigations on ASD should include addressing microbiota-gut-brain axis whenever possible, if not always.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are complex neurobiological disorders that impair social interactions and communication and lead to restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities. The causes of these disorders remain poorly understood, but gut microbiota, the 1013 bacteria in the human intestines, have been implicated because children with ASD often suffer gastrointestinal (GI) problems that correlate with ASD severity. Several previous studies have reported abnormal gut bacteria in children with ASD. The gut microbiome-ASD connection has been tested in a mouse model of ASD, where the microbiome was mechanistically linked to abnormal metabolites and behavior. Similarly, a study of children with ASD found that oral non-absorbable antibiotic treatment improved GI and ASD symptoms, albeit temporarily. Here, a small open-label clinical trial evaluated the impact of Microbiota Transfer Therapy (MTT) on gut microbiota composition and GI and ASD symptoms of 18 ASD-diagnosed children. RESULTS MTT involved a 2-week antibiotic treatment, a bowel cleanse, and then an extended fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) using a high initial dose followed by daily and lower maintenance doses for 7-8 weeks. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale revealed an approximately 80% reduction of GI symptoms at the end of treatment, including significant improvements in symptoms of constipation, diarrhea, indigestion, and abdominal pain. Improvements persisted 8 weeks after treatment. Similarly, clinical assessments showed that behavioral ASD symptoms improved significantly and remained improved 8 weeks after treatment ended. Bacterial and phagedeep sequencing analyses revealed successful partial engraftment of donor microbiota and beneficial changes in the gut environment. Specifically, overall bacterial diversity and the abundance of Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, and Desulfovibrio among other taxa increased following MTT, and these changes persisted after treatment stopped (followed for 8 weeks). CONCLUSIONS This exploratory, extended-duration treatment protocol thus appears to be a promising approach to alter the gut microbiome and virome and improve GI and behavioral symptoms of ASD. Improvements in GI symptoms, ASD symptoms, and the microbiome all persisted for at least 8 weeks after treatment ended, suggesting a long-term impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov, with the registration number NCT02504554.