-
1.
Effect of a Hop Extract Standardized in 8-Prenylnaringenin on Bone Health and Gut Microbiome in Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia: A One-Year Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Lecomte, M, Tomassi, D, Rizzoli, R, Tenon, M, Berton, T, Harney, S, Fança-Berthon, P
Nutrients. 2023;15(12)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Osteoporosis is a bone condition characterized by weakened and brittle bones, leading to an increased risk of fractures. Oestrogens play a vital role in maintaining bone health, whereby oestrogen deficiency elevates the risk of osteoporosis and fractures, particularly in menopausal women due to the decline in oestrogen levels. Phytoestrogens, plant-derived compounds capable of interacting with human oestrogen receptors, have presented an intriguing non-pharmaceutical avenue for preventing bone loss. Other phytoestrogens have received some attention in the field, however, limited human research exists on prenylflavonoids, a phytoestrogens found in hops (Humulus lupulus). This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial aimed to investigate the effects of a year-long supplementation of standardised hop extract (8-PN) Lifenol® on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Additionally, the study explored potential mechanisms, particularly focusing on changes in gut bacteria. Notably, gut bacteria play a role in bone metabolism and the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. They are also, along with the liver, responsible for converting hops phenols into active phytoestrogenic compounds. The trial was completed by 95 postmenopausal, women with Osteopenia aged 50 to 85. They all received calcium and vitamin D3 tablets in addition either a hop extract (100mcg) or a placebo for 48 weeks. Changes were monitored using DXA scans for bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism, blood samples for markers for bone health, a quality of life questionnaire, gut microbiome testing, and tests for short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) levels. In conclusion, the intake of hop extract confirmed a previously observed trend of a slight increase in total bone mineral density (BMD), in addition to the benefits linked to calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Although there were no significant changes in the composition of gut bacteria and SCFA levels, the hop extract candidates had a higher abundance of specific genera associated with total body BMD, suggesting a potential positive impact. Larger studies are required to validate these findings.
Abstract
Estrogen deficiency increases the risk of osteoporosis and fracture. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a hop extract standardized in 8-prenylnaringenin (8-PN), a potent phytoestrogen, could improve bone status of osteopenic women and to explore the gut microbiome roles in this effect. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, 100 postmenopausal, osteopenic women were supplemented with calcium and vitamin D3 (CaD) tablets and either a hop extract (HE) standardized in 8-PN (n = 50) or a placebo (n = 50) for 48 weeks. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism were assessed by DXA measurements and plasma bone biomarkers, respectively. Participant's quality of life (SF-36), gut microbiome composition, and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) levels were also investigated. In addition to the CaD supplements, 48 weeks of HE supplementation increased total body BMD (1.8 ± 0.4% vs. baseline, p < 0.0001; 1.0 ± 0.6% vs. placebo, p = 0.08), with a higher proportion of women experiencing an increase ≥1% compared to placebo (odds ratio: 2.41 ± 1.07, p < 0.05). An increase in the SF-36 physical functioning score was observed with HE versus placebo (p = 0.05). Gut microbiome α-diversity and SCFA levels did not differ between groups. However, a higher abundance of genera Turicibacter and Shigella was observed in the HE group; both genera have been previously identified as associated with total body BMD. These results suggest that an 8-PN standardized hop extract could beneficially impact bone health of postmenopausal women with osteopenia.
-
2.
Host-diet-gut microbiome interactions influence human energy balance: a randomized clinical trial.
Corbin, KD, Carnero, EA, Dirks, B, Igudesman, D, Yi, F, Marcus, A, Davis, TL, Pratley, RE, Rittmann, BE, Krajmalnik-Brown, R, et al
Nature communications. 2023;14(1):3161
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Composition of the human gut microbiome has been shown to be associated with chronic diseases such as obesity, however whether they have a causal effect in disease development or whether microbiota composition is a direct result of the disease is unclear. This randomised control trial of 17 individuals aimed to determine the effects of a diet designed to modulate the gut microbiome (MBD) on human energy balance compared to a typical Western style diet (WD). The MBD diet maximised fibre, resistant starch, and limited processed foods and resulted in a significant decrease in the amount of energy produced by individuals compared to the WD. It was also shown that the MBD increased the microbial composition and decreased nutrient breakdown. It was concluded that the MBD increased the amount of gut bacteria and altered the amount of energy produced by individuals on this diet. This study could be used by healthcare practitioners to understand that composition of the gut microbiome can affect the amount of energy gained from food. Diets high in fibre, starch and low in processed foods, which promote microbial diversity may help individuals to lose weight.
Abstract
The gut microbiome is emerging as a key modulator of human energy balance. Prior studies in humans lacked the environmental and dietary controls and precision required to quantitatively evaluate the contributions of the gut microbiome. Using a Microbiome Enhancer Diet (MBD) designed to deliver more dietary substrates to the colon and therefore modulate the gut microbiome, we quantified microbial and host contributions to human energy balance in a controlled feeding study with a randomized crossover design in young, healthy, weight stable males and females (NCT02939703). In a metabolic ward where the environment was strictly controlled, we measured energy intake, energy expenditure, and energy output (fecal and urinary). The primary endpoint was the within-participant difference in host metabolizable energy between experimental conditions [Control, Western Diet (WD) vs. MBD]. The secondary endpoints were enteroendocrine hormones, hunger/satiety, and food intake. Here we show that, compared to the WD, the MBD leads to an additional 116 ± 56 kcals (P < 0.0001) lost in feces daily and thus, lower metabolizable energy for the host (89.5 ± 0.73%; range 84.2-96.1% on the MBD vs. 95.4 ± 0.21%; range 94.1-97.0% on the WD; P < 0.0001) without changes in energy expenditure, hunger/satiety or food intake (P > 0.05). Microbial 16S rRNA gene copy number (a surrogate of biomass) increases (P < 0.0001), beta-diversity changes (whole genome shotgun sequencing; P = 0.02), and fermentation products increase (P < 0.01) on an MBD as compared to a WD along with significant changes in the host enteroendocrine system (P < 0.0001). The substantial interindividual variability in metabolizable energy on the MBD is explained in part by fecal SCFAs and biomass. Our results reveal the complex host-diet-microbiome interplay that modulates energy balance.
-
3.
Effect of an Immune-Boosting, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Food Supplement in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study.
Reino-Gelardo, S, Palop-Cervera, M, Aparisi-Valero, N, Espinosa-San Miguel, I, Lozano-Rodríguez, N, Llop-Furquet, G, Sanchis-Artero, L, Cortés-Castell, E, Rizo-Baeza, M, Cortés-Rizo, X
Nutrients. 2023;15(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread worldwide, reaching pandemic proportions. The symptoms caused by COVID-19 disease are nonspecific and may range from asymptomatic to severe pneumonia and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of a food supplement (probiotics, prebiotics, vitamin D, zinc and selenium) in patients admitted with COVID-19. This study was a prospective, randomised, non-blinded clinical trial. A total of 162 patients were enrolled at Sagunto Hospital, 42.0% of whom were women. Participants were assigned to one of the two groups: probiotic or control group. Results showed that higher mortality was found in men, older patients and those with severe radiological involvement. Furthermore, administration of the food supplement product Gasteel Plus®, as an adjuvant to the treatment established in the hospital for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-associated pneumonia, reduced the duration of digestive symptoms and hospital stay in patients with mild–moderate pulmonary involvement. Authors conclude that their findings demonstrate the importance of considering the use of the food supplement under review in the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2, including severe cases, which showed no side effects.
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 disease is a serious global health problem. Few treatments have been shown to reduce mortality and accelerate time to recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of a food supplement (probiotics, prebiotics, vitamin D, zinc and selenium) in patients admitted with COVID-19. METHODS A prospective randomized non-blinded clinical trial was conducted in a sample of 162 hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 recruited over eight months. All patients received standard treatment, but the intervention group (n = 67) was given one food supplement stick daily during their admission. After collecting the study variables, a statistical analysis was performed comparing the intervention and control groups and a multivariate analysis controlling for variables that could act as confounding factors. RESULTS ROC curve analysis with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.840 (p < 0.001; 95%CI: 0.741-0.939) of the food supplement administration vs. recovery indicated good predictive ability. Moreover, the intervention group had a shorter duration of digestive symptoms compared with the control group: 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 2.2 days (p = 0.001); patients with non-severe disease on chest X-ray had shorter hospital stays: 8.1 ± 3.9 vs. 11.6 ± 7.4 days (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS In this trial, the administration of a food supplement (Gasteel Plus®) was shown to be a protective factor in the group of patients with severe COVID-19 and allowed early recovery from digestive symptoms and a shorter hospital stay in patients with a normal-mild-moderate chest X-ray at admission (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04666116).
-
4.
Targeting the gut-lung axis by synbiotic feeding to infants in a randomized controlled trial.
Sjödin, KS, Sjödin, A, Ruszczyński, M, Kristensen, MB, Hernell, O, Szajewska, H, West, CE
BMC biology. 2023;21(1):38
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Infants are at increased risk of infections, and respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Although the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts are separate, they share a mucosal immune system called the “gut-lung axis.” The aim of this study was to compare the impacts of feeding prebiotic infant formula with the same prebiotic infant formula supplemented with probiotic Lactobacillus F19 (synbiotics) until 6 months of age on infant gut microbiota development in the first year of life. This study was a multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled study. Infants were randomised to control group - prebiotic formula or experimental group - synbiotic formula. Results showed additional benefit of feeding specific synbiotics to formula-fed infants over prebiotics only. In fact, synbiotic feeding led to the underrepresentation of Klebsiella [bacteria], enrichment of bifidobacteria, and slight increases in microbial degradation metabolites. Authors concluded that their findings support future clinical evaluation of synbiotic formula in the prevention of infections and associated antibiotic treatment as a primary outcome when breastfeeding is not feasible.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Formula-fed infants are at increased risk of infections. Due to the cross-talk between the mucosal systems of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts, adding synbiotics (prebiotics and probiotics) to infant formula may prevent infections even at distant sites. Infants that were born full term and weaned from breast milk were randomized to prebiotic formula (fructo- and galactooligosaccharides) or the same prebiotic formula with Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei F19 (synbiotics) from 1 to 6 months of age. The objective was to examine the synbiotic effects on gut microbiota development. RESULTS Fecal samples collected at ages 1, 4, 6, and 12 months were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and a combination of untargeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry/liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. These analyses revealed that the synbiotic group had a lower abundance of Klebsiella, a higher abundance of Bifidobacterium breve compared to the prebiotic group, and increases in the anti-microbial metabolite d-3-phenyllactic acid. We also analyzed the fecal metagenome and antibiotic resistome in the 11 infants that had been diagnosed with lower respiratory tract infection (cases) and 11 matched controls using deep metagenomic sequencing. Cases with lower respiratory tract infection had a higher abundance of Klebsiella species and antimicrobial resistance genes related to Klebsiella pneumoniae, compared to controls. The results obtained using 16S rRNA gene amplicon and metagenomic sequencing were confirmed in silico by successful recovery of the metagenome-assembled genomes of the bacteria of interest. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the additional benefit of feeding specific synbiotics to formula-fed infants over prebiotics only. Synbiotic feeding led to the underrepresentation of Klebsiella, enrichment of bifidobacteria, and increases in microbial degradation metabolites implicated in immune signaling and in the gut-lung and gut-skin axes. Our findings support future clinical evaluation of synbiotic formula in the prevention of infections and associated antibiotic treatment as a primary outcome when breastfeeding is not feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01625273 . Retrospectively registered on 21 June 2012.
-
5.
Effect of a Probiotic and a Synbiotic on Body Fat Mass, Body Weight and Traits of Metabolic Syndrome in Individuals with Abdominal Overweight: A Human, Double-Blind, Randomised, Controlled Clinical Study.
Laue, C, Papazova, E, Pannenbeckers, A, Schrezenmeir, J
Nutrients. 2023;15(13)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Numerous studies have provided evidence that the intestinal microbiota has a key role in the interface between dietary factors and host biology and that overweight, diabetes and liver steatosis, which are known to depend on dietary factors, are associated with alterations in the composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a probiotic and synbiotic strains on traits of metabolic syndrome, which is driven by low-grade inflammation. This study was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled design with three parallel arms. A total of 180 female and male overweight individuals aged ≥18 years were enrolled. Results showed that: - the probiotic resulted in significant improvements in the primary parameter, body fat mass; body weight; body mass index; waist circumference; waist-to-height ratio; visceral adipose tissue and in liver steatosis grade, as assessed with sonography. - the synbiotic resulted in better outcomes in visceral adipose tissue and liver steatosis grade, as assessed with sonography, and in reduction in constipation. - the count of viable lactobacilli was lower in the synbiotic test product than in the probiotic test product Authors concluded that the probiotic mixture and the synbiotic improved the parameters associated with overweight.
Abstract
L. fermentum strains K7-Lb1, K8-Lb1 and K11-Lb3 were found to suppress Th1 and Th2 response and to enhance defensin release by enterocytes, respectively. Based on these anti-inflammatory actions, we investigated the effect of these strains on traits of metabolic syndrome, which is driven by low-grade inflammation. In a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial with three parallel arms, 180 individuals with abdominal overweight were administered for 3 months with (1) placebo; (2) probiotic, comprising L. fermentum strains; or (3) synbiotic, comprising the strains + acacia gum (10 g daily). The effects were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks and post hoc tests (Holm-Sidak and Dunn's tests). The alteration (∆) in body fat mass (kg) (primary parameter) during intervention was significantly (p = 0.039) more pronounced in the Probiotic group (-0.61 ± 1.94; mean ± SD) compared with the Placebo group (+0.13 ± 1.64). Accordingly, differences were found in ∆ body weight (p = 0.012), BMI (p = 0.011), waist circumference (p = 0.03), waist-to-height ratio (p = 0.033), visceral adipose tissue (SAD) (p < 0.001) and liver steatosis grade (LSG) (p < 0.001), as assessed using sonography. In the Synbiotic group, ∆SAD (p = 0.002), ∆LSG (p < 0.001) and ∆constipation score (p = 0.009) were improved compared with Placebo. The probiotic mixture and the synbiotic improved the parameters associated with overweight.
-
6.
Energy Availability and Nutritional Intake during Different Training Phases of Wheelchair Athletes.
Hertig-Godeschalk, A, Ruettimann, B, Valido, E, Glisic, M, Stoyanov, J, Flueck, JL
Nutrients. 2023;15(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
To maintain a long-term and successful career, elite athletes try to prevent health problems and maximize training adaptations. This includes not only managing training volume and intensity, along with recovery, but also tailoring nutrition to individual needs. The aim of this study was to assess dietary intake, energy availability (EA), and blood biochemical parameters at four consecutive time points during the pre-competition and competition phases in elite wheelchair athletes participating in a pilot feasibility study. This study was a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. In the main study the participants were athletes who received either daily probiotic or prebiotic supplementation for four weeks, followed by a four-week washout period, and another four weeks of daily supplementation with another supplement. Results showed that: - neither EA nor energy intake (EI) displayed significant differences across the various time points. - all athletes experienced low EA for at least one day, indicating how tough fuelling is for elite athletes. - daily macronutrient intake and timing were frequently suboptimal, with athletes not adjusting EI to accommodate higher training loads. Authors concluded that their findings highlight the need for specific nutritional guidelines tailored to wheelchair athletes, as well as the importance of continuous education and guidance from qualified sports nutritionists.
Abstract
Optimizing nutritional intake and timing helps athletes to improve performance and long-term health. Different training phases can require varying nutritional needs. In this study, we conducted a descriptive assessment of dietary intake, energy availability (EA), and blood biochemical parameters in elite wheelchair athletes during distinct training phases. Data analyzed in this study were collected as part of a randomized controlled crossover trial exploring the feasibility of probiotics and prebiotic supplementation. Data were obtained from consecutive three-day diaries and blood samples, both collected at four different time points across four consecutive months. We included 14 athletes (mean (standard deviation) age 34 (9) years, eight females, and six males) active in different wheelchair sports. The mean daily nutritional intake (g/kg body mass) for females and males was 2.7 (0.9) and 4.0 (0.7) for carbohydrates, 1.1 (0.3) and 1.5 (0.3) for protein, and 0.8 (0.3) and 1.4 (0.2) for fat. EA did not change across the four time points in either female (p = 0.30) or male (p = 0.05) athletes. The mean EA was lower in female athletes compared to male athletes (p = 0.03). Low EA (≤30 kcal/ kg fat-free mass/day) was observed in female (58 (29) % of days) and male (34 (23) % of days) athletes. Iron deficiency with anemia was observed in two female athletes. Mean vitamin D levels were insufficient (<75 nmol/L). Macronutrient intake, EA, and blood biochemical parameters were suboptimal in this cohort of elite wheelchair athletes, especially in female athletes.
-
7.
Effect of an enzyme-containing mouthwash on the dental biofilm and salivary microbiome in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial.
Hoffstedt, T, Skov Hansen, LB, Twetman, S, Sonesson, M
European journal of orthodontics. 2023;45(1):96-102
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Fixed orthodontic appliances are associated with dysbiosis in the oral cavity which may result in demineralisations of the enamel. Antiseptic mouthwashes have been shown to control the formation of cariogenic biofilm but may have negative effects on the salivary microbiome. The aim of this 8-day double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, including 35 adolescents with fixed orthodontics, was to evaluate the effect of an enzyme-based mouthwash (EBM), used twice daily, on dental biofilm (plaque) formation and salivary microbiome. At 8 days, a statistically and clinically significant decrease in the orthodontic plaque index was seen in the EBM group, whilst no change was seen in the placebo group. There were no statistically significant changes in microbiome between groups but a trend to increased richness in the placebo group. The authors concluded that the use of an enzyme-based mouthwash alongside regular toothbrushing reduced dental biofilm in adolescents with orthodontics without affecting the salivary microbiome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mouthwashes containing oral antiseptics or enzymes are suggested suitable for controlling biofilm accumulation in patients with fixed appliances and thereby limiting unwanted side effects during the orthodontic treatment. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of an enzyme-based mouthwash on the amount of dental biofilm and the composition of the salivary microbiome in patients undergoing treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. TRIAL DESIGN Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 35 young adolescents (14-18 years) under treatment with fixed appliances were consecutively enrolled and randomly allocated to an experimental or a placebo group by opening a computer-generated numbered envelope. The subjects were instructed to rinse twice daily during an intervention period of 8 days with experimental mouthwash or placebo without active enzymes. Unstimulated whole saliva samples were collected at baseline and after 8 days. The participants and examiner were blinded for the allocation. The primary outcome was the Orthodontic Plaque Index (OPI) and the secondary was the composition of the salivary microbiome. RESULTS In total, 28 adolescents (21 females and 7 males) completed the trial and there were no differences in age, clinical, or microbial findings between the test (n = 14) and the placebo group (n = 14) at baseline. We found a decreased OPI in the test group after 8 days and the difference was statistically significant compared with the placebo group (P < 0.05). There were no significant treatment effects on the richness and global composition of the salivary microbiome. HARMS In total, one participant in the test group claimed nausea and abandoned the project. In total, two participants did not like the taste of the mouthwash but used it as instructed. No other adverse events or side effects were reported. LIMITATIONS Short-term pilot trials may by nature be sensitive for selection and performance biases and are not designed to unveil persisting effects. CONCLUSION Daily use of enzyme-containing mouthwash reduced the amount of dental biofilm in adolescents under treatment with the fixed orthodontic appliances, without affecting the composition of the salivary microbiota. ETHICAL APPROVAL Approved by the Regional Ethical Board, Lund, Sweden (Dnr 2020-05221). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05033015.
-
8.
A double-blinded, randomized, parallel intervention to evaluate biomarker-based nutrition plans for weight loss: The PREVENTOMICS study.
Aldubayan, MA, Pigsborg, K, Gormsen, SMO, Serra, F, Palou, M, Galmés, S, Palou-March, A, Favari, C, Wetzels, M, Calleja, A, et al
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2022;41(8):1834-1844
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity, and particularly abdominal adiposity, is associated with various metabolic abnormalities. Diet has a vital role in preventing and managing obesity, but evidence from clinical studies demonstrates there is a great interindividual variability in response to the same dietary intervention, which likely indicates that no one diet is superior to another. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of the PREVENTOMICS (empowering consumers to PREVENT diet-related diseases through OMICS sciences) platform, incorporated in an e-commerce digital tool, for producing more favourable health outcomes over dietary plans based on general diet recommendations, in subjects with overweight or obesity and elevated waist circumference. This study is a 10-week randomised single-centre, parallel-group, double-blinded intervention study. Participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by cluster to either the intervention group (personalised plan) or the control group (generic recommendations). Results show that there isn’t any additional benefit of personalising dietary plans, over a generic approach, on the change in fat mass and body weight in individuals with overweight or obesity and elevated waist circumference. Accordingly, personalisation of the diet did not significantly improve health parameters beyond the changes induced by the control diet. Participants in both groups lost approximately 3 kg of body weight. Authors conclude that based on their findings evidence to translate personalised nutrition approaches into clinical practice is insufficient.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Growing evidence suggests that biomarker-guided dietary interventions can optimize response to treatment. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the PREVENTOMCIS platform-which uses metabolomic and genetic information to classify individuals into different 'metabolic clusters' and create personalized dietary plans-for improving health outcomes in subjects with overweight or obesity. METHODS A 10-week parallel, double-blinded, randomized intervention was conducted in 100 adults (82 completers) aged 18-65 years, with body mass index ≥27 but <40 kg/m2, who were allocated into either a personalized diet group (n = 49) or a control diet group (n = 51). About 60% of all food was provided free-of-charge. No specific instruction to restrict energy intake was given. The primary outcome was change in fat mass from baseline, evaluated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Other endpoints included body weight, waist circumference, lipid profile, glucose homeostasis markers, inflammatory markers, blood pressure, physical activity, stress and eating behavior. RESULTS There were significant main effects of time (P < 0.01), but no group main effects, or time-by-group interactions, for the change in fat mass (personalized: -2.1 [95% CI -2.9, -1.4] kg; control: -2.0 [95% CI -2.7, -1.3] kg) and body weight (personalized: -3.1 [95% CI -4.1, -2.1] kg; control: -3.3 [95% CI -4.2, -2.4] kg). The difference between groups in fat mass change was -0.1 kg (95% CI -1.2, 0.9 kg, P = 0.77). Both diets resulted in significant improvements in insulin resistance and lipid profile, but there were no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION Personalized dietary plans did not result in greater benefits over a generic, but generally healthy diet, in this 10-week clinical trial. Further studies are required to establish the soundness of different precision nutrition approaches, and translate this science into clinically relevant dietary advice to reduce the burden of obesity and its comorbidities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT04590989).
-
9.
Oral lactase for infantile colic: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Narang, M, Shah, D
BMC pediatrics. 2022;22(1):468
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Infantile colic – unexplained and inconsolable crying episodes without any identifiable cause in otherwise healthy infants - is a common problem. It has been postulated to be caused due to painful intestinal contractions, lactose intolerance, altered gut microbiota, aerophagy, food hypersensitivity and behavioural factors. Currently, there is no well-established treatment of infantile colic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral lactase enzyme supplements in management of infantile colic. The primary objectives were to compare crying or fussing duration and number of colic days, and the secondary objectives were to compare the parent satisfaction and adverse effects in children receiving lactase or placebo. This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The enrolled infants (n = 162 children - 99 boys and 63 girls) were randomly assigned to receive five drops (0.2 mL) of the lactase enzyme preparation or placebo. Results show a significant reduction in crying and fussing duration in children receiving lactase drops prior to feeding in comparison to those receiving placebo during the entire 4-week treatment period. Furthermore, results show lesser number of days with colic, and better parental satisfaction in terms of positive change in child’s mood, alertness, activity and oral intake. Additionally, the treatment with lactase was well tolerated by all the infants as no serious adverse event was reported during the treatment. Authors conclude that oral lactase drops may result in significant symptomatic relief in infantile colic in terms of reducing the crying or fussing duration and number of colic days, resulting in better parental satisfaction.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infantile colic is a common problem during the first three months of life. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in an urban hospital in Delhi, India evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral lactase in management of infantile colic. METHODS One hundred sixty-two clinically healthy infants aged < 5 months age [mean (SD) = 63.5 (30.5) days] fulfilling the Rome-IV diagnostic criteria for infantile colic were enrolled. Eligible children were randomly allocated to receive 5 drops of lactase (600 FCC units/mL) (n = 80) or placebo (n = 82) mixed with breast milk or formula feed four times a day for a duration of 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were duration of crying or fussing (min/d), and number of days with colic lasting > 3 h/d; secondary outcomes were parental satisfaction and adverse events. RESULTS At the end of four weeks, mean (SD) crying or fussing time (min/d) was significantly shorter in infants receiving lactase in comparison to placebo [89.9 (115.2) vs.178.5 (153.2); P = 0.001]. The mean (SD) number of days with colic was also significantly less in the lactase group as compared to placebo group at the end of the treatment [12.1 (7.8) vs 17.6 (8.4); P < 0.001]. By the end of 4th week, parental satisfaction in terms of infant's mood, activity, alertness, comfort and oral intake was better in intervention group. The adverse event profile was comparable between two groups. CONCLUSIONS Oral lactase treatment in infantile colic results in symptomatic relief in terms of shortening of duration of crying or fussing, and better parental satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2017/12/010930) registered on 20/12/2017.
-
10.
Clinical, gut microbial and neural effects of a probiotic add-on therapy in depressed patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Schaub, AC, Schneider, E, Vazquez-Castellanos, JF, Schweinfurth, N, Kettelhack, C, Doll, JPK, Yamanbaeva, G, Mählmann, L, Brand, S, Beglinger, C, et al
Translational psychiatry. 2022;12(1):227
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most prevalent and burdensome psychiatric disorders. Compelling preclinical data indicate that the gut microbiota affects brain functions and depressive behaviour, providing a promising novel target for the treatment of depression. The aims of this study were to (i) examine the effect of a short-term, high-dose probiotic add-on therapy on depressive symptoms in MDD patients, and (ii) explore the effects of a probiotic supplementation on gut microbiota composition as well as brain structure and function. This study was a double-blind randomised controlled trial of a probiotic add-on therapy for four weeks in depressed patients. Patients (n=60) were randomly allocated to the two study groups and tested at three different time points. Results showed that an add-on probiotic treatment improves depressive symptoms and maintains healthy enterotypes, species richness and increases specific health related bacterial taxa. Furthermore, on a neural level, probiotics altered negative biases and emotional valence additionally to treatment-as-usual for depression. Authors conclude that their findings highlight the role of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in MDD and emphasises the potential of microbiota-related treatment approaches as therapies to improve the effectiveness of current treatments in depression.
Abstract
A promising new treatment approach for major depressive disorder (MDD) targets the microbiota-gut-brain (MGB) axis, which is linked to physiological and behavioral functions affected in MDD. This is the first randomized controlled trial to determine whether short-term, high-dose probiotic supplementation reduces depressive symptoms along with gut microbial and neural changes in depressed patients. Patients with current depressive episodes took either a multi-strain probiotic supplement or placebo over 31 days additionally to treatment-as-usual. Assessments took place before, immediately after and again four weeks after the intervention. The Hamilton Depression Rating Sale (HAM-D) was assessed as primary outcome. Quantitative microbiome profiling and neuroimaging was used to detect changes along the MGB axis. In the sample that completed the intervention (probiotics N = 21, placebo N = 26), HAM-D scores decreased over time and interactions between time and group indicated a stronger decrease in the probiotics relative to the placebo group. Probiotics maintained microbial diversity and increased the abundance of the genus Lactobacillus, indicating the effectivity of the probiotics to increase specific taxa. The increase of the Lactobacillus was associated with decreased depressive symptoms in the probiotics group. Finally, putamen activation in response to neutral faces was significantly decreased after the probiotic intervention. Our data imply that an add-on probiotic treatment ameliorates depressive symptoms (HAM-D) along with changes in the gut microbiota and brain, which highlights the role of the MGB axis in MDD and emphasizes the potential of microbiota-related treatment approaches as accessible, pragmatic, and non-stigmatizing therapies in MDD. Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov , identifier: NCT02957591.