-
1.
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Jamshidi, P, Farsi, Y, Nariman, Z, Hatamnejad, MR, Mohammadzadeh, B, Akbarialiabad, H, Nasiri, MJ, Sechi, LA
International journal of molecular sciences. 2023;24(19)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder the cause of which is not yet fully elucidated. Probiotics, prebiotics and dietary changes have been shown to mitigate IBS symptoms whilst the results from studies of faecal microbiota transplants (FMT) have been inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomised controlled trials (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT in IBS. 7 RCTs with a low risk of bias and no publication bias were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, no statistically significant effect was observed. A subgroup analysis by treatment modality showed that benefits were seen with lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple-donor FMT. Abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhoea and bloating were the most common adverse events, with no severe or critical adverse events reported. The authors call for larger and longer clinical trials to fill existing knowledge gaps.
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) poses a significant challenge due to its poorly understood pathogenesis, substantial morbidity, and often inadequate treatment outcomes. The role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in managing IBS symptoms remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of FMT in relieving symptoms in IBS patients. A thorough search was executed on PubMed/Medline and Embase databases until 14 June 2023, including all studies on FMT use in IBS patients. We examined the efficiency of FMT in reducing patients' symptoms overall and in particular subgroups, classified by placebo preparation, FMT preparation, frequency, and route of administration. Among 1015 identified studies, seven met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The overall symptomatology of FMT-treated IBS patients did not significantly differ from the control group (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.99, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.39-2.5). Multiple doses of FMT compared with non-FMT placebo, or single-donor FMT therapy compared with autologous FMT placebo also showed no significant benefit (OR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.07-1.32), p = 0.11, and OR = 1.67, 95%CI (0.59-4.67), p = 0.32, respectively). However, a single dose of multiple-donor FMT administered via colonoscopy (lower gastrointestinal (GI) administration) significantly improved patient symptoms compared with autologous FMT placebo (OR = 2.54, 95%CI (1.20-5.37), p = 0.01, and OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.20-4.03), p = 0.01, respectively). The studies included in the analysis showed a low risk of bias and no publication bias. In conclusion, lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple-donor FMT significantly alleviates patient complaints compared with the autologous FMT used as a placebo. The underlying mechanisms need to be better understood, and further experimental studies are desired to fill the current gaps.
-
2.
A randomized controlled trial of an oral probiotic to reduce antepartum group B Streptococcus colonization and gastrointestinal symptoms.
Hanson, L, VandeVusse, L, Forgie, M, Malloy, E, Singh, M, Scherer, M, Kleber, D, Dixon, J, Hryckowian, AJ, Safdar, N
American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2023;5(1):100748
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Streptococcus agalactiae (or group B Streptococcus [GBS]) is an encapsulated, gram-positive, beta-haemolytic anaerobe that asymptomatically colonizes the genitourinary tract. Vertical transmission of GBS during normal vaginal birth can lead to neonatal colonization and risk for early-onset GBS disease. The aim of this study was to present the findings of a phase II, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of an antenatal probiotic intervention to reduce GBS colonization. A secondary aim was to determine if the probiotic intervention reduces gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of pregnancy. Participants (n=107) were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: probiotic intervention (n=55) or placebo group (n=54). Results show that: - there weren’t any significant differences between the groups in demographic characteristics, perinatal or neonatal outcomes, or intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis doses. - there wasn’t any significant difference between groups in the presence of the probiotic bacteria on the rectal swabs, whereas the vaginal swabs showed a trend toward greater presence in probiotic group participants. - more probiotic participants took antenatal antibiotics (5/39) compared with controls (1/44). Authors conclude that probiotic bacteria colonisation of the genitourinary tract occurred more in the intervention group than in the control group and significantly reduced GI symptoms of pregnancy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics have been suggested as a strategy to reduce antenatal group B Streptococcus colonization. Although probiotics are known to improve gastrointestinal symptoms, this has not been studied during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a probiotic to reduce: (1) standard-of-care antenatal group B Streptococcus colonization and colony counts and (2) gastrointestinal symptoms of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN In a double-blind fashion, 109 healthy adult pregnant people were randomized to Florajen3 probiotic or placebo capsules once daily from 28 weeks' gestation until labor onset. Baseline vaginal and rectal study swabs for group B Streptococcus colony-forming units and microbiome analysis were collected at 28 and 36 weeks' gestation. Standard-of-care vaginal to rectal group B Streptococcus swabs were collected from all participants at 36 weeks' gestation and determined the need for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Data collection included solicitation of adverse events, demographic information, Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment score, yogurt ingestion, sexual activity, and vaginal cleaning practices. RESULTS A total of 83 participants completed the study to 36 weeks' gestation with no adverse events. Standard-of-care group B Streptococcus colonization was 20.4% in the control group and 15.4% in probiotic group participants (-5%; P=.73). The relative risk for positive standard-of-care vaginal-rectal group B Streptococcus colonization was 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-3.40) times higher in the control group than in the probiotic group (P=.55). There were no differences in median vaginal (P=.16) or rectal (P=.20) group B streptococcus colony-forming units at baseline or at 36 weeks (vaginal P>.999; rectal P=.56). Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptom Assessment scores were similar at baseline (P=.19), but significantly decreased in probiotic group participants at 36 weeks (P=.02). No covariates significantly altered group B Streptococcus colonization. Significantly more Florajen3 bacteria components were recovered from the vaginal-rectal samples of probiotic group participants (32%; P=.04) compared with controls. CONCLUSION The findings of this study provided insufficient evidence for the clinical application of the Florajen3 probiotic intervention to reduce standard-of-care vaginal-rectal group B Streptococcus colonization. The prevalence of group B Streptococcus was lower than expected in the study population, and intervention adherence was poor. Probiotic bacteria colonization of the genitourinary tract occurred more in intervention group participants than in controls and significantly reduced gastrointestinal symptoms of pregnancy.
-
3.
Effects of Probiotics in Adults with Gastroenteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Mitra, AK, Asala, AF, Malone, S, Mridha, MK
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;11(4)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally and symptoms can range from mild to life-threatening. Some studies have suggested benefits of probiotics in the treatment of gastroenteritis in children whilst in adults, results are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics on acute and chronic gastroenteritis in adults. 35 clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. Of these, 23 dealt with inflammatory bowel disease, 5 with pouchitis, 3 with antibiotic-induced diarrhoea, 2 with Helicobacter pylori infection and one each with diverticulitis and acute watery diarrhoea. 27 (77%) of studies showed some benefits of probiotic administration. The meta-analysis of 22 studies did not show a statistically significant benefit of probiotics. Although statistical analysis showed the studies to be homogenous, the authors point out that studies differed widely in aetiologies and probiotics used. A subgroup analysis of 8 studies in patients with ulcerative colitis also showed no benefit. In all studies, probiotics were well tolerated and no adverse side effects were reported. The authors concluded that further research is needed to help identify the most appropriate use of probiotics for the different types of gastroenteritis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- For chronic inflammatory gastroenteritis conditions in adults, probiotics were effective in treating and preventing relapse
- In ulcerative colitis, probiotics were not effective and adverse events outweighed the benefits
- No safety concerns were found for probiotic use in any studies
- Aetiologies, disease severity and duration as well as the type of probiotics used were widely diverse.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
To date, evidence has been mixed for probiotic effectiveness in gastrointestinal syndromes associated with gastroenteritis. The aim of this study was to review current evidence on the effect of probiotics on gastroenteritis in adults.
Methods
This was a systematic review (n=35; total sample size 4577, median 44) and meta-analysis (n=22) of randomised controlled trials. Quality was assessed using CADIMA as per a rating scale (0 to 4) and standards of critical appraisal.
Results
All 35 studies on gastroenteritis included participants with chronic diarrhoea of diverse aetiologies such as IBD, antibiotic-associated, except one which had acute watery diarrhoea.
51% (n=18) of studies assessed the effects of probiotics in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). 60% (n=21) used multiple strains of probiotics while the rest used single strains. Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, Escherichia and Streptococcus were the most common and only a few studies administered probiotics with another conventional treatment.
19 studies (55%) rated highly in terms of quality while 15 (43%) scored moderately. The majority (63%) of the 27 studies where probiotics were shown to be effective were of high quality.
Systematic review results:
- 27/53 studies (77%) showed a favourable response after using probiotics (resolution, improvement, remission or no relapse), mostly in patients with IBDs
- 7 studies (20%) found probiotics to be ineffective
- 1 study was inconclusive
- Multiple strain probiotics (VSL #3) was found to be most effective in IBD
- All administered probiotics were well tolerated with no adverse side effects although caution in immunocompromised patients was mentioned in several studies.
The meta-analysis results:
- Overall effectiveness for 22 studies (p=0.37) highlighted there was not enough evidence that the intervention was more protective than controls.
- Probiotics were not effective in UC (p = 0.28), and adverse events caused by probiotics may outweigh the benefits in studies with UC patients.
Conclusion
While benefits of effectiveness were found for probiotic use in gastroenteritis in adults, results from the systematic review and meta-analysis showed a mixed effect.
Clinical practice applications:
- Based on the systematic review, probiotics may be an effective treatment or adjuvant treatment for gastroenteritis but ineffective for around 20% of patients
- It is worth noting that combined therapy with standard treatment showed effective results
- Beneficial effects of probiotics in other key clinical outcomes including disease prevention, relapse, quality of life, morbidity were found
- While the results are interesting it is difficult to apply them in practice as the type of probiotics used were widely different as were the causes, severity and duration of gastroenteritis.
Considerations for future research:
- Further and larger studies would be beneficial to understand the benefits of probiotics in terms of single therapy or in combination with standard treatment particularly for UC, CDs, gastroenteritis not due to viral infection
- Individual-level data instead of aggregated data could give a better idea of effectiveness of probiotics in the future
- In this study aetiologies and the type, dosage, duration of probiotics used were widely diverse therefore systematic reviews and meta-analysis on specific conditions, specific probiotic strains and combinations would be beneficial.
Abstract
Probiotics have been widely used in gastroenteritis due to acute and chronic illnesses. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of probiotics in different health conditions is inconclusive and conflicting. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the effects of probiotics on gastroenteritis among adults. Only original articles on clinical trials that demonstrated the effects of probiotics in adults with gastroenteritis were used for this analysis. Multiple databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Scopus databases, were searched for the data. The study followed standard procedures for data extraction using a PRISMA flow chart. A quality appraisal of the selected studies was conducted using CADIMA. Finally, a meta-analysis was performed. Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria; of them, probiotics were found effective in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in 17 (49%), and the treatment of pouchitis in 4 (11.4%), antibiotic-induced diarrhea in 3 (8.6%), Helicobacter pylori infection in 2 (5.7%) and diverticulitis in 1 (2.9%), while the remaining 7 (20%) were ineffective, and 1 study's results were inconclusive. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant protective effects of probiotics. Having a τ2 value of zero and I2 of 6%, the studies were homogeneous and had minimum variances. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBDs and other chronic bowel diseases.
-
4.
Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Systematic Review of Prospective Cohort Studies.
Sanchez-Gimenez, R, Ahmed-Khodja, W, Molina, Y, Peiró, OM, Bonet, G, Carrasquer, A, Fragkiadakis, GA, Bulló, M, Bardaji, A, Papandreou, C
Nutrients. 2022;14(13)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major public health issue. Identification of circulating biomarkers with prognostic value may help to both identify pathophysiological processes relevant to CVD development and improve preventive cardiovascular risk reduction efforts. The aim of this study was to identify the association of circulating levels of microbial metabolites with CVD incidence. This study is a systematic review of twenty-one studies of which 19 were prospective cohort studies, one study included one nested case-control study and one study included two nested case–control studies. Results show that: - associations of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) [molecular metabolite derived from the gut flora] and subsequent risk of CV outcomes were supported by some but not all prospective studies. - inconsistent results were also obtained for secondary bile acids in relation to CVD and related outcomes, and CVD/all-cause mortality. - with regards to branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), their associations with CV outcomes were robust amongst most of the studies. Authors conclude that their findings show inconsistent results for TMAO and bile acids but robust ones for the relationships between BCAAs and CVD. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate whether circulating microbial metabolites could be an intervention target for CVD.
Abstract
Gut microbiota-derived metabolites have recently attracted considerable attention due to their role in host-microbial crosstalk and their link with cardiovascular health. The MEDLINE-PubMed and Elsevier's Scopus databases were searched up to June 2022 for studies evaluating the association of baseline circulating levels of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), secondary bile acids, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), tryptophan and indole derivatives, with risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). A total of twenty-one studies were included in the systematic review after evaluating 1210 non-duplicate records. There were nineteen of the twenty-one studies that were cohort studies and two studies had a nested case-control design. All of the included studies were of high quality according to the "Newcastle-Ottawa Scale". TMAO was positively associated with adverse cardiovascular events and CVD/all-cause mortality in some, but not all of the included studies. Bile acids were associated with atrial fibrillation and CVD/all-cause mortality, but not with CVD. Positive associations were found between BCAAs and CVD, and between indole derivatives and major adverse cardiovascular events, while a negative association was reported between tryptophan and all-cause mortality. No studies examining the relationship between SCFAs and CVD risk were identified. Evidence from prospective studies included in the systematic review supports a role of microbial metabolites in CVD.
-
5.
Effects of Hemp Sanitary Pads on the Vaginal Microecology.
Sun, Y, Li, C, Yan, Y, Lai, A, Peng, X, Yue, X, Li, Y, Liu, J, Liu, Y
Computational and mathematical methods in medicine. 2022;2022:4435722
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Under ideal situations, women have a variety of microbes that reside in the vagina which form the normal vaginal microbiome. When combined, the vaginal microbial flora, endocrine regulation system, anatomic structure of the vagina, and local endocrine system constitute the vaginal microecosystem, which is in turn part of the entire human microecosystem. In fact, the choice of appropriate sanitary pads is of high importance during the menstrual period. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hemp cotton sanitary pads on the vaginal microecology. The study is a randomised controlled field trial study which recruited women of childbearing age. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (experimental and control groups). The control group was further divided into 2 subgroups. The subjects in the experimental group used hemp sanitary pads. Results show that: - among women with a normal vaginal microecosystem or a vaginal microecologic imbalance at baseline, the vaginal cleanliness grade and overall vaginal microecologic status were better if hemp sanitary pads were used rather than the ordinary cotton sanitary pads. - there was no significant difference in the vaginal pH values between the two groups. - hemp sanitary pads had no therapeutic effect against vaginal infections. Authors conclude that the use of hemp cotton sanitary pads during menstruation, by women without vaginal inflammation, can help maintain balanced vaginal microecology which will help to prevent reproductive tract infections.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of hemp cotton sanitary pads on the vaginal microecology. METHODS A randomized controlled field trial was used to recruit 1002 community-based women of childbearing age. The women were randomly divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group used hemp cotton sanitary pads, while the control group used two types of cotton sanitary randomly chosen from the top five sanitary pads in terms of market share in China. The vaginal microecology was compared between the two groups after three months. RESULTS According to the vaginal microecologic examination results at baseline, 1002 women were included in 3 groups: normal vaginal microecologic, vaginal microecological disorders, and suspected vaginal infections. The number of patients in three groups were 39 (3.9%), 652 (65.1%), and 311 (31%), respectively. Three months later, the vaginal microecologic status and vaginal pH value of the suspected vaginal infection group were not significantly different between the experimental group and control group. The experimental group outperformed the control group with respect to vaginal cleanliness and vaginal microecology status in the women without a vaginal infection (normal vaginal microecology or microecological disorders group). The rate of abnormal cleanliness in the experimental group was lower than the control group (31.95% [108/338] vs. 43.62% [154/353]). The incidence of suspected vaginitis in the experimental group was lower than the control group (15.29% [51/338] vs. 23.51% [83/353]). CONCLUSION For women without vaginal inflammation, the use of hemp cotton sanitary pads during menstruation can help maintain the balance of the vaginal microecology to prevent reproductive tract infections.
-
6.
A Deep Look at the Vaginal Environment During Pregnancy and Puerperium.
Severgnini, M, Morselli, S, Camboni, T, Ceccarani, C, Laghi, L, Zagonari, S, Patuelli, G, Pedna, MF, Sambri, V, Foschi, C, et al
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2022;12:838405
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In healthy reproductive-aged women, the vaginal microbiome is generally dominated by members of the Lactobacillus genus. Lactobacilli promote the maintenance of the vaginal health, preventing the colonization and growth of adverse microorganisms through various mechanisms. The composition of the vaginal bacterial communities and related metabolites play a crucial role in maternal-foetal health. The aim of this study was to deepen the characteristics of the vaginal environment in a cohort of Caucasian women with a normal pregnancy throughout their different gestational ages (i.e., first, second, third trimester) and puerperium. This study is a prospective study of sixty-three Caucasian pregnant women. Participants were enrolled and sampled during all gestational ages; for 30 of them, clinical and microbiological data were also available for the puerperium. Additionally, 9 women who had a spontaneous miscarriage at the first trimester of pregnancy (gestational age: 11-13 weeks) during the study were included. Results show that: - irrespective of the period and type of pregnancy, bacterial vaginosis cases were characterised by a dramatic reduction of Lactobacillus and an increase of anaerobic bacteria. - the vaginal microbiome becomes more stable throughout the entire pregnancy, being less diverse and mainly dominated by lactobacilli. - women receiving an intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus were characterized by a vaginal abundance of Prevotella compared to untreated women. - at the puerperium, a significantly lower content of Lactobacillus and higher levels of Gardnerella, Prevotella, Atopobium, and Streptococcus were observed. Authors conclude that their findings may help implement ‘prognostic’ criteria (e.g., evaluation of the risk of spontaneous miscarriage based on the microbiome/metabolome profiles), as well as strategies for the prevention of early pregnancy loss, based on the ‘manipulation’ of the vaginal bacterial inhabitants.
Abstract
A deep comprehension of the vaginal ecosystem may hold promise for unraveling the pathophysiology of pregnancy and may provide novel biomarkers to identify subjects at risk of maternal-fetal complications. In this prospective study, we assessed the characteristics of the vaginal environment in a cohort of pregnant women throughout their different gestational ages and puerperium. Both the vaginal bacterial composition and the vaginal metabolic profiles were analyzed. A total of 63 Caucasian women with a successful pregnancy and 9 subjects who had a first trimester miscarriage were enrolled. For the study, obstetric examinations were scheduled along the three trimester phases (9-13, 20-24, 32-34 gestation weeks) and puerperium (40-55 days after delivery). Two vaginal swabs were collected at each time point, to assess the vaginal microbiome profiling (by Nugent score and 16S rRNA gene sequencing) and the vaginal metabolic composition (1H-NMR spectroscopy). During pregnancy, the vaginal microbiome underwent marked changes, with a significant decrease in overall diversity, and increased stability. Over time, we found a significant increase of Lactobacillus and a decrease of several genera related to bacterial vaginosis (BV), such as Prevotella, Atopobium and Sneathia. It is worth noting that the levels of Bifidobacterium spp. tended to decrease at the end of pregnancy. At the puerperium, a significantly lower content of Lactobacillus and higher levels of Gardnerella, Prevotella, Atopobium, and Streptococcus were observed. Women receiving an intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) were characterized by a vaginal abundance of Prevotella compared to untreated women. Analysis of bacterial relative abundances highlighted an increased abundance of Fusobacterium in women suffering a first trimester abortion, at all taxonomic levels. Lactobacillus abundance was strongly correlated with higher levels of lactate, sarcosine, and many amino acids (i.e., isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, valine, threonine, tryptophan). Conversely, BV-associated genera, such as Gardnerella, Atopobium, and Sneathia, were related to amines (e.g., putrescine, methylamine), formate, acetate, alcohols, and short-chain fatty-acids (i.e., butyrate, propionate).
-
7.
SARS-CoV-2 and immune-microbiome interactions: Lessons from respiratory viral infections.
Cyprian, F, Sohail, MU, Abdelhafez, I, Salman, S, Attique, Z, Kamareddine, L, Al-Asmakh, M
International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2021;105:540-550
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an enveloped RNA beta-coronavirus. This virus caused the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this review was to investigate the relationship between microbiota, immunity, and COVID-19, with particular focus on how microbiome-associated immune crosstalk can shape outcome of COVID-19. The study included 118 articles which investigated or reviewed COVID-19 or coronavirus and the microbiome of the gut or respiratory tract. Findings indicate that: - an over-activated immune system leads to massive pulmonary damage in COVID-19 patients. - the effect of aging and comorbidities, and the use of antibiotics have an effect on the diversity of the microbiota. - the milieu of gut flora can exert influence on pulmonary immune responses. - a unique cross-talk exists between the pulmonary and gut microbial compartments. Authors conclude by highlighting the need of further studies that delineate the role of the microbiota and their products in the immune dysregulation observed in SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Abstract
By the beginning of 2020, infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had rapidly evolved into an emergent worldwide pandemic, an outbreak whose unprecedented consequences highlighted many existing flaws within public healthcare systems across the world. While coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is bestowed with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, involving the vital organs, the respiratory system transpires as the main route of entry for SARS-CoV-2, with the lungs being its primary target. Of those infected, up to 20% require hospitalization on account of severity, while the majority of patients are either asymptomatic or exhibit mild symptoms. Exacerbation in the disease severity and complications of COVID-19 infection have been associated with multiple comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders, cancer, and chronic lung disease. Interestingly, a recent body of evidence indicated the pulmonary and gut microbiomes as potential modulators for altering the course of COVID-19, potentially via the microbiome-immune system axis. While the relative concordance between microbes and immunity has yet to be fully elucidated with regards to COVID-19, we present an overview of our current understanding of COVID-19-microbiome-immune cross talk and discuss the potential contributions of microbiome-related immunity to SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and COVID-19 disease progression.
-
8.
Assessment of vitamin B12 deficiency and B12 screening trends for patients on metformin: a retrospective cohort case review.
Martin, D, Thaker, J, Shreve, M, Lamerato, L, Budzynska, K
BMJ nutrition, prevention & health. 2021;4(1):30-35
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Vitamin B12 is a water-soluble vitamin. Medications including proton pump inhibitors, histamine H2 blockers and metformin have also been shown to cause vitamin B12 deficiency. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of vitamin B12 testing in a large cohort of patients on metformin and assess the benefit to formulating screening recommendations for vitamin B12 deficiency. This study is a retrospective cohort study of 13489 patients who were exposed to metformin. Results show that patients who are greater than 65 years old and patients who have been taking metformin for more than 5 years are at increased risk of vitamin B12 deficiency. Furthermore, the African-American population was tested at a lower rate (41.62%) compared with the non-African-American population (44.9%), showing a 15% less likelihood of being tested compared with the other ethnic groups. Authors conclude that physicians should be aware of the increased incidence of vitamin B12 deficiency in particular population cohorts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our study investigated the use of vitamin B12 testing in a large cohort of patients on metformin and assesses appropriateness and benefits of screening recommendations for vitamin B12 deficiency. DESIGN This retrospective cohort study included insured adult patients who had more than 1 year of metformin use between 1 January 2010 and 1 October 2016 and who filled at least two consecutive prescriptions of metformin to establish compliance. The comparison group was not exposed to metformin. Primary outcome was incidence of B12 deficiency diagnosed in patients on metformin. Secondary outcome was occurrence of B12 testing in the patient population on metformin. Records dated through 31 December 2018 were analysed. SETTING Large hospital system consisting of inpatient and outpatient data base. PARTICIPANTS A diverse, adult, insured population of patients who had more than 1 year of metformin use between 1 January 2010 and 1 October 2016 and who filled at least two consecutive prescriptions of metformin. RESULTS Of 13 489 patients on metformin, 6051 (44.9%) were tested for vitamin B12 deficiency, of which 202 (3.3%) tested positive (vs 2.2% of comparisons). Average time to test was 990 days. Average time to test positive for deficiency was 1926 days. Factors associated with testing were linked to sex (female, 47.8%), older age (62.79% in patients over 80 years old), race (48.98% white) and causes of malabsorption (7.11%). Multivariable logistic regression showed older age as the only factor associated with vitamin B12 deficiency, whereas African-American ethnicity approached significance as a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS Based on our study's findings of vitamin B12 deficiency in patients on metformin who are greater than 65 years old and have been using it for over 5 years, we recommend that physicians consider screening in these populations.
-
9.
Association of vaginal bacterial communities and reproductive outcomes with prophylactic antibiotic exposure in a subfertile population undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective exploratory study.
Eskew, AM, Stout, MJ, Bedrick, BS, Riley, JK, Herter, BN, Gula, H, Jungheim, ES, Wylie, KM
F&S science. 2021;2(1):71-79
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Approximately 1 in 8 couples receive infertility services in their lifetime. However, despite the increasing usage of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) technologies, the success rate, as measured using live birth rates, is just <50% in women <35 years of age. A low-diversity, Lactobacillus-dominated microbiome in the female reproductive tract has been thought to be a sign of optimal reproductive health, whereas an increased microbial diversity has been shown to be associated with poorer reproductive outcomes. The aims of this study were to (a) explore the effect of prophylactic azithromycin treatment on the vaginal bacterial microbiome longitudinally throughout an IVF cycle and (b) determine whether the characteristics of the vaginal bacterial communities are associated with clinical outcomes. This study is an a priori prospective exploratory cohort study conducted as a part of an ongoing randomized, controlled noninferiority trial. Subjects in the parent trial were randomly assigned to an azithromycin group or no-azithromycin group. The female subjects of the parent trial who were aged between 18–43 years and undergoing the first IVF cycle with a fresh embryo transfer were eligible for this study (n=27). Results show that in vaginal microbiome samples taken at the time of egg retrieval and embryo transfer, changes in the taxonomic composition, alpha diversity, and beta diversity are not associated with azithromycin [antibiotic] exposure at the time of gonadotropin initiation. Furthermore, bacterial community structures at baseline are not predictive of those at the time of embryo transfer. Authors conclude that their findings highlight the importance of timing in the assessment of vaginal microbiome to determine its associations with reproductive outcomes.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether prophylactic azithromycin is associated with the vaginal bacterial microbiome and clinical outcomes in subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN Prospective exploratory cohort study. SETTING Single academic fertility center. PATIENTS Subfertile women aged 18-43 years undergoing their first IVF cycle and fresh embryo transfer. INTERVENTION Primary exposure to prophylactic azithromycin (1 g orally) once at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the effect of azithromycin on the vaginal microbiome compared with a no-azithromycin group at 3 time points throughout the IVF cycle (baseline, retrieval, and embryo transfer). The secondary outcomes were associations of vaginal bacterial communities with clinical outcomes. RESULTS A planned a priori exploratory cohort of 27 subjects (12 in the azithromycin treatment group and 15 in the no-azithromycin group) contributed 79 vaginal swabs for the analysis as part of an ongoing randomized, controlled noninferiority trial. No specific taxa were associated with azithromycin or pregnancy at any time point. Azithromycin did not affect alpha diversity or community stability. Although there were trends of a lower bacterial load and higher percentage of Lactobacillus species in the azithromycin group at the time of transfer, these were not statistically significant. In women who did not become pregnant, the percentage of Lactobacillus species was lower (P = .048; Hodges-Lehmann estimate of difference, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.65) and the change in community composition over time was higher. The percentage of Lactobacillus species at baseline was not predictive of the percentage of Lactobacillus species at the time of embryo transfer. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic azithromycin at baseline is not associated with changes in vaginal bacterial communities. Bacterial community features at the time of embryo transfer are associated with pregnancy. Bacterial community structures at baseline are not predictive of those at the time of embryo transfer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03386227.
-
10.
The Effect of Exogenous Sex Steroids on the Vaginal Microbiota: A Systematic Review.
Ratten, LK, Plummer, EL, Bradshaw, CS, Fairley, CK, Murray, GL, Garland, SM, Bateson, D, Tachedjian, G, Masson, L, Vodstrcil, LA
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2021;11:732423
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A vaginal microbiota associated with optimal reproductive and sexual health outcomes is characterised by Lactobacillus spp., although microbiome composition varies across geographical locations and specific populations. The aim of this study was to summarise the effect of specific oestrogen-containing or progestin-only contraceptives as well as menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) on the vaginal microbiota, and evaluate the strength of these findings. This study is a systematic review of twenty-nine studies out of which 25 studies reported on the effect of hormonal contraception among reproductive-aged women and four on the effect of MHT among post-menopausal women. This review shows that: - oestrogen-containing contraceptives, particularly the combined oestrogen and progestin-containing oral contraceptive pill, had a positive effect on the composition of the vaginal microbiota. - among post-menopausal women using MHT, exogenous oestrogen also appeared to positively influence the vaginal microbiota. - exogenous-oestrogen as an adjunctive therapy does not impact the composition of the vaginal microbiota in a detrimental way. - the impact of progestin-only hormonal contraceptives was less consistent as there was equal evidence that they have either a negative or neutral impact on the vaginal microbiota. Authors conclude that their findings confirm the potential benefits of exogenous oestrogen in conferring a vaginal microbiota associated with optimal health outcomes for women.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exogenous sex steroids within hormonal contraception and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) have been used for family planning and management of menopausal symptoms, without consideration of their effects on the vaginal microbiota. This is largely because their use predates our understanding of the importance of the vaginal microbiome on human health. We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42018107730) to determine the influence of exogenous sex steroids, stratified by oestrogen-containing or progestin-only types of contraception, and MHT on the vaginal microbiome, as measured by molecular methods. METHODS Embase, PubMed and Medline were searched for relevant literature published through to December 1st 2020. Eligible studies reported on the effect of specific exogenous sex steroids on the vaginal microbiome using a molecular method. Data regarding the 'positive', 'negative' or 'neutral' effect of each type of contraceptive or MHT on the vaginal microbiome was extracted and summarised. A positive effect reflected sex steroid exposure that was associated with increased abundance of lactobacilli, a change to, or maintenance of, an optimal vaginal microbiota composition, or a decrease in bacterial diversity (specifically reflecting a low-diversity optimal microbiota state), relative to the control group. An exogenous sex steroid was designated as having a negative effect on the vaginal microbiome if it resulted in opposing effects (i.e. loss of lactobacilli, a non-optimal microbiota state). When no significant change was found, this was considered neutral/inconclusive. RESULTS We identified 29 manuscripts reporting on the effect of exogenous sex steroids on the vaginal microbiome; 25 investigating hormonal contraceptives, and 4 investigating MHT. Oestrogen-containing contraception, particularly reflecting the combined oestrogen and progestin-containing contraceptive pill, had a positive effect on the composition of the vaginal microbiota. Progestin-only contraception, particularly reflecting depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate, had mixed effects on the microbiota. Among post-menopausal women using MHT, exogenous oestrogen applied topically was associated with increased prevalence of lactobacilli. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that oestrogen-containing compounds may promote an optimal vaginal microbiota, which could have clinical applications. The impact of progestin-only contraceptives on the vaginal microbiota is less clear; more data is needed to determine how progestin-only contraceptives contribute to adverse reproductive and sexual health outcomes.