0
selected
-
1.
Resistance Exercise Training Increases Muscle Mass and Strength in Prostate Cancer Patients on Androgen Deprivation Therapy.
Houben, LHP, Overkamp, M, VAN Kraaij, P, Trommelen, J, VAN Roermund, JGH, DE Vries, P, DE Laet, K, VAN DER Meer, S, Mikkelsen, UR, Verdijk, LB, et al
Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2023;55(4):614-624
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) forms the cornerstone in the treatment of localised high-risk, locally advanced, and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). The hypothesis of this study was that protein supplementation augments the benefits of prolonged resistance exercise training to attenuate the decline in muscle mass, reduce fat mass accrual, and increase strength and physical performance in PCa patients on ADT. This study is a multicentre partly randomised controlled trial, comparing two intervention groups with a separately recruited control group. One hundred and twenty-six patients were included, and ninety-six patients finished the study. Results show that 20 week of resistance exercise training was feasible, safe, and well tolerated, and effectively counteracted the negative effect of ADT treatment on body composition, muscle mass, leg strength, and aerobic capacity in men with advanced PCa. Protein supplementation did not further augment the benefits of resistance exercise training. Authors conclude that protein supplementation is not required to further augment gains in muscle mass and strength after resistance exercise training in PCa patients who habitually consume ample protein.
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the effects of 20 wk resistance exercise training with or without protein supplementation on body composition, muscle mass, muscle strength, physical performance, and aerobic capacity in prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS Sixty prostate cancer patients receiving ADT were randomly assigned to perform 20 wk of resistance exercise training with supplementation of 31 g whey protein (EX + PRO, n = 30) or placebo (EX + PLA, n = 30), consumed immediately after exercise and every night before sleep. A separate control group (CON, n = 36) only received usual care. At baseline and after 20 wk, body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), muscle mass (computed tomography scan), muscle strength (1-repetition maximum strength tests), physical performance (Timed Up and Go Test, 30-Second Chair Stand Test, and Stair Climb Test), aerobic capacity (cardiopulmonary exercise test), and habitual dietary intake (food diary) were assessed. Data were analyzed using a two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS Over time, muscle mass and strength increased in EX + PRO and EX + PLA and decreased in CON. Total fat mass and fat percentage increased in EX + PRO and CON, but not in EX + PLA. Physical performance did not significantly change over time in either group. Aerobic capacity was maintained in EX + PLA, but it decreased in EX + PRO and CON. Habitual protein intake (without supplements) averaged >1.0 g·kg body weight -1 ·d -1 , with no differences over time or between groups. CONCLUSIONS In prostate cancer patients, resistance exercise training counteracts the adverse effects of ADT on body composition, muscle mass, muscle strength, and aerobic capacity, with no additional benefits of protein supplementation.
-
2.
Sedentary behavior and cancer-an umbrella review and meta-analysis.
Hermelink, R, Leitzmann, MF, Markozannes, G, Tsilidis, K, Pukrop, T, Berger, F, Baurecht, H, Jochem, C
European journal of epidemiology. 2022;37(5):447-460
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Globally, cancer is one of the leading causes of death. In modern day-to-day life, sedentary behaviour is prevalent, with adults spending an average of 8.2 hours without any physical activity. It is believed that sedentary behaviour plays a significant role in the increase in all-cause mortality, obesity, chronic diseases, and cancer risk. The purpose of this review and meta-analysis was to examine previous studies that reported associations between sedentary behaviour and cancer incidence and all-cancer mortality. A total of 14 meta-analyses were included in the study, and the strength of the evidence for each association was rated. A significant association was found between sedentary behaviour and cancer incidence across various cancer sites, including ovarian, endometrial, colon, breast, rectal, and prostate cancers. All-cancer mortality also showed positively significant associations with sedentary behaviour. There is a need for further research to evaluate the mechanisms associated with sedentary behaviour and the development of cancer at various sites. However, the results of this study can be used by healthcare professionals to better understand the importance of recommending physical activity and other therapeutic strategies.
Abstract
Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have summarized the association between sedentary behavior (SB) and cancer. However, the level of evidence and the potential for risk of bias remains unclear. This umbrella review summarized the current data on SB in relation to cancer incidence and mortality, with a particular emphasis on assessing the risk of bias. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Database for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the association between SB and cancer incidence and mortality. We also searched for recent observational studies not yet included in existing meta-analyses. We re-calculated summary risk estimates for cancer incidence and mortality using random effects models. We included 14 meta-analyses covering 17 different cancer sites from 77 original studies. We found that high SB levels increase the risk for developing ovarian, endometrial, colon, breast, prostate, and rectal cancers, with relative risks of 1.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.56), 1.29 (95% CI = 1.16-1.45), 1.25 (95% CI = 1.16-1.33), 1.08 (95% CI = 1.04-1.11), 1.08 (95% CI = 1.00-1.17), and 1.07 (95% CI = 1.01-1.12), respectively. Also, we found an increased risk of cancer mortality of 1.18 (95% CI = 1.09-1.26). Most associations between SB and specific cancer sites were supported by a "suggestive" level of evidence. High levels of SB are associated with increased risk of several types of cancer and increased cancer mortality risk.
-
3.
Exercise and Nutrition Interventions in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer during Curative Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bye, A, Sandmael, JA, Stene, GB, Thorsen, L, Balstad, TR, Solheim, TS, Pripp, AH, Oldervoll, LM
Nutrients. 2020;12(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Head and neck cancers (HNCs) comprises malignancies of the oral cavity, throat, larynx, salivary glands as well as nasal and paranasal sinuses. Surgery and radiotherapy (RT), sometimes combined with chemotherapy (CT) are the main treatment approaches. The aim of this study was to examine current evidence for nutritional interventions alone, physical exercise interventions alone and interventions combining nutrition and physical exercise during RT treatment for patients with HNCs. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirteen randomised controlled studies. Findings show that nutrition and physical exercise interventions have a positive effect on body composition and physical function for patients with HNCs undergoing RT (+/- concomitant CT) with a curative intent. Authors conclude that due to the pilot and feasibility design of the studies combining physical exercise and nutrition, no conclusions can be drawn concerning the effects from these studies.
Abstract
The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine the effects of nutritional and physical exercise interventions and interventions combining these interventions during radiotherapy treatment for patients with head and neck cancer on body composition, objectively measured physical function and nutritional status. Systematic electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed interface), EMBASE (Ovid interface), CINAHL (EBSCO interface) and Cochrane Library (Wiley interface). We identified 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included 858 patients. For body composition, using only nutrition as intervention, a significant difference between treatment and control group were observed (SMD 0.42 (95CI 0.23-0.62), p < 0.001). Only pilot RCTs investigated combination treatment and no significant difference between the treatment and control groups were found (SMD 0.21 (95CI -0.16-0.58), p = 0.259). For physical function, a significant difference between treatment and control group with a better outcome for the treatment group were observed (SMD 0.78 (95CI 0.51-1.04), p < 0.001). No effects on nutritional status were found. This meta-analysis found significantly positive effects of nutrition and physical exercise interventions alone in favor of the treatment groups. No effects in studies with combined interventions were observed. Future full-scaled RCTs combining nutrition and physical exercise is warranted.
-
4.
Change in physical activity and quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors receiving a physical activity intervention.
Robertson, MC, Lyons, EJ, Song, J, Cox-Martin, M, Li, Y, Green, CE, Pinto, BM, Carmack, CL, Harrison, C, Baum, G, et al
Health and quality of life outcomes. 2019;17(1):91
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Endometrial cancer survivors suffer from high rates of obesity and physical activity-related co-morbidities that are related to cancer-specific and overall mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate how change in physical activity over time related to change in multiple, specific measures of quality of life for endometrial cancer survivors receiving a physical activity intervention. This study was a one-group, pre-post design which recruited 100 women diagnosed with stage I, II, or IIIa endometrial cancer. Each participant received a customized exercise prescription that was based on the results of baseline fitness tests. Results indicate change in physical activity was positively associated with change in SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey) subscale scores for role limitations due to physical health and general health. Furthermore, change in physical activity was negatively associated with change in pain and somatic distress. Authors conclude that increasing physical activity was positively associated with improvements in role limitation due to physical health, general health, pain, and somatic distress.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial cancer survivors are at an increased risk of poor quality of life outcomes. Physical activity is positively associated with general quality of life in this population, however, little is known about how changes in physical activity may be associated with changes in specific aspects of quality of life. The aim of this secondary data analysis was to explore the relationships between change in physical activity and change in physical, mental, social, and other aspects of quality of life in endometrial cancer survivors receiving a physical activity intervention. METHODS Endometrial cancer survivors (N = 100) participated in a telephone-based physical activity intervention for six months. At baseline and post-intervention we measured physical activity via accelerometry and ecological momentary assessment, and quality of life via the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Quality of Life of Adult Cancer Survivors instrument, the Brief Symptom Inventory, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Perceived Stress Scale. We conducted structural equation modeling path analyses to investigate how physical activity post-intervention was associated with the quality of life measures' subscales post-intervention, adjusting for baseline levels and potentially confounding covariates. RESULTS Increasing physical activity was positively associated with improvements in general health (p = .044), role limitation due to physical health (p = .005), pain (p = .041), and somatic distress (p = .023). There was no evidence to indicate that change in physical activity was associated with change in other aspects of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Endometrial cancer survivors are at higher risk for suffering from challenges to physical quality of life, and findings from this study suggest that increasing physical activity may alleviate some of these problems. Further research is needed to determine whether other aspects of quality of life are linked to change in physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration number: NCT00501761 Name of registry: clinicaltrials.gov Date of registration: July 16, 2007. Date of enrollment: June 16, 2005.
-
5.
Exercise Preserves Physical Function in Prostate Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases.
Galvão, DA, Taaffe, DR, Spry, N, Cormie, P, Joseph, D, Chambers, SK, Chee, R, Peddle-McIntyre, CJ, Hart, NH, Baumann, FT, et al
Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2018;50(3):393-399
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Existing research indicates cancer patients with bone metastases should not participate in exercise due to potential risks to the skeletal system. However, current oncology guidelines suggest that all cancer patients should avoid inactivity, including those with bone metastases. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of exercise among 57 prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. Participants were randomised to either participate in exercise or receive usual care for three months. Exercise consisted of supervised aerobic activity, resistance training and stretching three days a week. Overall health status and physical function was measured by self-reported questionnaire. This study found self-reported physical functioning and lower muscle strength was improved significantly in the exercise group. There were no difference in bone pain between groups, and no adverse events occurred. Based on these results, the authors conclude exercise is safe and can help improve physical functioning among prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis.
Abstract
PURPOSE The presence of bone metastases has excluded participation of cancer patients in exercise interventions and is a relative contraindication to supervised exercise in the community setting because of concerns of fragility fracture. We examined the efficacy and safety of a modular multimodal exercise program in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. METHODS Between 2012 and 2015, 57 prostate cancer patients (70.0 ± 8.4 yr; body mass index, 28.7 ± 4.0 kg·m) with bone metastases (pelvis, 75.4%; femur, 40.4%; rib/thoracic spine, 66.7%; lumbar spine, 43.9%; humerus, 24.6%; other sites, 70.2%) were randomized to multimodal supervised aerobic, resistance, and flexibility exercises undertaken thrice weekly (EX; n = 28) or usual care (CON; n = 29) for 3 months. Physical function subscale of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 was the primary end point as an indicator of patient-rated physical functioning. Secondary end points included objective measures of physical function, lower body muscle strength, body composition, and fatigue. Safety was assessed by recording the incidence and severity of any adverse events, skeletal complications, and bone pain throughout the intervention. RESULTS There was a significant difference between groups for self-reported physical functioning (3.2 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-6.0 points; P = 0.028) and lower body muscle strength (6.6 kg; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-12.7; P = 0.033) at 3 months favoring EX. However, there was no difference between groups for lean mass (P = 0.584), fat mass (P = 0.598), or fatigue (P = 0.964). There were no exercise-related adverse events or skeletal fractures and no differences in bone pain between EX and CON (P = 0.507). CONCLUSIONS Multimodal modular exercise in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases led to self-reported improvements in physical function and objectively measured lower body muscle strength with no skeletal complications or increased bone pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12611001158954.