-
1.
Differential effects of renin-angiotensine-aldosteron system inhibition, sympathoinhibition and low sodium diet on blood pressure in women with a history of preeclampsia: A double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial (the PALM study).
Zoet, GA, Paauw, ND, Veerbeek, JHW, Groenhof, TKJ, Spiering, W, Verhaar, MC, Franx, A, Titia Lely, A
Pregnancy hypertension. 2022;:173-175
Abstract
Current guidelines lack sufficient evidence to recommend a specific blood pressure lowering strategy to prevent cardiovascular disease after preeclampsia. We conducted a double-blind cross-over trial to identify the most potent antihypertensive strategy: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibition (losartan), sympathoinhibition (moxonidine), low sodium diet and placebo (n = 10). Due to low inclusion rate our study stopped prematurely. Initiatory analyses showed no significant effect of antihypertensive strategy on office blood pressure and 24-hour blood pressure. However, nocturnal dipping was significantly higher on RAAS inhibition and low sodium diet compared to placebo and sympathoinhibition. Optimal cardiovascular prevention after preeclampsia should be further explored.
-
2.
Effect of losartan on the recoverability of renal function in anuric and oliguric patients with a solitary obstructed kidney: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Elkappany, S, Hashem, A, Elkarta, A, Sheashaa, H, Osman, Y, Shokeir, AA
BJU international. 2020;(6):715-721
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the role of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan on the recoverability of renal function after de-obstruction in patients with anuria and oliguria. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial in anuric or oliguric patients with calcular obstruction of solitary kidney. Patients with an anomalous kidney or those with an American Society of Anesthesiology score of >3 were excluded. After relief of obstruction, patients were allocated to receive either losartan potassium 25 mg or placebo for 3 months. Serum creatinine (sCr) and renographic glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured at nadir and after 3 months. Changes in sCr and renographic GFR were calculated by subtracting the values at nadir from those at 3 months. Improvement, stabilization or deterioration of sCr and renographic GFR were defined as percentage increase or decrease from nadir ≥10%, while changes <10% were considered as stabilization. RESULTS A total of 76 patients completed 3 months of follow-up. Demographics and peri-operative data were comparable in the two groups. The median (range) sCr change was -1.05 (-1.8, 0.4) and -0.5 (-1.3, 0.1) mg/dL in the losartan and placebo, groups, respectively (P = 0.07). In the losartan group, renographic GFR had improved in 26 (59.1%) and deteriorated in six (13.6%) patients, while, in the placebo group, it had improved in eight (25%) and deteriorated in 10 patients (31.3%; P = 0.01). Losartan also enhanced renographic GFR improvement vs placebo by a median (range) of 6.9 (-9, 44) vs 1.4 (-10, 32) mL/min (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS In patients with anuria and oliguria, losartan treatment contributes to renal function recoverability after relief of calcular obstruction of the solitary kidney.
-
3.
Combined treatment with valsartan and fluvastatin to delay disease progression in nonpermanent atrial fibrillation with hypertension: A clinical trial.
Zhao, Z, Yang, Y, Wang, J, Dong, Z, Niu, X, Liu, E, Liu, T, Li, L, Liang, Y, Li, G
Clinical cardiology. 2020;(12):1592-1600
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a complex cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice with increasing incidence. However, the effects of statins on patients with AF are not quite clear. HYPOTHESIS To investigate the protective effect of calcium channel blocker (CCB) and valsartan combined fluvastatin on hypertension (HTN) patients with nonpermanent AF. METHODS In three and a half years, 189 cases of patients diagnosed as HTN combining nonpermanent AF by eight medical centers, were recruited and randomly assigned to four groups with varied treatments: CCB group; CCB + statin group; valsartan group; and valsartan + statin group. The four groups were followed up for 24 months. The 7-day Holter ultrasound echocardiography (UCG) and biochemical indexes were completed at preset time nodes respectively. RESULTS After 24 months of follow-up, 178 patients completed the study. Compared with CCB group, the blood lipid level, inflammatory index, ultrasonic index and electrocardiographic measurement results of CCB + statin group, valsartan group and valsartan + statin group were improved in different degrees and had statistical significance (P < .05 or P < .01). Furthermore, the improvement trend of CCB + statin group and valsartan + statin group was more obvious. CONCLUSIONS The results indicated that valsartan can reduce AF load and recurrence rate, and delay the progression of nonpermanent AF to permanent AF in multiple ways, and the effect of combination of valsartan and fluvastatin is more significant. These results provide a new direction for the integrated upstream control strategy of AF.
-
4.
Prior Heart Failure Hospitalization, Clinical Outcomes, and Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Valsartan in HFpEF.
Vaduganathan, M, Claggett, BL, Desai, AS, Anker, SD, Perrone, SV, Janssens, S, Milicic, D, Arango, JL, Packer, M, Shi, VC, et al
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020;(3):245-254
Abstract
BACKGROUND The period shortly after hospitalization for heart failure (HF) represents a high-risk window for recurrent clinical events, including rehospitalization or death. OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine whether the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan varies in relation to the proximity to hospitalization for HF among patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS In this post hoc analysis of PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI [Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor] with ARB [Angiotensin Receptor Blocker] Global Outcomes in HFpEF), we assessed the risk of clinical events and response to sacubitril/valsartan in relation to time from last HF hospitalization among patients with HFpEF (≥45%). The primary outcome was composite total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death, analyzed by using a semiparametric proportional rates method, stratified by geographic region. RESULTS Of 4,796 validly randomized patients in PARAGON-HF, 622 (13%) were screened during hospitalization or within 30 days of prior hospitalization, 555 (12%) within 31 to 90 days, 435 (9%) within 91 to 180 days, and 694 (14%) after 180 days; 2,490 (52%) were never previously hospitalized. Over a median follow-up of 35 months, risk of total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death was inversely and nonlinearly associated with timing from prior HF hospitalization (p < 0.001). There was a gradient in relative risk reduction in primary events with sacubitril/valsartan from patients hospitalized within 30 days (rate ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.53 to 0.99) to patients never hospitalized (rate ratio: 1.00; 95% confidence interval: 0.80 to 1.24; trend in relative risk reduction: pinteraction = 0.15). With valsartan alone, the rate of total primary events was 26.7 (≤30 days), 24.2 (31 to 90 days), 20.7 (91 to 180 days), 15.7 (>180 days), and 7.9 (not previously hospitalized) per 100 patient-years. Compared with valsartan, absolute risk reductions with sacubitril/valsartan were more prominent in patients enrolled early after hospitalization: 6.4% (≤30 days), 4.6% (31 to 90 days), and 3.4% (91 to 180 days), whereas no risk reduction was observed in patients screened >180 days or who were never hospitalized (trend in absolute risk reduction: pinteraction = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS Recent hospitalization for HFpEF identifies patients at high risk for near-term clinical progression. In the PARAGON-HF trial, the relative and absolute benefits of sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan in HFpEF appear to be amplified when initiated in the high-risk window after hospitalization and warrant prospective validation. (PARAGON-HF; NCT01920711).
-
5.
Effects of sartans and low-dose statins on cerebral white matter hyperintensities and cognitive function in older patients with hypertension: a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Zhang, H, Cui, Y, Zhao, Y, Dong, Y, Duan, D, Wang, J, Sheng, L, Ji, T, Zhou, T, Hu, W, et al
Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2019;(5):717-729
Abstract
Cerebral white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and cognitive impairment are common in elderly hypertensive patients, and more needs to be learned about their prevention and treatment. Our aim was to investigate the effect of low-dose statins on WMH and cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing antihypertensive treatment. A total of 732 elderly hypertensive patients taking hydrochlorothiazide as their baseline medication were randomized using a 2 × 2 factorial design with antihypertensive (telmisartan vs. placebo) and lipid-modulating (low-dose rosuvastatin vs. placebo) arms. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cognitive function data were obtained. After a mean follow-up time of 59.8 (range 12-65) months, there were no differences in WMH progression and cognitive function decline over time between the groups in the antihypertensive arm. The risks of new-incident WMH Fazekas scale scores ≥ 2 and the incidence of cognitive impairment did not differ between the telmisartan and placebo groups. Rosuvastatin use was associated with lower risks of new-incident Fazekas scale scores ≥2 (hazard ratio = 0.500; 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.74) and cognitive impairment (hazard ratio = 0.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.80). Telmisartan interacted with rosuvastatin on reducing WMH progression and cognitive function decline. Findings suggest that low-dose rosuvastatin could reduce WMH progression and cognitive function decline in antihypertensive patients, as demonstrated by the interaction between telmisartan and low-dose rosuvastatin to this effect.
-
6.
Randomized trial of an increased dose of calcium channel blocker or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker as an add-on intensive depressor therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: the ACADEMIE Study.
Imaizumi, S, Shiga, Y, Ogawa, M, Sako, H, Nagata, Y, Matsunaga, A, Shirotani, T, Hoshino, F, Yahiro, E, Uehara, Y, et al
Heart and vessels. 2019;(4):698-710
Abstract
There is a lack of data on how to treat hypertensive patients with diabetes when treatment with medium doses of calcium channel blocker and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) is insufficient to achieve the target blood pressure (BP). A total of 121 participants with type 2 diabetes and uncontrolled essential hypertension, who were receiving medium doses of amlodipine (5 mg/day) and ARB, were enrolled. Participants were randomized to receive either a high dose of amlodipine (10 mg/day) plus a medium dose of ARB (high-AML) or a medium dose of amlodipine (5 mg/day) plus a high dose of ARB (high-ARB). The depressor effects of these two regimens were monitored using a telemonitoring home BP-measuring system. Fifty-four patients were excluded after an observation period, and the remaining 67 eligible participants were randomized into the two groups; 42 which had a record of their home BP for analysis. The change in morning home systolic and diastolic BP was greater in the high-AML than in the high-ARB (systolic BP; - 7.9 mmHg vs. + 2.7 mmHg; p = 0.0002, diastolic BP; - 3.9 mmHg vs. + 0.6 mmHg; p = 0.0007). In addition, the home systolic and diastolic BP before going to bed and office systolic BP were significantly reduced from week 0 only in the high-AML. An increased dose of amlodipine, but not ARB, reduced home morning BP in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes who were already receiving combination therapy with medium doses of amlodipine and ARB.
-
7.
Association Between Change in Central Nocturnal Blood Pressure and Urine Albumin-Creatinine Ratio by a Valsartan/Amlodipine Combination: A CPET Study.
Fujiwara, T, Yano, Y, Hoshide, S, Kanegae, H, Hashimoto, J, Kario, K
American journal of hypertension. 2018;(9):995-1001
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to assess the association of changes in brachial or central nocturnal systolic blood pressure (SBP) with change in urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) by a valsartan/amlodipine combination (80/5 mg) therapy in hypertensive patients. METHODS Twenty-three patients (age range, 47-78 years; mean, 68.0 years; 35% men, 65% with chronic kidney disease) with clinic brachial BP ≥140/90 mm Hg were treated with valsartan/amlodipine combination therapy for 16 weeks. At baseline and 16 weeks later, we measured brachial and central nocturnal SBP using an oscillometric Mobil-O-Graph device and UACR by spot urine in 23 patients. RESULTS The changes in brachial nocturnal SBP (r = 0.445, P = 0.033) and those in central nocturnal SBP (r = 0.616, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with change in UACR by intervention. In multivariable-adjusted multiple regression analyses including changes in both brachial and central nocturnal SBP jointly, only central nocturnal SBP change retained a statistically significant association with change in UACR (β = 0.919, P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS Lowering central nocturnal SBP by a valsartan/amlodipine combination therapy was associated with reduction of UACR, independently of brachial nocturnal SBP reduction. Central nocturnal SBP may be a therapeutic target to protect the kidney. A larger scale interventional study will be needed to confirm the kidney protection conferred by lowering central nocturnal SBP. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION Trial Number UMIN000013519.
-
8.
A randomised controlled trial evaluating renal protective effects of selenium with vitamins A, C, E, verapamil, and losartan against extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy-induced renal injury.
El-Nahas, AR, Elsaadany, MM, Taha, DE, Elshal, AM, El-Ghar, MA, Ismail, AM, Elsawy, EA, Saleh, HH, Wafa, EW, Awadalla, A, et al
BJU international. 2017;(1):142-147
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the protective effects of selenium with vitamins A, C and E (selenium ACE, i.e. antioxidants), verapamil (calcium channel blocker), and losartan (angiotensin receptor blocker) against extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL)-induced renal injury. PATIENTS AND METHODS A randomised controlled trial was conducted between August 2012 and February 2015. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with a single renal stone (<2 cm) suitable for ESWL. Patients with diabetes, hypertension, congenital renal anomalies, moderate or marked hydronephrosis, or preoperative albuminuria (>300 mg/L) were excluded. ESWL was performed using the electromagnetic DoLiS lithotripter. Eligible patients were randomised into one of four groups using sealed closed envelopes: Group1, control; Group 2, selenium ACE; Group 3, losartan; and Group 4, verapamil. Albuminuria and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) were estimated after 2-4 h and 1 week after ESWL. The primary outcome was differences between albuminuria and uNGAL. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed before ESWL, and at 2-4 h and 1 week after ESWL to compare changes in renal perfusion. RESULTS Of 329 patients assessed for eligibility, the final analysis comprised 160 patients (40 in each group). Losartan was the only medication that showed significantly lower levels of albuminuria after 1 week (P < 0.001). For perfusion changes, there was a statistically significant decrease in the renal perfusion in patients with obstructed kidneys in comparison to before ESWL (P = 0.003). These significant changes were present in the control or antioxidant group, whilst in the losartan and verapamil groups renal perfusion was not significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS Losartan was found to protect the kidney against ESWL-induced renal injury by significantly decreasing post-ESWL albuminuria. Verapamil and losartan maintained renal perfusion in patients with post-ESWL renal obstruction.
-
9.
Abelmoschus manihot - a traditional Chinese medicine versus losartan potassium for treating IgA nephropathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Li, P, Chen, YZ, Lin, HL, Ni, ZH, Zhan, YL, Wang, R, Yang, HT, Fang, JA, Wang, NS, Li, WG, et al
Trials. 2017;(1):170
Abstract
BACKGROUND IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is one of the most common primary glomerular diseases worldwide, but effective therapy remains limited and many patients progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Only angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) show a high level of evidence (1B level) of being of value in the treatment for IgAN according to the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. However, traditional Chinese medicine has raised attention in kidney disease research. Abelmoschus manihot, a single medicament of traditional Chinese medicine has shown therapeutic effects in primary glomerular disease according to the randomized controlled clinical trial that we have completed. Here, we conduct a new study to assess the efficacy and safety of Abelmoschus manihot in IgAN. Also, this study is currently the largest double-blind, randomized controlled registered clinical research for the treatment of IgAN. METHODS We will conduct a multicenter, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy randomized controlled study. The study is designed as a noninferiority clinical trial. Approximately 1600 biopsy-proven IgAN patients will be enrolled at 100 centers in China and followed up for as long as 48 weeks. IgAN patients will be randomized assigned to the Abelmoschus manihot group (in the form of a huangkui capsule, 2.5 g, three times per day) and the losartan potassium group (losartan potassium, 100 mg/d). The primary outcome is the change in 24-h proteinuria from baseline after 48 weeks of treatment. Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline after 48 weeks of treatment, the incidence of endpoint events (proteinuria ≥3.5 g/24 h, the doubling of serum creatinine, or receiving blood purification treatment) are the secondary outcomes. Twenty-four-hour proteinuria and eGFR are measured at 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks. DISCUSSION This study will be of sufficient size and scope to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Abelmoschus manihot compared to losartan potassium in treating patients with IgAN. The results of this study may provide a new, effective and safe treatment strategy for IgAN. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02231125 . Registered on 30 August 2014.
-
10.
Plasma Biomarkers Reflecting Profibrotic Processes in Heart Failure With a Preserved Ejection Fraction: Data From the Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB on Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Study.
Zile, MR, Jhund, PS, Baicu, CF, Claggett, BL, Pieske, B, Voors, AA, Prescott, MF, Shi, V, Lefkowitz, M, McMurray, JJ, et al
Circulation. Heart failure. 2016;(1)
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a clinical syndrome that has been associated with changes in the extracellular matrix. The purpose of this study was to determine whether profibrotic biomarkers accurately reflect the presence and severity of disease and underlying pathophysiology and modify response to therapy in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS Four biomarkers, soluble form of ST2 (an interleukin-1 receptor family member), galectin-3, matrix metalloproteinase-2, and collagen III N-terminal propeptide were measured in the Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB on Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAMOUNT) trial at baseline, 12 and 36 weeks after randomization to valsartan or LCZ696. We examined the relationship between baseline biomarkers, demographic and echocardiographic characteristics, change in primary (change in N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide) and secondary (change in left atrial volume) end points. The median (interquartile range) value for soluble form of ST2 (33 [24.6-48.1] ng/mL) and galectin 3 (17.8 [14.1-22.8] ng/mL) were higher, and for matrix metalloproteinase-2 (188 [155.5-230.6] ng/mL) lower, than in previously published referent controls; collagen III N-terminal propeptide (5.6 [4.3-6.9] ng/mL) was similar to referent control values. All 4 biomarkers correlated with severity of disease as indicated by N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, E/E', and left atrial volume. Baseline biomarkers did not modify the response to LCZ696 for lowering N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; however, left atrial volume reduction varied by baseline level of soluble form of ST2 and galectin 3; patients with values less than the observed median (<33 ng/mL soluble form of ST2 and <17.8 ng/mL galectin 3) had reduction in left atrial volume, those above median did not. Although LCZ696 reduced N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, levels of the other 4 biomarkers were not affected over time. CONCLUSIONS In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, biomarkers that reflect collagen homeostasis correlated with the presence and severity of disease and underlying pathophysiology, and may modify the structural response to treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00887588.