-
1.
Cardiovascular Benefits of Combination Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Plus Calcium Channel Blockade in Black Hypertensive Patients.
Brook, RD, Kaciroti, N, Jamerson, T, Jamerson, KA
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979). 2021;(4):1150-1152
-
2.
Electrophysiological and ECG Effects of Perhexiline, a Mixed Cardiac Ion Channel Inhibitor, Evaluated in Nonclinical Assays and in Healthy Subjects.
Midei, MG, Darpo, B, Ayers, G, Brown, R, Couderc, JP, Daly, W, Ferber, G, Sager, PT, Camm, AJ
Journal of clinical pharmacology. 2021;(12):1606-1617
Abstract
Perhexiline has been used to treat hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In addition to its effect on carnitine-palmitoyltransferase-1, it has mixed ion channel effects through inhibition of several cardiac ion currents. Effects on cardiac ion channels expressed in mammalian cells were assayed using a manual patch-clamp technique, action potential duration (APD) was measured in ventricular trabeculae of human donor hearts, and electrocardiogram effects were evaluated in healthy subjects in a thorough QT (TQT) study. Perhexiline blocked several cardiac ion currents at concentrations within the therapeutic range (150-600 ng/mL) with IC50 for hCav1.2 ∼ hERG < late hNav1.5. A significant APD shortening was observed in perhexiline-treated cardiomyocytes. The TQT study was conducted with a pilot part in 9 subjects to evaluate a dosing schedule that would achieve therapeutic and supratherapeutic perhexiline plasma concentrations on days 4 and 6, respectively. Guided by the results from the pilot, 104 subjects were enrolled in a parallel-designed part with a nested crossover comparison for the positive control. Perhexiline caused QTc prolongation, with the largest effect on ΔΔQTcF, 14.7 milliseconds at therapeutic concentrations and 25.6 milliseconds at supratherapeutic concentrations and a positive and statistically significant slope of the concentration-ΔΔQTcF relationship (0.018 milliseconds per ng/mL; 90%CI, 0.0119-0.0237 milliseconds per ng/mL). In contrast, the JTpeak interval was shortened with a negative concentration-JTpeak relationship, a pattern consistent with multichannel block. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether this results in a low proarrhythmic risk.
-
3.
Isradipine Versus Placebo in Early Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Trial.
,
Annals of internal medicine. 2020;(9):591-598
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies suggest that dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers may be associated with reduced risk for Parkinson disease (PD). OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of isradipine, a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker, on the rate of clinical progression of PD. DESIGN Multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02168842). SETTING 57 Parkinson Study Group sites in North America. PARTICIPANTS Patients with early-stage PD (duration <3 years) who were not taking dopaminergic medications at enrollment. INTERVENTION 5 mg of immediate-release isradipine twice daily or placebo for 36 months. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts I to III score measured in the antiparkinson medication "ON" state between baseline and 36 months. Secondary outcomes included time to initiation and use of antiparkinson medications, time to onset of motor complications, change in nonmotor disability, and quality-of-life measures. RESULTS 336 patients were randomly assigned (mean age, 62 years [SD, 9]; 68% men; disease duration, 0.9 year [SD, 0.7]; mean UPDRS part I to III score, 23.1 [SD, 8.6]); 95% of patients completed the study. Adjusted least-squares mean changes in total UPDRS score in the antiparkinson medication ON state over 36 months for isradipine and placebo recipients were 2.99 (95% CI, 0.95 to 5.03) points versus 3.26 (CI, 1.25 to 5.26) points, respectively, with a treatment effect of -0.27 (CI, -3.02 to 2.48) point (P = 0.85). Statistical adjustment for antiparkinson medication use did not change the findings. Secondary outcomes showed no effect of isradipine treatment. The most common adverse effects of isradipine were edema and dizziness. LIMITATION The isradipine dose may have been insufficient to engage the target calcium channels associated with neuroprotective effects. CONCLUSION Long-term treatment with immediate-release isradipine did not slow the clinical progression of early-stage PD. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
-
4.
Beta blockers versus calcium channel blockers for provocation of vasospastic angina after drug-eluting stent implantation: a multicentre prospective randomised trial.
Sawano, M, Katsuki, T, Kitai, T, Tamita, K, Obunai, K, Ikegami, Y, Yamane, T, Ueda, I, Endo, A, Maekawa, Y, et al
Open heart. 2020;(2)
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug-eluting stent-induced vasospastic angina (DES-VSA) has emerged as a novel complication in the modern era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although beta blockers (BBs) are generally recommended for coronary heart disease, they may promote incidence of DES-VSA. This study aimed to compare the effects of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) perceived to be protective against DES-VSA and BBs on subsequent coronary events after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. METHODS In this multicentre prospective, randomised study, 52 patients with coronary artery disease who underwent PCI for a single-vessel lesion with everolimus-eluting stent placement were randomised into post-stenting BB (N=26) and CCB (N=26) groups and followed for 24 months to detect any major cardiovascular events (MACE). A positive result on acetylcholine provocation testing during diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG) at 9 months was the primary endpoint for equivalence. MACE included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cerebrovascular disease or coronary revascularisation for stable coronary artery disease after index PCI. RESULTS At 9 months, 42 patients (80.8%) underwent diagnostic coronary angiography and acetylcholine provocation testing. Among them, seven patients in each group were diagnosed with definite vasospasm (intention-to-treat analysis 26.9% vs 26.9%, risk difference 0 (-0.241, 0.241)). Meanwhile, the secondary endpoint, 24-month MACE, was higher in the CCB group (19.2%) than in the BB group (3.8%) (p=0.01). In detail, coronary revascularisation for stable coronary artery disease was the predominant endpoint that contributed to the greater proportion of MACE in the CCB group (CCB (19.2%) vs BB (3.8%), p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of acetylcholine-induced coronary artery spasms did not differ between patients receiving BBs or CCBs at 9 months after PCI. However, a higher incidence of 2-year MACE was observed in the CCB group, suggesting the importance of BB administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This study was registered at the Japanese University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trial Registry (The Prospective Randomized Trial for Optimizing Medical Therapy After Stenting: Calcium-Beta Trial; UMIN000008321, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000009536).
-
5.
Cinnarizine and sodium valproate as the preventive agents of pediatric migraine: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Amanat, M, Togha, M, Agah, E, Ramezani, M, Tavasoli, AR, Azizi Malamiri, R, Fashandaky, F, Heidari, M, Salehi, M, Eshaghi, H, et al
Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache. 2020;(7):665-674
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few migraine preventive agents have been assessed in a pediatric population. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of cinnarizine and sodium valproate for migraine prophylaxis in children and adolescents. METHODS We carried out a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in the Children's Medical Center and Sina hospital, Tehran, Iran. Eligible participants were randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio via interactive web response system to receive either cinnarizine, sodium valproate, or placebo. The primary endpoints were the mean change in frequency and intensity of migraine attacks from baseline to the last 4 weeks of trial. The secondary endpoint was the efficacy of each drug in the prevention of migraine. The drug was considered effective if it decreased migraine frequency by more than 50% in the double-blind phase compared with the baseline. Safety endpoint was adverse effects that were reported by children or their parents. RESULTS A total of 158 children participated. The frequency of migraine attacks significantly reduced compared to baseline in cinnarizine (difference: -8.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): -9.3 to -6.6), sodium valproate (difference: -8.3; 95% confidence interval: -9.3 to -7.2), and placebo (difference: -4.4; 95% confidence interval: -5.4 to -3.4) arms. The decrease was statistically greater in cinnarizine (difference: -3.6; 95% confidence interval: -5.5 to -1.6) and sodium valproate (difference: -3.9; 95% confidence interval: -5.8 to -1.9) arms, compared to placebo group. Children in all groups had significant reduction in intensity of episodes compared to baseline (cinnarizine: -4.6; 95% confidence interval: -5.2 to -4.0; sodium valproate: -4.0; 95% confidence interval: -4.8 to -3.3; placebo: -2.6; 95% confidence interval: -3.4 to -1.8). The decrease was statistically greater in cinnarizine (difference: -2.0; 95% confidence interval: -3.2 to -0.8) and sodium valproate (difference: -1.5; 95% confidence interval: -2.7 to -0.3) arms, compared to the placebo group. Seventy-one percent of individuals in the cinnarizine group, 66% of cases in the sodium valproate group, and 42% of people in the placebo arm reported more than 50% reduction in episodes at the end of the trial. The odds ratio for >50% responder rate was 3.5 (98.3% confidence interval: 1.3 to 9.3) for cinnarizine versus placebo and 2.7 (98.3% confidence interval: 1.0 to 6.9) for sodium valproate versus placebo. Nine individuals reported adverse effects (three in cinnarizine, five in sodium valproate, and one in the placebo group) and one case in the sodium valproate group discontinued the therapy due to severe sedation. CONCLUSION Cinnarizine and sodium valproate could be useful in migraine prophylaxis in children and adolescents. Trial registration: IRCT201206306907N4.
-
6.
Therapeutic effects of nebulized verapamil on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized and double-blind clinical trial.
Bozorgmehr, R, Edalatifard, M, Safavi, E, Rahimi, B, Ghorbani, F, Abtahi, H, Amini, S, Pourdowlat, G
The clinical respiratory journal. 2020;(4):370-381
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In this study, we assessed the clinical effect of inhaled verapamil on hospitalized COPD patients in a randomized and double-blind study. METHOD COPD patients randomly received 10 mg of inhaled verapamil or 4 cc nebulized distilled water (DW) as placebo. RESULTS Twenty patients enrolled in each group with no difference in baseline characteristics. Mean age was 64.95 ± 8.9 and 66.9 ± 10.74 years in verapamil and control group; respectively, (P > 0.05). The mean dyspnea score was 6.4 ± 1.2 and 6.2 ± 1.8 in the verapamil and control group, respectively and decreased to 4.9 ± 1.3 and 5.7 ± 1.8 after the intervention. The mean change in the verapamil group was significantly higher, (22.43% ± 10.6% vs 8.7% ± 12.1%), P = 0.00. Unlike the control group, the FEV1 value in the verapamil group significantly increased and reached to 1.17 ± 0.4 L from 1.03 ± 0.4. There was a significant decrease in airway resistance in both groups after intervention. However, neither total lung capacity and residual volume nor forced vital capacity changed significantly. Moreover, oxygen saturation in the verapamil group changed 4.8% ± 2.5% and this improvement in the control group was 1.8 ± 1 (P = 0.00). Smoker subjects, ones with PAP more than 35 mm Hg and obese patients benefit from verapamil. CONCLUSION The beneficial impact of inhaled verapamil on the diminishing of dyspnea score along with its bronchodilatory effect would make this selective calcium blocker agent a therapeutic option in COPD.
-
7.
Pharmacokinetic Interaction Among Telmisartan, Amlodipine, and Hydrochlorothiazide After a Single Oral Administration in Healthy Male Subjects.
Moon, SJ, Jeon, JY, Yu, KS, Kim, MG
Clinical therapeutics. 2019;(11):2273-2282
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, necessitating hypertension control. Antihypertensive drugs are more potent when administered in combinations of 2 or 3 different classes of drugs. One such therapy includes a combination of an angiotensin receptor blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction among telmisartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide. METHODS A randomized, open-label, 3-period, 6-sequence, 3-treatment, single-dose crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 sequences and one of the following treatments was administered in each period: treatment A, co-administration of one tablet of telmisartan 80 mg and one tablet of amlodipine 10 mg; treatment B, one tablet of hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg alone; and treatment C, co-administration of all 3 investigational products. Serial blood samples were collected up to 144 hours postdose. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by using LC/MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax and AUC0-last, were determined by using noncompartmental analysis. The geometric least squares mean ratios and associated 90% CIs of log-transformed Cmax and AUC0-last for separate administration or co-administration were calculated to evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions. FINDINGS Twenty-seven subjects completed the study. The geometric least squares mean ratios and 90% CIs of Cmax and AUC0-last were 1.02 (0.85-1.21) and 1.04 (0.97-1.13) for telmisartan; 1.00 (0.95-1.04) and 0.95 (0.91-0.99) for amlodipine; and 0.88 (0.82-0.96) and 0.86 (0.82-0.90) for hydrochlorothiazide, respectively. No serious adverse events were recorded, and all reported adverse events were of mild intensity. IMPLICATIONS The pharmacokinetic parameters of telmisartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide when administered separately or co-administered were compared, and all the parameters met the criteria for pharmacokinetic equivalence. Combination therapy of these 3 drugs had no significant impact on the pharmacokinetic parameters of each drug. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03889145).
-
8.
Preventing spasm of the radial artery conduit during coronary artery bypass grafting: Nicardipine versus verapamil.
Özdemir, HI, van Dijk, CHB, Özdemir, AB, van Straten, BHM, Haanschoten, M, Soliman-Hamad, MA
Journal of cardiac surgery. 2019;(12):1505-1510
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY In vitro studies have shown a reduction in radial artery spasm with the use of calcium antagonists. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of topical treatment of the radial artery conduit using either verapamil or nicardipine before the anastomoses. METHODS This prospective randomized study included 131 patients, who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with the use of the radial artery as a conduit. In 65 patients, the harvested radial artery was topically treated with verapamil and in 66 patients with nicardipine. After harvesting the radial artery, the direct flow through the conduit was measured in vitro before 5-minute incubation in nicardipine or verapamil and measured again after incubation. The flow before and after incubation was compared. Postincubation flow was also compared in the two groups. After performing the anastomosis, the flow through the radial artery was measured in vivo. RESULTS The mean flow after NaCl incubation was 19.93 ± 12.66 mL/min and after incubation in the Ca+ channel blocker 47.16 ± 14.58 mL/min (P < .001). No significant difference in postincubation free flow was found between verapamil (46.29 ± 15.43 mL/min) and nicardipine (48.01 ± 13.77 mL/min; P = .503). CONCLUSION Topical treatment with Ca+ channel blockers reduces radial artery spasm and significantly increases the free flow through the radial artery conduit. Nicardipine is a safe and effective alternative of verapamil in preventing spasm of radial artery conduit.
-
9.
Effects of Nilvadipine on Cerebral Blood Flow in Patients With Alzheimer Disease.
de Jong, DLK, de Heus, RAA, Rijpma, A, Donders, R, Olde Rikkert, MGM, Günther, M, Lawlor, BA, van Osch, MJP, Claassen, JAHR
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979). 2019;(2):413-420
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Cerebrovascular changes, including reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF), occur early in the development of Alzheimer disease and may accelerate disease progression. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated how 6 months of treatment with the calcium antagonist nilvadipine would affect CBF in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease. CBF was measured with magnetic resonance arterial spin labeling in whole-brain gray matter and in a priori defined regions of interest including the hippocampus. Fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned (29 in each group), of whom 22 in both groups had no magnetic resonance exclusion criteria and were medication compliant over 6 months. Mean age was 72.8±6.2 years, mean mini-mental state examination was 20.4±3.4. Nilvadipine treatment lowered systolic blood pressure (Δ=-11.5 [95% CI, -19.7 to -3.2] mm Hg; P<0.01), while whole-brain gray-matter CBF remained stable (Δ=5.4 [95% CI, -6.4 to 17.2] mL/100 g per minute; P=0.36). CBF in the hippocampus increased (left: Δ=24.4 [95% CI, 4.3-44.5] mL/100 g per minute; P=0.02; right: Δ=20.1 [95% CI, -0.6 to 40.8] mL/100 g per minute; P=0.06). There was no significant change in CBF in the posterior cingulate cortex (Δ=5.2 [95% CI, -16.5 to 27.0] mL/100 g per minute; P=0.63) or other regions of interest. In conclusion, nilvadipine reduced blood pressure and increased CBF in the hippocampus, whereas other regions showed stable or small nonsignificant increases in CBF. These findings not only indicate preserved cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer disease but also point toward beneficial cerebrovascular effects of antihypertensive treatment. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02017340.
-
10.
A randomized controlled trial on the blood pressure-lowering effect of amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS in sustained hypertension.
Huang, QF, Sheng, CS, Li, Y, Dou, Y, Zheng, MS, Zhu, ZM, Wang, JG, ,
Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2019;(5):648-657
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
In a multicenter, randomized trial, we investigated whether the long half-time dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker amlodipine was more efficacious than the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of nifedipine in lowering ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in sustained hypertension (clinic systolic/diastolic BP 140-179/90-109 mm Hg and 24-hour systolic/diastolic BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg). Eligible patients were randomly assigned to amlodipine 5-10 mg/day or nifedipine-GITS 30-60 mg/day. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed for 24 hours at baseline and 4-week treatment and for 48 hours at 8-week treatment with a dose of medication missed on the second day. After 8-week treatment, BP was similarly reduced in the amlodipine (n = 257) and nifedipine-GITS groups (n = 248) for both clinic and ambulatory (24-hour systolic/diastolic BP 10.3/6.5 vs 10.9/6.3 mm Hg, P ≥ 0.24) measurements. However, after missing a dose of medication, ambulatory BP reductions were greater in the amlodipine than nifedipine-GITS group, with a significant (P ≤ 0.04) between-group difference in 24-hour (-1.2 mm Hg) and daytime diastolic BP (-1.5 mm Hg). In conclusion, amlodipine and nifedipine-GITS were efficacious in reducing 24-hour BP. When a dose of medication was missed, amlodipine became more efficacious than nifedipine-GITS.