-
1.
Is There a Need to Revise Goals in the Management of Dyslipidemias?
Sinning, D, Landmesser, U
Current cardiology reports. 2019;(6):51
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Current guidelines on the management of patients with dyslipidemias recommend specific risk-dependent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment goals. Recently, several randomized clinical trials have investigated further lowering of LDL-C in addition to statin therapy using novel therapeutic approaches and examined their effects on cardiovascular (CV) risk. This review summarizes newly available data on efficacy and safety of lowering LDL-C beyond statin therapy and below current treatment targets. RECENT FINDINGS In patients at very high risk for CV events, a significant residual risk remains when failing to achieve significant LDL-C reduction on maximally tolerated statin therapy alone. Further lowering of LDL-C, even beyond current treatment targets, has been shown to be safe and was associated with a further reduced CV risk reduction. The relative risk reduction per change in LDL-C levels has been observed to be consistent even in patient populations achieving extremely low levels of LDL-C. In patients at very high CV risk, further lowering of LDL-C beyond statin therapy and present treatment targets has been observed to further reduce CV risk, which may be foremost relevant for patients at a particular high absolute CV risk, e.g., for patients with progressive and/or very extensive coronary disease.
-
2.
The biochemical and genetic diagnosis of lipid disorders.
Schaefer, EJ, Geller, AS, Endress, G
Current opinion in lipidology. 2019;(2):56-62
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To examine recent advances in our knowledge on the diagnosis of lipid disorders. RECENT FINDINGS Fasting values above the 99th percentile for direct LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), lipoprotein(a), and triglycerides are greater than 225 mg/dl, greater than 160 mg/dl, and greater than 500 mg/dl (>5.82, >394, and >5.65 mmol/l), respectively, whereas such values for plasma lathosterol, β-sitosterol, and cholestanol are greater than 8.0, 8.0, and 5.0 mg/l (>0.021, 0.019, and 0.013 mmol/l), respectively. Values below the first percentile for LDL-C are less than 40 mg/dl (<1.03 mmol/l) and for HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) less than 25 mg/dl (<0.65 mmol/l) in men and less than 30 mg/dl (<0.78 mmol/l) in women, respectively. The above values can predispose to premature CVD, pancreatitis, neurologic disease, and kidney failure, and may be associated with monogenic lipid disorders. In the absence of secondary causes including diabetes or kidney, liver, or thyroid disease, consideration should be given to sequencing the following genes: ABCA1, ABCG5, ABCG8, APOA1, APOA5, APOB, APOC2, APOE, CETP, CYP27A1, GPIHBP1, LCAT, LDLR, LDLRAP1, LIPA, LIPC, LMF1, LPL, MTTP, PCSK9, SCARB1, and STAP1. SUMMARY Recent data indicate that secondary causes and a wider range of conditions need to be considered in identifying the underlying causes of hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperalphalipoproteinemia, hypobetalipoproteinemia, and HDL deficiency. Identifying such disorders allows for a more precise assessment of prognosis and the formulation of optimal therapy.
-
3.
Baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to predict the extent of cardiovascular benefit from lipid-lowering therapies: a review.
Navarese, EP, Andreotti, F, Raggi, P, Kolodziejczak, M, Buffon, A, Bliden, K, Tantry, U, Kubica, J, Sardella, G, Lauten, A, et al
European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy. 2019;(1):47-54
Abstract
Lipid-lowering therapies have been shown to improve cardiovascular outcome in a wide range of patients. The current guidelines recommend a graded approach to reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) proportional to the patient's risk, with the goal of achieving either a certain magnitude of reduction or a specific threshold of final LDL-C. Recent findings from a meta-analysis of numerous randomized trials suggest that more attention should be given to the baseline LDL-C of an individual patient. In this review, we discuss how the baseline LDL-C level may provide a means to better understand the results of recent cardiovascular outcome trials and the expected benefits of lipid-lowering therapies. The exact quantification of the clinical benefit associate with an intensified lipid-lowering therapy depends on the baseline LDL-C. Mortality is reduced in a log-linear fashion only when LDL-C > 100 mg/dL.
-
4.
Progress in finding pathogenic DNA copy number variations in dyslipidemia.
Iacocca, MA, Dron, JS, Hegele, RA
Current opinion in lipidology. 2019;(2):63-70
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW DNA copy number variations (CNVs) are large-scale mutations that include deletions and duplications larger than 50 bp in size. In the era when single-nucleotide variations were the major focus of genetic technology and research, CNVs were largely overlooked. However, CNVs clearly underlie a substantial proportion of clinical disorders. Here, we update recent progress in identifying CNVs in dyslipidemias. RECENT FINDINGS Until last year, only the LDLR and LPA genes were appreciated as loci within which clinically relevant CNVs contributed to familial hypercholesterolemia and variation in Lp(a) levels, respectively. Since 2017, next-generation sequencing panels have identified pathogenic CNVs in at least five more genes underlying dyslipidemias, including a PCSK9 whole-gene duplication in familial hypercholesterolemia; LPL, GPIHBP1, and APOC2 deletions in hypertriglyceridemia; and ABCA1 deletions in hypoalphalipoproteinemia. SUMMARY CNVs are an important class of mutation that contribute to the molecular genetic heterogeneity underlying dyslipidemias. Clinical applications of next-generation sequencing technologies need to consider CNVs concurrently with familiar small-scale genetic variation, given the likely implications for improved diagnosis and treatment.
-
5.
Reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: Risk prediction and lipid management.
Miname, MH, Santos, RD
Progress in cardiovascular diseases. 2019;(5):414-422
Abstract
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a frequent genetic disorder characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and early onset of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. FH is caused by mutations in genes that regulate LDL catabolism, mainly the LDL receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB) and gain of function of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9). However, the phenotype may be encountered in individuals not carrying the latter monogenic defects, in approximately 20% of these effects of polygenes predominate, and in many individuals no molecular defects are encountered at all. These so-called FH phenocopy individuals have an elevated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in comparison with normolipidemic individuals but this risk is lower than in those with monogenic disease. Individuals with FH are exposed to elevated LDL-C levels since birth and this explains the high cardiovascular, mainly coronary heart disease, burden of these subjects. However, recent studies show that this risk is heterogenous and depends not only on high LDL-C levels but also on presence of previous cardiovascular disease, a monogenic cause, male sex, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, low HDL-cholesterol, obesity and elevated lipoprotein(a). This heterogeneity in risk can be captured by risk equations like one from the SAFEHEART cohort and by detection of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. High dose high potency statins are the main stain for LDL-C lowering in FH, however, in most situations these medications are not powered enough to reduce cholesterol to adequate levels. Ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors should also be used in order to better treat LDL-C in FH patients.
-
6.
Current Role of Lipoprotein Apheresis.
Thompson, G, Parhofer, KG
Current atherosclerosis reports. 2019;(7):26
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Lipoprotein apheresis is a very efficient but time-consuming and expensive method of lowering levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein(a)) and other apoB containing lipoproteins, including triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. First introduced almost 45 years ago, it has long been a therapy of "last resort" for dyslipidaemias that cannot otherwise be managed. In recent years new, very potent lipid-lowering drugs have been developed and the purpose of this review is to define the role of lipoprotein apheresis in the current setting. RECENT FINDINGS Lipoprotein apheresis still plays an important role in managing patients with homozygous FH and some patients with other forms of hypercholesterolaemia and cardiovascular disease. In particular, patients not achieving treatment goals despite modern lipid-lowering drugs, either because these are not tolerated or the response is insufficient. Recently, lipoprotein(a) has emerged as an important cardiovascular risk factor and lipoprotein apheresis has been used to decrease lipoprotein(a) concentrations in patients with marked elevations and cardiovascular disease. However, there is considerable heterogeneity concerning the recommendations by scientific bodies as to which patient groups should be treated with lipoprotein apheresis. Lipoprotein apheresis remains an important tool for the management of patients with severe drug-resistant dyslipidaemias, especially those with homozygous FH.
-
7.
Non-HDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B compared with LDL-cholesterol in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment.
Carr, SS, Hooper, AJ, Sullivan, DR, Burnett, JR
Pathology. 2019;(2):148-154
Abstract
Low density lipoprotein (LDL) is the predominant atherogenic lipoprotein particle in the circulation. Conventionally, a fasting lipid profile has been used for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment. A non-fasting sample is now regarded as a suitable alternative to a fasting sample. In routine clinical practice, the Friedewald equation is used to estimate LDL-cholesterol, but it has limitations. Commercially available direct measures of LDL-cholesterol are not standardised. LDL-cholesterol is a well-established risk factor for ASCVD, being the primary therapeutic target in both primary and secondary prevention. Non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol is a measure of the cholesterol content in the atherogenic lipoproteins, but it does not reflect the particle number. Non-HDL-cholesterol has the advantage over LDL-cholesterol of including remnant cholesterol and being independent of triglyceride variability, but it is compromised by the non-specificity bias of direct HDL-cholesterol methods used in the calculation. Apolipoprotein (apo) B, the major structural protein in very low-density lipoprotein, intermediate density lipoprotein, LDL and lipoprotein (a), is a measure of the number of atherogenic lipoproteins. ApoB methods are standardised, but the assay comes at an additional, albeit relatively low cost. Non-HDL-cholesterol and apoB are more accurate measures than LDL-cholesterol in hypertriglyceridaemic individuals, non-fasting samples, and in those with very-low LDL-cholesterol concentrations. Accumulating evidence suggests that non-HDL-cholesterol and apoB are superior to LDL-cholesterol in predicting ASCVD risk, and both have been designated as secondary targets in some treatment guidelines. We review the measurement, potential role, utility and current status of non-HDL-cholesterol and apoB when compared with LDL-cholesterol in ASCVD risk assessment.
-
8.
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: How Low to Go?
Qamar, A, Libby, P
Current cardiology reports. 2019;(8):77
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Recent advances in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapy have now enabled reducing LDL-C safely to very low levels. This review summarizes evidence from recent randomized clinical trials of intensive LDL-C lowering in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and provides a practical approach for LDL-C lowering to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events in this population. RECENT FINDINGS The risk of atherothrombotic events falls linearly with LDL-C level extending to very low achieved LDL-C levels (< 10 mg/dL) without apparent safety concerns. The addition of ezetimibe or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors (i.e., evolocumab or alirocumab) to statin therapy lowers LDL-C to very low levels (≤ 30-50 mg/dL) with safety under the conditions studied and reduces the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Current data support LDL-C lowering to levels below 70 mg/dL in patients post-ACS. Combination of high-intensity statins, ezetimibe, and if needed PCSK9 inhibitors merits consideration in such patients with ACS to optimize outcomes.
-
9.
Update on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol quantification.
Chung, S
Current opinion in lipidology. 2019;(4):273-283
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW β-Quantification is considered the reference measurement procedure for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, this technique is time-consuming and thus is inappropriate for routine clinical practice. Therefore, the Friedewald equation or homogeneous assays have been widely utilized. As several pitfalls exist with these two methods, a novel method for estimating LDL-C was developed by Martin et al. RECENT FINDINGS Martin's method uses a strata-specific median for the triglycerides/very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) ratio on the basis of triglycerides and non-HDL-C concentrations. Recent studies show that Martin's method better correlates with β-quantification or homogeneous assays compared with the Friedewald equation, especially with values of triglycerides at least 150 mg/dl and/or LDL-CD less than 70 mg/dl. Such findings have also been demonstrated in other ethnic groups (Japanese and Korean) and disease populations, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease, in which the triglycerides/VLDL-C ratio can be affected. SUMMARY For the current therapeutic goal of LDL-C values below 70 mg/dl in high-risk patients, accurate assessment of LDL-C levels at very low levels is required. Martin's method could overcome pitfalls such as underestimation of the Friedewald equation at this level. Further evaluation of the triglycerides/VLDL-C ratio in participants with diverse ethnic backgrounds or clinical conditions would expand the implementation of this novel method.
-
10.
The evolution of genetic-based risk scores for lipids and cardiovascular disease.
Dron, JS, Hegele, RA
Current opinion in lipidology. 2019;(2):71-81
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With improved next-generation sequencing technology, open-access genetic databases and increased awareness of complex trait genetics, we are entering a new era of risk assessment in which genetic-based risk scores (GRSs) will play a clinical role. We review the concepts underlying polygenic models of disease susceptibility and challenges in clinical implementation. RECENT FINDINGS Polygenic risk scores are currently used in genetic research on dyslipidemias and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although the underlying principles for constructing polygenic scores for lipids are established, the lack of consensus on which score to use is indicated by the large number - about 50 - that have been published. Recently, large-scale polygenic scores for CVD appear to afford superior risk prediction compared to small-scale scores. Despite the potential benefits of GRSs, certain biases towards ethnicity and sex need to be worked through. SUMMARY We are on the verge of clinical application of GRSs to provide incremental information on dyslipidemia and CVD risk above and beyond traditional clinical variables. Additional work is required to develop a consensus of how such scores will be constructed and measured in a validated manner, as well as clinical indications for their use.