-
1.
[How to improve hydration and fluid intake in institutionalized older people? A scientific literature review].
Masot, O, Iglesias Millán, A, Nuin, C, Miranda, J, Lavedán, A, Botigué, T
Nutricion hospitalaria. 2018;(6):1441-1449
Abstract
BACKGROUND residents are vulnerable to suffer of dehydration due to physiological changes and the physical and cognitive limitations. AIM: to handle this situation, it has been decided to evaluate the interventions which are carried out for the management of dehydration and low fluid intake in older people living in nursing homes. METHODS the revised scientific literature review methodology of PRISMA was applied. An electronic database search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and other sources databases. The literature search was carried out between October 2016 and January 2017. Out of a total of 3,379 articles extracted, eleven studies were selected for analysis. In addition, their quality was assessed through Cochrane and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS the risk of bias in the studies was mostly medium. Regarding the results, the interventions were classified according to whether they were invasive or non-invasive. Invasive interventions were intravenous and/or subcutaneous fluid therapy. Their effectiveness was related to the clinical improvement of dehydration. However, local reactions appeared. Non-invasive interventions focused on the individualized assistance, the stimulation to drink more and the consideration of the preferences of each resident, producing an increase in fluid intake and an improvement in analytical parameters. CONCLUSIONS given the peculiarities of the institutionalized elderly population, both types of intervention have been shown to have a positive effect on improving hydration. Nonetheless, non-invasive interventions have confirmed to be more efficient given their simplicity of application and cause fewer adverse effects.
-
2.
Under What Conditions do Water-Intervention Studies Significantly Improve Child Body Weight?
Stookey, JD
Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 2017;:62-67
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
There are particular conditions that may optimize the effects of drinking-water interventions on body weight change and risk of obesity. Strategic planning to create and sustain conditions for optimal effects of drinking water may maximize the impact of school-based interventions to reduce childhood obesity. This paper proposes questions about the target population, type of diet and activity level that will be maintained during the intervention, and planned intervention message(s). The proposed questions are motivated by conditions associated with significant effects of drinking water in randomized controlled trials. They are discussed in relation to conditions underlying the recently successful school-based drinking-water intervention in New York City. If conditions allow, school-based drinking-water interventions have the potential to efficiently benefit millions of children worldwide, who are at risk of becoming obese.
-
3.
Shifting Focus: From Hydration for Performance to Hydration for Health.
Perrier, ET
Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 2017;:4-12
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Over the past 10 years, literature on hydration biomarkers has evolved considerably - from (de)hydration assessment towards a more global definition of biomarkers of hydration in daily life. This shift in thinking about hydration markers was largely driven by investigating the differences that existed between otherwise healthy individuals whose habitual, ad-libitum drinking habits differ, and by identifying physiological changes in low-volume drinkers who subsequently increase their water intake. Aside from obvious differences in urinary volume and concentration, a growing body of evidence is emerging that links differences in fluid intake with small, but biologically significant, differences in vasopressin (copeptin), glomerular filtration rate, and markers of metabolic dysfunction or disease. Taken together, these pieces of the puzzle begin to form a picture of how much water intake should be considered adequate for health, and represent a shifting focus from hydration for performance, toward hydration for health outcomes. This narrative review outlines the key areas of research in which the global hydration process - including water intake, urinary hydration markers, and vasopressin - has been associated with health outcomes, focusing on kidney and metabolic endpoints. It will also provide a commentary on how various hydration biomarkers may be used in hydration for health assessment. Finally, if adequate water intake can play a role in maintaining health, how might we tell if we are drinking enough? Urine output is easily measured, and can take into account differences in daily physical activity, climate, dietary solute load, and other factors that influence daily water needs. Today, targets have been proposed for urine osmolality, specific gravity, and color that may be used by researchers, clinicians, and individuals as simple indicators of optimal hydration. However, there remain a large number of incomplete or unanswered research questions regarding the relationships between water intake, hydration, vasopressin, and health outcomes. Thus, this emerging field represents an excellent opportunity, particularly for young researchers, to develop relevant and novel lines of research.
-
4.
Effects of Dehydration on Brain Functioning: A Life-Span Perspective.
Pross, N
Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 2017;:30-36
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the last 10 years, there has been an increase in the publication of literature dealing with the effects of mild dehydration on cognition in healthy adults. Fewer studies, leading to less consistent data, involved other age groups. SUMMARY In healthy young adults refraining from drinking or participating in dehydration protocols, it was found that mild dehydration had no impact on performance, whereas the mood was widely impaired. Several studies have also been conducted in young children either as observational studies or as interventional studies. Nevertheless, methodological differences in (de)hydration monitoring, in cognitive assessments, and in the age/brain maturation of study participants, often resulted in contradictory findings regarding the cognitive functions impacted by (de)hydration. Although not consistent, these data showed that not only mood but also performance tend to be impaired by dehydration in children. Even if older adults are likely to be more vulnerable to dehydration than younger adults, very few studies have been conducted in this regard in this population. The results show that, like it is in children, cognition tends to be impaired when the elderly are dehydrated. Taken together, these studies suggest that dehydration has greater detrimental effects in vulnerable populations. Recent imaging data suggest that the brain of children and elderly adults may have fewer resources to manage the effects of dehydration. Consequently, cognitive tasks may be more demanding for younger and older brains and performance more likely to be impaired in these populations, in comparison to young healthy subjects who have greater and more efficient resources.
-
5.
Applications of the water drinking test in glaucoma management.
Susanna, R, Clement, C, Goldberg, I, Hatanaka, M
Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2017;(6):625-631
Abstract
Intraocular pressure (IOP) peaks and means have been considered important factors for glaucoma onset and progression. However, peak IOP detection depends only on appropriated IOP checks at office visits, whereas the mean IOP requires longitudinal IOP data collection and may be affected by the interval between visits. Also, IOP peak assessment is necessary to verify if the peak pressure of a given patient is in target range, to evaluate glaucoma suspect risk, the efficacy of hypotensive drugs and to detect early loss of IOP control. The water-drinking test has gained significant attention in recent years as an important tool to evaluate IOP peaks and instability. The main objective of this review was to present new findings and to discuss the applicability of the water-drinking test in glaucoma management.
-
6.
Relationship between Sodium Intake and Water Intake: The False and the True.
Bankir, L, Perucca, J, Norsk, P, Bouby, N, Damgaard, M
Annals of nutrition & metabolism. 2017;:51-61
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Generally, eating salty food items increases thirst. Thirst is also stimulated by the experimental infusion of hypertonic saline. But, in steady state, does the kidney need a higher amount of water to excrete sodium on a high than on a low sodium intake? This issue is still controversial. The purpose of this review is to provide examples of how the kidney handles water in relation to salt intake/output. It is based on re-analysis of previously published studies in which salt intake was adjusted to several different levels in the same subjects, and in databases of epidemiologic studies in populations on an ad libitum diet. Summary and Key Messages: These re-analyses allow us to draw the following conclusions: (1) In a steady state situation, the urine volume (and thus the fluid intake) remains unchanged over a large range of sodium intakes. The adaptation to a higher sodium excretion rests only on changes in urinary sodium concentration. However, above a certain limit, this concentration cannot increase further and the urine volume may then increase. (2) In population studies, it is not legitimate to assume that sodium is responsible for changes in urine volume, since people who eat more sodium also eat more of other nutrients leading to an increase in the excretion of potassium, urea and other solutes, besides sodium. (3) After an abrupt increase in sodium intake, fluid intake is increased in the first few days, but urine volume does not change. The extra fluid drunk is responsible for an increase in body weight.
-
7.
The Influence of Drinking Fluid on Endurance Cycling Performance: A Meta-Analysis.
Holland, JJ, Skinner, TL, Irwin, CG, Leveritt, MD, Goulet, EDB
Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 2017;(11):2269-2284
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluid replacement during cycling exercise evolves on a spectrum from simply drinking to thirst to planned structured intake, with both being appropriate recommendations. However, with mixed findings suggesting fluid intake may or may not improve endurance cycling performance (ECP) in a diverse range of trained individuals, there is a clear need for summarised evidence regarding the effect of fluid consumption on ECP. OBJECTIVES (1) Determine the magnitude of the effect of drinking fluid on performance during cycling exercise tasks of various durations, compared with no drinking; (2) examine the relationship between rates of fluid intake and ECP; and (3) establish fluid intake recommendations based on the observations between rates of fluid intake and ECP. STUDY DESIGN Meta-analysis. METHODS Studies were located via database searches and cross-referencing. Performance outcomes were converted to a similar metric to represent percentage change in power output. Fixed- and random-effects weighted mean effect summaries and meta-regression analyses were used to identify the impact of drinking fluid on ECP. RESULTS A limited number of research manuscripts (n = 9) met the inclusion criteria, producing 15 effect estimates. Meta-regression analyses demonstrated that the impact of drinking on ECP under 20-33 °C ambient temperatures was duration-dependent. Fluid consumption of, on average, 0.29 mL/kg body mass/min impaired 1 h high-intensity (80% peak oxygen uptake [[Formula: see text]o2peak]) ECP by -2.5 ± 0.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] -4.1 to -0.9%) compared with no fluid ingestion. In contrast, during >1 to ≤2 h and >2 h moderate-intensity (60-70% [Formula: see text]o2peak) cycling exercise, ECP improved by 2.1 ± 1.5% (95% CI 1.2-2.9%) and 3.2 ± 1.2% (95% CI 0.8-5.6%), respectively, with fluid ingestion compared with no fluid intake. The associated performance benefits were observed when the rates of fluid intake were in the range of 0.15-0.20 mL/kg body mass/min for >1 to ≤2 h cycling exercise and ad libitum or 0.14-0.27 mL/kg body mass/min for cycling exercise >2 h. CONCLUSIONS A rate of fluid consumption of between 0.15 and 0.34 mL/kg body mass/min during high-intensity 1 h cycling exercise is associated with reductions in ECP. When cycling at moderate intensity for >1 to ≤2 h, cyclists should expect a gain in performance of at least 2% if fluid is consumed at a rate of 0.15-0.20 mL/kg body mass/min. For cycling exercise >2 h conducted at moderate intensity, consuming fluid ad libitum or at a rate of 0.14-0.27 mL/kg body mass/min should improve performance by at least 3%. Until further research is conducted, these recommendations should be used as a guide to inform hydration practices.
-
8.
Negative, Null and Beneficial Effects of Drinking Water on Energy Intake, Energy Expenditure, Fat Oxidation and Weight Change in Randomized Trials: A Qualitative Review.
Stookey, JJ
Nutrients. 2016;(1)
Abstract
Drinking water has heterogeneous effects on energy intake (EI), energy expenditure (EE), fat oxidation (FO) and weight change in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults and/or children. The aim of this qualitative review of RCTs was to identify conditions associated with negative, null and beneficial effects of drinking water on EI, EE, FO and weight, to generate hypotheses about ways to optimize drinking water interventions for weight management. RCT conditions that are associated with negative or null effects of drinking water on EI, EE and/or FO in the short term are associated with negative or null effects on weight over the longer term. RCT conditions that are associated with lower EI, increased EE and/or increased FO in the short term are associated with less weight gain or greater weight loss over time. Drinking water instead of caloric beverages decreases EI when food intake is ad libitum. Drinking water increases EE in metabolically-inflexible, obese individuals. Drinking water increases FO when blood carbohydrate and/or insulin concentrations are not elevated and when it is consumed instead of caloric beverages or in volumes that alter hydration status. Further research is needed to confirm the observed associations and to determine if/what specific conditions optimize drinking water interventions for weight management.
-
9.
A systematic review to determine the most effective interventions to increase water intake.
Chua, TX, Prasad, NS, Rangan, GK, Allman-Farinelli, M, Rangan, AM
Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.). 2016;(10):860-9
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining adequate fluid intake has been hypothesized to be beneficial for the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review to determine the most effective interventions to increase water intake. METHODS Six electronic databases were searched from 1910 until March 2015 in the English language. Additional sources through hand-searches, expert recommendations and reviews were checked. Intervention studies increasing water intake in adults through non-pharmacological methods were eligible for inclusion. The quality of included studies was assessed. RESULTS A total of 950 studies were found of which 16 met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were randomized controlled trials, and seven studies spanned 6 months or longer. The study populations varied and included patients with recurrent nephrolithiasis (n = 6), autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (n = 3), CKD (n = 1), urinary tract infection (n = 1) and other miscellaneous conditions (n = 5). The quality of the studies was mostly neutral (63%) with no studies of high quality. Interventions ranged from instruction alone to self-monitoring tools, providing water bottles and counselling and education. Most interventions successfully increased water intake with 13 studies reporting an increase of at least 500 mL. The most effective strategies were instruction and self-monitoring using urine dipstick or 24 h urine volume. CONCLUSION All interventions carried out in the studies succeeded in increasing water intake, with none leading to decreases in intake, and these could be implemented in potential clinical trials in CKD. However, more high quality long-term intervention studies are required to further validate findings.
-
10.
Am I Drinking Enough? Yes, No, and Maybe.
Cheuvront, SN, Kenefick, RW
Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 2016;(2):185-92
Abstract
Adequate fluid intake can be dually defined as a volume of fluid (from water, beverages, and food) sufficient to replace water losses and provide for solute excretion. A wide range of fluid intakes are compatible with euhydration, whereby total body water varies narrowly from day to day by 600 to 900 mL (<1% body mass). One measure of fluid intake adequacy involves enough fluid to prevent meaningful body water deficits outside this euhydration range (i.e., dehydration). Another measure of fluid intake adequacy involves enough fluid to balance the renal solute load, which can vary widely inside the euhydration range. The subtle but important distinction between the 2 types of adequacy may explain some of the ambiguity surrounding the efficacy of hydration status markers. Both perspectives of fluid intake adequacy are discussed in detail and a simple tool is reviewed that may help healthy, active, low-risk populations answer the question, "Am I drinking enough?" Key Teaching Points • Adequate fluid intake can be dually defined as a volume of fluid (from water, beverages, and food) sufficient to replace water losses and provide for solute excretion. • Fluid needs can differ greatly among individuals due to variation in the factors that influence both water loss and solute balance; thus, adequacy is consistent with a wide range of fluid intakes and is better gauged using hydration assessment methods. • Adequacy of fluid intake for replacing meaningful water losses (dehydration) can be assessed simply, inexpensively, and with reasonable fidelity among healthy, active, low-risk individuals. • Adequacy of fluid intake for solute excretion per se can also be assessed among individuals but is more difficult to define and less practical to measure.