0
selected
-
1.
[Hydrochlorothiazide and skin cancer].
Olde Engberink, RHG, van der Hoeven, NV, Zwinderman, AH, van den Born, BH
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 2019
Abstract
Hydrochlorothiazide and skin cancer Hydrochlorothiazide is a frequently prescribed diuretic with known photosensitizing properties. Recently, a large case-control study in a Danish population found an association between the use of hydrochlorothiazide and an increased risk of developing non-melanoma skin cancer. These data suggest that it may be wise to limit the use of hydrochlorothiazide for the treatment of hypertension. We reviewed the current literature to examine whether a causal relationship between hydrochlorothiazide and non-melanoma skin cancer exists. We consider that the evidence for a causal relationship is limited and contradicting. Moreover, we found that other antihypertensive agents such as calcium blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers are also associated with basal cell carcinoma. Based on the current literature, there seems to be insufficient evidence to advice against the use of hydrochlorothiazide.
-
2.
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Reduction With SGLT-2 Inhibitors: Dose-Response Meta-analysis and Comparative Evaluation With Low-Dose Hydrochlorothiazide.
Georgianos, PI, Agarwal, R
Diabetes care. 2019;(4):693-700
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors lower clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP), possibly through their natriuretic action. However, it remains unclear whether this BP-lowering effect is dose dependent and different from that of low-dose hydrochlorothiazide. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to quantify the association of the dose with response of ambulatory BP to SGLT-2 inhibition and to provide comparative evaluation with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane database of clinical trials from inception of each database through 22 August 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting treatment effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on ambulatory BP. We extracted data on the mean difference between the active treatment and placebo groups in change from baseline (CFB) of ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP. RESULTS We identified seven RCTs (involving 2,381 participants) comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors with placebo. Of these, two RCTs included low-dose hydrochlorothiazide as active comparator. CFB in 24-h systolic BP between SGLT-2 inhibitor and placebo groups was -3.62 mmHg (95% CI -4.29, -2.94) and in diastolic BP was -1.70 mmHg (95% CI -2.13, -1.26). BP lowering with SGLT-2 inhibition was more potent during daytime than during nighttime. The CFB in ambulatory BP was comparable between low-dose and high-dose subgroups and was similar to that for low-dose hydrochlorothiazide. Eligible RCTs did not evaluate cardiovascular outcomes/mortality. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis shows that SGLT-2 inhibitors provoke an average reduction of systolic/diastolic BP 3.62/1.70 mmHg in 24-h ambulatory BP. This BP-lowering effect remains unmodified regardless of the dose of SGLT-2 inhibitor and is comparable with BP-lowering efficacy of low-dose hydrochlorothiazide.
-
3.
Hydrochlorothiazide is not the most useful nor versatile thiazide diuretic.
Vongpatanasin, W
Current opinion in cardiology. 2015;(4):361-5
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To determine usefulness and versatility of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) relative to other thiazide diuretics in the treatment of hypertension. RECENT FINDINGS HCTZ was found to be less potent in lowering blood pressure (BP) than other thiazide diuretics, including chlorthalidone (CTD) and bendroflumethiazide. A recent meta-analysis also suggested HCTZ (12.5-25 mg daily) to be less potent than antihypertensive agents from several other classes, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, and calcium antagonists. The risk of hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and hyperuricemia associated with HCTZ was lower than with CTD, while the risk of gouty arthritis was similar. Despite lower risks of metabolic side-effects, meta-analysis of clinical trials showed that, for any given difference in achieved clinic SBP, HCTZ therapy was associated with 18% higher adverse cardiovascular events when compared with CTD. SUMMARY Increasing evidence suggests inferiority of HCTZ in lowering BP and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients when compared with other drugs in the same class, particularly CTD and indapamide. Thus, HCTZ is neither more useful nor more versatile than other thiazide diuretics. CTD and indapamide should be preferred over HCTZ in most hypertensive patients when diuretics are required for treatment of hypertension.
-
4.
Head-to-head comparisons of hydrochlorothiazide with indapamide and chlorthalidone: antihypertensive and metabolic effects.
Roush, GC, Ernst, ME, Kostis, JB, Tandon, S, Sica, DA
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979). 2015;(5):1041-6
Abstract
Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) has often been contrasted with chlorthalidone, but relatively little is known about HCTZ versus indapamide (INDAP). This systematic review retrieved 9765 publications, and from these, it identified 14 randomized trials with 883 patients comparing HCTZ with INDAP and chlorthalidone on antihypertensive potency or metabolic effects. To make fair comparisons, the dose of the diuretic in each arm was assigned 1 of 3 dose levels. In random effects meta-analysis, INDAP and chlorthalidone lowered systolic blood pressure more than HCTZ -5.1 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -8.7 to -1.6); P=0.004 and -3.6 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -7.3 to 0.0); P=0.052, respectively. For both comparisons, there was minimal heterogeneity in effect across trials and no evidence for publication bias. The HCTZ-INDAP contrast was biased in favor of greater HCTZ potency because of a much greater contribution to the overall effect from trials in which the HCTZ arm had a higher dose level than the INDAP arm. For the HCTZ-INDAP comparison, no single trial was responsible for the overall result nor was it possible to detect significant modifications of this comparison by duration of follow-up, high- versus low-bias trials, or the presence or absence of background medications. There were no detectable differences between HCTZ and INDAP in metabolic adverse effects, including effects on serum potassium. In conclusion, these head-to-head comparisons demonstrate that, like chlorthalidone, INDAP is more potent than HCTZ at commonly prescribed doses without evidence for greater adverse metabolic effects.
-
5.
The contribution of the ACCOMPLISH trial to the treatment of stage 2 hypertension.
Byrd, JB, Bakris, G, Jamerson, K
Current hypertension reports. 2014;(3):419
Abstract
The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) recommended a thiazide-like diuretic, alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drug classes, as initial therapy for hypertension. JNC 7, however, did not specify preferred combinations. The Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial was completed five years after the JNC 7 and demonstrated a 20 % advantage in cardiovascular risk reduction when blood pressure was lowered using the single-pill combination of benazepril-amlodipine compared to benazepril-hydrochlorothiazide (Jamerson et al. 359(23):2417-28 [1]). This new and significant finding provided compelling evidence that the long-standing preference for diuretics as initial therapy could be refuted, but it may also be relevant to the lower-than-expected reduction in coronary disease related events (compared to stroke) observed for decades prior to the ACCOMPLISH approach to therapy. The JNC 8 panel members recently published their recommendations, and while the group did not recommend benazepril-hydrochlorothiazide over other combinations, they did highlight the findings of ACCOMPLISH, rating the primary ACCOMPLISH paper as "good." The American Society of Hypertension position paper and the European Hypertension Society guidelines endorse such combinations as a first-line agent for patients with stage 2 hypertension. We review the current position of ACCOMPLISH in the guidelines regarding treatment of stage 2 hypertension.
-
6.
Single-pill triple-combination therapy: an alternative to multiple-drug treatment of hypertension.
Chrysant, SG
Postgraduate medicine. 2011;(6):21-31
Abstract
Hypertension (HTN) affects an estimated 76.4 million US adults. Despite improvements in blood pressure (BP) control rates and the availability of effective antihypertensive agents, only 50% of these individuals achieve BP control. It is now recognized that many patients will require ≥ 2 antihypertensive agents to achieve BP control. Both the current US and reappraisal of the 2007 European guidelines include dual-combination regimens among recommended treatments for initial HTN therapy. For patients requiring 3 drugs, the combination of agents with complementary mechanisms of action (ie, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocker, calcium channel blocker, and diuretic) has been recognized as rational and effective. Three single-pill triple-drug combinations have recently been approved for use in HTN in the United States: valsartan (VAL)/amlodipine (AML)/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ); olmesartan medoxomil (OM)/AML/HCTZ; and aliskiren (ALI)/VAL/HCTZ. Triple-combination regimens have resulted in a greater proportion of patients achieving BP control compared with dual-combination regimens, with significantly lower BP levels documented after only 2 weeks at maximum doses. Single-pill combinations offer convenience to address barriers to BP control such as poor adherence to therapy and therapeutic inertia. Additional benefits of combining antihypertensive agents from different classes include improved efficacy, safety, and reduction of cardiovascular risk. In patients with essential HTN for whom dual therapy is inadequate, single-pill triple-drug therapy can offer a simplified and effective treatment strategy.
-
7.
Hydrochlorothiazide versus calcium channel blockers: what is the best add-on to a renin-angiotensin system blocker for treating hypertension in patients with renal disease?
Lerma, EV
Current hypertension reports. 2011;(5):386-95
Abstract
Hypertension remains an important problem that increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Achieving long-term control of arterial hypertension, which has an estimated prevalence of 28% in the US adult population, would translate into a significant reduction in cardiovascular events. Specific causes can be identified and treated for certain forms of secondary hypertension, but often it is multifactorial. Therefore, it makes sense to attain blood pressure control by addressing more than one pressor mechanism. Several clinical studies have demonstrated that combination antihypertensive therapy is more effective than monotherapy, and a review of currently published data suggests that approximately 75% of hypertensive individuals will require some form of combination therapy to achieve target blood pressure (BP) goals. To this end, the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of Blood Pressure (JNC 7) has recommended that antihypertensive therapy should start with two drugs when a patient presents with systolic blood pressure (SBP) more than 20 mm Hg above target levels, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) more than 10 mm Hg above target levels, or both. This review attempts to analyze the current evidence in published medical literature to answer the question of whether hydrochlorothiazide or a calcium channel blocker is a better add-on to a renin-angiotensin system blocker for treating hypertension in patients with renal disease.
-
8.
Thiazide-induced severe hypercalcemia: a case report and review of literature.
Desai, HV, Gandhi, K, Sharma, M, Jennine, M, Singh, P, Brogan, M
American journal of therapeutics. 2010;(6):e234-6
Abstract
Most common causes of hypercalcemia are hyperparathyroidism, malignancy, vitamin D-mediated conditions such as sarcoidosis, and vitamin D toxicity. Less commonly, hypercalcemia can be caused by drugs such as thiazide diuretics and lithium. Mild hypercalcemia is usually asymptomatic but severe hypercalcemia is associated with nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, excessive thirst, muscle weakness, lethargy, confusion, and fatigue. We are reporting a case of abdominal pain and altered mental status caused by thiazide-induced severe hypercalcemia of 19.8 mg/dL. This is the most severe case of thiazide-induced hypercalcemia that we have seen reported. Patients on thiazide diuretics should have their electrolytes frequently checked, especially patients on calcium supplements. Management usually includes hydration and discontinuation of drugs causing hypercalcemia.