-
1.
Coronary artery calcium scoring for individualized cardiovascular risk estimation in important patient subpopulations after the 2019 AHA/ACC primary prevention guidelines.
Dzaye, O, Dudum, R, Reiter-Brennan, C, Kianoush, S, Tota-Maharaj, R, Cainzos-Achirica, M, Blaha, MJ
Progress in cardiovascular diseases. 2019;(5):423-430
Abstract
The 2018 and 2019 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) recommend consideration of so-called "risk-enhancing factors" in borderline to intermediate risk individuals. These include high-risk race/ethnicity (e.g. South Asian origin), chronic kidney disease, a family history of premature ASCVD, the metabolic syndrome, chronic inflammatory disorders (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis [RA], psoriasis, or chronic human immunodeficiency virus [HIV]), and conditions specific to women, among others. Studies suggest, however, that risk may be highly heterogeneous within these subgroups. The AHA/ACC guidelines also recommend consideration of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring for further risk assessment in borderline to intermediate risk individuals in whom management is uncertain. Although the combination of risk enhancing factors and CAC burden (together with Pooled Cohort estimates) may lead to more accurate ASCVD risk assessment, few publications have closely examined the interplay between risk enhancing factors and CAC scoring for personalized risk estimation. Our aim is to review the relevant literature in this area. Although further research is clearly needed, CAC assessment seems a highly valuable option to inform individualized ASCVD risk management in these important, often highly heterogeneous patient subgroups.
-
2.
Prospects for the Primary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction and Stroke.
Caldwell, M, Martinez, L, Foster, JG, Sherling, D, Hennekens, CH
Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. 2019;(3):207-214
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), principally myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, is the leading clinical and public health problem in the United States and is rapidly becoming so worldwide. Their primary prevention is promising, in theory, but difficult to achieve in practice. The principal modalities that have demonstrated efficacy include therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLCs) and adjunctive drug therapies under the guidance of the health-care provider and tailored to the individual patient. The prevention and treatment of the pandemic of overweight and obesity and lack of regular physical activity, both of which are alarmingly common in the United States, prevention and treatment of hypertension, avoidance and cessation of cigarette smoking, adoption and maintenance of a healthy diet, and avoidance of heavy alcohol consumption all have proven benefits in decreasing the risks of a first MI and stroke as well as other clinical manifestations of CVD. Although adoption of TLCs would avoid the need for adjunctive drug therapies in many primary prevention subjects, this strategy is difficult to achieve or maintain for most and may be insufficient for many, especially those at high risk with metabolic syndrome. The criteria for metabolic syndrome, affecting over 40% of the adult population older than 40 in the United States, include overweight or obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and insulin resistance, a precursor of diabetes. The adjunctive therapies of proven benefit in the primary prevention of MI and stroke include statins, blood pressure medications, aspirin, and drugs to treat insulin resistance and hyperglycemia. Fortunately, even for patients who prefer prescription of pills to proscription of harmful lifestyles, these drug therapies still have net benefits. The adoption and maintenance of TLCs and adjunctive drug therapies into clinical practice will reduce both the incidence of and mortality from a first MI and stroke as well as other major clinical manifestations of CVD.
-
3.
2018 Cholesterol Guidelines: Key Topics in Primary Prevention.
Clark, D, Virani, SS
Current atherosclerosis reports. 2019;(5):17
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The 2018 American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) cholesterol guidelines are a comprehensive update providing recommendations for management of patients with high blood cholesterol based on the best available evidence. This review highlights key topics clinicians need to know for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) based on the 2018 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS The guidelines include a broad framework for risk estimation and management for primary prevention of ASCVD. Additional tools to refine risk assessment and guide management in primary prevention are outlined, including the use of risk-enhancing factors and coronary artery calcium score measurement. Lifestyle modification, appropriate risk assessment, and the use of proven pharmacologic therapies are essential for effective primary prevention as outlined in the 2018 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines.
-
4.
Primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease: populations, individuals, and health professionals.
Gupta, R, Wood, DA
Lancet (London, England). 2019;(10199):685-696
Abstract
Ischaemic heart disease has a multifactorial aetiology and can be prevented from developing in populations primordially, and in individuals at high risk by primary prevention. The primordial approach focuses on social determinants of health in populations: political, economic, and social factors, principally unplanned urbanisation, illiteracy, poverty, and working and living conditions. Implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals can lead to major improvements in cardiovascular health, and adequate health-care financing and universal health care are important for achieving these goals. Population-level interventions should focus on tobacco control, promotion of healthy foods (fruits, vegetables, legumes, and nuts), curbing unhealthy foods (saturated fats, trans fats, refined carbohydrates, excessive salt, and alcohol), promotion of physical activity in everyday living, and control of ambient and indoor pollution. At the individual level, identification of people at high multifactorial risk and guideline-driven management of hypertension, LDL cholesterol, and diabetes is required. Strategies to improve adherence to healthy lifestyles and drug therapies are essential and can be implemented at health system, health care, and patient levels with use of education, technology, and personalised approaches. Improving quality of medical education with a focus on ischaemic heart disease prevention for physicians, nurses, allied health workers, and the public is required.
-
5.
2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Part 1, Lifestyle and Behavioral Factors.
Arnett, DK, Khera, A, Blumenthal, RS
JAMA cardiology. 2019;(10):1043-1044
-
6.
Association of Clinician Knowledge and Statin Beliefs With Statin Therapy Use and Lipid Levels (A Survey of US Practice in the PALM Registry).
Lowenstern, A, Navar, AM, Li, S, Virani, SS, Goldberg, AC, Louie, MJ, Lee, LV, Peterson, ED, Wang, TY
The American journal of cardiology. 2019;(7):1011-1018
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Guideline implementation requires clinician knowledge but may be influenced by pre-existing beliefs and biases. We assessed the association of these clinician factors with lipid management following the release of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines. In the PALM registry, 774 clinicians completed a survey to assess their knowledge of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, belief in statin benefit, and statin safety concerns. The association of these factors with statin use, statin dosing, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were assessed in the 6,839 patients treated by these clinicians between May and November 2015. Overall, 63.9% of clinicians responded to at least 3 out of 4 hypothetical scenarios in concordance with guideline recommendations (good tested knowledge), 88.4% reported belief in statin benefit, and 15.4% raised concerns about statin safety. Belief in statin benefit was more prevalent among cardiologists, who represented 48.8% of the clinicians surveyed, and concerns regarding statin safety were higher among noncardiologists and clinicians in an academic setting. Guideline knowledge was not associated with a difference in statin use (74.1% vs 73.8%, p = 0.84) and achievement of LDL-C level <100 mg/dl (54.7% vs 52.4%, p = 0.07). However, patients treated by clinicians who reported belief in statin benefit were more likely to receive guideline-recommended statin intensity (41.9% vs 36.9%, p = 0.03), whereas patients treated by clinicians expressing statin safety concerns were less likely receive statins of at least guideline-recommended intensity (36.8% vs 42.5%, p = 0.001) and to achieve an LDL-C <100 mg/dl (44.1% vs 56.1%, p <0.001); the latter persisted after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.89). In conclusion, clinician beliefs regarding benefits and risks of statins were significantly associated with guideline adherence and patients' achieved LDL-C levels, whereas clinician knowledge of guideline recommendations was not.
-
7.
Evidence to prevent childhood obesity: The continuum of preconception, pregnancy, and postnatal interventions.
Bull, F, Willumsen, J
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2019;:3-4
-
8.
Prevention: From the cradle to the grave and beyond.
Dendale, P, Scherrenberg, M, Sivakova, O, Frederix, I
European journal of preventive cardiology. 2019;(5):507-511
Abstract
Present cardiac prevention mainly focuses on risk reduction later in life, and focuses also mainly on reducing risk factors for coronary heart disease. However, multiple studies have gathered evidence that the development risk of cardiovascular disease starts early in life and that even preconceptional influences play an important role in lifetime risk. Therefore, the importance of well-timed prevention strategies to reduce cardiovascular disease is well established. In this article, we discuss different risk factors for future cardiac disease, and how we can respond to lesser known cardiac risk factors in the different stages of life.
-
9.
Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of Sex-Related Differences in Predisposition and Prevention.
Al-Salameh, A, Chanson, P, Bucher, S, Ringa, V, Becquemont, L
Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2019;(2):287-308
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, compiled data suggest that type 2 diabetes affects the risk of cardiovascular disease differentially according to sex. In recent years, large meta-analyses have confirmed that women with type 2 diabetes have a higher relative risk of incident coronary heart disease, fatal coronary heart disease, and stroke compared with their male counterparts. The reasons for these disparities are not completely elucidated. A greater burden of cardiometabolic risk in women was proposed as a partial explanation. Indeed, several studies suggest that women experience a larger deterioration in major cardiovascular risk factors and put on more weight than do men during their transition from normoglycemia to overt type 2 diabetes. This excess weight is associated with higher levels of biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and procoagulant state. Moreover, sex differences in the prescription and use of some cardiovascular drugs may compound an "existing" disparity. We searched PubMed for articles published in English and French, by using the following terms: ("cardiovascular diseases") AND ("diabetes mellitus") AND ("sex disparity" OR "sex differences" OR "sex related differences" OR "sex-related differences" OR "sex disparities"). In this article, we review the available literature on the sex aspects of primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with type 2 diabetes, in the predisposition to cardiovascular disease in those people, and in the control of diabetes and associated cardiovascular risk factors.
-
10.
Lifestyles and Cardiovascular Prevention in Childhood and Adolescence.
Abrignani, MG, Lucà, F, Favilli, S, Benvenuto, M, Rao, CM, Di Fusco, SA, Gabrielli, D, Gulizia, MM, ,
Pediatric cardiology. 2019;(6):1113-1125
Abstract
Pathology studies demonstrated that coronary fatty streaks develop early in life and that even more advanced fibrous plaques are present in a proportion of adolescents. The presence and extent of atherosclerosis in children and adolescents can be correlated with the same risk factors present in adults; as well as, childhood levels of these risk factors predict adult cardiovascular diseases. Children are born with ideal cardiovascular health but, unfortunately, most of them develop over time modifiable behavioral risk factors. Achieving sustained lifestyle changes initiated too late in adults is difficult, and pharmacologic risk factor control cannot fully restore a low-risk state. Therefore, it seems eminently reasonable to initiate healthful lifestyle training as early in life, decreasing the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors to retard atherogenic processes and reduce the future burden of cardiovascular diseases. Many guideline recommendations encourage universal adoption of healthier lifestyles, identification of children with cardiovascular risk factors, and their treatment using targeted lifestyle modification and, rarely, pharmacotherapy. Major gains will likely accrue from public health strategies targeting incorrect diet, physical activity, and cigarette smoking. Individualized strategies, however, will initially focus on the highest risk children such as those with familial hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. The primary purpose of this article is to provide a broad overview on the long-term cardiovascular effects of risk factors in children and youth and to outline various lines of evidence for the efficacy of primordial and primary prevention in young people, as well as recommendations for population- and individual-level strategies and evidence-based interventions.