-
1.
Comparative Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, DPP-4 Inhibitors, and Sulfonylureas on Risk of Kidney Outcomes: Emulation of a Target Trial Using Health Care Databases.
Xie, Y, Bowe, B, Gibson, AK, McGill, JB, Maddukuri, G, Yan, Y, Al-Aly, Z
Diabetes care. 2020;(11):2859-2869
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4), and sulfonylureas on risk of kidney outcomes among people with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS U.S. veterans initiated on SGLT2i (n = 18,544), GLP-1 (n = 23,711), DPP-4 (n = 39,399), or sulfonylureas (n = 134,904) were followed for up to 3 years to evaluate the risk of the composite outcome of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline >50%, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or all-cause mortality. Risks were estimated using survival models adjusted for predefined covariates as well as covariates identified by a high-dimensional variable selection algorithm through application of generalized propensity scores. RESULTS Compared with those treated with sulfonylureas, treatment with SGLT2i, GLP-1, and DPP-4 was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (hazard ratio 0.68 [95% CI 0.63, 0.74], 0.72 [0.67, 0.77], and 0.90 [0.86, 0.95], respectively). While we did not observe a statistically significant difference in risk between the SGLT2i and GLP-1 arms (0.95 [0.87, 1.04]), both SGLT2i and GLP-1 had a lower risk of the composite outcome than DPP-4 (0.76 [0.70, 0.82] and 0.79 [0.74, 0.85], respectively). Analyses by eGFR category suggested that compared with the sulfonylurea arm, those in the SGLT2i and GLP-1 arms exhibited a lower risk of the composite outcome in all eGFR categories, including eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Compared with DPP-4, both SGLT2i and GLP-1 exhibited a reduced risk of the composite outcome in eGFR <90 to ≥60, <60 to ≥45, and <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSIONS In type 2 diabetes, treatment with SGLT2i or GLP-1 compared with DPP-4 or sulfonylureas was associated with a lower risk of adverse kidney outcomes.
-
2.
Comparison of the effects of three kinds of glucose-lowering drugs on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, open-label, three-arm, active control study.
Kinoshita, T, Shimoda, M, Nakashima, K, Fushimi, Y, Hirata, Y, Tanabe, A, Tatsumi, F, Hirukawa, H, Sanada, J, Kohara, K, et al
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2020;(6):1612-1622
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is often observed in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and it is known that the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus leads to the aggravation of NAFLD. The aim of this study was to compare the possible effects of three kinds of oral hypoglycemic agents on NAFLD in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS We carried out a prospective clinical trial (a randomized and open-label study) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and NAFLD. A total of 98 patients were randomly allocated either to the dapagliflozin (n = 32), pioglitazone (n = 33) or glimepiride (n = 33) group, and the patients took these drugs for 28 weeks. The primary end-point was the change of the liver-to-spleen ratio on abdominal computed tomography. RESULTS There was no difference in baseline clinical characteristics among the three groups. Dapagliflozin, pioglitazone and glimepiride ameliorated hyperglycemia similarly. Bodyweight and visceral fat area were significantly decreased only in the dapagliflozin group. Serum adiponectin levels were markedly increased in the pioglitazone group compared with the other two groups. Dapagliflozin and pioglitazone, but not glimepiride, significantly increased the liver-to-spleen ratio, and the effects of dapagliflozin and pioglitazone on the liver-to-spleen ratio were comparable. CONCLUSIONS The present study showed that the decrease of visceral fat area and the increase of adiponectin level contributed to the improvement of NAFLD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, dapagliflozin and pioglitazone exerted equivalent beneficial effects on NAFLD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, although it seemed that these two drugs had different mechanisms of action.
-
3.
Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone versus Glimepiride after Metformin and Alogliptin Combination Therapy: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Parallel-Controlled Study.
Kim, JM, Kim, SS, Kim, JH, Kim, MK, Kim, TN, Lee, SH, Lee, CW, Park, JY, Kim, ES, Lee, KJ, et al
Diabetes & metabolism journal. 2020;(1):67-77
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited information regarding the optimal third-line therapy for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that is inadequately controlled using dual combination therapy. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone or glimepiride when added to metformin plus alogliptin treatment for T2DM. METHODS This multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02426294) recruited 135 Korean patients with T2DM that was inadequately controlled using metformin plus alogliptin. The patients were then randomized to also receive pioglitazone (15 mg/day) or glimepiride (2 mg/day) for a 26-week period, with dose titration was permitted based on the investigator's judgement. RESULTS Glycosylated hemoglobin levels exhibited similar significant decreases in both groups during the treatment period (pioglitazone: -0.81%, P<0.001; glimepiride: -1.05%, P<0.001). However, the pioglitazone-treated group exhibited significantly higher high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P<0.001) and significantly lower homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance values (P<0.001). Relative to pioglitazone, adding glimepiride to metformin plus alogliptin markedly increased the risk of hypoglycemia (pioglitazone: 1/69 cases [1.45%], glimepiride: 14/66 cases [21.21%]; P<0.001). CONCLUSION Among patients with T2DM inadequately controlled using metformin plus alogliptin, the addition of pioglitazone provided comparable glycemic control and various benefits (improvements in lipid profiles, insulin resistance, and hypoglycemia risk) relative to the addition of glimepiride.
-
4.
Baseline Characteristics of Randomized Participants in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE).
Wexler, DJ, Krause-Steinrauf, H, Crandall, JP, Florez, HJ, Hox, SH, Kuhn, A, Sood, A, Underkofler, C, Aroda, VR, ,
Diabetes care. 2019;(11):2098-2107
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE GRADE (Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study) is a 36-center unmasked, parallel treatment group, randomized controlled trial evaluating four diabetes medications added to metformin in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We report baseline characteristics and compare GRADE participants to a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cohort. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Participants were age ≥30 years at the time of diagnosis, with duration of T2DM <10 years, HbA1c 6.8-8.5% (51-69 mmol/mol), prescribed metformin monotherapy, and randomized to glimepiride, sitagliptin, liraglutide, or insulin glargine. RESULTS At baseline, GRADE's 5,047 randomized participants were 57.2 ± 10.0 years of age, 63.6% male, with racial/ethnic breakdown of 65.7% white, 19.8% African American, 3.6% Asian, 2.7% Native American, 7.6% other or unknown, and 18.4% Hispanic/Latino. Duration of diabetes was 4.2 ± 2.8 years, with mean HbA1c of 7.5 ± 0.5% (58 ± 5.3 mmol/mol), BMI of 34.3 ± 6.8 kg/m2, and metformin dose of 1,944 ± 204 mg/day. Among the cohort, 67% reported a history of hypertension, 72% a history of hyperlipidemia, and 6.5% a history of heart attack or stroke. Applying GRADE inclusion criteria to NHANES indicates enrollment of a representative cohort with T2DM on metformin monotherapy (NHANES cohort average age, 57.9 years; mean HbA1c, 7.4% [57 mmol/mol]; BMI, 33.2 kg/m2; duration, 4.2 ± 2.5 years; and 7.2% with a history of cardiovascular disease). CONCLUSIONS The GRADE cohort represents patients with T2DM treated with metformin requiring a second diabetes medication. GRADE will inform decisions about the clinical effectiveness of the addition of four classes of diabetes medications to metformin.
-
5.
Sitagliptin vs. pioglitazone as add-on treatments in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes on the maximal dose of metformin plus sulfonylurea.
Khaloo, P, Asadi Komeleh, S, Alemi, H, Mansournia, MA, Mohammadi, A, Yadegar, A, Afarideh, M, Esteghamati, S, Nakhjavani, M, Esteghamati, A
Journal of endocrinological investigation. 2019;(7):851-857
Abstract
AIMS: To compare the efficacy of sitagliptin versus pioglitazone as add-on drugs in patients with poorly controlled diabetes with metformin and sulfonylureas. METHODS This is a randomized, open-label, parallel assignment clinical trial. Patients who had inadequate glycemic control [7% (53 mmol/mol) ≤ A1C < 11% (97 mmol/mol)] despite a minimum 6-month period of active treatment with metformin 2000 mg/day plus gliclazide 240 mg/day were enrolled in the study. HbA1C, fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting plasma lipid parameters [total cholesterol (TC0, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)], systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), weight, waist circumference, and body mass index were measured at baseline and after 17, 34, and 52 weeks of treatment. Generalized estimating equation analysis was done to compare treatment groups for continuous efficacy parameters. RESULTS No significant difference in HbA1C reduction was observed between the treatment groups during the study course. (P = 0.149, adjusted P = 0.434; coefficient - 0.11 ± 0.08). The FBG (P = 0.032; coefficient 7.44 ± 3.48), HDL-C (P = 0.001; coefficient - 2.69 ± 0.83), TG (P = 0.027; coefficient 12.63 ± 5.71) and SBP (P < 0.001; coefficient 5.43 ± 1.26) changes from baseline, and weight gain were greater in the pioglitazone group. The mean changes in LDL-C and TC from baseline to week 52 were greater in the sitagliptin group (P = 0.034; coefficient - 7.40 ± 3.50, P = 0.013; coefficient - 7.16 ± 2.88, respectively). CONCLUSION Sitagliptin and pioglitazone were equally effective in improvement of HbA1C. There were some differences in terms of lipid indices, weight gain, and SBP. The current study confirmed that both sitagliptin and pioglitazone are effective treatment options and the decision should be made for each individual based on the baseline characteristics.
-
6.
Long-term effect of pioglitazone vs glimepiride on lipoprotein oxidation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a prospective randomized study.
Sartore, G, Chilelli, NC, Seraglia, R, Ragazzi, E, Marin, R, Roverso, M, Cosma, C, Vaccaro, O, Burlina, S, Lapolla, A
Acta diabetologica. 2019;(5):505-513
Abstract
AIMS: Type 2 diabetes (DM2) is associated to oxidative modifications of high-density lipoproteins (HDL), which can interfere with their function. Pioglitazone has proved effective in raising HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and lowering small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL), but no clinical studies have examined its effect on lipoprotein oxidation in patients with DM2. METHODS We assessed the effect of pioglitazone vs glimepiride after 1 year on HDL oxidation, expressed as relative abundance of peptides containing Met112O in ApoA-I (oxApoA-I) estimated by mass spectrometry (MALDI/TOF/TOF), in 95 patients with DM2. The oxLDL and AGE were quantified by ELISA. RESULTS Patients receiving pioglitazone showed a significant increase in the concentration of ApoA-I (Δ = 7.2 ± 14.8 mg/dL, p < 0.02) and a reduction in oxApoA-I (Δ = - 1.0 ± 2.6%, p < 0.02); this reduction was not significantly different from glimepiride. oxLDL showed a slight, but not significant increase in both treatment groups. Regression analysis showed a correlation between ΔoxApoA-I and ΔAGE (r = 0.30; p = 0.007) in all patients, while both of these parameters were unrelated to changes in HbA1c, HDL-C, duration of illness, or use of statins. CONCLUSIONS Long-term treatment with pioglitazone was effective in reducing the oxidation of HDL, but not LDL in patients with DM2, while glimepiride didn't. This finding seems to be associated to the change of glyco-oxidation status, not to any improvement in glycemic control or lipid profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT00700856, ClinicalTrials.gov Registered June 18, 2008.
-
7.
Effects of canagliflozin versus glimepiride on adipokines and inflammatory biomarkers in type 2 diabetes.
Garvey, WT, Van Gaal, L, Leiter, LA, Vijapurkar, U, List, J, Cuddihy, R, Ren, J, Davies, MJ
Metabolism: clinical and experimental. 2018;:32-37
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Type 2 diabetes and obesity are pro-inflammatory states associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Canagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, demonstrated superiority in lowering HbA1c versus glimepiride with less hypoglycemia and greater weight reduction via loss of fat mass in a 52-week trial of type 2 diabetes patients. This post hoc, exploratory analysis assessed the effects of canagliflozin versus glimepiride on select adipokines, inflammatory biomarkers, and chemokines. METHODS Changes from baseline to Week 52 in serum leptin, adiponectin, IL-6, TNFα, CRP, PAI-1, VCAM-1, and MCP-1 were measured in a randomly selected subset of type 2 diabetes patients on metformin receiving canagliflozin 300 mg (n = 100) or glimepiride (n = 100) in the overall study. Correlations between change in biomarkers and change in select metabolic and anthropometric variables were assessed. RESULTS At Week 52, canagliflozin decreased median serum leptin by 25% (95% CI: -34%, -15%) and increased median serum adiponectin by 17% (95% CI: 11%, 23%) compared with glimepiride. There was a 22% reduction in median serum IL-6 (95% CI: -34%, -10%) and a 7% increase in median serum TNFα (95% CI: 1%, 12%) with canagliflozin versus glimepiride. No between-group differences were observed with the other biomarkers. The decrease in serum leptin with canagliflozin was correlated with change in weight (r ≥ 0.3) only; the increase in adiponectin and decrease in IL-6 with canagliflozin occurred independently of changes in HbA1c, weight, or lipids. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that canagliflozin may improve adipose tissue function and induce changes in serum leptin, adiponectin, and IL-6 that favorably impact insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular disease risk.
-
8.
Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial.
Vaccaro, O, Masulli, M, Nicolucci, A, Bonora, E, Del Prato, S, Maggioni, AP, Rivellese, AA, Squatrito, S, Giorda, CB, Sesti, G, et al
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2017;(11):887-897
Abstract
BACKGROUND The best treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes in whom treatment with metformin alone fails to achieve adequate glycaemic control is debated. We aimed to compare the long-term effects of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas, given in addition to metformin, on cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS TOSCA.IT was a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic clinical trial, in which patients aged 50-75 years with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy (2-3 g per day) were recruited from 57 diabetes clinics in Italy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), by permuted blocks randomisation (block size 10), stratified by site and previous cardiovascular events, to add-on pioglitazone (15-45 mg) or a sulfonylurea (5-15 mg glibenclamide, 2-6 mg glimepiride, or 30-120 mg gliclazide, in accordance with local practice). The trial was unblinded, but event adjudicators were unaware of treatment assignment. The primary outcome, assessed with a Cox proportional-hazards model, was a composite of first occurrence of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or urgent coronary revascularisation, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned participants with baseline data available and without any protocol violations in relation to inclusion or exclusion criteria). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00700856. FINDINGS Between Sept 18, 2008, and Jan 15, 2014, 3028 patients were randomly assigned and included in the analyses. 1535 were assigned to pioglitazone and 1493 to sulfonylureas (glibenclamide 24 [2%], glimepiride 723 [48%], gliclazide 745 [50%]). At baseline, 335 (11%) participants had a previous cardiovascular event. The study was stopped early on the basis of a futility analysis after a median follow-up of 57·3 months. The primary outcome occurred in 105 patients (1·5 per 100 person-years) who were given pioglitazone and 108 (1·5 per 100 person-years) who were given sulfonylureas (hazard ratio 0·96, 95% CI 0·74-1·26, p=0·79). Fewer patients had hypoglycaemias in the pioglitazone group than in the sulfonylureas group (148 [10%] vs 508 [34%], p<0·0001). Moderate weight gain (less than 2 kg, on average) occurred in both groups. Rates of heart failure, bladder cancer, and fractures were not significantly different between treatment groups. INTERPRETATION In this long-term, pragmatic trial, incidence of cardiovascular events was similar with sulfonylureas (mostly glimepiride and gliclazide) and pioglitazone as add-on treatments to metformin. Both of these widely available and affordable treatments are suitable options with respect to efficacy and adverse events, although pioglitazone was associated with fewer hypoglycaemia events. FUNDING Italian Medicines Agency, Diabete Ricerca, and Italian Diabetes Society.
-
9.
Open-label randomized non-inferiority trial of a fixed-dose combination of glimepiride and atorvastatin for the treatment of people whose Type 2 diabetes is uncontrolled on metformin.
Ambery, P, Stylianou, A, Atkinson, G, Dott, C, Baylor Curtis, L, Haque, N, LaCroix, K, Min, KW, ,
Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2016;(8):1084-93
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate, in a randomized, open-label study, the non-inferiority of a bioequivalent fixed-dose combination of glimepiride and atorvastatin vs. separately co-administered tablets in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS Participants with HbA1c ≥ 53 to < 80 mmol/mol (≥ 7.0 to < 9.5%), average fasting blood glucose > 7.0 mmol/l, who were on metformin for ≥ 3 months, were randomized to combination (n = 215) or co-administered glimepiride and atorvastatin (n = 212) once daily for 20 weeks. Up-titration of glimepiride (1-4 mg) and atorvastatin (10-20 mg) were based on average fasting blood glucose and LDL cholesterol, respectively. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline to week 20 in HbA1c and LDL cholesterol. RESULTS Non-inferiority was demonstrated for both co-primary endpoints: the upper limits of 95% CIs for differences (combination-reference) were less than the prespecified margins of 3.3 mmol/mol (0.3%) for change from baseline in HbA1c [difference 0.1 mmol/mol (95% CI -1.6, 1.9); 0.01% (95% CI -0.15, 0.17)] and 6% for percentage change from baseline in LDL cholesterol [difference 0.87% (95% CI -2.47, 4.21)]. Similar proportions of participants on combination and reference had treatment-emergent adverse events (64 vs. 61%). More participants on combination had hypoglycaemia (21 vs. 13%); most events were considered by the treating physician to be unrelated to study drug. CONCLUSIONS The combination was non-inferior to separately co-administered tablets and the safety profile was consistent with the known profiles of glimepiride and atorvastatin. The observed increase in hypoglycaemia on the combination cannot be explained, but may be attributable to non-systematic collectiof glucose readings and may have been influenced by reporting bias in this open-label trial.
-
10.
Differences between Mitiglinide/Voglibose Fixed-dose Combination and Glimepiride in Modifying Low-density Lipoprotein Heterogeneity in Japanese Type-2 Diabetic Patients: A Pilot Study.
Tani, S, Nagao, K, Hirayama, A
Drug research. 2016;(2):94-9
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of mitiglinide/voglibose fixed-dose combination and glimepiride on low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-heterogeneity in type-2 diabetic patients with unstable glycemic control after treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. METHODS This was an open-label pilot study in which type-2 diabetic patients were randomly assigned to the mitiglinide/voglibose (fixed-dose combination of mitiglinide 10 mg and voglibose 0.2 mg, n=14) or glimepiride (0.5 mg, n=16). RESULTS In the glimepiride group, serum LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and small-dense (sd) LDL levels decreased significantly (-8.5% and -9.0%), while sd-LDL/LDL-C and an indicator of LDL-particle size, LDL-C/apoB, did not change significantly. In the mitiglinide/voglibose group, serum LDL-C levels did not change, while sd-LDL levels and sd-LDL/LDL-C decreased significantly (-8.6% and -7.9%) and LDL-C/apoB increased significantly (5.8%). Fasting blood glucose levels tended to be reduced to a greater extent in the glimepiride group than in the mitiglinide/voglibose group (-13.9% vs. -8.4%, p=0.08), while the rate of reduction of HbA1c levels tended to be higher in the mitiglinide/voglibose group than in the glimepiride group (-6.9% vs. -3.4%, p=0.09), suggesting differences in fluctuating blood glucose levels between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION There were differences in the effects of mitiglinide/voglibose fixed-dose combination and glimepiride in addition to DPP-4 inhibitors on LDL-metabolism, and this may be related to fluctuations in blood glucose levels after treatment with these agents.