-
1.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Is Not Associated with an Increased Risk of Polyps and Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Vichos, T, Rezaie, A, Vichos, P, Cash, B, Pimentel, M
Digestive diseases and sciences. 2023;68(6):2585-2596
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers and adenomatous colorectal polyps (CRP) are a risk factor for developing CRC. The potential role of functional disturbances seen in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) for the development of CRC are not yet clear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the occurrence of CRC and CRP in IBS patients. 14 cohort studies with a total of 654,764 IBS patients and 2,277,195 controls and six cross-sectional studies with 26,641 IBS patients and 87,803 controls were included in the review. Based on the pooled data from 5 cross-sectional studies, IBS patients had a significantly lower occurrence of CRP (by 71%). CRC risk was also reduced but this did not reach statistical significance. Only four of the 14 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis and, again, CRC risk was lower in IBS patients but this was not statistically significant.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy in the US. Several factors are associated with increased/decreased CRC risk and often linked to adenomatous colorectal polyps (CRP). Recent studies suggest a lower risk of neoplastic lesions among irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. We aimed to systematically assess the occurrence of CRC and CRP in IBS patients. METHODS Searches of the Medline, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were performed, blindly and independently, by two investigators. Studies of CRC or CRP incidence in IBS patients (diagnosed by Rome or other symptom-based criteria) were eligible for inclusion. CRC and CRP effect estimates were pooled in meta-analyses using random models. RESULTS Of 4941 non-duplicate studies, 14 were included, comprising 654,764 IBS patients and 2,277,195 controls in 8 cohort studies, and 26,641 IBS patients and 87,803 controls in 6 cross-sectional studies. Pooled analysis revealed a significantly decreased prevalence of CRP in IBS subjects vs. controls, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.29 (95% CI (0.15, 0.54)). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 96%, p < 0.01). This finding persisted when studies which did not report pre-cancerous polyps separately were excluded (OR 0.23, 95% CI (0.15, 0.35), I2 = 85%, p < 0.01). CRC prevalence was lower in IBS subjects, but this did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.40, 95% CI (0.09, 1.77]). CONCLUSION Our analyses reveal a decreased incidence of colorectal polyps in IBS, although CRC did not reach significance. Mechanistic studies with detailed genotypic analysis and clinical phenotyping are needed to better elucidate the potentially protective effect of IBS on CRC development.
-
2.
Diabetes mellitus, prediabetes and the risk of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies with 29.9 million participants and 86,345 cases.
Aune, D, Schlesinger, S, Mahamat-Saleh, Y, Zheng, B, Udeh-Momoh, CT, Middleton, LT
European journal of epidemiology. 2023;38(6):591-604
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Diabetes mellitus and prediabetes may increase an individual’s risk for Parkinson’s disease (PD), however the research completed to date has been controversial. This meta-analysis of 15 observational studies with 86,345 individuals with PD aimed to update the research on PD risk for individuals with diabetes or prediabetes and determine possible reasons for the ambiguity of previous research. The results showed that compared to people without diabetes, those with, were at a 27% increased relative risk of PD and a 4% increase amongst those with prediabetes. Individuals with a history of complications alongside diabetes were at a higher risk than those without. It was concluded that the risk of developing PD is increased amongst individuals with diabetes. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that individuals with diabetes may be at an increased risk for PD and should be monitored. However, as this is based on observational studies, there is a chance that PD increases the risk for diabetes and not the reverse.
Abstract
A diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and prediabetes has been associated with increased risk of Parkinson's disease (PD) in several studies, but results have not been entirely consistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies on diabetes mellitus, prediabetes and the risk of PD to provide an up-to-date assessment of the evidence. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies up to 6th of February 2022. Cohort studies reporting adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between diabetes, prediabetes and Parkinson's disease were included. Summary RRs (95% CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Fifteen cohort studies (29.9 million participants, 86,345 cases) were included in the meta-analysis. The summary RR (95% CI) of PD for persons with diabetes compared to persons without diabetes was 1.27 (1.20-1.35, I2 = 82%). There was no indication of publication bias, based on Egger's test (p = 0.41), Begg's test (p = 0.99), and inspection of the funnel plot. The association was consistent across geographic regions, by sex, and across several other subgroup and sensitivity analyses. There was some suggestion of a stronger association for diabetes patients reporting diabetes complications than for diabetes patients without complications (RR = 1.54, 1.32-1.80 [n = 3] vs. 1.26, 1.16-1.38 [n = 3]), vs. those without diabetes (pheterogeneity=0.18). The summary RR for prediabetes was 1.04 (95% CI: 1.02-1.07, I2 = 0%, n = 2). Our results suggest that patients with diabetes have a 27% increased relative risk of developing PD compared to persons without diabetes, and persons with prediabetes have a 4% increase in RR compared to persons with normal blood glucose. Further studies are warranted to clarify the specific role age of onset or duration of diabetes, diabetic complications, glycaemic level and its long-term variability and management may play in relation to PD risk.
-
3.
The Efficacy of Self-Management Strategies for Females with Endometriosis: a Systematic Review.
Mardon, AK, Leake, HB, Hayles, C, Henry, ML, Neumann, PB, Moseley, GL, Chalmers, KJ
Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.). 2023;30(2):390-407
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Endometriosis is a gynaecological condition with symptoms of pelvic pain, fatigue, and stress. Decreased quality of life, impaired fertility and hinderances to carry out day to day tasks are all associated with endometriosis. Treatment options involve medications and surgery; however, both are associated with poorer outcomes than the initial disease itself. Self-management strategies that the individual can perform themselves, such as lifestyle changes, meditation, and rest have all been used to improve the quality of life of individuals with endometriosis, however their effectiveness has not been determined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of self-management strategies for the management of endometriosis. The study showed that many self-management strategies were no more effective than placebo or hormonal therapies for the management of endometriosis. It was concluded that many self-management strategies were no more effective than hormonal treatment at reducing endometriosis symptoms and the studies that did show a benefit were insufficient to base recommendations on due to poor design. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that currently the research on self-management strategies of endometriosis is poor and whilst some may be of benefit to individuals who cannot or do not want to take hormone therapy, more research is warranted.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
It is not possible to generalise the findings of this systematic review for the self-management of endometriosis due to the poor quality of evidence. Further studies of higher quality are needed.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Endometriosis is an inflammatory condition where endometrial-like tissue is found outside of the uterus. Diagnosis of endometriosis is made in around 6-10% of females of reproductive age. Endometriosis can adversely affect fertility, psychological well being and quality of life (QoL). Conventional interventions can have side effects and limited effectiveness. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to evaluate the efficacy of self-management interventions for pain-related symptoms and QoL.
Methods
Fifteen experimental studies were included in this SR. Ten evaluated dietary supplements, three evaluated dietary modifications, one evaluated over-the-counter (OTC) medication, and one evaluated exercise. Outcome measures were self-reported for dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, overall pain, non-menstrual pelvic pain, use of medications and QoL.
Results
- Most dietary supplements were no more effective than placebo or frequently recommended medical interventions, at reducing pain-related outcomes.
- Melatonin (one RCT n=30) performed better than placebo for managing dysmenorrhoea and overall pain but not for non-menstrual pelvic pain. PEA-transploydatin (one RCT n=20) performed better than placebo for dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain but not better than medical intervention.
- Resveratrol (one RCT n=22 & one intervention study n=12) plus the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) was more effective than the OCP alone for managing dysmenorrhoea.
- In one observational study, 75% of participants (n=295) reported a reduction in ‘high’ intensity pain scores following a 12-month gluten-free diet (p- value =<0.005). Similarly, a full dietary modification (one non randomised controlled trial , n=30) found less participants reporting pain at ‘high intensity’ (18%) compared to linseed and calcium oil supplements (41%) and placebo (62%).
- A metal trace element supplement was more effective than placebo for managing overall pain (one RCT p- value<0.001).
- Naproxen (one cross over trial, n=11) performed better than placebo at managing dysmenorrhoea (83% vs 41%, p- value 0.008).
- Hatha yoga (one RCT n=12) was found to be effective at reducing overall pain and improving QoL compared to no yoga (p-value <0.05).
Conclusion
Due to limited, low-quality evidence, high risk of bias and high levels of heterogeneity between studies, it was not possible to generalise the findings of the studies included in this systematic review. Further research of high-quality is needed in order to make self-management recommendations for females with endometriosis.
Notes: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
Evidence-based self-management interventions are considered critical for the management of endometriosis. However, the quality of evidence in this SR was considered of poor quality. Further high-quality research is needed in order to be able to make recommendations. Strategies that showed potential benefits included:
- Dietary modifications and a gluten-free diet may be effective for reducing the intensity of pain associated with endometriosis.
- Hatha yoga may be effective at reducing overall pain and supporting psychological wellbeing and QoL.
Considerations for future research:
High quality studies are needed as well as a ‘gold standard’ definition for self-management criteria. Understanding potential barriers to self-management interventions may also be beneficial.
Abstract
Self-management is critical for the care of endometriosis. Females with endometriosis frequently use self-management strategies to manage associated symptoms; however, the efficacy of such strategies is unknown. The aim of this review was to systematically appraise the evidence concerning efficacy of self-management strategies for endometriosis symptoms. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched from inception to March 2021. We included peer-reviewed experimental studies published in English evaluating the efficacy of self-management strategies in human females laparoscopically diagnosed with endometriosis. Studies underwent screening, data extraction, and risk of bias appraisal (randomised studies: Risk of Bias 2 tool; non-randomised studies: Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions tool). Of the fifteen studies included, 10 evaluated dietary supplements, three evaluated dietary modifications, one evaluated over-the-counter medication, and one evaluated exercise. Most studies had a high-critical risk of bias. Many self-management strategies were not more effective at reducing endometriosis symptoms compared to placebo or hormonal therapies. Where studies suggest efficacy for self-management strategies, no recommendations can be made due to the poor quality and heterogeneity of evidence. High-quality empirical evidence is required to investigate the efficacy of self-management strategies for females with endometriosis.
-
4.
The efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a meta-analysis.
Huang, C, Kuo, S, Lin, L, Yang, Y
Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. 2023;17:17534666231158563
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by reduced airflow, excess mucus secretion and shortness of breath. During exacerbations, excessive free radicals are formed leading to reduced levels of the body’s glutathione (GSH) antioxidant system. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a precursor to GSH and also a well-known mucolytic agent. The aim of this meta-analysis, which included 9 randomised, placebo-controlled trials with 2137 COPD patients, was to evaluate the effectiveness of NAC supplementation. Outcome measures were number of patients with no acute exacerbations, change in forced expiratory volume at 1s (FEV1), change in forced vital capacity (FVC), St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, change in glutathione levels and adverse events. There was no statistically significant difference between the NAC and the placebo group in any of the outcomes. This was regardless of dose, which ranged from 600 mg every 24 hours to 1800 every 12 hours. Limitations of this meta-analysis, as listed by the authors, include the small number and sizes of studies and the heterogeneity of study designs.
Abstract
BACKGROUND N-acetylcysteine (NAC) may reduce acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through an antioxidant effect. Due to the heterogeneity in studies, the currently available data do not confirm the efficacy of oral NAC therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. We hypothesize that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients receiving regular oral NAC therapy do not achieve improved clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of long-term oral NAC therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS The literature search was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all included clinical studies. Studies were eligible for inclusion only if they directly compared the outcomes of NAC versus placebo in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease between 1 January 2000 and 30 May 2022. All studies were included if they reported one or more of the following outcomes: number of patients with no acute exacerbations, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score, glutathione level, and adverse events. RESULTS Nine randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. There were 1061 patients in the NAC group and 1076 patients in the placebo group. The current meta-analysis provides evidence that the number of patients with no acute exacerbations (965 patients receiving NAC therapy, 979 control group patients), change in FEV1 (433 patients receiving NAC therapy, 447 control group patients), change in FVC (177 patients receiving NAC therapy, 180 control group patients), change in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (128 patients receiving NAC therapy, 131 control group patients), change in glutathione levels (38 patients receiving NAC therapy, 40 control group patients), and adverse events (832 patients receiving NAC therapy, 846 control group patients) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION NAC did not reduce the risk of acute exacerbation or ameliorate the decline in lung volume in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.
-
5.
Effect of synbiotic supplementation on immune parameters and gut microbiota in healthy adults: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Li, X, Hu, S, Yin, J, Peng, X, King, L, Li, L, Xu, Z, Zhou, L, Peng, Z, Ze, X, et al
Gut microbes. 2023;15(2):2247025
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gut microbiota is involved in regulating immunity and synbiotics, that is combinations of pro- and prebiotics, may therefore modulate immunity via the gut microbiota. The aim of this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the immune-modulatory effects of a synbiotic supplement (containing Bifidobacterium lactis HN019, Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 and fructo-oligosaccharide) in healthy adults. Outcome measures included C-reactive protein (CRP, an inflammatory marker), various pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, stool and salivary secretory IgA (sIgA), leukocytes, microbial stool analysis and occurrence, duration, and severity of upper respiratory tract infections (URTI). Compared to the control group, a significant reduction in the inflammatory markers CRP and interferon-gamma and an increase in the anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 and stool sIgA were observed in the supplementation group. There were no differences in types of leukocytes or URTIs between groups. Significant favourable changes in microbiome analysis were observed in the supplemented group which correlated with the observed improvements in inflammatory markers. These changes were dependent on the baseline composition of the microbiome. No adverse events were reported. The authors conclude that the data show that synbiotics are of benefit to healthy adults and support the concept of personalised supplementation.
Abstract
Synbiotics are increasingly used by the general population to boost immunity. However, there is limited evidence concerning the immunomodulatory effects of synbiotics in healthy individuals. Therefore, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 106 healthy adults. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either synbiotics (containing Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 1.5 × 108 CFU/d, Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 7.5 × 107 CFU/d, and fructooligosaccharide 500 mg/d) or placebo for 8 weeks. Immune parameters and gut microbiota composition were measured at baseline, mid, and end of the study. Compared to the placebo group, participants receiving synbiotic supplementation exhibited greater reductions in plasma C-reactive protein (P = 0.088) and interferon-gamma (P = 0.008), along with larger increases in plasma interleukin (IL)-10 (P = 0.008) and stool secretory IgA (sIgA) (P = 0.014). Additionally, synbiotic supplementation led to an enrichment of beneficial bacteria (Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Collinsella) and several functional pathways related to amino acids and short-chain fatty acids biosynthesis, whereas reduced potential pro-inflammatory Parabacteroides compared to baseline. Importantly, alternations in anti-inflammatory markers (IL-10 and sIgA) were significantly correlated with microbial variations triggered by synbiotic supplementation. Stratification of participants into two enterotypes based on pre-treatment Prevotella-to-Bacteroides (P/B) ratio revealed a more favorable effect of synbiotic supplements in individuals with a higher P/B ratio. In conclusion, this study suggested the beneficial effects of synbiotic supplementation on immune parameters, which were correlated with synbiotics-induced microbial changes and modified by microbial enterotypes. These findings provided direct evidence supporting the personalized supplementation of synbiotics for immunomodulation.
-
6.
Transforming Psoriasis Care: Probiotics and Prebiotics as Novel Therapeutic Approaches.
Buhaș, MC, Candrea, R, Gavrilaș, LI, Miere, D, Tătaru, A, Boca, A, Cătinean, A
International journal of molecular sciences. 2023;24(13)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin, characterised by dysfunctional proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes (a type of skin cell). Previous research has shown that psoriasis is associated with gut dysbiosis and increased levels of inflammatory cytokines. The aim of this non-randomised, open-label clinical trial of 63 psoriasis patients was to evaluate the effectiveness of supplementation with a spore-based probiotic (containing 5 strains of Bacillus, taken for 12 weeks) in combination with 3 prebiotics (fructo-oligosaccharides, xylo-oligosaccharides and galacto-oligosaccharides, taken for 8 weeks) alongside standard topical treatment versus topical treatment alone. Outcome measure included Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), inflammatory cytokines, insulin, glucose, lipids, uric acid, body composition, BMI and skin analysis. 15 of the 42 patients in the supplementation group also had a microbiome analysis. Significant improvements were seen in the supplementation group for PASI, DLQI, inflammatory markers, blood lipids, BMI as well as skin analysis, compared to the control group. Favourable changes in microbiome analysis were also observed. It is noteworthy that there were several significant differences between groups at baseline, including severity of psoriasis which was worse in the supplemented group. The authors concluded that patients receiving a combination of a spore-based probiotics and prebiotics alongside standard topical treatment experienced multiple improvements but that further clinical trials are required to establish the most effective combinations and doses.
Abstract
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with autoimmune pathological characteristics. Recent research has found a link between psoriasis, inflammation, and gut microbiota dysbiosis, and that probiotics and prebiotics provide benefits to patients. This 12-week open-label, single-center clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of probiotics (Bacillus indicus (HU36), Bacillus subtilis (HU58), Bacillus coagulans (SC208), Bacillus licheniformis (SL307), and Bacillus clausii (SC109)) and precision prebiotics (fructooligosaccharides, xylooligosaccharides, and galactooligosaccharides) in patients with psoriasis receiving topical therapy, with an emphasis on potential metabolic, immunological, and gut microbiota changes. In total, 63 patients were evaluated, with the first 42 enrolled patients assigned to the intervention group and the next 21 assigned to the control group (2:1 ratio; non-randomized). There were between-group differences in several patient characteristics at baseline, including age, psoriasis severity (the incidence of severe psoriasis was greater in the intervention group than in the control group), the presence of nail psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis, though it is not clear whether or how these differences may have affected the study findings. Patients with psoriasis receiving anti-psoriatic local therapy and probiotic and prebiotic supplementation performed better in measures of disease activity, including Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Dermatology Life Quality Index, inflammatory markers, and skin thickness compared with those not receiving supplementation. Furthermore, in the 15/42 patients in the intervention group who received gut microbiota analysis, the gut microbiota changed favorably following 12 weeks of probiotic and prebiotic supplementation, with a shift towards an anti-inflammatory profile.
-
7.
Effect of Chamomile on the Complications of Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Maleki, M, Mardani, A, Manouchehri, M, Ashghali Farahani, M, Vaismoradi, M, Glarcher, M
Integrative cancer therapies. 2023;22:15347354231164600
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cancer and its treatments are associated with a wide range of complications such as mucositis, nausea/vomiting and dermatitis as well as implication for mental health, such as anxiety and depression, which can reduce quality of life (QOL) of patients. Chamomile is a commonly used medicinal herbal that is used in various forms orally and topically. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of chamomile, in its various forms of administration, for complications of cancer (any type) and its treatments. 18 controlled intervention studies including 1099 patients were included in the review. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies a meta-analysis was not possible. Benefits were reported for locally applied forms of chamomile for prevention of mucositis (7 of 8 studies), topical application for prevention of dermatitis or phlebitis (4/5), aromatherapy massage for anxiety (2) and QOL (2), tea for depression but not anxiety (1). No effect was seen of syrup for QOL (1). No side effects were reported in the included studies. The authors conclude that chamomile is a safe method to help mitigate the suffering from cancer complications.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Oral use of chamomile infusion may be helpful for people receiving treatment for cancer.
- Studies of this intervention report no safety concerns.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
This systematic review examined the use of chamomile in the support of people receiving treatment for cancer. Studies of a variety of chamomile preparations were considered.
Methods
- The authors retrieved 2240 studies from 5 on-line databases, from which 18 studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis.
- Fifteen of these studies were randomised control trials (RCT), three were non-randomised studies. German (Matricaria recutita) and Roman (Chamaemelum nobile) chamomile varieties were included. Studies using blends with other herbs were excluded.
- A narrative review was produced due to heterogeneous patient groups, preparations and trial protocols.
Results
- 1099 patients were included in the analysis, 57% female.
- Risk of bias assessment of 15 RCTs identified 2 RCTs with high risk of bias in blinding or in reporting outcome data.
- Studies in several cancer types were included, four in head and neck cancer (HNC), four in leukaemia, three in breast cancer, one in digestive system cancers, remaining in mixed cancer types.
- Eight studies reported the impact on oral mucositis of chamomile infusions used as mouthwash, or ice chips, or applied as an oral gel. Patients were receiving chemotherapy orstem cell transplantation, with interventions for up to 21 days after chemotherapy. Seven studies reported reduced severity and/or duration of mucositis and associated pain. One study of 14 days’ use after 5-fluorouracil treatment for colorectal cancer showed no impact on oral mucositis.
- One of three studies of psychological impact of cancer treatment used chamomile tea and reported no impact on anxiety but decreased depression. In comparison, two studies of weekly aromatherapy massage using chamomile oil reported reduced anxiety.
- One RCT in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia reported increased neutrophil count with 125mg chamomile in syrup versus placebo (p=0.019, 955 CI 15.076-171.324)
- One RCT in breast cancer randomised 45 women receiving usual antiemetics to additional chamomile capsules (500mg) or ginger (500mg) capsules, twice daily for 5 days before and after chemotherapy, or control group of no additional botanicals. Both botanical interventions reduced frequency of vomiting compared with the control group. Frequency of nausea was also reduced by ginger but not by chamomile.
- Five studies evaluated external treatments of chamomile on skin complications of radiotherapy. Reduction in radiation dermatitis in HNC patients with compresses soaked in chamomile infusion was reported.
- No side effects of using chamomile preparations were reported by the studies included in the systematic review.
Conclusion
Chamomile has been studied in a variety of preparations for people receiving treatment for cancer. Several RCTs reported significant amelioration of common side effects of cancer treatments, with reduced severity and/or duration of oral mucositis and associated pain.
Clinical practice applications:
- Chamomile infusion used in the mouth, as mouthwash or ice chips, may be useful for oral mucositis, a common side effect of cancer treatment
- Chamomile infusion may also be considered for mental wellbeing
- Several protocols for using chamomile preparations are described in the review and practitioners may refer to the individual studies cited
- This use of chamomile in the described applications appears to be safe
- (Reviewer’s note: allergy to ragwort would be a contraindication for use of chamomile preparations)
Considerations for future research:
- More detailed comparisons of chamomile preparations would be useful, for use in oral mucositis
- Topical applications may be studied further by researchers in aromatherapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Despite significant advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, many people across the world still suffer from this chronic disease and its complications. Chamomile as an herbal medicine has gained an increasing attention for relieving cancer complications. This study aimed to integrate and synthesize current international evidence regarding the effect of chamomile on cancer complications. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken. Five online databases including Web of Science, PubMed [including MEDLINE], Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Embase were searched and articles published from inception to January 2023 were retrieved. All clinical trials and similar interventional studies on human subjects examining the effects of chamomile on cancer complications were included in the review and research synthesis. Relevant data were extracted from eligible studies after quality appraisals using proper methodological tools. The review results were presented narratively given that meta-analysis was impossible. RESULTS A total of 2240 studies were retrieved during the search process, but 18 articles were selected. The total sample size was 1099 patients with cancer of which 622 participants were female. Fifteen studies used an RCT design. Various forms of chamomile were used such as mouthwash, topical material, tea, capsule, syrup and aromatherapy massage. Chamomile effectively reduced oral mucositis, skin complications, depression, and vomiting and also improved appetite and quality of life among cancer patients. CONCLUSION The use of chamomile as a non-pharmacologic and safe method can be helpful for mitigating cancer complications in patients with cancer. Therefore, it can be incorporated into routine care along with other therapeutic measures to reduce patients' suffering related to cancer. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER (PROSPERO): CRD42022307887.
-
8.
Lactulose regulates gut microbiota dysbiosis and promotes short-chain fatty acids production in acute pancreatitis patients with intestinal dysfunction.
Wang, J, Jiang, M, Hu, Y, Lei, Y, Zhu, Y, Xiong, H, He, C
Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie. 2023;163:114769
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is commonly associated with gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction in the early phase which in turn increases the risk of infectious complications and as such poorer prognosis. Lactulose is a prebiotic that can modulate the gut microbiota and intestinal metabolites. The aim of this open-label, randomised controlled study, involving 83 patients with moderate-severe AP and associated GI dysfunction, was to evaluate the efficacy of lactulose on intestinal function, infectious complications and prognosis compared to rhubarb, which has shown benefits for the aforementioned outcomes of AP. GI function improved significantly within 7 days in both groups, with no difference between groups. Whilst one marker (D-lac) of intestinal permeability was improved in both groups after 7 days, another marker (DAO) showed no improvement in either group. There was no significant difference between groups in this respect. There was no difference in clinical outcomes between groups, but certain inflammatory markers (TNF-a, IL-6) declined more in the lactulose than in the rhubarb group. More beneficial changes in the microbiota and its metabolites were seen in the lactulose, compared to the rhubarb group. The authors concluded that lactulose is a potent alternative to rhubarb for patients with AP and associated GI dysfunction.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal dysfunction is one of the common complications in the early stage of acute pancreatitis (AP), which often associates with bad outcome. Lactulose, as a prebiotic, has been widely used to improve gut health, yet its effect on AP is unclear. METHODS This was a prospective, randomized trial of moderate severe AP patients complicated with intestinal dysfunction. A total of 73 participants were randomly assigned to receive either lactulose or Chinese herb rhubarb for 1 week. The primary efficacy endpoint was the recovery of intestinal function. The serum levels of inflammatory cytokines and gut barrier indexes were examined. The fecal samples from patients before and after treatment were collected. 16 S rRNA gene sequencing analysis was performed to explore the composition of gut microbiota and the amount of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were detected by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). RESULTS The intestinal dysfunction was prominently improved after 7 days of treatment with either lactulose or rhubarb. The serum levels of cytokines and gut permeability index were decreased after treatment, with stronger down-regulated degree in lactulose group than rhubarb. The potential beneficial genus Bifidobacterium was enriched in lactulose group, while pathogenic bacteria including Escherichia-Shigella and Neisseria were abundant in rhubarb group. Of note, the level of SCFAs was remarkably increased after treatment, with higher amount in lactulose group than rhubarb group. CONCLUSIONS Lactulose could not only restore intestinal function but also regulate gut microbiota and promote the production of SCFAs.
-
9.
Effect of an enzyme-containing mouthwash on the dental biofilm and salivary microbiome in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial.
Hoffstedt, T, Skov Hansen, LB, Twetman, S, Sonesson, M
European journal of orthodontics. 2023;45(1):96-102
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Fixed orthodontic appliances are associated with dysbiosis in the oral cavity which may result in demineralisations of the enamel. Antiseptic mouthwashes have been shown to control the formation of cariogenic biofilm but may have negative effects on the salivary microbiome. The aim of this 8-day double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, including 35 adolescents with fixed orthodontics, was to evaluate the effect of an enzyme-based mouthwash (EBM), used twice daily, on dental biofilm (plaque) formation and salivary microbiome. At 8 days, a statistically and clinically significant decrease in the orthodontic plaque index was seen in the EBM group, whilst no change was seen in the placebo group. There were no statistically significant changes in microbiome between groups but a trend to increased richness in the placebo group. The authors concluded that the use of an enzyme-based mouthwash alongside regular toothbrushing reduced dental biofilm in adolescents with orthodontics without affecting the salivary microbiome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mouthwashes containing oral antiseptics or enzymes are suggested suitable for controlling biofilm accumulation in patients with fixed appliances and thereby limiting unwanted side effects during the orthodontic treatment. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of an enzyme-based mouthwash on the amount of dental biofilm and the composition of the salivary microbiome in patients undergoing treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. TRIAL DESIGN Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 35 young adolescents (14-18 years) under treatment with fixed appliances were consecutively enrolled and randomly allocated to an experimental or a placebo group by opening a computer-generated numbered envelope. The subjects were instructed to rinse twice daily during an intervention period of 8 days with experimental mouthwash or placebo without active enzymes. Unstimulated whole saliva samples were collected at baseline and after 8 days. The participants and examiner were blinded for the allocation. The primary outcome was the Orthodontic Plaque Index (OPI) and the secondary was the composition of the salivary microbiome. RESULTS In total, 28 adolescents (21 females and 7 males) completed the trial and there were no differences in age, clinical, or microbial findings between the test (n = 14) and the placebo group (n = 14) at baseline. We found a decreased OPI in the test group after 8 days and the difference was statistically significant compared with the placebo group (P < 0.05). There were no significant treatment effects on the richness and global composition of the salivary microbiome. HARMS In total, one participant in the test group claimed nausea and abandoned the project. In total, two participants did not like the taste of the mouthwash but used it as instructed. No other adverse events or side effects were reported. LIMITATIONS Short-term pilot trials may by nature be sensitive for selection and performance biases and are not designed to unveil persisting effects. CONCLUSION Daily use of enzyme-containing mouthwash reduced the amount of dental biofilm in adolescents under treatment with the fixed orthodontic appliances, without affecting the composition of the salivary microbiota. ETHICAL APPROVAL Approved by the Regional Ethical Board, Lund, Sweden (Dnr 2020-05221). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05033015.
-
10.
Effect of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Acute Fracture Healing: A Phase II Screening Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.
Slobogean, GP, Bzovsky, S, O'Hara, NN, Marchand, LS, Hannan, ZD, Demyanovich, HK, Connelly, DW, Adachi, JD, Thabane, L, Sprague, S
JBMR plus. 2023;7(1):e10705
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Almost half of all adult patients with fractures are vitamin D deficient. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of different vitamin D regimens on the healing of acute tibia and femur fractures. 102 18-50-year-old patients were enrolled in the study and randomised to receive a) two high doses (150,000 IU) at time of injury and after 6 weeks, b) 4000 IU daily, c) 600 IU daily or d) placebo for 3 months. After 3 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the 3 intervention groups with respect to clinical or radiographic outcomes of fracture healing. The authors report a significantly better clinical, but not radiographic, outcome for 4000 IU per day versus placebo with a p-value of 0.15 (note: generally, to be considered statistically significant, p should be < 0.05). Similar results were observed after 12 months. There was no significant correlation between vitamin D levels and fracture healing. The authors concluded that high dose vitamin D may confer a modest benefit for fracture healing but that this requires confirmation from a larger clinical trial.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The evidence base for the use of vitamin D supplements in isolation to support fracture healing is weak.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
- Low levels of vitamin D can have negative effects on bone metabolism and healing of fractures
- Almost half of all adult fracture patients are vitamin D deficient
- The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of supplementing vitamin D3 (VD3) to improve tibia and femur fracture healing.
Methods
- Four-arm, double-blind, randomised, phase II screening, placebo-controlled trial
- 102 adult patients (aged 18-50 years) with a non-osteoporotic tibial or femoral shaft fracture were randomised into 1 of 4 treatment groups
- Just over half (56%) of participants were vitamin D3 deficient at baseline
- Intervention groups: 1) 150,000 IU VD3 loading dose at injury and at 6 weeks (high loading) plus daily placebo; 2) placebo loading doses plus 4000 IU VD3 daily (high dose); 3) placebo loading doses plus 600 IU VD3 daily (low dose); 4) placebo loading dose plus placebo daily
- Duration: 3 months intervention, further 9 months follow-up. Vitamin D levels were assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months.
Primary outcome measures at 3 months:
- Clinical assessment using the Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT)
- Radiographic assessment using the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST).
Secondary outcomes: as above at 6, 9 and 12 months.
Results at 3 months:
- No statistically significant difference between high loading and high dose, high and low dose or low dose and placebo for either clinical or radiological assessment (all p-values ≥0.4)
- Post-hoc analysis of any dose vs placebo showed no significant difference with either clinical or radiological assessment (all p-values ≥0.25)
- Post-hoc analysis of high dose vs placebo showed no significant difference for radiological assessment (p=0.76) whilst it was reported as statistically significant for clinical assessment with p=0.16, with a benefit of VD3 supplementation.
- Similar results were seen at 12 months with reported benefit of high dose VD3 for fracture healing with p=0.18
- Vitamin D levels improved in all 3 VD3 groups from baseline to 6 weeks
- There was no statistically significant correlation between fracture healing and vitamin D level.
Conclusion
The authors conclude that VD3 supplementation may be of modest benefit for fracture healing, but further, larger trials are needed to confirm this.
Clinical practice applications:
- When working with clients who present with a fracture, it should be noted that the evidence for benefit of vitamin D supplementation alone for fracture healing is weak.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger studies to increase the statistical power to detect smaller benefits are required
- Larger studies may also identify differences in potential benefits between patient populations with different baseline levels of vitamin D.
Abstract
Nearly half of adult fracture patients are vitamin D deficient (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels <20 ng/mL). Many surgeons advocate prescribing vitamin D supplements to improve fracture healing outcomes; however, data supporting the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplements to improve acute fracture healing are lacking. We tested the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation for improving tibia and femur fracture healing. We conducted a single-center, double-blinded phase II screening randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Patients aged 18-50 years receiving an intramedullary nail for a tibia or femoral shaft fracture were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive (i) 150,000 IU loading dose vitamin D3 at injury and 6 weeks (n = 27); (ii) 4000 IU vitamin D3 daily (n = 24); (iii) 600 IU vitamin D3 daily (n = 24); or (iv) placebo (n = 27). Primary outcomes were clinical fracture healing (Function IndeX for Trauma [FIX-IT]) and radiographic fracture healing (Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures [RUST]) at 3 months. One hundred two patients with a mean age of 29 years (standard deviation 8) were randomized. The majority were male (69%), and 56% were vitamin D3 deficient at baseline. Ninety-nine patients completed the 3-month follow-up. In our prespecified comparisons, no clinically important or statistically significant differences were detected in RUST or FIX-IT scores between groups when measured at 3 months and over 12 months. However, in a post hoc comparison, high doses of vitamin D3 were associated with improved clinical fracture healing relative to placebo at 3 months (mean difference [MD] 0.90, 80% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 1.79; p = 0.16) and within 12 months (MD 0.89, 80% CI, 0.05 to 1.74; p = 0.18). The study was designed to identify potential evidence to support the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation in improving acute fracture healing. Vitamin D3 supplementation, particularly high doses, might modestly improve acute tibia or femoral shaft fracture healing in healthy adults, but confirmatory studies are required. The Vita-Shock trial was awarded the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's (OTA) Bovill Award in 2020. This award is presented annually to the authors of the most outstanding OTA Annual Meeting scientific paper. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.