1.
Small Interfering RNA to Reduce Lipoprotein(a) in Cardiovascular Disease.
O'Donoghue, ML, Rosenson, RS, Gencer, B, López, JAG, Lepor, NE, Baum, SJ, Stout, E, Gaudet, D, Knusel, B, Kuder, JF, et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2022;387(20):1855-1864
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Numerous epidemiologic studies over the past three decades have shown an association between higher circulating lipoprotein(a) concentrations and an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated administration of a small interfering RNA designed to lower the body's production of apolipoprotein(a). This study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio to receive one of four doses of small interfering RNA (n= 281) (10 mg every 12 weeks, 75 mg every 12 weeks, 225 mg every 12 weeks, or 225 mg every 24 weeks) or matching placebo, administered subcutaneously. Results show that treatment with small interfering RNA markedly reduced the concentration of lipoprotein(a) in a dose-dependent manner and appeared to be safe. At higher doses, the treatment reduced the lipoprotein(a) concentration by more than 95%, as compared with placebo, with nearly all patients who received the treatment with small interfering RNA having a lipoprotein(a) concentration of less than 125 nmol per litre. Authors conclude that further large-scale interventions are needed to confirm a causal role for lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lipoprotein(a) is a presumed risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Olpasiran is a small interfering RNA that reduces lipoprotein(a) synthesis in the liver. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial involving patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and a lipoprotein(a) concentration of more than 150 nmol per liter. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four doses of olpasiran (10 mg every 12 weeks, 75 mg every 12 weeks, 225 mg every 12 weeks, or 225 mg every 24 weeks) or matching placebo, administered subcutaneously. The primary end point was the percent change in the lipoprotein(a) concentration from baseline to week 36 (reported as the placebo-adjusted mean percent change). Safety was also assessed. RESULTS Among the 281 enrolled patients, the median concentration of lipoprotein(a) at baseline was 260.3 nmol per liter, and the median concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 67.5 mg per deciliter. At baseline, 88% of the patients were taking statin therapy, 52% were taking ezetimibe, and 23% were taking a proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor. At 36 weeks, the lipoprotein(a) concentration had increased by a mean of 3.6% in the placebo group, whereas olpasiran therapy had significantly and substantially reduced the lipoprotein(a) concentration in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in placebo-adjusted mean percent changes of -70.5% with the 10-mg dose, -97.4% with the 75-mg dose, -101.1% with the 225-mg dose administered every 12 weeks, and -100.5% with the 225-mg dose administered every 24 weeks (P<0.001 for all comparisons with baseline). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar across the trial groups. The most common olpasiran-related adverse events were injection-site reactions, primarily pain. CONCLUSIONS Olpasiran therapy significantly reduced lipoprotein(a) concentrations in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Longer and larger trials will be necessary to determine the effect of olpasiran therapy on cardiovascular disease. (Funded by Amgen; OCEAN[a]-DOSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04270760.).
2.
Association between plasma fatty acids and inflammatory markers in patients with and without insulin resistance and in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, a cross-sectional study.
Bersch-Ferreira, ÂC, Sampaio, GR, Gehringer, MO, Torres, EAFDS, Ross-Fernandes, MB, da Silva, JT, Torreglosa, CR, Kovacs, C, Alves, R, Magnoni, CD, et al
Nutrition journal. 2018;17(1):26
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
It is known that people with cardiovascular disease (CVD) have increased inflammation and raised levels of circulating inflammatory molecules. The presence of insulin resistance is thought to increase these levels, as are certain fatty acids coming from dietary fats. The aims of this cross-sectional study were to compare the levels of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with CVD with and without insulin resistance, and to evaluate the possible link between the blood levels of fatty acids and inflammatory biomarkers among these patients. The authors concluded that the CVD patients with insulin resistance had a higher concentration of some inflammatory molecules in the blood than those without insulin resistance. They also observed that saturated fatty acids were linked to higher levels of inflammatory molecules in the blood, while unsaturated fatty acids correlated with lower levels.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proinflammatory biomarkers levels are increased among patients with cardiovascular disease, and it is known that both the presence of insulin resistance and diet may influence those levels. However, these associations are not well studied among patients with established cardiovascular disease. Our objective is to compare inflammatory biomarker levels among cardiovascular disease secondary prevention patients with and without insulin resistance, and to evaluate if there is any association between plasma fatty acid levels and inflammatory biomarker levels among them. METHODS In this cross-sectional sub-study from the BALANCE Program Trial, we collected data from 359 patients with established cardiovascular disease. Plasma fatty acids and inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), adiponectin, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha) were measured. Biomarkers and plasma fatty acid levels of subjects across insulin resistant and not insulin resistant groups were compared, and general linear models were used to examine the association between plasma fatty acids and inflammatory biomarkers. RESULTS Subjects with insulin resistance had a higher concentration of hs-CRP (p = 0.002) and IL-6 (p = 0.002) than subjects without insulin resistance. Among subjects without insulin resistance there was a positive association between stearic fatty acid and IL-6 (p = 0.032), and a negative association between alpha-linolenic fatty acid and pro-inflammatory biomarkers (p < 0.05). Among those with insulin resistance there was a positive association between monounsaturated fatty acids and arachidonic fatty acid and adiponectin (p < 0.05), and a negative association between monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids and pro-inflammatory biomarkers (p < 0.05), as well as a negative association between polyunsaturated fatty acids and adiponectin (p < 0.05). Our study has not found any association between hs-CRP and plasma fatty acids. CONCLUSIONS Subjects in secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease with insulin resistance have a higher concentration of hs-CRP and IL-6 than individuals without insulin resistance, and these inflammatory biomarkers are positively associated with saturated fatty acids and negatively associated with unsaturated fatty acids.
3.
Testosterone Deficiency, Weakness, and Multimorbidity in Men.
Peterson, MD, Belakovskiy, A, McGrath, R, Yarrow, JF
Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):5897
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
With age, the occurrence of total testosterone (TT) deficiency in men also increases. Such deficiency can have a detrimental impact on the musculoskeletal system leading to bone and muscle loss, increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Hence muscle weakness is a known a predicitve factor for chronic disease. Whereby reference ranges have been set for testosterone levels in young healthy men, uncertainty exists about optimal levels throughout different age ranges, ethnicities and in concurrence with diseases. This observational study evaluated how TT deficiency and muscle weakness assessed via grip strength, relates to chronic health conditions in men. The study included 2399 young, middle-aged, and older men in the US, with a diverse ethnic backgrounds, who presented with and without testosterone deficiency. The findings indicated that TT levels were highest amongst young men, yet no particular difference was seen in levels between middle-aged and older men. Grip strength decreased in the higher age categories. Chronic health conditions were more common in young and older men who displayed testosterone deficiencies, whilst low testosterone and reduced grip strength were linked to the presence of chronic disease in all age groups. Overall the study confirmed previous research, that in men with testosterone deficiency chronic disease was much more prevalent, even after accounting for other variables. The study also observed a much lower average of TT levels in young men compared to previous research, in mostly white males. Thus testosterone deficiency appears much more common in men of all ages when including a variety of ethnic groups. As low testosterone may play an early, causal role in the chronic disease process, continuous monitoring of testosterone levels through the life span may aid the early identification of chronic disease development or disease progression. Further research is needed on the independent and joint effects of low TT and muscular weakness. From a clinical perspective, this study affirms that low testosterone in men is a presenting risk factor for chronic disease and that chronic disease is commonly accompanied by low testosterone. It also highlights some unsettled aspects around reference ranges of testosterone
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to evaluate the association between total testosterone (TT) deficiency and weakness on multimorbidity in men. Analyses were performed to examine the prevalence of multimobidity among young, middle-aged, and older men, with and without testosterone deficiency. Multivariate logistic models were also used to determine the association between age-specific TT tertiles and multimorbidity, adjusting for key sociodemographic variables, as well as a secondary analysis adjusted for grip strength. Multimorbidity was more prevalent among men with testosterone deficiency, compared to normal TT in the entire group (36.6% vs 55.2%; p < 0.001); however, differences were only seen within young (testosterone deficiency: 36.4%; normal TT: 13.5%; p < 0.001) and older men (testosterone deficiency: 75.0%; normal TT: 61.5%; p < 0.001). Robust associations were found between the age-specific low-TT (OR: 2.87; 95%CI: 2.14-3.83) and moderate-TT (OR: 1.67; 95%CI: 1.27-2.20) tertiles (reference high-TT) and multimorbidity. Secondary analysis demonstrated that both low TT (OR: 1.82; 95%CI: 1.29-2.55) and moderate-TT (OR: 1.31; 95%CI: 1.01-1.69) were associated with multimorbidity, even after adjusting for obesity (OR: 1.75; 95%CI: 1.07-2.87) and NGS (OR: 1.21 per 0.05 unit lower NGS). Low TT and weakness in men were independently associated with multimorbidity at all ages; however, multimorbidity was more prevalent among young and older men with testosterone deficiency.