0
selected
-
1.
Greater risk of severe COVID-19 in Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic populations is not explained by cardiometabolic, socioeconomic or behavioural factors, or by 25(OH)-vitamin D status: study of 1326 cases from the UK Biobank.
Raisi-Estabragh, Z, McCracken, C, Bethell, MS, Cooper, J, Cooper, C, Caulfield, MJ, Munroe, PB, Harvey, NC, Petersen, SE
Journal of public health (Oxford, England). 2020;42(3):451-460
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has to date resulted in over 6 million cases. Growing reports highlight men and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) cohorts as at higher risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether differential patterns of COVID-19 incidence and severity, by sex and ethnicity, might be explained by cardiometabolic, socio-economic, lifestyle and behavioural exposures. This study is a prospective cohort study of over half a million men and women from across the UK. Results showed that male sex, BAME ethnicity, higher body mass index and greater household size were associated with significantly greater odds of a positive result. However, the sex and ethnicity differential pattern of COVID-19 is not adequately explained by variations in cardiometabolic factors, 25(OH)-vitamin D levels, socio-economic or behavioural factors. Authors conclude that investigation of alternative biological and genetic susceptibilities as well as more comprehensive assessment of the complex economic, social and behavioural differences should be prioritised.
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined whether the greater severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) amongst men and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) individuals is explained by cardiometabolic, socio-economic or behavioural factors. METHODS We studied 4510 UK Biobank participants tested for COVID-19 (positive, n = 1326). Multivariate logistic regression models including age, sex and ethnicity were used to test whether addition of (1) cardiometabolic factors [diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, prior myocardial infarction, smoking and body mass index (BMI)]; (2) 25(OH)-vitamin D; (3) poor diet; (4) Townsend deprivation score; (5) housing (home type, overcrowding) or (6) behavioural factors (sociability, risk taking) attenuated sex/ethnicity associations with COVID-19 status. RESULTS There was over-representation of men and BAME ethnicities in the COVID-19 positive group. BAME individuals had, on average, poorer cardiometabolic profile, lower 25(OH)-vitamin D, greater material deprivation, and were more likely to live in larger households and in flats/apartments. Male sex, BAME ethnicity, higher BMI, higher Townsend deprivation score and household overcrowding were independently associated with significantly greater odds of COVID-19. The pattern of association was consistent for men and women; cardiometabolic, socio-demographic and behavioural factors did not attenuate sex/ethnicity associations. CONCLUSIONS In this study, sex and ethnicity differential pattern of COVID-19 was not adequately explained by variations in cardiometabolic factors, 25(OH)-vitamin D levels or socio-economic factors. Factors which underlie ethnic differences in COVID-19 may not be easily captured, and so investigation of alternative biological and genetic susceptibilities as well as more comprehensive assessment of the complex economic, social and behavioural differences should be prioritised.
-
2.
Brain-Behavior-Immune Interaction: Serum Cytokines and Growth Factors in Patients with Eating Disorders at Extremes of the Body Mass Index (BMI) Spectrum.
Caroleo, M, Carbone, EA, Greco, M, Corigliano, DM, Arcidiacono, B, Fazia, G, Rania, M, Aloi, M, Gallelli, L, Segura-Garcia, C, et al
Nutrients. 2019;11(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Eating disorders such as anorexia, binge eating and night-time eating cause great fluctuations in body mass and have also been shown to alter the immune system, and more specifically markers of inflammation called cytokines. In this observational study of 90 patients with known eating disorders, the researchers tried to identify how much BMI, ‘underweightness’ and malnutrition influenced the body’s pro-inflammatory response and upset the normal immune response. They found that many inflammatory cytokines were elevated in the blood samples taken, a likely response to the conditions of stress in the body. These cytokines are known to interact with the nervous system and were also influenced by other common symptoms such as depression. They were able to group the differences in cytokines for anorexia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, post-dinner eating, night-eating, sweet-eating and fasting. These markers of dysfunctional eating behaviours may help form part of a therapeutic approach to treating eating disorders based on supporting the immune response and reducing inflammation to stabilise metabolic processes. Future studies in a larger population of patients is necessary to determine the relevance of these findings.
Abstract
Alterations of the immune system are known in eating disorders (EDs), however the importance of cytokine balance in this context has not been clarified. We compared cytokines and growth factors at opposite ends of BMI ranges, in 90 patients classified in relation to BMI, depressive and EDs comorbidities. Serum concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) were determined by a biochip analyzer (Randox Labs). Differences were calculated through ANOVA. Possible predictors of higher cytokine levels were evaluated through regression analysis. IL-1α, IL-10, EGF, and IFN-γ were altered individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) and binge eating disorder (BED). Night-eating was associated with IL-8 and EGF levels, IL-10 concentrations with post-dinner eating and negatively with sweet-eating, long fasting with higher IFN-γ levels. IL-2 increase was not linked to EDs, but to the interaction of depression and BMI. Altogether, for the first time, IL-1α, IL-10, EGF, and IFN-γ were shown to differ between AN and HCs, and between AN and individuals with obesity with or without BED. Only IL-2 was influenced by depression. Dysfunctional eating behaviors predicted abnormal concentrations of IL-10, EGF, IL-8 and IFN-γ.
-
3.
Comparison of two low-fat diets, differing in protein and carbohydrate, on psychological wellbeing in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes: a randomised clinical trial.
Watson, NA, Dyer, KA, Buckley, JD, Brinkworth, GD, Coates, AM, Parfitt, G, Howe, PRC, Noakes, M, Murphy, KJ
Nutrition journal. 2018;17(1):62
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The psychological burden of living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has far reaching effects, negatively impacting quality of life, physical health and emotional wellbeing. It has been suggested that health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes in response to weight status however this has not yet been explored in individuals with T2D. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to compare the effects of high protein and high carbohydrate diets, combined with moderate intensity exercise, on psychological wellbeing and HRQoL in 61 overweight adults with T2D. Participants enrolled in a 12-week weight loss period followed by a 12-week weight maintenance phase and blood glucose levels and various quality of life factors were assessed. This trial found in overweight adults with T2D, improvements in several psychological wellbeing and HRQoL were seen in response to modest weight loss and improvements in blood sugar levels. Improvements were seen in both high protein and high carbohydrate group, though a high protein diet may be better for maintaining control of blood glucose levels thus improving feelings of vitality. Based on this study, the authors conclude that it is imperative to address and support the psychological aspects of patients managing T2D.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although higher-protein diets (HP) can assist with weight loss and glycemic control, their effect on psychological wellbeing has not been established. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of a HP and a higher-carbohydrate diet (HC), combined with regular exercise, on psychological wellbeing both during weight loss (WL) and weight maintenance phases (WM). METHODS In a parallel RCT, 61 adults with T2D (mean ± SD: BMI 34.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2, aged 55 ± 8 years) consumed a HP diet (29% protein, 34% carbohydrate, 31% fat) or an isocaloric HC diet (21%:48%:24%), with moderate intensity exercise, for 12 weeks of WL and 12 weeks of WM. Secondary data evaluating psychological wellbeing was assessed using: Problems Areas in Diabetes (PAID); Diabetes-39 Quality of Life (D-39); Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) at Weeks 0, 12 and 24 and evaluated with mixed models analysis. RESULTS Independent of diet, improvements for PAID; D-39 diabetes control; D-39 severity of diabetes; SF-36 physical functioning and SF-36 general health were found following WL (d = 0.30 to 0.69, P ≤ 0.04 for all) which remained after 12 weeks of WM. SF-36 vitality improved more in the HP group (group x time interaction P = 0.03). Associations were seen between HbA1c and D-39 severity of diabetes rating (r = 0.30, P = 0.01) and SF-36 mental health (r = - 0.32, P = 0.003) and between weight loss and PAID (r = 0.30, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION Several improvements in diabetes-related and general psychological wellbeing were seen similarly for both diets following weight loss and a reduction in HbA1c with most of these improvements remaining when weight loss was sustained for 12 weeks. A HP diet may provide additional increases in vitality. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN 12613000008729 ) on 4 January 2013.
-
4.
Association between eating behaviour and diet quality: eating alone vs. eating with others.
Chae, W, Ju, YJ, Shin, J, Jang, SI, Park, EC
Nutrition journal. 2018;17(1):117
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Selecting foods for a day is easily influenced by the social environment and eating together or alone plays a big role in that decision. The study aims to evaluate the association between diet quality of the modern Korean adult population based on the eating behaviour and the socioeconomic factors that influence their diet quality. The study is a cross-sectional study which included 3365 men and 5258 women aged between 19 and 64 years. The study included demographic, socioeconomics, and health behaviour factors as covariates. Results indicate that diet quality is influence by eating behaviour. Authors observed that when Korean adults ate without a companion, their diet quality was significantly lower than those who consistently ate with others. Furthermore, from the higher education to lower education level, the diet quality declined when they eat alone. Authors conclude that many Korean adults are experiencing low diet quality when they eat alone. The study provides evidence to promote interventions to improve diet quality among the public.
Abstract
BACKGROUND To discover the association between eating alone and diet quality among Korean adults who eat alone measured by the mean adequacy ratio (MAR), METHODS The cross-sectional study in diet quality which was measured by nutrient intakes, indicated as MAR and nutrient adequacy ratio (NAR) with the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) VI 2013-2015 data. Study population was 8523 Korean adults. Multiple linear regression was performed to identify the association between eating behaviour and MAR and further study analysed how socioeconomic factors influence the diet quality of those who eat alone. RESULTS We found that the diet quality of people who eat alone was lower than that of people who eat together in both male (β: - 0.110, p = 0.002) and female participants (β: - 0.069, p = 0.005). Among who eats alone, the socioeconomic factors that negatively influenced MAR with the living arrangement, education level, income levels, and various occupation classifications. CONCLUSIONS People who eat alone have nutrition intake below the recommended amount. This could lead to serious health problems not only to those who are socially disadvantaged but also those who are in a higher social stratum. Policy-makers should develop strategies to enhance diet quality to prevent potential risk factors.