0
selected
-
1.
The influence of macronutrient intake, stress and prostaglandin levels (pgf2α) of urine with the incidence of dysmenorrhea in adolescents.
Tahir, A, Sinrang, AW, Jusuf, EC, Syamsuddin, S, Stang, Arsyad, A
Gaceta sanitaria. 2021;35 Suppl 2:S298-S301
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Dysmenorrhea is a health problem that has a negative impact on the physical and emotional aspects of health. It also causes absenteeism in school that affects academic performance. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of macronutrient intake, stress, and prostaglandin levels (pgf2α) on adolescent dysmenorrhea incidence. This study is an observational cohort study of 16 years old adolescents with a menstrual cycle every 21–35 days and a menstrual period of about 5–7 days. Results show that: - levels of pgf2α affect the incidence of dysmenorrhea i.e., prostaglandins can reduce or temporarily inhibit blood supply to the uterus, causing the uterus to lack oxygen and cause myometrium contraction which in turn causes pain. - stress is very influential with dysmenorrhea as it can interfere with the work of the endocrine system. - an insufficient intake of nutrients may increase the risk of dysmenorrhoea. Thus, adolescents should ensure adequate intake of macronutrients especially during menstruation. Authors conclude that stress and prostaglandin levels significantly affect the occurrence of dysmenorrhea in adolescents.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to analyze the influence of macronutrient intake, stress, and prostaglandin levels (pgf2α) on adolescent dysmenorrhea incidence. METHOD This type of study is observational analytic with a cohort study draft done in January-March 2020 at High junior school 21 Makassar. Respondents in this study were grade X and XI students divided into 64 teenagers who had dysmenorrhea and 64 adolescents who did not experience Dysmenrhea. The criteria of the respondent in this study were the reproductive age, already experiencing menstruation, knowing the time and date of menstruation, menstrual cycles were regular, and willing to be respondents. The study used Menstrual Symptoms Questionnaire (MSQ) and used an ultrasonography (ultrasound) examination to perform the sample cervical. Food recall 24 hours to assess the intake of macronutrients, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS 42) to measure stress levels, and an examination of urine prostaglandin levels using the method Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Urine intake is carried out on the second day as much as 2-5cc. Data were analyzed by the Chi-square test and logistics regression backward. RESULT A multivariate analysis showed a variable that strongly affects dysmenorrhea is stress with the value p=0.000 and the level of prostaglandins with p-value=0.003 compared to other variables. CONCLUSION Stress and prostaglandin levels significantly affect the occurrence of dysmenorrhea in adolescents.
-
2.
How Does the Brain Implement Adaptive Decision Making to Eat?
Compan, V, Walsh, BT, Kaye, W, Geliebter, A
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2015;35(41):13868-78
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
While food intake is critical for survival, adaptive decision-making can be altered through various mechanisms and eventually lead to disordered eating patterns. Feeding behaviour is dependent on homeostatic rules, motivational drives, biological predispositions and external stressors. This complex web elucidates how humans can decide to satisfy or abstain from hunger cues, and the underlying mechanisms of this behaviour have been increasingly explored. This review summarises the overall neural circuitry in restrictive food choice and binge eating. Serotonergic systems play a key role in eating disorders because they are involved in responses to stress, emotions and feeding behaviour. The decision to overeat or abstain from eating is a reward, and this goal-directed and persistent behaviour mirror some aspects of drug dependence. This review found that voluntary processes in the nervous system could be modified to predominate over homeostatic control of hunger. Eating disorders may emerge when serotonin neurons reach their limit of adaptive capacities, potentially to the extent of compromised survival. This study provides a basis for developing more effective interventions for this population.
Abstract
Adaptive decision making to eat is crucial for survival, but in anorexia nervosa, the brain persistently supports reduced food intake despite a growing need for energy. How the brain persists in reducing food intake, sometimes even to the point of death and despite the evolution of multiple mechanisms to ensure survival by governing adaptive eating behaviors, remains mysterious. Neural substrates belong to the reward-habit system, which could differ among the eating disorders. The present review provides an overview of neural circuitry of restrictive food choice, binge eating, and the contribution of specific serotonin receptors. One possibility is that restrictive food intake critically engages goal-directed (decision making) systems and "habit," supporting the view that persistent caloric restriction mimics some aspects of addiction to drugs of abuse. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT An improved understanding of the neural basis of eating disorders is a timely challenge because these disorders can be deadly. Up to 70 million of people in the world suffer from eating disorders. Anorexia nervosa affects 1-4% of women in United States and is the first cause of death among adolescents in Europe. Studies relying on animal models suggest that decision making to eat (or not) can prevail over actual energy requirements due to emotional disturbances resulting in abnormal habitual behavior, mimicking dependence. These recent studies provide a foundation for developing more specific and effective interventions for these disorders.
-
3.
No effect of caloric restriction on salivary cortisol levels in overweight men and women.
Tam, CS, Frost, EA, Xie, W, Rood, J, Ravussin, E, Redman, LM
Metabolism: clinical and experimental. 2014;63(2):194-8
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Alterations in normal cortisol patterns have been observed in people who are obese. The effect of weight loss on cortisol levels, a measure of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) activity, in overweight individuals is not known. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that 6 months of moderate caloric restriction would alter morning and diurnal salivary cortisol levels. Thirty-five overweight adults (average BMI 27.8 kg/m2) took part in this randomised control trial. Participants were assigned to either calorie restriction (CR: 25% reduction in energy intake), calorie restriction+exercise (CR+EX: 12.5% reduction in energy intake+12.5% increase in exercise energy expenditure) or control (healthy weight-maintenance diet) for 6 months. Salivary cortisol was measured at 8:00, 8:30, 11:00, 11:30, 12:30, 13:00, 16:00 and 16:30. Morning cortisol was defined as the mean cortisol concentration at 08:00 and 08:30. Diurnal cortisol was calculated as the mean of the 8 cortisol measures across the day. Across all groups, higher morning and diurnal cortisol levels were associated with impaired insulin sensitivity. There was no significant effect of group, time or sex on morning or diurnal cortisol levels. The authors concluded that a 10% weight loss with a 25% CR diet alone or with exercise did not impact morning or diurnal salivary cortisol levels in overweight individuals. Their findings suggest that prolonged restriction of energy intake is not perceived by the body as a stressor, and therefore CR may present a viable intervention.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The effect of weight loss by diet or diet and exercise on salivary cortisol levels, a measure of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal activity, in overweight individuals is not known. The objective was to test the hypothesis that 24 weeks of moderate caloric restriction (CR) (25%) by diet or diet and aerobic exercise would alter morning and diurnal salivary cortisol levels. DESIGN AND SETTING Randomized control trial in an institutional research center. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-five overweight (BMI: 27.8±0.7 kg/m(2)) but otherwise healthy participants (16 M/19 F). INTERVENTION Participants were randomized to either calorie restriction (CR: 25% reduction in energy intake, n=12), calorie restriction+exercise (CR+EX: 12.5% reduction in energy intake+12.5% increase in exercise energy expenditure, n=12) or control (healthy weight-maintenance diet, n=11) for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Salivary cortisol measured at 8:00, 8:30, 11:00, 11:30, 12:30, 13:00, 16:00 and 16:30. Morning cortisol was defined as the mean cortisol concentration at 08:00 and 08:30. Diurnal cortisol was calculated as the mean of the 8 cortisol measures across the day. RESULTS In the whole cohort, higher morning and diurnal cortisol levels were associated with impaired insulin sensitivity (morning: P=0.004, r(2)=0.24; diurnal: P=0.02, r(2)=0.15). Using mixed model analysis, there was no significant effect of group, time or sex on morning or diurnal cortisol levels. CONCLUSION A 10% weight loss with a 25% CR diet alone or with exercise did not impact morning or diurnal salivary cortisol levels.
-
4.
Lack of effect of high-protein vs. high-carbohydrate meal intake on stress-related mood and eating behavior.
Lemmens, SG, Martens, EA, Born, JM, Martens, MJ, Westerterp-Plantenga, MS
Nutrition journal. 2011;10:136
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Previous research has shown that overweight people may eat during times of stress, even in the absence of hunger. Alongside this, people are more likely to eat calorific ‘comfort’ foods to cope with feelings of stress, even though these foods may add to physiological stress levels. This study explored whether different macronutrients (protein vs carbohydrate) influenced stress-related eating behaviour. This was a randomized cross-over trial with 38 adults (19 men, 19 women) investigating the effects of a high-protein vs. high-carbohydrate meal on the stress-induced psychological mood response, the rewarding value of food (‘liking’ and ‘wanting’), and the stress-induced food choice and subsequent food intake. Participants were tested in four conditions: 1) a stress condition, with a consumption of a high-protein meal; 2) a rest condition, with a consumption of a high-protein meal; 3) a stress condition, with a consumption of a high-carbohydrate meal; 4) a rest condition, with a consumption of a high-carbohydrate meal. A difficult IQ test with not enough time to solve the questions was used to simulate the stress conditions, while an easy version of the test with plenty of time to solve the questions was used for the rest conditions. Food reward and food choice were measured using psychometric questionnaires, while the subsequent energy intake was calculated based on the consumed 'wanted' food items, chosen by the participants during the psychometric tests. The results of this study showed no greater feelings of satiety in the high-protein vs. high-carbohydrate groups, with no significant differences in food choice or intake between the groups following the stress/rest tests. Decreased ‘wanting’ and energy intake was only seen in participants with high tendency to overeat ("disinhibited eating pattern"), and only during the rest condition, after the consumption of a high-protein meal. This effect, however, disappeared under the stress condition. The authors conclude that the consumption of a high-protein meal, compared with a high-carbohydrate meal, appears to have limited impact on stress-related eating behaviour.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consumption of meals with different macronutrients, especially high in carbohydrates, may influence stress-related eating behavior. We aimed to investigate whether consumption of high-protein vs. high-carbohydrate meals influences stress-related mood, food reward, i.e. 'liking' and 'wanting', and post-meal energy intake. METHODS Participants (n = 38, 19m/19f, age = 25 ± 9 y, BMI = 25.0 ± 3.3 kg/m2) came to the university four times, fasted, once for a stress session receiving a high-protein meal, once for a rest session receiving a high-protein meal, once for a stress session receiving a high-carbohydrate meal and once for a rest session receiving a high-carbohydrate meal (randomized cross-over design). The high-protein and high-carbohydrate test meals (energy percentage protein/carbohydrate/fat 65/5/30 vs. 6/64/30) matched for energy density (4 kJ/g) and daily energy requirements (30%). Stress was induced using an ego-threatening test. Pre- and post-meal 'liking' and 'wanting' (for bread, filling, drinks, dessert, snacks, stationery (non-food alternative as control)) was measured by means of a computer test. Following the post-meal 'wanting' measurement, participants received and consumed their wanted food items (post-meal energy intake). Appetite profile (visual analogue scales), mood state (Profile Of Mood State and State Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaires), and post-meal energy intake were measured. RESULTS Participants showed increased feelings of depression and anxiety during stress (P < 0.01). Consumption of the test meal decreased hunger, increased satiety, decreased 'liking' of bread and filling, and increased 'liking' of placebo and drinks (P < 0.0001). Food 'wanting' decreased pre- to post-meal (P < 0.0001). The high-protein vs. high-carbohydrate test meal induced lower subsequent 'wanting' and energy intake (1.7 ± 0.3 MJ vs. 2.5 ± 0.4 MJ) only in individuals characterized by disinhibited eating behavior (factor 2 Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, n = 16), during rest (P ≤ 0.01). This reduction in 'wanting' and energy intake following the high-protein meal disappeared during stress. CONCLUSIONS Consumption of a high-protein vs. high-carbohydrate meal appears to have limited impact on stress-related eating behavior. Only participants with high disinhibition showed decreased subsequent 'wanting' and energy intake during rest; this effect disappeared under stress. Acute stress overruled effects of consumption of high-protein foods. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR1904). The protocol described here in this study deviates from the trial protocol approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Maastricht University as it comprises only a part of the approved trial protocol.
-
5.
Enhanced cortisol production rates, free cortisol, and 11beta-HSD-1 expression correlate with visceral fat and insulin resistance in men: effect of weight loss.
Purnell, JQ, Kahn, SE, Samuels, MH, Brandon, D, Loriaux, DL, Brunzell, JD
American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. 2009;296(2):E351-7
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Excess abdominal fat in men is a risk factor for both type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that increased cortisol levels contribute to increased abdominal fat and insulin resistance in men. Twenty-four healthy men aged 18-70 took part in the study. Eight of the participants, who were obese, were put on a calorie-controlled weight loss diet. Cortisol production rate (CPR) and free cortisol (FC) were correlated with increased intra-abdominal fat (IAF) and decreased insulin sensitivity (Si). Cortisol levels were not correlated with subcutaneous fat (SQF). CPR and FC did not change with weight loss, suggesting that cortisol levels could influence the distribution of body fat upon weight regain. The authors concluded that their findings support a role for activation of the HPA axis and abnormal cortisol secretion in determining body fat distribution and predisposing these men to type 2 diabetes.
Abstract
Controversy exists as to whether endogenous cortisol production is associated with visceral obesity and insulin resistance in humans. We therefore quantified cortisol production and clearance rates, abdominal fat depots, insulin sensitivity, and adipocyte gene expression in a cohort of 24 men. To test whether the relationships found are a consequence rather than a cause of obesity, eight men from this larger group were studied before and after weight loss. Daily cortisol production rates (CPR), free cortisol levels (FC), and metabolic clearance rates (MCR) were measured by stable isotope methodology and 24-h sampling; intra-abdominal fat (IAF) and subcutaneous fat (SQF) by computed tomography; insulin sensitivity (S(I)) by frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test; and adipocyte 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 (11beta-HSD-1) gene expression by quantitative RT-PCR from subcutaneous biopsies. Increased CPR and FC correlated with increased IAF, but not SQF, and with decreased S(I). Increased 11beta-HSD-1 gene expression correlated with both IAF and SQF and with decreased S(I). With weight loss, CPR, FC, and MCR did not change compared with baseline; however, with greater loss in body fat than lean mass during weight loss, both CPR and FC increased proportionally to final fat mass and IAF and 11beta-HSD-1 decreased compared with baseline. These data support a model in which increased hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity in men promotes selective visceral fat accumulation and insulin resistance and may promote weight regain after diet-induced weight loss, whereas 11beta-HSD-1 gene expression in SQF is a consequence rather than cause of adiposity.
-
6.
Lysine fortification reduces anxiety and lessens stress in family members in economically weak communities in Northwest Syria.
Smriga, M, Ghosh, S, Mouneimne, Y, Pellett, PL, Scrimshaw, NS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(22):8285-8
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The risk of protein deficiency, particularly lysine, is high among communities that depend on wheat for their protein supply. In experimental animals, prolonged lysine inadequacy increases stress-induced anxiety, however the evidence of nutritional benefits for fortifying wheat with lysine is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate whether consuming lysine-fortified wheat for three months would reduce stress and anxiety in Northwest Syrian rural communities. This study indicated that lysine fortification significantly reduced anxiety in males. These results suggest that some stress responses among economically weak populations consuming wheat-based diets can be improved with lysine fortification.
Abstract
Lysine is a limiting amino acid in diets based on wheat as the staple. In experimental animals, prolonged dietary lysine inadequacy increases stress-induced anxiety. If observed in humans, such a result would have a strong implication for the relationship between nutrition and communal quality of life and mental health. As part of a 3-month randomized double-blind study, we tested whether lysine fortification of wheat reduces anxiety and stress response in family members in poor Syrian communities consuming wheat as a staple food. In the lysine-fortified group, the plasma cortisol response to the blood drawing as a cause of stress was reduced in females, as was sympathetic arousal in males as measured by skin conductance. Lysine fortification also significantly reduced chronic anxiety as measured by the trait anxiety inventory in males. These results suggest that some stress responses in economically weak populations consuming cereal-based diets can be improved with lysine fortification.