1.
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Phase IIa Study: Evaluating the Effect of Curcumin for Treatment of Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome in Solid Cancer Patients.
Chaiworramukkul, A, Seetalarom, K, Saichamchan, S, Prasongsook, N
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2022;23(7):2333-2340
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cancer anorexia–cachexia syndrome (CACS) is usually found in advanced cancer patients. CACS is a multifactorial process which comprises skeletal muscle and adipose tissue loss which may be compounded by anorexia and a dysregulated metabolic state. The hypothesis of this study was that curcumin will increase body compositions and body weight in patients with solid malignancy and CACS when compared to placebo after adjusting by age, gender, primary site of cancer, stage of cancer, performance status, and supplementary nutrition support. This study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised phase lla study. A total of 46 patients were enrolled, of whom 33 underwent 1:1 block of four randomisations. Seventeen patients were randomly assigned to receive curcumin at dose of 800 mg twice daily orally and sixteen patients were randomly assigned to received placebo. Results show that curcumin supplementation: (1) did not statistically significantly improve body compositions and body weight when compared to placebo; (2) may cause clinical benefit in term of hand grip muscle strength and slow progress of CACS by decreasing in basal metabolic rate and preventing the decline in serum albumin; and (3) administered orally for two months at a dose of up to 2 grams daily appeared safe and no serious adverse events were reported. Authors conclude that curcumin inhibited process of CACS via reduction of basal metabolic rate and slowed down the progression of hand-grip muscle strength loss. Furthermore, nuclear factor kappa B [regulator of gene expression] levels merit further exploration as potentially suitable predictive biomarker for CACS treatment with curcumin.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aim to investigate the effect of curcumin on preventing cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) via through mechanism of inhibition on NF-kB signal pathway. Outcome measurement for primary end point was improvement of body tissue composition, and the secondary end points were body weight and body mass index, hand grip muscle strengthening, and safety. METHODS This is randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase ll a study, 33 patients with CACS in solid malignancy were enrolled and randomized in 1:1 to receive oral curcumin (at a dose of 800 mg twice daily) or placebo for 8 weeks. RESULTS All parameters of body compositions were not statistically significant different between two groups, which were consist body fat mass [-1.25(SEM 0.87) vs. +0.63(SEM 0.55); p=0.119], skeletal muscle mass [-0.35(SEM 0.60) vs.+0.33(SEM 0.42); p=0.408] and percent body fat [-0.47(SEM 0.95) vs. -0.29(SEM 0.82); p=0.893] including with basal metabolic rate [-13.47(SEM 21.94) vs. +15.30(13.76); p=0.336]. The average of weight loss was also not statistically significant different between two groups. [-1.4 kg(SEM 0.89) in curcumin vs-1.12 kg(SEM 0.73), p=0.810]. Notably, patient with curcumin had less reduction of hand-grip muscle strength on both hands [Rt. handed: -2.47 in curcumin vs. -5.36 in placebo; p=0.318] [Lt. handed: -1.98 vs. -5.43; p=0.317], and basal metabolic rate than placebo group. Most adverse events were grade 1 on both groups similarly. CONCLUSION Curcumin was not shown to be superior to placebo with regard to increasing the body composition in cancer patients with CACS. However, curcumin might show some clinical benefits, including slow progression of hand-grip muscle strength loss, and basal metabolic rate. Further investigations should be explored.
2.
A phase II randomized controlled trial of three exercise delivery methods in men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy.
Alibhai, SMH, Santa Mina, D, Ritvo, P, Tomlinson, G, Sabiston, C, Krahn, M, Durbano, S, Matthew, A, Warde, P, O'Neill, M, et al
BMC cancer. 2019;19(1):2
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Most men diagnosed with prostate cancer receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and they commonly experience adverse side effects. Exercise is one of the most effective interventions to counter ADT side effects. The main aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of conducting a large multi-centre non-inferiority RCT of three exercise delivery models in men with prostate cancer on ADT. The study is a randomized phase II non-inferiority trial recruited 59 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer at any stage. The study compared 1:1, site-based personal training with two less-resource-intense approaches: group, site-training and individual home-based training. Results indicate that exercise adherence, as measured through attendance, was high for supervised sessions but under 50% by self-report and accelerometery. There was no difference between the three groups in terms of satisfaction. Authors conclude that both group, site-training and individual home-based training interventions in men with prostate cancer on ADT appeared to be similar to 1:1, site-based personal training for multiple efficacy outcomes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing evidence demonstrates that 1:1 personal training (PT) improves many adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Whether less resource-intensive exercise delivery models are as effective remains to be established. We determined the feasibility of conducting a multi-center non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing PT with supervised group (GROUP) and home-based (HOME) exercise programs, and obtained preliminary efficacy estimates for GROUP and HOME compared to PT on quality of life (QOL) and physical fitness. METHODS Men with prostate cancer on ADT were recruited from one of two experienced Canadian centres and randomized 1:1:1 to PT, GROUP, or HOME. Randomization was stratified by length of ADT use and site. Participants completed moderate intensity aerobic and resistance exercises 4-5 days per week for 6 months with a target 150 min per week of exercise. Exercise prescriptions were individualized and progressed throughout the trial. Feasibility endpoints included recruitment, retention, adherence, and participant satisfaction. The efficacy endpoints QOL, fatigue, and fitness (VO2 peak, grip strength, and timed chair stands) in GROUP and HOME were compared for non-inferiority to PT. Descriptive analyses were used for feasibility endpoints. Between-group differences for efficacy endpoints were examined using Bayesian linear mixed effects models. RESULTS Fifty-nine participants (mean age 69.9 years) were enrolled. The recruitment rate was 25.4% and recruitment was slower than projected. Retention was 71.2%. Exercise adherence as measured through attendance was high for supervised sessions but under 50% by self-report and accelerometry. Satisfaction was high and there was no difference in this measure between all three groups. Between-group differences (comparing both GROUP and HOME to PT) were smaller than the minimum clinically important difference on most measures of QOL, fatigue, and fitness. However, two of six outcomes for GROUP and four of six outcomes for HOME had a > 20% probability of being inferior for GROUP. CONCLUSIONS Feasibility endpoints were generally met. Both GROUP and HOME interventions in men with PC on ADT appeared to be similar to PT for multiple efficacy outcomes, although conclusions are limited by a small sample size and cost considerations have not been incorporated. Efforts need to be targeted to improving recruitment and adherence. A larger trial is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02046837 . Date of registration: January 20, 2014.