1.
A whole-grain diet reduces peripheral insulin resistance and improves glucose kinetics in obese adults: A randomized-controlled trial.
Malin, SK, Kullman, EL, Scelsi, AR, Haus, JM, Filion, J, Pagadala, MR, Godin, JP, Kochhar, S, Ross, AB, Kirwan, JP
Metabolism: clinical and experimental. 2018;82:111-117
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Literature shows that dietary whole-grain intake is associated with a lower incidence of type 2 diabetes. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between a whole-grain diet and insulin resistance and glucose use in individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes. The study was a randomized, double-blind, controlled crossover trial involving fourteen middle-aged, obese adults at risk for diabetes. Randomisation was carried out prior to metabolic testing. Results indicate that whole-grain intake as part of a mixed-meal diet significantly improved post-prandial (after a meal) glucose metabolism in middle-aged obese adults. Furthermore, both whole-grain and refined-grain interventions induced about 3–6% weight and fat loss. Authors conclude that whole-grain intake effectively promotes glycaemic control by improving insulin action.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole-grain intake is associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes but the mechanisms are unclear. PURPOSE We tested the hypothesis that a WG diet reduces insulin resistance and improves glucose use in individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes compared with an isocaloric-matched refined-grain diet. METHODS A double-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial of 14 moderately obese adults (Age, 38 ± 2 y; BMI, 34.0 ± 1.1 kg/m2). Insulin resistance and glucose metabolism was assessed using an oral glucose tolerance test combined with isotopic tracers of [6,6-2H2]-glucose and [U-13C]-glucose, and indirect calorimetry. Peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance was assessed as 1/(rate of disposal/insulin), and endogenous glucose rates of appearance (Ra) iAUC60-240 × insulin iAUC60-240, respectively. Both diets met ADA nutritional guidelines and contained either whole-grain (50 g per 1000 kcal) or equivalent refined-grain. All food was provided for 8 wk. with an 8-10 wk. washout period between diets. RESULTS Post-prandial glucose tolerance, peripheral insulin sensitivity, and metabolic flexibility (insulin-stimulated - fasting carbohydrate oxidation) improvements were greater after whole-grain compared to the refined-grain diet (P < 0.05). Compared to baseline, body fat (~2 kg) and hepatic Ra insulin resistance was reduced by both diets, while fasting glucose and exogenous glucose-meal were unchanged after both interventions. Changes in peripheral insulin resistance and metabolic flexibility correlated with improved glucose tolerance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Whole-grains reduced diabetes risk and the mechanisms appear to work through reduced post-prandial blood glucose and peripheral insulin resistance that were statistically linked to enhanced metabolic flexibility.
2.
A controlled trial of gluten-free diet in patients with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea: effects on bowel frequency and intestinal function.
Vazquez-Roque, MI, Camilleri, M, Smyrk, T, Murray, JA, Marietta, E, O'Neill, J, Carlson, P, Lamsam, J, Janzow, D, Eckert, D, et al
Gastroenterology. 2013;144(5):903-911.e3
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The relationship between gluten exposure and diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) is not well understood. Non-celiac IBS-D patients who are positive for HLA-DQ2/8 genes associated with CD can show symptom improvement on a gluten-free diet (GFD). The aim of this 4-week parallel randomized controlled clinical trial in HLA-DQ2/8 positive and negative patients with IBS-D was to assess the effects of a gluten-containing diet (GCD) compared to a GFD on bowel function, gut transit, small bowel (SB) and colonic barrier functions as measured by two-sugar excretion permeability test and mRNA expression of TJ proteins in mucosa of the small bowel (SB) and rectosigmoid (RS) derived by biopsy. Immune response to diets was also measured as cytokine production from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Patient were recruited from the Mayo clinic’s database of IBS suffers, and invited to participate. Patients with diagnosed CD were excluded. Genotype analysis was performed for HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. 22 patients were placed on the GCD (11 HLA-DQ2/8–negative and 11 HLA-DQ2/8–positive) and 23 on the GFD (12 HLA-DQ2/8−negative and 11 HLA-DQ2/8–positive. All meals and snacks were ingested or prepared in the Mayo Clinic. Patients were advised to eat only the foods provided by the study dieticians. Gluten-free and gluten-containing meals were prepared using the same macronutrient content (20% protein, 30% fat, 50% carb). Compliance to the diet was assessed by direct questioning by the dietitians and reported to be excellent. All patients were ingesting gluten in their diet prior to starting the study. At 4-weeks, a statistically significant decrease in stool frequency of subjects on GFD compared to subjects on GCD (p=0.04) was seen. This effect was more pronounced in subjects who were HLA-DQ2 or 8 positive (p=0.019) There was no significant diet effect (GFD vs. GCD) on, daily stool form, ease of passage or gastric emptying. The GCD was associated with higher small bowel (SB) permeability (based on 0–2 hr levels of mannitol (p=0.028) and lactulose:mannitol ratio (P=0.0012)). SB permeability was greater in HLA-DQ2/8–positive than −negative patients (P=.018). No significant differences in colonic permeability were observed. Significant diet-associated changes in occludin expression in SB mucosa in the HLA-DQ2 or 8 positive group were seen (p=0.017). Expressions of tight junction proteins (zonulin (ZO-1), occludin, and claudin-1 mRNA) in colonic mucosa were significantly lower in GCD relative to GFD in the overall groups, particularly in subjects with HLA-DQ2 or 8 positive status. Cytokine response was higher (interleukin-10) in response to GCD than GFD (unrelated to HLA genotype). A limitation in the quantification of TJ protein expression is that it was solely based on PCR (mRNA expression). In future, other methods should be included to directly identify these proteins and their distribution. The inability to document alterations in colonic permeability using the 2-sugar excretion profile from 8 to 24 hours is a limitation. This may be due to lack of sensitivity of the lactulose and mannitol excretion test, for example, due to the metabolism of both sugars by colonic bacteria. Another limitation is that the mechanism for improvement in stool frequency on a GFD in the absence of changes in colonic transit was not elucidated by our studies. This study does not specifically address the effects of gluten protein per se, and it is possible that other proteins in wheat flour may be responsible for the changes observed. The author concludes that this study provide mechanistic explanations for the observation that gluten withdrawal may improve patient symptoms in IBS. The data also partially explains that the biological effects of gluten were associated with HLA-DQ2 or 8 genotype. The relationship of dietary factors, innate and adaptive immune responses and mucosal interactions in IBS-D deserve further study. Further clinical studies evaluating the effects of gluten withdrawal in patients with IBS-D are needed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) could benefit from a gluten-free diet (GFD). METHODS We performed a randomized controlled 4-week trial of a gluten-containing diet (GCD) or GFD in 45 patients with IBS-D; genotype analysis was performed for HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. Twenty-two patients were placed on the GCD (11 HLA-DQ2/8 negative and 11 HLA-DQ2/8 positive) and 23 patients were placed on the GFD (12 HLA-DQ2/8 negative and 11 HLA-DQ2/8 positive). We measured bowel function daily, small-bowel (SB) and colonic transit, mucosal permeability (by lactulose and mannitol excretion), and cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells after exposure to gluten and rice. We collected rectosigmoid biopsy specimens from 28 patients, analyzed levels of messenger RNAs encoding tight junction proteins, and performed H&E staining and immunohistochemical analyses. Analysis of covariance models was used to compare data from the GCD and GFD groups. RESULTS Subjects on the GCD had more bowel movements per day (P = .04); the GCD had a greater effect on bowel movements per day of HLA-DQ2/8-positive than HLA-DQ2/8-negative patients (P = .019). The GCD was associated with higher SB permeability (based on 0-2 h levels of mannitol and the lactulose:mannitol ratio); SB permeability was greater in HLA-DQ2/8-positive than HLA-DQ2/8-negative patients (P = .018). No significant differences in colonic permeability were observed. Patients on the GCD had a small decrease in expression of zonula occludens 1 in SB mucosa and significant decreases in expression of zonula occludens 1, claudin-1, and occludin in rectosigmoid mucosa; the effects of the GCD on expression were significantly greater in HLA-DQ2/8-positive patients. The GCD vs the GFD had no significant effects on transit or histology. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells produced higher levels of interleukin-10, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and transforming growth factor-α in response to gluten than rice (unrelated to HLA genotype). CONCLUSIONS Gluten alters bowel barrier functions in patients with IBS-D, particularly in HLA-DQ2/8-positive patients. These findings reveal a reversible mechanism for the disorder. Clinical trials.govNCT01094041.
3.
Long-term effects of provided low and high glycemic load low energy diets on mood and cognition.
Cheatham, RA, Roberts, SB, Das, SK, Gilhooly, CH, Golden, JK, Hyatt, R, Lerner, D, Saltzman, E, Lieberman, HR
Physiology & behavior. 2009;98(3):374-9
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Previous studies have shown a difference between low glycaemic index (GI) and high GI energy restricted diets on mood and cognition. This randomised trial of 46 healthy overweight individuals aimed to assess the long-term effects of LG or HG energy restricted diet on mood and cognition function. Individuals were randomly assigned to a low GI or a high GI diet with caloric restriction for 12 months. The study did not observe any difference in cognitive function of individuals assigned to either the low GI or the high GI diet but it did show a beneficial effect of low GI diet on subclinical depression. The results of this small study were consistent with previous studies where low GI diets may be protective against negative mood change during weight loss whereas negative changes occur if a conventional high GI diet is consumed.
Abstract
Energy-restricted low glycemic load diets are being used increasingly for weight loss. However, the long-term effects of such regimens on mood and cognitive performance are not known. We assessed the effects of low glycemic load (LG) and high glycemic load (HG) energy-restricted diets on mood and cognitive performance during 6 months of a randomized controlled trial when all food was provided. Subjects were 42 healthy overweight adults (age 35+/-5 years; BMI 27.8+/-1.6 kg/m(2)) with a mean weight loss of 8.7+/-5.0% that did not differ significantly by diet randomization. Mood was assessed by using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire. Cognitive performance was assessed by using computerized tests of simple reaction time, vigilance, learning, short-term memory and attention, and language-based logical reasoning. Worsening mood outcome over time was observed in the HG diet group compared to the LG for the depression subscale of POMS (p=0.009 after including hunger as a covariate). There was no significant change over time in any cognitive performance values. These findings suggest a negative effect of an HG weight loss diet on sub-clinical depression but, in contrast to a previous suggestion, provide no support for differential effects of LG versus HD diets on cognitive performance.