0
selected
-
1.
Consumption of 85% cocoa dark chocolate improves mood in association with gut microbial changes in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Shin, JH, Kim, CS, Cha, L, Kim, S, Lee, S, Chae, S, Chun, WY, Shin, DM
The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2022;99:108854
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Disturbances in a person’s mood interrupts their personal well-being and the ability to participate in social interactions, leading to physical health problems such as chronic diseases. The role of diet as a mood regulator has received a great deal of interest. Certain dietary components have been shown to reduce anxiety and depression and improve quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of dark chocolate intake on mood in everyday life, with special emphasis on the gut-brain axis. This study is a randomized controlled trial. Participants who met the criteria for eligibility were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) control group (CON, n=14); 2) 85% cocoa chocolate group (DC85, n=18); and 3) 70% cocoa chocolate group (DC70, n=16). Results show that daily intake of dark chocolate significantly reduced negative affect in the DC85, but not in the DC70. Furthermore, gut microbial diversity was significantly higher in DC85 than the CON. Authors conclude that dark chocolate has prebiotic effects by restructuring the diversity and composition of the gut microbiome, which may in turn improve mood via the gut-brain axis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- To highlight the potential benefits of high cocoa content dark chocolate in relation to mental states
- To promote more awareness of how dietary habits may impact emotional wellbeing
- To emphasise the importance of microbiota and the gut-brain axis regarding dietary habits.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
The authors highlight that dark chocolate has been continually identified for its effects on mood. However, there is a dearth of evidence concerning the emotional impact of daily consumption of dark chocolate. Hence, the impact of dark chocolate consumption on daily mood, focusing on the gut-brain axis, is being investigated in this study.
Objectives
- To evaluate the correlation between the effect on emotional state after consuming dark chocolate and the gut microbiota in healthy adults
- To identify alterations in the composition and diversity of the microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract on account of dark chocolate intake.
Study Design
A randomised controlled trial was performed at Seoul National University from July to December 2017, This involved. consumption of two types of dark chocolate (70% and 85% cocoa content). Subjects in the treatment groups were blinded although investigators and the control cohort were unblinded.
Participants
117 individuals were screened. However, 48 healthy males and females aged 20-30 years were eligible at baseline.
Interventions
- Subjects (n=16): Consumed 30g/day of 70% cocoa chocolate for 3 weeks
- Participants (n=18): Consumed 30g/day of 85% cocoa chocolate for 3 weeks
- Participants (n=14): The control group consumed no chocolate for 3 weeks.
Main Health Outcomes Measured
- Mood states were quantified via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule in tandem with Microbiota analysis pre- and post-experiment
- Body composition analysis and dietary assessment were also conducted pre- and post-intervention
- Faecal 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of bacterial genomic DNA was conducted for the cohort who consumed 85% cocoa chocolate and the control arm to evaluate the association between the mood-altering effects of dark chocolate and the gut microbiota
- Statistical tests were performed based on intention-to-treat analysis. The Chi-squared test, Kruskal-Wallis test, one-way ANOVA, unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were employed for inter-group analysis. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to assess the association between gut microbiota composition and mood scores and P<.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
- Daily intake of dark chocolate substantially diminished negative emotional states in the cohort consuming 85% cocoa content, but not in the 70% cocoa treatment arm
- Gut microbial diversity was substantially greater in the 85% cacao cohort than the control group (P<.05)
- Blautia obeum levels were significantly elevated and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels were decreased in the 85% cacao cohort than the control arm (P<.05).
- Furthermore, it was observed that changes in negative affect scores were inversely correlated with diversity and relative abundance of Blautia obeum (P<.05).
Conclusions
The observations suggest that consumption of dark chocolate with a higher cocoa content may induce prebiotic effects due to its capacity to restructure the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota. Furthermore, consuming dark chocolate with a higher cocoa might exert a positive effect on negative emotional states through the gut-brain axis.
Clinical practice applications:
- To inform practitioners of the benefits of 30g/day high (85%) cocoa chocolate consumption and its potential positive impact on mood through the gut-brain axis
- To educate clients regarding the potential benefits of daily high cocoa content chocolate consumption and its possible favourable effect on emotional states associated with gut microbiota.
Considerations for future research:
- More extensive research could investigate interventions of a longer period
- Further studies could evaluate if any difference exists between cocoa and cacao consumption and emotional states via the gut-brain axis, and the strength of any associations
- Interventions could investigate which strains of bacteria that high cocoa content dark chocolate may affect.
Abstract
Dark chocolate has long been recognized for its mood-altering properties; however, the evidence regarding the emotional effects of daily dark chocolate intake is limited. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of dark chocolate intake on mood in everyday life, with special emphasis on the gut-brain axis. Two different dark chocolates (85% and 70% cocoa content) were tested in this study. In a randomized controlled trial, healthy adults (20-30 y) consumed either 30 g/d of 85% cocoa chocolate (DC85, n=18); 70% cocoa chocolate (DC70, n=16); or no chocolate (control group, CON; n=14); for 3 weeks. Mood states were measured using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Daily consumption of dark chocolate significantly reduced negative affect in DC85, but not in DC70. To assess the association between the mood-altering effects of dark chocolate and the gut microbiota, we performed fecal 16S rRNA sequencing analysis for the DC85 and CON groups. Gut microbial diversity was significantly higher in DC85 than CON (P<.05). Blautia obeum levels were significantly elevated and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels were reduced in DC85 compared to CON (P<.05). Furthermore, we found that the observed changes in negative affect scores were negatively correlated with diversity and relative abundance of Blautia obeum (P<.05). These findings indicate that dark chocolate exerts prebiotic effects, as evidenced by its ability to restructure the diversity and abundance of intestinal bacteria; thus, it may improve negative emotional states via the gut-brain axis.
-
2.
The Weight Optimization Revamping Lifestyle using the Dietary Guidelines (WORLD) Study: Sustained Weight Loss Over 12 Months.
Psota, TL, Tindall, AM, Lohse, B, Miller, PE, Petersen, KS, Kris-Etherton, PM
Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2020;28(7):1235-1244
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Effective long-term weight loss strategies to reduce the risk of death and diseases associated with being obese or overweight are required, as restrictive programmes are difficult to sustain, and weight loss may be heavily influenced by behavioural factors. This randomised control trial of 101 premenopausal women with obesity or overweight aimed to compare a lower-fat and moderate-fat diets, both with nutrition education for 12 months. The results showed that both treatment groups lost weight. Both groups consumed the same amount of fat but increased their diet quality. Diet quality and greater attendance at nutritional education sessions were associated with greater weight loss. Cholesterol was significantly lower in both groups, but blood pressure remained unchanged. Interestingly there were a large number of women who did not complete the trial. It was concluded that irrespective of the amount of fat consumed, nutrition education can help to achieve sustained weight loss, improve diet quality and decrease heart disease risk for at least 12 months. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that recommending fat-based targets for weight loss may be ineffective and the importance of emotional and behavioural support for individuals on a weight loss regime to improve their risk for heart disease.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare two energy-restricted, nutrient-dense diets at the upper or lower ends of the dietary fat recommendation range (lower fat [20% energy from fat] versus moderate fat [35%]) on weight loss using behavioral theory-based nutrition education. METHODS A total of 101 premenopausal women with overweight or obesity were randomized to an energy-restricted lower-fat or moderate-fat diet for 1 year. Interventions included 28 behavioral theory-based nutrition education sessions plus weekly exercise sessions. RESULTS Both treatment groups experienced weight loss (-5.0 kg for lower fat and -4.3 kg for moderate fat; P < 0.0001), but there was no difference in weight loss or fat intake between groups. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased (-3. 4 mg/dL and -3.8 mg/dL; P < 0.05), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased (1.9 mg/dL; P < 0.05) in both groups at 12 months. Diet quality, assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, increased significantly at 4 months versus baseline (70.8 [0.9] vs. 77.8 [1.0]) and was maintained through 12 months. Higher Healthy Eating Index scores were associated with greater weight loss at 4 months (r = -0.2; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In the context of a well-resourced, free-living weight-loss intervention, total fat intake did not change; however, theory-based nutrition education underpinned by food-based recommendations resulted in caloric deficits, improvements in diet quality, and weight loss that was sustained for 1 year.
-
3.
Broccoli consumption affects the human gastrointestinal microbiota.
Kaczmarek, JL, Liu, X, Charron, CS, Novotny, JA, Jeffery, EH, Seifried, HE, Ross, SA, Miller, MJ, Swanson, KS, Holscher, HD
The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2019;63:27-34
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Diet affects metabolic and gastrointestinal diseases, with the microbiome considered to be a mediating factor. Broccoli is a good source of fibre and phytochemicals including glucosinolates. The aim of this investigator-blinded, controlled feeding, randomised, crossover study was to evaluate the effects of broccoli on the composition and function of the microbiome. 18 healthy adults received 200 g cooked broccoli and 20 g raw daikon radish per day for 18 days in addition to a controlled, brassica-free diet or the same diet without the broccoli and daikon radish, with a 24-day washout period. A statistically significant increase in the ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes was observed following the broccoli intervention. When stratified by BMI above or below 25, this increase was only seen in those with a lower BMI whilst those with a higher BMI displayed a decrease in the ratio, although the latter was not statistically significant. In those with the lower BMI, there was also a correlation between the changes in the microbiota composition and glucosinolate metabolites. It was predicted that the involved changes would affect the functions of the endocrine system, transport and catabolism and energy metabolism. The authors concluded that eating broccoli may affect both the composition and the function of the microbiome.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Broccoli consumption at dosages of 200g per day were shown to change the composition of gastrointestinal microbiota, increasing Bacteroidetes and decreasing Firmicutes, and impact their function
- The observed results were strongest in those with a BMI of less than 26
- While interesting, the study only included 18 participants and therefore the results should be further confirmed.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
There is growing evidence linking dysbiosis of the gastrointestinal microbiota and diet-induced gastrointestinal and metabolic diseases. Both long-term and acute dietary changes, fasting, eating frequency, and consumption of specific fibres and food phytochemicals play a role in shaping the composition and function of the microbiota, although evidence is lacking for specific foods. This study aimed to determine the impact of broccoli intake on the number of bacterial strains and their functional capacity.
Methods
This was a single-blind, randomised, crossover, complete feeding intervention. Study participants were healthy adults (n=18, females =10). Participants were requested to not eat Brassica vegetables for 3 weeks before the start of the study.
Subjects participated in two 18-day diet periods separated by a 24-hour washout, during which breakfast and dinner were consumed on site to observe compliance. The control diet was prepared using traditional American foods, excluding all Brassica vegetables. During the broccoli intervention period, participants consumed the same base diet with the addition of 200g of broccoli.
Faecal samples were collected on day 1, and day 16. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed on bacterial strains. On day 17, time series plasma sampling and 24-hour urine collection was done.
Results
There was no difference in alpha diversity (a measure of microbiome diversity within a sample) between the two treatment periods. This indicates that no bacterial species were extinguished by broccoli treatment. Beta diversity analysis (a measure of the (dis)similarity between samples) indicated that bacterial communities were impacted by treatment (P=0.03).
After broccoli consumption, Bacteroidetes increased by 10% (P =0.03), while Firmicutes decreased by 8% (P=0.05). Overall the ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes increased by 37% (P=0.01) versus a 5% decrease in the control period. The Bacteroides genus increased by 6% (P=0.02) versus a 2% decrease in the control period.
Interestingly, the effects were most strong in those with a lower BMI (< 26 kg/m2) who had an increase in metabolites after broccoli consumption. Algorithms to predict the function of the microbiota showed that broccoli increased endocrine (P=0.05), energy metabolism (P=0.01), transport and catabolism (P=0.04) pathways.
Conclusion
Broccoli intake, at 200g daily, changes the composition and potentially impacts the function of the gut microbiota.
Clinical practice applications:
- Studies like this allow practitioners to focus on specific foods in specific quantities to positively alter the microbiota and their function
- Cruciferous vegetables, like broccoli, kale, cauliflower, cabbage, Brussel sprouts, are an important group as they contain fibre and phytonutrients such as glucosinolates. These compounds can be metabolised by the microbiota into active compounds with health benefits. This study has shown the bidirectional benefit of broccoli consumption in that it can positively impact the function and composition of the microbiota
- Interestingly, the results in this small study were driven by participants with a BMI of less than 26. Sub-group analysis found no statistically significant relationships in participants with BMI >26
- It is worth noting that it is possible that the addition of 5g of fibre from the broccoli is also contributing to the changes observed.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger, controlled feeding studies that isolate specific foods to identify their effects on the microbiota are needed
- Genetic sequencing for only a few bacterial myrosinases has been completed and therefore future studies should aim to assess the metabolic capabilities in faecal samples such as myrosinase activity
- While this study and others have shown changes in the types of bacteria after cruciferous vegetable consumption the consistency of results has been mixed potentially due to differing study designs and treatment dosages. Further studies to clarify and confirm these results would be beneficial
- To assess the function of the microbiota a predictive algorithm was used. This requires experimental confirmation by such methods as metabolite profiling and whole genome shotgun sequencing.
Abstract
The human gastrointestinal microbiota is increasingly linked to health outcomes; however, our understanding of how specific foods alter the microbiota is limited. Cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli are a good source of dietary fiber and phytonutrients, including glucosinolates, which can be metabolized by gastrointestinal microbes. This study aimed to determine the impact of broccoli consumption on the gastrointestinal microbiota of healthy adults. A controlled feeding, randomized, crossover study consisting of two 18-day treatment periods separated by a 24-day washout was conducted in healthy adults (n=18). Participants were fed at weight maintenance with the intervention period diet including 200 g of cooked broccoli and 20 g of raw daikon radish per day. Fecal samples were collected at baseline and at the end of each treatment period for microbial analysis. Beta diversity analysis indicated that bacterial communities were impacted by treatment (P=.03). Broccoli consumption decreased the relative abundance of Firmicutes by 9% compared to control (P=.05), increased the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes by 10% compared to control (P=.03) and increased Bacteroides by 8% relative to control (P=.02). Furthermore, the effects were strongest among participants with body mass index <26 kg/m2, and within this group, there were associations between bacterial relative abundance and glucosinolate metabolites. Functional prediction revealed that broccoli consumption increased the pathways involved in the functions of the endocrine system (P=.05), transport and catabolism (P=.04), and energy metabolism (P=.01). These results reveal that broccoli consumption affects the composition and function of the human gastrointestinal microbiota.
-
4.
Probiotic Bifidobacterium strains and galactooligosaccharides improve intestinal barrier function in obese adults but show no synergism when used together as synbiotics.
Krumbeck, JA, Rasmussen, HE, Hutkins, RW, Clarke, J, Shawron, K, Keshavarzian, A, Walter, J
Microbiome. 2018;6(1):121
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Numerous studies have established that the gut microbiota contributes to gastrointestinal health and this can also be achieved through dietary consumption of probiotics and prebiotics. Gut microbiota have also been associated in impacting the markers of metabolic diseases but not many studies are available. Henceforth on this basis this study, looked into the synergistic effects of administering prebiotic together with a select probiotic Bifidobacterium strain. The main objective of this study was to establish the synergistic effect of probiotics and prebiotics and compare their effects on microbiota composition. This study was a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial conducted on a total of 151 volunteers assigned to six treatments groups. The authors concluded that the synergistic combinations tested in this study did not demonstrate functional synergism, and neither any significant effects on metabolic disease outcomes were observed within the six treatment groups. Although, the findings from this study clearly demonstrated that the pro and prebiotic components improved markers of colonic permeability, henceforth providing a rational for their use in gut microbiota health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND One way to improve both the ecological performance and functionality of probiotic bacteria is by combining them with a prebiotic in the form of a synbiotic. However, the degree to which such synbiotic formulations improve probiotic strain functionality in humans has not been tested systematically. Our goal was to use a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm clinical trial in obese humans to compare the ecological and physiological impact of the prebiotic galactooligosaccharides (GOS) and the probiotic strains Bifidobacterium adolescentis IVS-1 (autochthonous and selected via in vivo selection) and Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 (commercial probiotic allochthonous to the human gut) when used on their own or as synbiotic combinations. After 3 weeks of consumption, strain-specific quantitative real-time PCR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed on fecal samples to assess changes in the microbiota. Intestinal permeability was determined by measuring sugar recovery in urine by GC after consumption of a sugar mixture. Serum-based endotoxin exposure was also assessed. RESULTS IVS-1 reached significantly higher cell numbers in fecal samples than BB-12 (P < 0.01) and, remarkably, its administration induced an increase in total bifidobacteria that was comparable to that of GOS. Although GOS showed a clear bifidogenic effect on the resident gut microbiota, both probiotic strains showed only a non-significant trend of higher fecal cell numbers when administered with GOS. Post-aspirin sucralose:lactulose ratios were reduced in groups IVS-1 (P = 0.050), IVS-1 + GOS (P = 0.022), and GOS (P = 0.010), while sucralose excretion was reduced with BB-12 (P = 0.002) and GOS (P = 0.020), indicating improvements in colonic permeability but no synergistic effects. No changes in markers of endotoxemia were observed. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that "autochthony" of the probiotic strain has a larger effect on ecological performance than the provision of a prebiotic substrate, likely due to competitive interactions with members of the resident microbiota. Although the synbiotic combinations tested in this study did not demonstrate functional synergism, our findings clearly showed that the pro- and prebiotic components by themselves improved markers of colonic permeability, providing a rational for their use in pathologies with an underlying leakiness of the gut.
-
5.
Substituting whole grains for refined grains in a 6-wk randomized trial has a modest effect on gut microbiota and immune and inflammatory markers of healthy adults.
Vanegas, SM, Meydani, M, Barnett, JB, Goldin, B, Kane, A, Rasmussen, H, Brown, C, Vangay, P, Knights, D, Jonnalagadda, S, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2017;105(3):635-650
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Increased whole grain consumption has been associated with reduced levels of inflammation. This randomised, controlled trial aimed to assess the effects of a whole grain diet in comparison with a refined grain diet on the immune system, levels of inflammation and gut bacteria. 81 men and women aged between 40 and 60 were randomly assigned to either a whole grain or a refined grain diet for a period of 6 weeks. All other dietary components were kept the same and calorie levels were controlled to maintain weight levels. The study findings showed a positive effect on stool frequency and stool weight with the whole grain diet in comparison to the refined grain diet. The whole grain diet also showed modest positive effects on gut bacteria profiles and aspects of immunity. The whole grain diet showed no effects on markers of inflammation.
Abstract
Background: Observational studies suggest an inverse association between whole-grain (WG) consumption and inflammation. However, evidence from interventional studies is limited, and few studies have included measurements of cell-mediated immunity.Objective: We assessed the effects of diets rich in WGs compared with refined grains (RGs) on immune and inflammatory responses, gut microbiota, and microbial products in healthy adults while maintaining subject body weights.Design: After a 2-wk provided-food run-in period of consuming a Western-style diet, 49 men and 32 postmenopausal women [age range: 40-65 y, body mass index (in kg/m2) <35] were assigned to consume 1 of 2 provided-food weight-maintenance diets for 6 wk.Results: Compared with the RG group, the WG group had increased plasma total alkyresorcinols (a measure of WG intake) (P < 0.0001), stool weight (P < 0.0001), stool frequency (P = 0.02), and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producer Lachnospira [false-discovery rate (FDR)-corrected P = 0.25] but decreased pro-inflammatory Enterobacteriaceae (FDR-corrected P = 0.25). Changes in stool acetate (P = 0.02) and total SCFAs (P = 0.05) were higher in the WG group than in the RG group. A positive association was shown between Lachnospira and acetate (FDR-corrected P = 0.002) or butyrate (FDR-corrected P = 0.005). We also showed that there was a higher percentage of terminal effector memory T cells (P = 0.03) and LPS-stimulated ex vivo production of tumor necrosis factor-α (P = 0.04) in the WG group than in the RG group, which were positively associated with plasma alkylresorcinol concentrations.Conclusion: The short-term consumption of WGs in a weight-maintenance diet increases stool weight and frequency and has modest positive effects on gut microbiota, SCFAs, effector memory T cells, and the acute innate immune response and no effect on other markers of cell-mediated immunity or systemic and gut inflammation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01902394.
-
6.
Timing of food intake predicts weight loss effectiveness.
Garaulet, M, Gómez-Abellán, P, Alburquerque-Béjar, JJ, Lee, YC, Ordovás, JM, Scheer, FA
International journal of obesity (2005). 2013;37(4):604-11
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
As obesity is a multifactorial disease, dietary interventions must take into account a range of physiological and psychological variables. There is emerging evidence linking energy regulation to the circadian clock, emphasizing that the timing of eating may play a role in weight regulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of food timing in weight loss effectiveness among 420 overweight or obese participants during a 20-week weight loss treatment. Participants were grouped as either early or late eaters for consuming their main meal, and their energy intake, expenditure, appetite hormones, CLOCK genotype, sleep duration and chronotype were studied. In this study, those who ate their main meal late lost significantly less weight than early eaters. The findings of this study indicate that timing of food intake relates to long-term weight loss effectiveness in humans. These findings may help in developing therapeutic strategies for weight loss that incorporates the timing of food consumption with the traditional energy balance and macronutrient composition.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is emerging literature demonstrating a relationship between the timing of feeding and weight regulation in animals. However, whether the timing of food intake influences the success of a weight-loss diet in humans is unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of food timing in weight-loss effectiveness in a sample of 420 individuals who followed a 20-week weight-loss treatment. METHODS Participants (49.5% female subjects; age (mean ± s.d.): 42 ± 11 years; BMI: 31.4 ± 5.4 kg m(-2)) were grouped in early eaters and late eaters, according to the timing of the main meal (lunch in this Mediterranean population). 51% of the subjects were early eaters and 49% were late eaters (lunch time before and after 1500 hours, respectively), energy intake and expenditure, appetite hormones, CLOCK genotype, sleep duration and chronotype were studied. RESULTS Late lunch eaters lost less weight and displayed a slower weight-loss rate during the 20 weeks of treatment than early eaters (P=0.002). Surprisingly, energy intake, dietary composition, estimated energy expenditure, appetite hormones and sleep duration was similar between both groups. Nevertheless, late eaters were more evening types, had less energetic breakfasts and skipped breakfast more frequently that early eaters (all; P<0.05). CLOCK rs4580704 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with the timing of the main meal (P=0.015) with a higher frequency of minor allele (C) carriers among the late eaters (P=0.041). Neither sleep duration, nor CLOCK SNPs or morning/evening chronotype was independently associated with weight loss (all; P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Eating late may influence the success of weight-loss therapy. Novel therapeutic strategies should incorporate not only the caloric intake and macronutrient distribution - as is classically done - but also the timing of food.