1.
A Biopsychosocial Model of Sex Differences in Children's Eating Behaviors.
Keller, KL, Kling, SMR, Fuchs, B, Pearce, AL, Reigh, NA, Masterson, T, Hickok, K
Nutrients. 2019;11(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This paper discusses the role of sex on children’s appetite and responses to food cues. The review flips the question of whether the variations in obesity and eating disorders seen by biological sex are actually influenced by, and to what extent, by sex eg. is sex the determining factor for differing responses? It specifically reviews behaviours in children aged 11 years and younger, avoiding adolescence (the typical age when differences in eating patterns occur), to understand if these differences are correlated with sex, given the high incidence of female eating disorders. The researchers reviewed specific traits including food acceptance, food intake, picky eating, appetitive traits, eating compensation, eating in the absence of hunger, and meal-specific microstructural patterns (e.g., bite rate and eating speed). They found that girls typically like a wider variety of foods than boys and had a greater preference for plant foods whilst boys typically preferred meats and foods higher in fats and sugar. No sex differences were found for picky eating. Boys were found to have greater enjoyment for eating, with girls showing more food avoidance traits, however this may be from parental strategies reinforcing this behaviour in girls. Boys are more readily satiated and better able to regulate their food and drink intake than girls. Yet boys are also more likely to eat in the absence of hunger and have a faster eating rate and larger bite size. The paper concludes that the studies reviewed are suggestive of male–female differences in food liking and intake, appetitive traits, self-regulatory eating, and meal-related microstructure.
Abstract
The prevalence of obesity and eating disorders varies by sex, but the extent to which sex influences eating behaviors, especially in childhood, has received less attention. The purpose of this paper is to critically discuss the literature on sex differences in eating behavior in children and present new findings supporting the role of sex in child appetitive traits and neural responses to food cues. In children, the literature shows sex differences in food acceptance, food intake, appetitive traits, eating-related compensation, and eating speed. New analyses demonstrate that sex interacts with child weight status to differentially influence appetitive traits. Further, results from neuroimaging suggest that obesity in female children is positively related to neural reactivity to higher-energy-dense food cues in regions involved with contextual processing and object recognition, while the opposite was found in males. In addition to differences in how the brain processes information about food, other factors that may contribute to sex differences include parental feeding practices, societal emphasis on dieting, and peer influences. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings, as they may have implications for the development of effective intervention programs to improve dietary behaviors and prevent obesity.
2.
Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence.
Adriaanse, MA, Vinkers, CD, De Ridder, DT, Hox, JJ, De Wit, JB
Appetite. 2011;56(1):183-93
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Eating a healthy diet reduces the likelihood of becoming overweight or chronically ill. Many people are aware of the health benefits of eating a healthy diet, and are hence motivated to eat healthily. This study is a review and meta-analysis with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness of setting implementation intentions (the where, when and how planning in goal setting) in promoting healthy eating behaviour. Results indicate that implementation intentions can be effective in increasing healthy eating behaviours with 12 studies showing an overall medium size effect on increasing fruit and vegetable consumption. Authors conclude that implementation intentions to promote healthy eating have more promising effects that those aiming to diminish unhealthy eating patterns.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether implementation intentions are an effective tool to help people put their intentions to eat a healthy diet into practice. Additionally, it was investigated whether the quality of the outcome measures and the quality of the control conditions that are used in these studies influence implementation intentions' effectiveness. METHODS Twenty three empirical studies investigating the effect of implementation intentions on eating behavior were included. In assessing the empirical evidence, a distinction was made between studies that aim to increase healthy eating (i.e., eating more fruits) and studies that aim to diminish unhealthy eating (i.e., eating fewer unhealthy snacks). RESULTS Implementation intentions are an effective tool for promoting the inclusion of healthy food items in one's diet (Cohen's d=.51), but results for diminishing unhealthy eating patterns are less strong (Cohen's d=.29). For studies aiming to increase healthy eating, it was found that higher quality outcome measures and lower quality control conditions tended to yield stronger effects. CONCLUSION Implementation intentions are somewhat more effective in promoting healthy eating than in diminishing unhealthy eating, although for some studies promoting healthy eating effect sizes may have been inflated due to less than optimal control conditions.