1.
Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides and risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis and supporting evidence.
Zhang, L, Rana, I, Shaffer, RM, Taioli, E, Sheppard, L
Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research. 2019;781:186-206
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Glyphosate is a highly effective broad-spectrum herbicide that is typically applied in mixtures known as glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs). Glyphosate and its metabolites persist in food, water, and dust, potentially indicating that everyone may be exposed ubiquitously. The objective of this study was to focus on an a priori hypothesis - the highest biologically relevant exposure to GBHs, i.e., higher levels, longer durations and/or with sufficient lag and latency, will lead to increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in humans. This study is a meta-analysis of six studies (one cohort and five case-control control studies) with almost 65,000 participants. Results demonstrated a significantly increased NHL risk in highly GBH-exposed individuals. Authors conclude that the overall evidence from human, animal, and mechanistic studies presented in this study, supports a compelling link between exposures to GBHs and increased risk for NHL.
Abstract
Glyphosate is the most widely used broad-spectrum systemic herbicide in the world. Recent evaluations of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) by various regional, national, and international agencies have engendered controversy. We investigated whether there was an association between high cumulative exposures to GBHs and increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in humans. We conducted a new meta-analysis that includes the most recent update of the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) cohort published in 2018 along with five case-control studies. Using the highest exposure groups when available in each study, we report the overall meta-relative risk (meta-RR) of NHL in GBH-exposed individuals was increased by 41% (meta-RR = 1.41, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.13-1.75). For comparison, we also performed a secondary meta-analysis using high-exposure groups with the earlier AHS (2005), and we calculated a meta-RR for NHL of 1.45 (95% CI: 1.11-1.91), which was higher than the meta-RRs reported previously. Multiple sensitivity tests conducted to assess the validity of our findings did not reveal meaningful differences from our primary estimated meta-RR. To contextualize our findings of an increased NHL risk in individuals with high GBH exposure, we reviewed publicly available animal and mechanistic studies related to lymphoma. We documented further support from studies of malignant lymphoma incidence in mice treated with pure glyphosate, as well as potential links between glyphosate / GBH exposure and immunosuppression, endocrine disruption, and genetic alterations that are commonly associated with NHL or lymphomagenesis. Overall, in accordance with findings from experimental animal and mechanistic studies, our current meta-analysis of human epidemiological studies suggests a compelling link between exposures to GBHs and increased risk for NHL.
2.
Key Risk Factors Affecting Farmers' Mental Health: A Systematic Review.
Daghagh Yazd, S, Wheeler, SA, Zuo, A
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019;16(23)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of psychological stress among farmers and farm workers is greater than that of non-farmers. The mental health of farmers can be affected by several factors, including pesticide exposure, financial problems, climate issues, and poor physical health. A total of 167 studies are included in this systematic review incorporating data from the studies conducted in 34 countries, including the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia. There is a need for risk assessment that influences farmers' mental health, according to this systematic review. There is a need for more robust studies to evaluate the impact of climate change and pesticide exposure on farmers' mental health and to determine which strategies can be used to help them find therapies. Using the results of this systematic review, healthcare professionals can raise awareness about mental health issues and assist farmers in identifying the symptoms, allowing them to seek help.
Abstract
Recently, concern has increased globally over farmers' mental health issues. We present a systematic review of the outcomes, locations, study designs, and methods of current studies on farmers' mental health. In particular, this review aims to fill an important gap in understanding of the potential key risk factors affecting farmers' mental health around the world. 167 articles on farmer mental health were included in a final systematic review using a standardized electronic literature search strategy and PRISMA guidelines. The four most-cited influences on farmers' mental health in the reviewed literature respectively were pesticide exposure, financial difficulties, climate variabilities/drought, and poor physical health/past injuries. The majority of studies were from developed countries, most specifically from the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Comparative studies on the mental health of farmers and other occupational workers showed mixed results, with a larger portion identifying that psychological health disturbances were more common in farmers and farm-workers. Knowledge of farmer psychological disorder risk factors and its impacts are essential for reducing the burden of mental illness. Further research will be required on climate change impacts, developing country farmers' mental health, and information on how to reduce help-seeking barriers amongst farmers.
3.
Probiotics and oral health: A systematic review.
Seminario-Amez, M, López-López, J, Estrugo-Devesa, A, Ayuso-Montero, R, Jané-Salas, E
Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2017;22(3):e282-e288
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Oral cavity has its own microbiome. When the balance of the microbes living in the oral cavity is altered, e.g. due to poor oral hygiene, diet or the use of antimicrobial drugs, periodontal disease and dental caries can develop. Probiotics may provide a new approach for the prevention and management of these oral diseases. This review paper examined 12 published randomised clinical trials, 2 meta-analyses and 1 systematic review that assessed the effect of probiotics in the treatment and/or prevention of an infectious oral disease. Based on the reviewed studies, the authors concluded that the use of probiotics could be beneficial for the maintenance of oral health, due to its ability to decrease colony forming unit counts of oral pathogens. However, more clinical trials with longer-term follow-ups are needed to confirm the efficacy of probiotic therapy, identify specific probiotic strains and determine the correct dose, treatment time and delivery form required for each disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Probiotics are microorganisms, mainly bacteria, which benefit the host's health. Many studies support the role of probiotics as a contributor to gastrointestinal health, and nowadays many authors are trying to prove its influence in oral health maintenance. OBJECTIVES To review the published literature with the purpose of knowing the importance of using probiotics as a preventive and therapeutic method for oral infectious diseases management. MATERIAL AND METHODS An electronic search in PubMed database with the keywords "oral health AND probiotics AND dentistry" was conducted. The inclusion criteria were: randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assess the action of any probiotic strain in the treatment and / or prevention of an infectious oral disease, RCTs that assess the action of any probiotic strain on counting colony forming units (CFU) of oral pathogens, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The Jadad scale was used to assess the high quality of RCTs. RESULTS Fifteen articles were considered for this review. Of which, 12 were RCTs of good / high quality (Jadad scale), two meta-analysis and one systematic review. CONCLUSIONS The literature reviewed suggests probiotics usage could be beneficial for the maintenance of oral health, due to its ability to decrease the colony forming units (CFU) counts of the oral pathogens. However, randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up periods are needed to confirm their efficacy in reducing the prevalence/incidence of oral infectious diseases. Furthermore, the recognition of specific strains with probiotic activity for each infectious oral disease is required, in order to determine exact dose, treatment time and ideal vehicles.