-
1.
The Influence of n-3PUFA Supplementation on Muscle Strength, Mass, and Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Santo André, HC, Esteves, GP, Barreto, GHC, Longhini, F, Dolan, E, Benatti, FB
Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.). 2023;14(1):115-127
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3PUFA) are long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids essential to human health. They play a role in cell membrane integrity, immune and inflammation regulation, cognition and neuromuscular function. As the human body cannot make these fatty acids, they need to be obtained through diet or supplementation. Regarding skeletal muscle, recent research showed that n-3PUFAs may increase the uptake of amino acids by increasing the membrane fluidity in the muscle, and by activating pathways that inhibit protein breakdown. This led to the hypothesis that n-3PUFAs may enhance muscle mass gain and strength. This systematic review sought to gather all available evidence about the impact of n-3PUFA supplementation on muscle mass, strength, and function in healthy young and older adults. The review included 14 studies with a total of 1443 participants. The authors found that n-3PUFA supplementation had no significant effect on muscle mass or muscle function in healthy young and older adults, however, a very small but significant positive effect was noted regarding muscle strength. In the discussion section, the authors explain the challenges of their review and how these findings integrate with the current understanding and other research findings. They concluded more research is needed to get a better insight into the effects of n-3PUFA on muscle function and the variants.
Abstract
The effects of omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3PUFA) supplementation on skeletal muscle are currently unclear. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize all available evidence regarding the influence of n-3PUFA supplementation on muscle mass, strength, and function in healthy young and older adults. Four databases were searched (Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and SportDiscus). Predefined eligibility criteria were determined according to Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, and Study Design. Only peer-reviewed studies were included. The Cochrane RoB2 Tool and the NutriGrade approach were used to access risk of bias and certainty in evidence. Effect sizes were calculated using pre-post scores and analyzed using a three-level, random-effects meta-analysis. When sufficient studies were available, subanalyses were performed in the muscle mass, strength, and function outcomes according to participant's age (<60 or ≥60 years), supplementation dosage (<2 or ≥2 g/day), and training intervention ("resistance training" vs. "none or other"). Overall, 14 individual studies were included, total 1443 participants (913 females; 520 males) and 52 outcomes measures. Studies had high overall risk of bias and consideration of all NutriGrade elements resulted in a certainty assessment of moderate meta-evidence for all outcomes. n-3PUFA supplementation had no significant effect on muscle mass (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.07 [95% CI: -0.02, 0.17], P = 0.11) and muscle function (SMD = 0.03 [95% CI: -0.09, 0.15], P = 0.58), but it showed a very small albeit significant positive effect on muscle strength (SMD = 0.12 [95% CI: 0.006, 0.24], P = 0.04) in participants when compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses showed that age, supplementation dose, or cosupplementation alongside resistance training did not influence these responses. In conclusion, our analyses indicated that n-3PUFA supplementation may lead to very small increases in muscle strength but did not impact muscle mass and function in healthy young and older adults. To our knowledge, this is the first review and meta-analysis investigating whether n-3PUFA supplementation can lead to increases in muscle strength, mass, and function in healthy adults. Registered protocol: doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2FWQT.
-
2.
High-protein diets and testosterone.
Whittaker, J
Nutrition and health. 2023;29(2):185-191
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
High protein diets have been shown to have several benefits such as weight loss and the promotion of feeling fuller for longer following food. A recent study has however shown that testosterone levels are decreased in men who follow a high protein diet. This study aimed to summarise the data on high protein diets and testosterone. The results showed that diets with more than 3.4g/kg/day protein decreased total testosterone levels possibly due to the body adjusting its biochemistry to ensure that the excess protein in the diet is metabolised. Furthermore, inflammation in response to an increased amount of protein may suppress testosterone production. It was concluded that increased protein intake of more than 3.4g/kg/day drives the decrease in total testosterone in the body of men regardless of what happens to the level of carbohydrate and fat in the body. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that high protein diets may decrease testosterone levels in men.
Abstract
A recent meta-analysis found low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets (> 3.4 g/kg of bodyweight/day) (g/kg/day) decreased men's total testosterone (∼5.23 nmol/L) [Whittaker and Harris (2022) Low-carbohydrate diets and men's cortisol and testosterone: systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition and Health. DOI: 10.1177/02601060221083079]. This finding has generated substantial discussion, however, it has often lacked clarity and context, with the term 'high-protein' being used unqualified. Firstly, diets < 3.4 g/kg/day are not associated with a consistent decrease in testosterone. Secondly, the average protein intake is ∼1.3 g/kg/day, conventional 'high-protein' diets are ∼1.8-3 g/kg/day and the vast majority of athletes are < 3.4 g/kg/day; meaning very few individuals will ever surpass 3.4 g/kg/day. To avoid such confusion in the future, the following definitions are proposed: very high (> 3.4 g/kg/day), high (1.9-3.4 g/kg/day), moderate (1.25-1.9 g/kg/day) and low (<1.25 g/kg/day). Using these, very high-protein diets (> 3.4 g/kg/day) appear to decrease testosterone, however high- and moderate-protein diets (1.25-3.4 g/kg/day) do not.
-
3.
Influence of methyl donor nutrients as epigenetic regulators in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of observational studies.
Chávez-Hidalgo, LP, Martín-Fernández-de-Labastida, S, M de Pancorbo, M, Arroyo-Izaga, M
World journal of gastroenterology. 2023;29(7):1219-1234
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent type of cancer and yet has the second highest mortality rate in cancer patients worldwide. Hence there is an urgency to understand more about dietary and lifestyle factors that can help to prevent this type of cancer. It is known that folate has a preventive function in CRC, possibly due to its role in DNA methylation. Methylation is the addition of methyl groups to DNA, which influences gene expression and regulation. This systematic review investigated how folate and other dietary methyl groups and methyl influencers such as B vitamins and alcohol influence the development of CRC, whilst also considering various genetic variants in methyl-metabolising enzymes (polymorphisms). The analysis included a total of 19 case-control and cohort studies and highlighted that potential interactions between methyl donor nutrients, genetic variants, and alcohol influence CRC risk. For most, high levels of folate intake were considered a protective factor, while high alcohol consumption proved to be a risk factor. Yet these interactions appear to be complex, with gender, genetic variations and folate status appearing to contribute to variable and, in some cases, contradictory outcomes. The authors suggested in their findings that Vitamin B6, Vitamin B3 (Niacin), and alcohol may affect CRC by influencing its risk by acting on both the genetic code itself and the epigenetic factors that control gene activity. Further research is needed to better understand the complexity of these mechanisms, and to help clarify the influence of methyl group donors as epigenetic regulators of gene activity in CRC development.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dietary methyl donors might influence DNA methylation during carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, whether the influence of methyl donor intake is modified by polymorphisms in such epigenetic regulators is still unclear. AIM: To improve the current understanding of the molecular basis of CRC. METHODS A literature search in the Medline database, Reference Citation Analysis (https:// www.referencecitationanalysis.com/), and manual reference screening were performed to identify observational studies published from inception to May 2022. RESULTS A total of fourteen case-control studies and five cohort studies were identified. These studies included information on dietary methyl donors, dietary components that potentially modulate the bioavailability of methyl groups, genetic variants of methyl metabolizing enzymes, and/or markers of CpG island methylator phenotype and/or microsatellite instability, and their possible interactions on CRC risk. CONCLUSION Several studies have suggested interactions between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms, methyl donor nutrients (such as folate) and alcohol on CRC risk. Moreover, vitamin B6, niacin, and alcohol may affect CRC risk through not only genetic but also epigenetic regulation. Identification of specific mechanisms in these interactions associated with CRC may assist in developing targeted prevention strategies for individuals at the highest risk of developing CRC.
-
4.
The effects of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation on lipid profile in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
Asbaghi, O, Ashtary-Larky, D, Naseri, K, Saadati, S, Zamani, M, Rezaei Kelishadi, M, Nadery, M, Doaei, S, Haghighat, N
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:953012
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Elevated fats circulating in the blood has been shown to be a predictor for heart disease. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is a type of fat that is found in the milk and meat of animals such as cows, sheep and goats. Although classed as a fat, when taken in a supplemental form, some studies have shown it to decrease circulating fats whereas others have shown no beneficial effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 56 randomised control trials aimed to explore the effects of CLA on circulating blood profiles. The results showed that CLA increased levels of cholesterols, which may contribute to heart disease, but also increased cholesterol which may help to prevent heart disease. It was concluded that CLA supplementation has little effect on fats in the blood. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that there may be little utility in recommending a supplemental CLA for the management of heart disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The findings of trials investigating the effect of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) administration on lipid profile are controversial. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to explore the effects of CLA supplementation on lipid profile. METHODS Two authors independently searched electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus until March 2022, in order to find relevant RCTs. The random effects model was used to evaluate the mean and standard deviation. RESULTS In total, 56 RCTs with 73 effect sizes met the inclusion criteria and were eligible for the meta-analysis. CLA supplementation significantly alter triglycerides (TG) (WMD: 1.76; 95% CI: -1.65, 5.19), total cholesterols (TC) (WMD: 0.86; 95% CI: -0.42, 2.26), low-density lipoprotein cholesterols (LDL-C) (WMD: 0.49; 95% CI: -0.75, 2.74), apolipoprotein A (WMD: -3.15; 95% CI: -16.12, 9.81), and apolipoprotein B (WMD: -0.73; 95% CI: -9.87, 8.41) concentrations. However, CLA supplementation significantly increased the density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (WMD: -0.40; 95% CI: -0.72, -0.07) concentrations. CONCLUSION CLA supplementation significantly improved HDL-C concentrations, however, increased concentrations of TG, TC, LDL-C, apolipoprotein A, and apolipoprotein B. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier: CRD42022331100.
-
5.
Effect of sleep duration on dietary intake, desire to eat, measures of food intake and metabolic hormones: A systematic review of clinical trials.
Soltanieh, S, Solgi, S, Ansari, M, Santos, HO, Abbasi, B
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2021;45:55-65
-
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Adequate sleep is crucial to health. Yet, sleep disturbances have become very common in modern societies. A lack of sleep is linked to increased risk for several chronic diseases such as diabetes, high blood pressure, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, appetite-regulating hormones can be disrupted by sleep shortages, which is thought to drive chronic overeating, leading to weight gain, obesity and its associated health consequences. This review examined the relationship between sleep duration and food consumption and energy intake, whilst also monitoring changes in body weight and appetite-regulating hormones. The review encompassed 50 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 3387 participants, including 1079 children and adolescents and 2308 adults. The findings suggested that sleep shortages contribute to significant increases in calorie intake, fat intake, increased body weight, appetite, hunger, more frequent eating and bigger portion sizes. In this review lack of sleep did not change protein and carbohydrate intake. Nor did lack of sleep make people exert more or less energy overall, however, a variance amongst ethnic groups was observed here. There was not enough evidence for changes in metabolic rate, so the review assumed no significant effect. When viewed collectively, the appetite-regulating hormones of leptin and ghrelin, the stress hormone cortisol and the sugar-regulating hormone insulin were not significantly influenced by sleep duration. However, there seemed to be a wide variance of outcomes when looking at individual studies' results. In conclusion, the authors reiterated the importance of sleep for health maintenance, advocating for a minimum of 7 hours of sleep per day for adults and that, despite busy modern lifestyles, sleep optimisation strategies should be prioritised. Less than 6 hours of sleep per day increases the risk of health consequences, like weight gain and metabolic disorders and sleep management should be considered part of their treatment protocols.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Reduced sleep duration may serve as a mediator for weight gain in part due to increased appetite, increased fat intake and disruptions to energy balance.
- Enhancing sleep quality may serve to support weight loss protocols.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Short sleep duration and disruptions to circadian rhythm have been associated with being overweight and obese. It has been suggested that sleep restriction may interfere with appetite regulating hormones leading to increased appetite and disrupted energy balance.
This study aimed to systematically review studies exploring the relationship between sleep duration and food consumption, energy intake, anthropometric characteristics and appetite-regulating hormones.
Methods
This systematic review included 50 randomised controlled trials including 3,387 participants.
Results
Energy intake
- 13 out of 30 the included studies found that short sleep conditions led to higher energy intake.
- 1 study identified that sleep restriction resulted in a 15.3% and 9.2% increase in energy intake in both women and men.
- 3 studies noted that prolonging sleep duration led to a reduction in energy intake.
- 1 study reported a reduction in energy intake after sleep restriction (P=0.031).
Fat consumption
- 9 studies out of 22 identified a significant association between short sleep and increased fat consumption.
- 7 studies did not identify a difference between groups.
- 3 studies noted a decrease in fat consumption following prolonged sleep (P<0.001, P<0.05, P=0.04).
Hunger and appetite
- 11 studies out of 17 observed that sleep restriction resulted in increased hunger ratings.
- 3 studies found an increase in appetite following sleep restriction (P<0.01) with 3 finding no difference..
- 1 study reported a decrease in appetite following sleep restriction.
- 2 studies noted that portion sizes increased as a result of sleep restriction (P<0.01).
- 1 study reported an increase in eating occasions following restricted sleep compared to habitual sleep (6.08 vs 4.96).
Body weight
- 6 studies out of 14 found no effect of sleep loss on body weight.
- 4 studies identified that sleep restriction led to weight gain (P<0.001, P<0.05, P=0.14, P=0.031).
- 2 studies reported weight loss following increased sleep duration (P<0.001).
Ghrelin and leptin
- Leptin and ghrelin levels were generally not found to be influenced by sleep duration, with the exception of a few studies.
Clinical practice applications:
Reduced sleep duration may promote weight gain by:
- Increasing energy intake.
- Increasing fat consumption.
- Increasing hunger and appetite.
- Increasing portion sizes and eating occasions.
Prolonging sleep duration may support weight loss by:
- Reducing energy intake.
- Reducing fat intake.
Considerations for future research:
- Mixed results on the influence of sleep restriction on appetite regulating hormones, leptin and ghrelin.
- Some studies noted the negative impact of sleep restriction on leptin and ghrelin concentrations, collectively shortened sleep duration did not appear to influence these hormones.
- Further sleep restriction studies exploring additional appetite regulating hormones and neuropeptides and the reward system may provide a more definitive understanding of the underlying mechanism for reduced sleep duration to disrupt the appetite and energy balance and promote weight gain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Sleep, as well as diet and physical activity, plays a significant role in growth, maturation, health, and regulation of energy homeostasis. Recently, there is increasing evidence indicating a possible causal association between sleep duration and energy balance. We aimed to examine the relationship between sleep duration and food consumption, energy intake, anthropometric characteristics, and appetite-regulating hormones by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS Electronic literature searches were conducted on Medline, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until July 2020. The search was conducted with the following words: "Sleep Duration", "Circadian Rhythm", "Sleep Disorders" in combination with "Obesity", "Overweight", "Abdominal Obesity", "Physical Activity", "Energy Intake", "Body Mass Index", "Lipid Metabolism", "Caloric Restriction", Leptin, "Weight Gain", and "Appetite Regulation" using human studies.methods RESULTS After screening 708 abstracts, 50 RCTs (7 on children or adolescents and 43 on adults) were identified and met the inclusion criteria. In general, the findings suggested that sleep restriction may leads to a significant increment in energy intake, fat intake, body weight, appetite, hunger, eating occasions, and portion size, while protein and carbohydrate consumption, total energy expenditure, and respiratory quotient remained unaffected as a result of sleep restriction. Serum leptin, ghrelin, and cortisol concentrations were not influenced by sleep duration as well. CONCLUSION Insufficient sleep can be considered as a contributing factor for energy imbalance, weight gain, and metabolic disorders and it is suggested that to tackle disordered eating it may be necessary to pay more attention to sleep duration.
-
6.
An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on adherence to mediterranean diet and risk of cancer.
Morze, J, Danielewicz, A, Przybyłowicz, K, Zeng, H, Hoffmann, G, Schwingshackl, L
European journal of nutrition. 2021;60(3):1561-1586
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The development of cancer is associated with a number of risk factors, including smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyles, alcohol consumption, infections, pollution, and dietary imbalances. Based on previous research, optimal consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, along with reduced consumption of red and processed meat, reduces cancer risk. According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with lower cancer mortality and site-specific cancer development. A Mediterranean diet includes fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, fish, whole grains, extra virgin olive oil, and low amounts of red meat, processed meat, egg, and dairy, along with moderate amounts of red wine. According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, adherence to the Mediterranean diet reduces the risk of cancer mortality and the risk of developing cancers specific to the site, such as colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, gastric cancer, and lung cancer. Among the components of the Mediterranean diet, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains have been shown to reduce cancer risk. Bioactive substances found in Mediterranean diet components require additional robust studies to evaluate their benefits. A healthcare professional can use the results of this study to make clinical decisions and recommend therapeutic interventions to cancer patients.
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of current systematic review was to update the body of evidence on associations between adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) and risk of cancer mortality, site-specific cancer in the general population; all-cause, and cancer mortality as well as cancer reoccurrence among cancer survivors. METHODS A literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control and cohort studies published up to April 2020 was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Study-specific risk estimates for the highest versus lowest adherence to the MedDiet category were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence from cohort studies and RCTs was evaluated using the NutriGrade scoring system. RESULTS The updated search revealed 44 studies not identified in the previous review. Altogether, 117 studies including 3,202,496 participants were enclosed for meta-analysis. The highest adherence to MedDiet was inversely associated with cancer mortality (RRcohort: 0.87, 95% CI 0.82, 0.92; N = 18 studies), all-cause mortality among cancer survivors (RRcohort: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66, 0.86; N = 8), breast (RRobservational: 0.94, 95% CI 0.90, 0.97; N = 23), colorectal (RRobservational: 0.83, 95% CI 0.76, 0.90; N = 17), head and neck (RRobservational: 0.56, 95% CI 0.44, 0.72; N = 9), respiratory (RRcohort: 0.84, 95% CI 0.76, 0.94; N = 5), gastric (RRobservational: 0.70, 95% CI 0.61, 0.80; N = 7), bladder (RRobservational: 0.87, 95% CI 0.76, 0.98; N = 4), and liver cancer (RRobservational: 0.64, 95% CI 0.54, 0.75; N = 4). Adhering to MedDiet did not modify risk of blood, esophageal, pancreatic and prostate cancer risk. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our results suggest that highest adherence to the MedDiet was related to lower risk of cancer mortality in the general population, and all-cause mortality among cancer survivors as well as colorectal, head and neck, respiratory, gastric, liver and bladder cancer risks. Moderate certainty of evidence from cohort studies suggest an inverse association for cancer mortality and colorectal cancer, but most of the comparisons were rated as low or very low certainty of evidence.
-
7.
The benefits and risks of beetroot juice consumption: a systematic review.
Zamani, H, de Joode, MEJR, Hossein, IJ, Henckens, NFT, Guggeis, MA, Berends, JE, de Kok, TMCM, van Breda, SGJ
Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. 2021;61(5):788-804
-
-
-
Plain language summary
This review examined the health benefits and risks associated with beetroot juice (BRJ) from 86 studies. The nitrate contained in high amounts in BRJ increases nitric oxide (NO) levels in the body. NO has vasodilatory effects and thus reduces blood pressure and helps oxygen- and nutrient delivery to organs and muscles. Hence there has been an interest in BRJ for sports performance improvement and the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The review collected evidence of the effect of BRJ on the cardiovascular system and sports performance according to gender, trained and untrained individuals. Whilst the authors also briefly mention other health benefits of BRJ. From wider research, it is known that excess nitrate can form carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds (NOCs) in the body. Yet little is known whether this could also be a potential risk with BRJ consumption since vegetable consumption and many plant compounds generally appear to reduce the risk of cancers and can block the formation of NOCs. Hence the authors concluded that more research is needed to ensure that currently suggested dosages for BRJ do not aid NOCs production. In summary, BRJ has a beneficial effect on nitric oxide levels, oxygen consumption, blood flow, platelet aggregation, heart rate, cardiac output, blood pressure, improves sports performance and endurance and could be valuable for the management of cardiovascular disease. Yet high levels of consumption may not come without risks and more studies are needed to assess safety.
Abstract
Beetroot juice (BRJ) has become increasingly popular amongst athletes aiming to improve sport performances. BRJ contains high concentrations of nitrate, which can be converted into nitric oxide (NO) after consumption. NO has various functions in the human body, including a vasodilatory effect, which reduces blood pressure and increases oxygen- and nutrient delivery to various organs. These effects indicate that BRJ may have relevant applications in prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, the consumption of BRJ also has an impact on oxygen delivery to skeletal muscles, muscle efficiency, tolerance and endurance and may thus have a positive impact on sports performances. Aside from the beneficial aspects of BRJ consumption, there may also be potential health risks. Drinking BRJ may easily increase nitrate intake above the acceptable daily intake, which is known to stimulate the endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds (NOC's), a class of compounds that is known to be carcinogenic and that may also induce several other adverse effects. Compared to studies on the beneficial effects, the amount of data and literature on the negative effects of BRJ is rather limited, and should be increased in order to perform a balanced risk assessment.
-
8.
Effects of Nutrition/Diet on Brown Adipose Tissue in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Heenan, KA, Carrillo, AE, Fulton, JL, Ryan, EJ, Edsall, JR, Rigopoulos, D, Markofski, MM, Flouris, AD, Dinas, PC
Nutrients. 2020;12(9)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The body has many uses for the energy that is consumed in the diet, one of these is for the generation of heat. Brown adipose tissue (BAT), which is stored in the lower neck, collarbone, abdomen and along the spine, is a special type of fat that is activated when the body is cold and serves to generate heat. The activity of this fat is of benefit to humans, as it reduces weight gain, improves blood sugar balance, and helps reduce blood lipid levels, reducing the risk for heart disease and type 2 diabetes. This systematic review of 24 publications aimed to determine whether nutrition and/or diet affects the activity of BAT. The results showed that there was no change in BAT activity following a high calorie carbohydrate rich meal, a standard meal and during overfeeding. Supplementation of L-Arginine, which is a supplement that helps the body build muscle, also had no effect on BAT activity. It was concluded that BAT activity was not affected by nutrition or diet. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the effect of diet on risk for heart disease and type 2 diabetes may not involve the modification of BAT.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brown adipose tissue (BAT) provides a minor contribution to diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT)-the metabolic response to food consumption. Increased BAT activity is generally considered beneficial for mammalian metabolism and has been associated with favorable health outcomes. The aim of the current systematic review was to explore whether nutritional factors and/or diet affect human BAT activity. METHODS We searched PubMed Central, Embase and Cochrane Library (trials) to conduct this systematic review (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42018082323). RESULTS We included 24 eligible papers that studied a total of 2785 participants. We found no mean differences in standardized uptake value of BAT following a single meal or after 6 weeks of L-Arginine supplementation. Resting energy expenditure (REE), however, was increased following a single meal and after supplementation of capsinoid and catechin when compared to a control condition (Z = 2.41, p = 0.02; mean difference = 102.47 (95% CI = 19.28-185.67)). CONCLUSIONS Human BAT activity was not significantly affected by nutrition/diet. Moreover, REE was only increased in response to a single meal, but it is unlikely that this was due to increased BAT activity. BAT activity assessments in response to the chronic effect of food should be considered along with other factors such as body composition and/or environmental temperature.
-
9.
The impact of nutrition and lifestyle on male fertility.
Benatta, M, Kettache, R, Buchholz, N, Trinchieri, A
Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica. 2020;92(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The impact of environmental, lifestyle and nutritional factors on unexplained male fertility has long been acknowledged. Yet, little research had been dedicated to the topic, despite declining semen quality having become a worldwide phenomena. Available studies have yielded limited, and at times conflicting, evidence. Hence this literature review sought to capture the current knowledge around unexplained male infertility and environmental, lifestyle, diet and nutrients factors. Summarized is the evidence from 69 studies, including population observations and clinical trials. The collected outcomes showed that a Western-type diet, rich in red and processed meats, refined grains, high-energy drinks and sweets, trans and saturated fats was associated with poor semen quality. Whereby higher intakes of fruits and vegetables, whole grains, omega-3 and poultry showed beneficial effects. However, as only selected groups were examined, more research is needed to project such findings onto the wider population. The reviewed evidence also included alcohol consumption, which showed high alcohol intake closely correlated to declining sperm concentrations. Whilst the verdict on caffeine consumption and the impact on sperm quality was inconclusive. In addition, several interventional studies evaluated the effect of dietary supplementation on various parameters of semen, where coenzyme Q10, L-carnitine, vitamin E, antioxidants, combined nutrient formulations and herbal blends all had positive outcomes. The review on zinc and folic acid supplementation yielded mixed results. This brief recap of the current evidence on environmental, lifestyle and nutritional influences on male infertility summarises the dietary foundations for the support of unexplained male infertility.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Male unexplained infertility has long been suspected to result from environmental, lifestyle and nutritional factors. However, the literature on the subject is still scarce, and clinical studies providing robust evidence are even scarcer. In addition, some similar studies come to different conclusions. Dietary pattern can influence spermatogenesis by its content of fatty acids and antioxidants. Yet, in an age of industrialized mass food production, human bodies become more exposed to the ingestion of xenobiotics, as well as chemicals used for production, preservation, transportation and taste enhancement of foods. We attempted in this paper to collect the available evidence to date on the effect of nutritional components on male fertility. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic search of the relevant literature published in PubMed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Database was conducted. Literature was evaluated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa- Scale. RESULTS Epidemiological observations are concordant in demonstrating an association of low-quality sperm parameters with higher intake of red meat, processed and organ meat and fullfat dairy. On the contrary, better semen parameters were observed in subjects consuming a healthy diet, rich in fruit, vegetables, whole grains and fish. Evidences of the negative impact on male fertility of by-products of water disinfection, accumulation in food chain of persistent organochlorine pollutants, pesticides, phthalates from food and water containers and hormones used in breeding cattle have been reported. Clinical trials of the effects of micronutrients on semen parameters and outcomes of assisted fertilization are encouraging, although optimal modality of treatment should be established. CONCLUSIONS Although quality of evidence should be ameliorated, it emerges that environmental factors can influence male fertility. Some nutrients may enhance fertility whereas others will worsen it. With diagnostic analysis on a molecular or even sub-molecular level, new interactions with micronutrients or molecular components of our daily ingested foods and leisure drugs may lead to a better understanding of so far suspected but as yet unexplained effects on male spermatogenesis and fertility.
-
10.
Respiratory and Allergic Effects in Children Exposed to Pesticides-A Systematic Review.
Buralli, RJ, Dultra, AF, Ribeiro, H
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(8)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Agricultural pesticides are harmful chemicals used to protect plants from pests and diseases. There has been previous research showing a link between pesticide usage and respiratory symptoms, asthma, allergies, and lung function irregularities in children. To evaluate the relationship between pesticide usage and allergic and respiratory effects in children, 21 studies were included in this systematic review. This systematic review reports an association between multiple sources of pesticide exposure during fetal and early development and respiratory symptoms and allergies among children. Compared to high-income countries, children in the middle- and low-income countries were exposed to multiple pesticide sources. As current scientific evidence is sparse, more research is needed to determine the causal relationship between pesticides and respiratory and allergic symptoms in children. Robust research in low- and middle-income countries is necessary. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the harmful effects of pesticide exposure in children and to take clinical decisions to reduce the exposure and its effects.
Abstract
Pesticide exposure may affect children's respiratory and allergic health, although results from epidemiological studies have not reached consensus. This review aims to analyze the scientific evidence on respiratory and allergic effects of exposure to agricultural pesticides in children aged up to 12 years old. The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo, and Lilacs were screened to select articles published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese, and 21 articles were included in this review. Most investigations were conducted in North America (mostly in the United States), while no studies conducted in Latin America or Africa were found, despite their intensive use of pesticides. Children are exposed to pesticides through multiple pathways from the prenatal period throughout later developmental stages and may experience several respiratory effects. Most studies (79%) found positive associations with pesticide exposure and children's respiratory and allergic effects such as asthma, wheezing, coughs, acute respiratory infections, hay fever, rhinitis, eczema, chronic phlegm, and lung function impairments. Contrastingly, 21% of the studies found no associations between pesticide exposure and children's respiratory health. The vast differences among the characteristics of the studies hamper any comparison of the results. Exposure to pesticides may have several impacts on childhood respiratory health. More studies must be conducted, especially in low- and middle-income countries, preferably with comparable research protocols adapted to local realities. Efforts should be made to develop comprehensive risk mitigation strategies and behavioral interventions to reduce children's exposure to pesticides used in agriculture and respiratory health effects, and to ensure healthy childhood growth.