1.
Effect of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Acute Fracture Healing: A Phase II Screening Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.
Slobogean, GP, Bzovsky, S, O'Hara, NN, Marchand, LS, Hannan, ZD, Demyanovich, HK, Connelly, DW, Adachi, JD, Thabane, L, Sprague, S
JBMR plus. 2023;7(1):e10705
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Almost half of all adult patients with fractures are vitamin D deficient. The aim of this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of different vitamin D regimens on the healing of acute tibia and femur fractures. 102 18-50-year-old patients were enrolled in the study and randomised to receive a) two high doses (150,000 IU) at time of injury and after 6 weeks, b) 4000 IU daily, c) 600 IU daily or d) placebo for 3 months. After 3 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the 3 intervention groups with respect to clinical or radiographic outcomes of fracture healing. The authors report a significantly better clinical, but not radiographic, outcome for 4000 IU per day versus placebo with a p-value of 0.15 (note: generally, to be considered statistically significant, p should be < 0.05). Similar results were observed after 12 months. There was no significant correlation between vitamin D levels and fracture healing. The authors concluded that high dose vitamin D may confer a modest benefit for fracture healing but that this requires confirmation from a larger clinical trial.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The evidence base for the use of vitamin D supplements in isolation to support fracture healing is weak.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
- Low levels of vitamin D can have negative effects on bone metabolism and healing of fractures
- Almost half of all adult fracture patients are vitamin D deficient
- The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of supplementing vitamin D3 (VD3) to improve tibia and femur fracture healing.
Methods
- Four-arm, double-blind, randomised, phase II screening, placebo-controlled trial
- 102 adult patients (aged 18-50 years) with a non-osteoporotic tibial or femoral shaft fracture were randomised into 1 of 4 treatment groups
- Just over half (56%) of participants were vitamin D3 deficient at baseline
- Intervention groups: 1) 150,000 IU VD3 loading dose at injury and at 6 weeks (high loading) plus daily placebo; 2) placebo loading doses plus 4000 IU VD3 daily (high dose); 3) placebo loading doses plus 600 IU VD3 daily (low dose); 4) placebo loading dose plus placebo daily
- Duration: 3 months intervention, further 9 months follow-up. Vitamin D levels were assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months.
Primary outcome measures at 3 months:
- Clinical assessment using the Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT)
- Radiographic assessment using the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (RUST).
Secondary outcomes: as above at 6, 9 and 12 months.
Results at 3 months:
- No statistically significant difference between high loading and high dose, high and low dose or low dose and placebo for either clinical or radiological assessment (all p-values ≥0.4)
- Post-hoc analysis of any dose vs placebo showed no significant difference with either clinical or radiological assessment (all p-values ≥0.25)
- Post-hoc analysis of high dose vs placebo showed no significant difference for radiological assessment (p=0.76) whilst it was reported as statistically significant for clinical assessment with p=0.16, with a benefit of VD3 supplementation.
- Similar results were seen at 12 months with reported benefit of high dose VD3 for fracture healing with p=0.18
- Vitamin D levels improved in all 3 VD3 groups from baseline to 6 weeks
- There was no statistically significant correlation between fracture healing and vitamin D level.
Conclusion
The authors conclude that VD3 supplementation may be of modest benefit for fracture healing, but further, larger trials are needed to confirm this.
Clinical practice applications:
- When working with clients who present with a fracture, it should be noted that the evidence for benefit of vitamin D supplementation alone for fracture healing is weak.
Considerations for future research:
- Larger studies to increase the statistical power to detect smaller benefits are required
- Larger studies may also identify differences in potential benefits between patient populations with different baseline levels of vitamin D.
Abstract
Nearly half of adult fracture patients are vitamin D deficient (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels <20 ng/mL). Many surgeons advocate prescribing vitamin D supplements to improve fracture healing outcomes; however, data supporting the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplements to improve acute fracture healing are lacking. We tested the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation for improving tibia and femur fracture healing. We conducted a single-center, double-blinded phase II screening randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Patients aged 18-50 years receiving an intramedullary nail for a tibia or femoral shaft fracture were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive (i) 150,000 IU loading dose vitamin D3 at injury and 6 weeks (n = 27); (ii) 4000 IU vitamin D3 daily (n = 24); (iii) 600 IU vitamin D3 daily (n = 24); or (iv) placebo (n = 27). Primary outcomes were clinical fracture healing (Function IndeX for Trauma [FIX-IT]) and radiographic fracture healing (Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures [RUST]) at 3 months. One hundred two patients with a mean age of 29 years (standard deviation 8) were randomized. The majority were male (69%), and 56% were vitamin D3 deficient at baseline. Ninety-nine patients completed the 3-month follow-up. In our prespecified comparisons, no clinically important or statistically significant differences were detected in RUST or FIX-IT scores between groups when measured at 3 months and over 12 months. However, in a post hoc comparison, high doses of vitamin D3 were associated with improved clinical fracture healing relative to placebo at 3 months (mean difference [MD] 0.90, 80% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 1.79; p = 0.16) and within 12 months (MD 0.89, 80% CI, 0.05 to 1.74; p = 0.18). The study was designed to identify potential evidence to support the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation in improving acute fracture healing. Vitamin D3 supplementation, particularly high doses, might modestly improve acute tibia or femoral shaft fracture healing in healthy adults, but confirmatory studies are required. The Vita-Shock trial was awarded the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's (OTA) Bovill Award in 2020. This award is presented annually to the authors of the most outstanding OTA Annual Meeting scientific paper. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
2.
Daily Nutritional Supplementation with Vitamin D₃ and Phenylbutyrate to Treatment-Naïve HIV Patients Tested in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Ashenafi, S, Amogne, W, Kassa, E, Gebreselassie, N, Bekele, A, Aseffa, G, Getachew, M, Aseffa, A, Worku, A, Hammar, U, et al
Nutrients. 2019;11(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Poor nutritional status is common among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients including vitamin D (vitD3) deficiency. VitD3 together with phenylbutyrate (PBA) can induce an antimicrobial peptide called cathelicidin which has anti-viral properties. VitD3 and PBA can also enhance autophagy, a physiological process known to enhance destruction of intracellular viruses. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate whether vitD3 + PBA could reduce viral replication and restore immune and nutritional status in HIV infection. 173 previously untreated HIV patients were randomised to receive either 5000 IU vitD3 and 500 mg PBA or placebos for 16 weeks with follow-up of a further 8 weeks. Most subjects had low plasma vitD3 levels at baseline which increased significantly in the vitD3 + PBA group compared with placebo at weeks 4, 8 and 16, indicating good compliance and response to the treatment. There were no statistical differences in any of the measured outcomes, including viral load, CD4 cells, CD8 cells and body mass index, between treatment and placebo group at any point during the study and follow-up.
Abstract
Poor nutritional status is common among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients including vitamin D (vitD₃) deficiency. We conducted a double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, to investigate if daily nutritional supplementation with vitD₃ (5000 IU) and phenylbutyrate (PBA, 2 × 500 mg) could mediate beneficial effects in treatment-naïve HIV patients. Primary endpoint: the change in plasma HIV-1 comparing week 0 to 16 using modified intention-to-treat (mITT, n = 197) and per-protocol (n = 173) analyses. Secondary endpoints: longitudinal HIV viral load, T cell counts, body mass index (BMI), middle-upper-arm circumference (MUAC), and 25(OH)D₃ levels in plasma. Baseline characteristics were detectable viral loads (median 7897 copies/mL), low CD4⁺ (median 410 cells/µL), and elevated CD8⁺ (median 930 cells/µL) T cell counts. Most subjects were vitD₃ deficient at enrolment, but a gradual and significant improvement of vitD₃ status was demonstrated in the vitD₃ + PBA group compared with placebo (p < 0.0001) from week 0 to 16 (median 37.5 versus 115.5 nmol/L). No significant changes in HIV viral load, CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cell counts, BMI or MUAC could be detected. Clinical adverse events were similar in both groups. Daily vitD₃ + PBA for 16 weeks was well-tolerated and effectively improved vitD₃ status but did not reduce viral load, restore peripheral T cell counts or improve BMI or MUAC in HIV patients with slow progressive disease. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01702974.
3.
Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Birth Size: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Maugeri, A, Barchitta, M, Blanco, I, Agodi, A
Nutrients. 2019;11(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Vitamin D deficiency may affect mother and neonatal outcomes, increasing the risk of pregnancy complications, preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), and poor offspring health. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effects of oral vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on foetal growth and incidence of LBW and SGA births. 13 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), published between 1980 and 2016, were included in the meta-analysis, including in total 2016 newborns (1184 from mothers in the intervention groups and 832 from controls). Dosages ranged from 200-4000 IU for daily intakes and 35000 IU to 600000 IU for single or intermittent administration. Whilst there was no evidence for publication bias (e.g. an over-reporting of positive outcomes), overall, the quality of the reviewed studies varied from very low (head circumference) to moderate (birth weight, birth length, LBW, and SGA). All studies evaluating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D (OHD) levels showed that intervention significantly increased 25-OHD concentration in both mothers and infants. The meta-analysis showed that vitamin D supplementation significantly increased birth weight and length, independent of dosage and whether vitamin D was administered daily or in single/intermittent high dosages. Head circumference was increased in a non-dose dependent way with daily but not with single/intermittent vitamin D supplementation. Effects on all three parameters were seen when vitamin D was supplemented alone, but not in combination with other nutrients. Both, risk of LBW and SGA, were also significantly reduced with vitamin D supplementation.
Abstract
During pregnancy, vitamin D supplementation may be a feasible strategy to help prevent low birthweight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA) births. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is inconclusive, probably due to heterogeneity in study design and type of intervention. A systematic literature search in the PubMed-Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was carried out to evaluate the effects of oral vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on birthweight, birth length, head circumference, LBW, and SGA. The fixed-effects or random-effects models were used to calculate mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). On a total of 13 RCTs, maternal vitamin D supplementation had a positive effect on birthweight (12 RCTs; MD = 103.17 g, 95% CI 62.29⁻144.04 g), length (6 RCTs; MD = 0.22 cm, 95% CI 0.11⁻0.33 cm), and head circumference (6 RCTs; MD:0.19 cm, 95% CI 0.13⁻0.24 cm). In line with these findings, we also demonstrated that maternal vitamin D supplementation reduced the risk of LBW (3 RCTs; RR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.22⁻0.74) and SGA (5 RCTS; RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51⁻0.92). The present systematic review and meta-analysis confirmed the well-established effect of maternal vitamin D supplementation on birth size. However, further research is required to better define risks and benefits associated with such interventions and the potential implications for public health.