-
1.
Effects of Wholegrain Compared to Refined Grain Intake on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers, Gut Microbiota, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Children: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Madsen, MTB, Landberg, R, Nielsen, DS, Zhang, Y, Anneberg, OMR, Lauritzen, L, Damsgaard, CT
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2024;119(1):18-28
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
High consumption of wholegrain foods has been linked to a lower risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes. Some trials have shown benefits to body weight, blood lipids and glucose homeostasis but most of these studies are with adults. Cardiometabolic disease begins in childhood therefore data is needed for this age group to back up dietary recommendations in order to prevent later development of cardiometabolic disease. The aim of this randomized crossover trial was to look at the effects of wholegrain oats and rye intake on serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL), cholesterol and plasma insulin, other cardiometabolic markers, body composition, the composition of the gut microbiome and gastrointestinal symptoms in children with high body mass index (BMI). 55 healthy Danish children (aged 8 – 13) took part. They ate wholegrain oats and rye (WG) or refined grain products (RG) ad libtum for 8 weeks in random order. Measurements were taken at 0, 8 and 16 weeks. Compared with RG, WG reduced LDL cholesterol as well as total:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triacylglycerol. WG also modulated the abundance of specific types of gut bacteria, increased plasma acetate, propionate, and butyrate and fecal butyrate and reduced fatigue with no other effects on gut symptoms. This study supports the recommendation to swap refined grain for wholegrain oats and rye in children. Further studies are needed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wholegrain intake is associated with lower risk of cardiometabolic diseases in adults, potentially via changes in the gut microbiota. Although cardiometabolic prevention should start early, we lack evidence on the effects in children. OBJECTIVES This study investigated the effects of wholegrain oats and rye intake on serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and plasma insulin (coprimary outcomes), other cardiometabolic markers, body composition, gut microbiota composition and metabolites, and gastrointestinal symptoms in children with high body mass index (BMI). METHODS In a randomized crossover trial, 55 healthy Danish 8- to 13-y-olds received wholegrain oats and rye ("WG") or refined grain ("RG") products ad libitum for 8 wk in random order. At 0, 8, and 16 wk, we measured anthropometry, body composition by dual-energy absorptiometry, and blood pressure. Fasting blood and fecal samples were collected for analysis of blood lipids, glucose homeostasis markers, gut microbiota, and short-chain fatty acids. Gut symptoms and stool characteristics were determined by questionnaires. Diet was assessed by 4-d dietary records and compliance by plasma alkylresorcinols (ARs). RESULTS Fifty-two children (95%) with a BMI z-score of 1.5 ± 0.6 (mean ± standard deviation) completed the study. They consumed 108 ± 38 and 3 ± 2 g/d wholegrain in the WG and RG period, which was verified by a profound difference in ARs (P < 0.001). Compared with RG, WG reduced LDL cholesterol by 0.14 (95% confidence interval: -0.24, -0.04) mmol/L (P = 0.009) and reduced total:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.001) and triacylglycerol (P = 0.048) without altering body composition or other cardiometabolic markers. WG also modulated the abundance of specific bacterial taxa, increased plasma acetate, propionate, and butyrate and fecal butyrate and reduced fatigue with no other effects on gut symptoms. CONCLUSION High intake of wholegrain oats and rye reduced LDL cholesterol and triacylglycerol, modulated bacterial taxa, and increased beneficial metabolites in children. This supports recommendations of exchanging refined grain with wholegrain oats and rye among children. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04430465.
-
2.
Efficacy of probiotic treatment as post-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19: A double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized trial.
Wischmeyer, PE, Tang, H, Ren, Y, Bohannon, L, Jiang, D, Bergens, M, Ramirez, ZE, Andermann, TM, Messina, JA, Sung, JA, et al
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2024;43(1):259-267
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection, continues to pose a unique and novel challenge to global health. Ongoing research is showing a potentially significant role of the microbiome and dysbiosis in COVID-19 disease severity and development of Long-Covid. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) as post-exposure prophylaxis against COVID-19. This study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomised to receive LGG or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Results showed that the participants randomised to LGG had fewer symptoms and prolonged time to development of COVID-19 compared to those receiving placebo. Additionally, probiotic supplementation also reduced symptomatic disease, and changed the gut microbiome structure. Authors conclude that their findings lend credence to the notion that symbiotic microbes may be valuable partners in the fight against COVID-19 and potentially other future pandemic diseases.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose unprecedented challenges to worldwide health. While vaccines are effective, additional strategies to mitigate the spread/severity of COVID-19 continue to be needed. Emerging evidence suggests susceptibility to respiratory tract infections in healthy subjects can be reduced by probiotic interventions; thus, probiotics may be a low-risk, low-cost, and easily implementable modality to reduce risk of COVID-19. METHODS In this initial study, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across the United States testing probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) as postexposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in 182 participants who had household exposure to someone with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed within ≤7 days. Participants were randomized to receive oral LGG or placebo for 28 days. The primary outcome was development of illness symptoms within 28 days of COVID-19 exposure. Stool was collected to evaluate microbiome changes. RESULTS Intention-to-treat analysis showed LGG treatment led to a lower likelihood of developing illness symptoms versus placebo (26.4 % vs. 42.9 %, p = 0.02). Further, LGG was associated with a statistically significant reduction in COVID-19 diagnosis (log rank, p = 0.049) via time-to-event analysis. Overall incidence of COVID-19 diagnosis did not significantly differ between LGG and placebo groups (8.8 % vs. 15.4 %, p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS This data suggests LGG is associated with prolonged time to COVID-19 infection, reduced incidence of illness symptoms, and gut microbiome changes when used as prophylaxis ≤7 days post-COVID-19 exposure, but not overall incidence. This initial work may inform future COVID-19 prevention studies worldwide, particularly in developing nations where Lacticaseibacillus probiotics have previously been utilized to reduce other non-COVID infectious-morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04399252, Date: 22/05/2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04399252.
-
3.
Prebiotic diet changes neural correlates of food decision-making in overweight adults: a randomised controlled within-subject cross-over trial.
Medawar, E, Beyer, F, Thieleking, R, Haange, SB, Rolle-Kampczyk, U, Reinicke, M, Chakaroun, R, von Bergen, M, Stumvoll, M, Villringer, A, et al
Gut. 2024;73(2):298-310
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
It is thought that there is a connection between the gut microbiota and the brain and that prebiotics which fuel these gut microbiota may be able to affect mood and decision making. This randomised control trial of 59 individuals with overweight aimed to determine if supplementation of prebiotic fibre in the form of inulin could affect the desire for food. The results showed that compared to placebo individuals given inulin had a lower desire towards high caloric foods in conjunction with a change in the composition of the gut microbiota, especially Bifidobacteriaceae. It was concluded that prebiotics may be able to alter food-related decision making and alter the composition of the gut microbiota. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that individuals who are overweight may choose unhealthy foods due to an imbalance in their gut microbiota. These individuals may benefit from prebiotic fibre to help aid microbiota changes and empowerment over food choices.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Animal studies suggest that prebiotic, plant-derived nutrients could improve homoeostatic and hedonic brain functions through improvements in microbiome-gut-brain communication. However, little is known if these results are applicable to humans. Therefore, we tested the effects of high-dosed prebiotic fibre on reward-related food decision-making in a randomised controlled within-subject cross-over study and assayed potential microbial and metabolic markers. DESIGN 59 overweight young adults (19 females, 18-42 years, body mass index 25-30 kg/m2) underwent functional task MRI before and after 14 days of supplementary intake of 30 g/day of inulin (prebiotics) and equicaloric placebo, respectively. Short chain fatty acids (SCFA), gastrointestinal hormones, glucose/lipid and inflammatory markers were assayed in fasting blood. Gut microbiota and SCFA were measured in stool. RESULTS Compared with placebo, participants showed decreased brain activation towards high-caloric wanted food stimuli in the ventral tegmental area and right orbitofrontal cortex after prebiotics (preregistered, family wise error-corrected p <0.05). While fasting blood levels remained largely unchanged, 16S-rRNA sequencing showed significant shifts in the microbiome towards increased occurrence of, among others, SCFA-producing Bifidobacteriaceae, and changes in >60 predicted functional signalling pathways after prebiotic intake. Changes in brain activation correlated with changes in Actinobacteria microbial abundance and associated activity previously linked with SCFA production, such as ABC transporter metabolism. CONCLUSIONS In this proof-of-concept study, a prebiotic intervention attenuated reward-related brain activation during food decision-making, paralleled by shifts in gut microbiota. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03829189.
-
4.
Synbiotic as an ameliorating factor in the health-related quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. A randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Hariri, Z, Yari, Z, Hoseini, S, Abhari, K, Sohrab, G
BMC women's health. 2024;24(1):19
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), as a chronic endocrine disorder, can affect many aspects of young women’s lives. Apart from physical complications, women with polycystic ovary syndrome are more likely to suffer from mental and behavioural disorders. The aim of this study was to examine whether synbiotic supplementation could improve the health quality of life of women with PCOS. This study was a triple-blind, randomised clinical trial which recruited women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Participants were randomly divided into synbiotic or placebo groups for 12 weeks. Results showed that synbiotic supplementation improved the scores of emotional, body hair, weight and infertility domains of PCOSQ-26 compared to placebo group. Authors concluded that 12-week supplementation with synbiotics could noticeably improve the emotional, body hair, weight, infertility and general physical health status of women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are complicated mechanisms that link the disruption of the gut microbiome to the symptoms and complications of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In this study, an attempt was made to assess the effects of synbiotics on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in women with PCOS . METHODS Fifty-six women with PCOS were enrolled in a triple-blind controlled trial for 12 weeks. They were randomly assigned to receive a daily 2-gram synbiotic sachets (containing Bacillus coagulans (GBI-30), Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus helveticus, and fructooligosaccharide) (n = 28) or placebo (n = 28). To evaluate the impact on the HRQoL, participants were required to fill 26-Item Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (PCOSQ-26), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) pre and post the intervention. RESULTS Finally, statistical analyses were performed on 52 participants who finished the trial. Synbiotic supplementation improved the scores of emotional (P = 0.044), body hair (P = 0.016), weight (P = 0.033) and infertility domains (P = 0.027) of PCOSQ-26 compared to placebo group. The physical score within SF-12 also had a significant enhancement (P = 0.035). No significant improvement was seen in the PSS-10 score at the end of the trial. CONCLUSION This study illustrated the advantageous effects of synbiotics on the health-related quality of life in women with PCOS. Further studies are required to confirm our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION http://www.irct.ir : IRCT20211108053007N1; date of registration: 14/02/2023.
-
5.
A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet may lead to improvement of intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in more conditions than irritable bowel syndrome and congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency.
Roth, B, Ohlsson, B
Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.). 2024;117:112254
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Studies have shown that a starch and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD) leads to considerable improvements of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The purpose of this pilot study was to see if a SSRD would be beneficial in other conditions with similar symptoms. Two people took part in the study. A man with functional diarrhoea and a woman with microscopic colitis. The SSRD consists of low intakes of sugar-rich products, but continued or increased intakes of all meats and fish, fat, natural dairy products, eggs, berries, fruits, nuts, seeds, and vegetables low in starch. Fiber-rich bread and pasta and raw or wild rice were recommended instead of white bread and more processed rice and pasta. During the 4-week intervention, the participants lost weight and waist circumference reduced. The degree of satiety after a meal was increased and the sweet cravings were strongly reduced. The gastrointestinal symptoms improved in the participant with diarrhoea but was unaffected in the participant with microscopic colitis. Reductions of diarrhoea and of bloating and flatulence were most pronounced in both patients. The psychological well-being was improved during the intervention. Extraintestinal symptoms were also reduced during the SSRD, especially urinary urgency and belching. This is a small intervention study and therefore not possible to make generalised claims or recommendations. However, healthcare practitioners could look at SSRD when working with IBS patients as a therapeutic dietary option.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet has been found to improve gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome, as well as reduce weight and improve psychological well-being. Our hypothesis was that a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet would also be beneficial in other conditions with similar symptoms. The aim of the present research letter was to describe the role of a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet in a pilot project in patients with diarrhea having varying causes. METHODS One man, age 36 y, suffering from functional diarrhea and one woman, 56 y, suffering from microscopic colitis, were randomized to a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet for 4 wk. At baseline, dietary information was given, and blood samples collected. Weight and waist circumference were measured. The participants completed the irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system for evaluating specific gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms and visual analog scale for irritable bowel syndrome for evaluation of specific gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological well-being. The degrees of satiety and sweet craving were measured on visual analog scales. After 4 wk, all procedures were repeated. RESULTS Weight, body mass index, and waist circumference were decreased during the intervention. The total amount of gastrointestinal symptoms was decreased in the participants with functional diarrhea, and diarrhea and bloating were decreased in both participants. Both had reduced extraintestinal symptoms and improved psychological well-being. Blood levels had mainly unchanged or slightly increased values of measurements reflecting nutrient intake. CONCLUSIONS A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet may lead to weight reduction, reduced symptoms, and improved well-being in several patient categories, not only in patients suffering from irritable bowel syndrome. Future randomized trials should be done.
-
6.
Oral compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life for patients with lung cancer during chemotherapy: A randomized placebo-controlled study.
Wei, H, Yue, Z, Han, J, Chen, P, Xie, K, Sun, Y, Zhu, J
Thoracic cancer. 2024;15(2):182-191
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy occupies an important role in the management of lung cancer; however, there are treatment-associated side effects. These symptoms may deteriorate the quality of life for patients undergoing chemotherapy, and even necessitate dose reduction or discontinuation. The aim of this study was to determine whether oral compound probiotic supplements can reduce chemotherapy-related adverse effects and improve lung cancer patients' quality of life during chemotherapy. This study was a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical study. A total of 100 lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy where enrolled for the study. They were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: intervention (probiotics) vs placebo. Results showed that the participants receiving probiotic supplements were significantly better in various dimensions of the overall quality of life, role function, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhoea relative to the placebo group. Authors concluded that compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life and relieve platinum-based doublet chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal adverse reactions for lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy is an important approach for lung cancer patients. The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of the compound probiotic supplements in improving the quality of life for lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled chemotherapy-naive patients with lung cancer who were scheduled to receive platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. All eligible patients were randomly administered (1:1) compound probiotic supplements (group BP-1) or placebo (group C) for two chemotherapy cycles. The EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire scores were evaluated before the first, second, and third cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in the EROTC QLQ C30 questionnaire score between the two groups after two cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS A total of 110 patients were recruited from March 2021 to January 2022. After undergoing two cycles of chemotherapy, group BP-1 were significantly better in various dimensions of the overall quality of life, role function, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea relative to group C (76.90 ± 18.31 vs. 58.89 ± 17.17; 93.33 ± 11.58 vs. 85.93 ± 15.06; 0.00 ± 0.00 vs. 27.04 ± 29.15; 6.67 ± 13.53 vs. 22.22 ± 18.80; 0.95 ± 5.63 vs. 28.15 ± 22.42; 2.86 ± 9.47 vs. 15.56 ± 16.82; p < 0.05, respectively). The incidence of nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea in group BP-1 was significantly lower than in group C (0% vs. 71.43%, 16.67% vs. 57.14%, 2.38% vs. 63.27%, and 7.14% vs. 42.86%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life and relieve chemotherapy-related gastrointestinal side effects for lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1800019269).
-
7.
Collinsella aerofaciens as a predictive marker of response to probiotic treatment in non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome.
Gargari, G, Mantegazza, G, Cremon, C, Taverniti, V, Valenza, A, Barbaro, MR, Marasco, G, Duncan, R, Fiore, W, Ferrari, R, et al
Gut microbes. 2024;16(1):2298246
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut-brain interaction in which recurrent abdominal pain is associated with defecation or a change in bowel habits. Various therapeutic options for IBS target the underlying pathophysiological aspects of the condition. Unfortunately, no single approach can effectively address this disorder’s diverse manifestations simultaneously. The aim of this study was to identify markers for recognising non-constipated (NC) IBS patients that may show significant clinical improvements upon treatment with the probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DG (LDG). This study is based on a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 63 patients were included in this study who were randomised to receive a probiotic treatment or placebo capsules for 12 weeks. Results showed that the probiotic bacterium LDG can be clinically effective in a subgroup of non-constipated IBS patients characterised by an altered faecal microbiota which resembles that observed in metabolic syndrome-associated pathologic or pre-pathologic conditions. Furthermore, a bacterium reported to contribute to pro-inflammatory immune states, was positively associated with markers of increased endothelial permeability and liver functionality Authors concluded that an analysis of the faecal microbiota focused on particular bacteria could permit the identification of NC-IBS patients who can obtain a significant clinical benefit from the probiotic treatment.
Abstract
Probiotics are exploited for adjuvant treatment in IBS, but reliable guidance for selecting the appropriate probiotic to adopt for different forms of IBS is lacking. We aimed to identify markers for recognizing non-constipated (NC) IBS patients that may show significant clinical improvements upon treatment with the probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei DG (LDG). To this purpose, we performed a post-hoc analysis of samples collected during a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial in which NC-IBS patients were randomized to receive at least 24 billion CFU LDG or placebo capsules b.i.d. for 12 weeks. The primary clinical endpoint was the composite response based on improved abdominal pain and fecal type. The fecal microbiome and serum markers of intestinal (PV1 and zonulin), liver, and kidney functions were investigated. We found that responders (R) in the probiotic arm (25%) differed from non-responders (NR) based on the abundance of 18 bacterial taxa, including the families Coriobacteriaceae, Dorea spp. and Collinsella aerofaciens, which were overrepresented in R patients. These taxa also distinguished R (but not NR) patients from healthy controls. Probiotic intervention significantly reduced the abundance of these bacteria in R, but not in NR. Analogous results emerged for C. aerofaciens from the analysis of data from a previous trial on IBS with the same probiotic. Finally, C. aerofaciens was positively correlated with the plasmalemmal vesicle associated protein-1 (PV-1) and the markers of liver function. In conclusion, LDG is effective on NC-IBS patients with NC-IBS with a greater abundance of potential pathobionts. Among these, C. aerofaciens has emerged as a potential predictor of probiotic efficacy.
-
8.
A multidomain intervention against cognitive decline in an at-risk-population in Germany: Results from the cluster-randomized AgeWell.de trial.
Zülke, AE, Pabst, A, Luppa, M, Roehr, S, Seidling, H, Oey, A, Cardona, MI, Blotenberg, I, Bauer, A, Weise, S, et al
Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2024;20(1):615-628
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Due to ageing populations, there is a rapid increase in people living with dementia. A number of modifiable risk factors have been identified, including obesity, excessive alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus, depression, physical inactivity, smoking and social isolation. The aim of this cluster-randomised controlled trial, including 1030 participants at risk of developing dementia aged 60-77, was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidomain intervention which included optimisation of nutrition and medication, and physical, social, and cognitive activity for two years compared to standard care. There was no benefit of the intervention for the primary outcome global cognitive performance. The intervention had a positive effect on the secondary outcome health-related quality of life but did not have any significant effect on quality of life, depressive symptoms, social inclusion, activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. The study period coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic. Significantly more participants than controls reported perceived COVID-19-related restrictions with regards to nutrition, whilst there was no such differences between groups for physical, cognitive or social activity. Better adherence to the nutrition and social activity components of the programme were associated with better global cognitive performance, whilst there was no association with physical and cognitive activity.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We investigated the effectiveness of a multidomain intervention to preserve cognitive function in older adults at risk for dementia in Germany in a cluster-randomized trial. METHODS Individuals with a Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Dementia (CAIDE) risk score ≥ 9 aged 60 to 77 years were recruited. After randomization of their general practitioner (GP), patients received a multidomain intervention (including optimization of nutrition and medication, and physical, social, and cognitive activity) or general health advice and GP treatment as usual over 24 months. Primary outcome was global cognitive performance (composite z score, based on domain-specific neuropsychological tests). RESULTS Of 1030 participants at baseline, n = 819 completed the 24-month follow-up assessment. No differences regarding global cognitive performance (average marginal effect = 0.010, 95% confidence interval: -0.113, 0.133) were found between groups at follow-up. Perceived restrictions in intervention conduct by the COVID-19 pandemic did not impact intervention effectiveness. DISCUSSION The intervention did not improve global cognitive performance. HIGHLIGHTS Overall, no intervention effects on global cognitive performance were detected. The multidomain intervention improved health-related quality of life in the total sample. In women, the multidomain intervention reduced depressive symptoms. The intervention was completed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
9.
Exploration of differential responses to FODMAPs and gluten in people with irritable bowel syndrome- a double-blind randomized cross-over challenge study.
Nordin, E, Landberg, R, Hellström, PM, Brunius, C
Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society. 2024;20(2):21
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a complex condition characterized by recurrent abdominal pain associated with abnormal bowel habits. Diet is considered a main cause of symptoms in IBS, and fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) are of major concern. The aim of this study was to unravel determinants of differential IBS responses to FODMAP and gluten provocation interventions from molecular data. This study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled three-way crossover study. Participants were randomised in blocks of 12 into the sequences CBA, ACB, and BAC (A=FODMAPs, B=Gluten, and C=Placebo). Results showed that despite a comprehensive set of methods applied to explore IBS responses, including both regression and classification, predictors of differential response could not be established. Authors concluded by encouraging the application of molecular subtyping methodologies in future studies due to the differential responses to treatment.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is large variation in response to diet in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and determinants for differential response are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES Our aim was to investigate differential clinical and molecular responses to provocation with fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) and gluten in individuals with IBS. METHODS Data were used from a crossover study with week-long interventions with either FODMAPs, gluten or placebo. The study also included a rapid provocation test. Molecular data consisted of fecal microbiota, short chain fatty acids, and untargeted plasma metabolomics. IBS symptoms were evaluated with the IBS severity scoring system. IBS symptoms were modelled against molecular and baseline questionnaire data, using Random Forest (RF; regression and clustering), Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC), and univariate methods. RESULTS Regression and classification RF models were in general of low predictive power (Q2 ≤ 0.22, classification rate < 0.73). Out of 864 clustering models, only 2 had significant associations to clusters (0.69 < CR < 0.73, p < 0.05), but with no associations to baseline clinical measures. Similarly, PARAFAC revealed no clear association between metabolome data and IBS symptoms. CONCLUSION Differential IBS responses to FODMAPs or gluten exposures could not be explained from clinical and molecular data despite extensive exploration with different data analytical approaches. The trial is registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS gov as NCT03653689 31/08/2018.
-
10.
Efficacy of probiotics or synbiotics in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lou, J, Cui, S, Huang, N, Jin, G, Chen, C, Fan, Y, Zhang, C, Li, J
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2024;59:48-62
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The intestinal microbiota is a complex microbial community that plays an irreplaceable role in human life. Intestinal dysbiosis is very common in patients with critical illnesses. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics or synbiotics in preventing ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirty-three trials (n=4 retrospective studies and n=29 randomised controlled studies). A total of 7886 patients were grouped into the probiotics or synbiotics group (n= 4065) and control group (n= 3821). Results showed that probiotics or synbiotics significantly reduced the incidence of VAP and sepsis, as well as the duration of mechanical support, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and ICU morality. Authors concluded that probiotics or synbiotics supplementation plays a beneficial role in critically ill patients and presents a novel approach to the management of critical diseases.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This latest systematic review and meta-analysis aim to examine the effects of probiotic and synbiotic supplementation in critically ill patients. METHODS Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database, and the Web of Science. The primary output measure was the incident of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and the secondary outputs were diarrhea, Clostridium diffusion infection (CDI), incident of sepsis, incident of hospital acquired pneumonia, duration of mechanical exploitation, ICU mortality rate, length of ICU stay, in hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay. Data were pooled and expressed as Relative Risk(RR) and Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). RESULTS 33 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, with 4065 patients who received probiotics or synbiotics (treatment group) and 3821 patients who received standard care or placebo (control group). The pooled data from all included studies demonstrated that the treatment group has significantly reduced incidence of ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) (RR = 0.80; 95 % CI: 0.67-0.96; p = 0.021, I2 = 52.5 %) and sepsis (RR = 0.97; 95 % CI: 0.66-1.42; p = 0.032, I2 = 54.4 %), As well as significantly increased duration of mechanical exploitation (SMD = -0.47; 95 % CI: -0.74-0.20, p = 0.012, I2 = 63.4 %), ICU mobility (RR = 0.95; 95 % CI: 0.71-1.27; p = 0.004, I2 = 62.8 %), length of ICU stay (SMD = -0.29; 95 % CI: -0.58-0.01; p = 0.000, I2 = 82.3 %) and length of hospital stay (SMD = -0.33; 95 % CI: -0.57-0.08, p = 0.000, I2 = 74.2 %) than the control group. There were no significant differences in diarrhea, CDI, incidence of hospital acquired pneumonia, and in hospital mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis showed that probiotic and synbiotic supplements are beneficial for critically ill patients as they significantly reduce the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia and sepsis, as well as the duration of mechanical exploitation, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and ICU mortality. However, this intervention has minimal impact on diarrhea, CDI, incidence of hospital acquired pneumonia, and in hospital mortality in critically ill patients.