Search for atoxic cereals: a single blind, cross-over study on the safety of a single dose of Triticum monococcum, in patients with celiac disease.

BMC gastroenterology. 2013;13:92
Full text from:

Plain language summary

The only current treatment for coeliac disease (CD) is lifelong adherence to a gluten free diet (GFD). As many CD patients report this to be difficult, alternatives for a baking-quality wheat that does not contain gluten are sought. Triticum monococcum (TM) is an ancient wheat that has shown potential to be a non-toxic gluten alternative for patients with CD.  The aim of this study was to assess the safety of TM administration in patients with CD. 12 CD patients who have followed a gluten free diet for at least one year and were challenged with rice, gluten or TM, and followed for four weeks. The findings of this study showed that the safety of TM administration is inconclusive, though well tolerated by all patients. The authors encourage further investigation on this cereal as a harmless gluten alternative for CD patients. 

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cereals of baking quality with absent or reduced toxicity are actively sought as alternative therapy to a gluten-free diet (GFD) for patients with coeliac disease (CD). Triticum monococcum, an ancient wheat, is a potential candidate having no toxicity in in-vitro and ex-vivo studies. The aim of our study was to investigate on the safety of administration of a single dose of gluten of Tm in patients with CD on GFD. METHODS We performed a single blind, cross-over study involving 12 CD patients who had been on a GFD for at least 12 months, challenged on day 0, 14 and 28 with a single fixed dose of 2.5 grams of the following (random order): Tm, rice (as reference atoxic protein) and Amygluten (as reference toxic protein) dispersed in a gluten-free pudding. The primary end-point of the study was the change in intestinal permeability, as assessed by changes in the urinary lactulose/rhamnose ratio (L/R ratio) measured by High Pressure Liquid Chromatography. We also assessed the occurrence of adverse gastrointestinal events, graded for intensity and duration according to the WHO scale. Variables were expressed as mean ± SD; paired t-test and χ² test were used as appropriate. RESULTS The urinary L/R ratio did not change significantly upon challenge with the 3 cereals, and was 0.055 ± 0.026 for Tm Vs 0.058 ± 0.035 for rice (p = 0.6736) and Vs 0.063 ± 0.054 with Amygluten (p = 0.6071). Adverse gastrointestinal events were 8 for Tm, Vs 11 for rice (p = 0.6321) and Vs 31 for Amygluten p = 0.0016), and, in all cases events were graded as "mild" or "moderate" with TM and rice, and as "severe" or "disabling" in 4 cases during Amygluten. CONCLUSIONS No definite conclusion can be drawn on the safety of Tm, based on no change in urinary L/R because even Amygluten, a toxic wheat protein, did not cause a significant change in urinary L/R indicating low sensitivity of this methodology in studies on acute toxicity. Tm was, however, well tolerated by all patients providing the rationale for further investigation on the safety of this cereal for CD patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT-AIFA n2008-000697-20.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Digestive, absorptive and microbiological
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Gluten
Environmental Inputs : Diet
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition
Functional Laboratory Testing : Urine
Bioactive Substances : Triticummonococcum ; Gluten ; Amygluten

Methodological quality

Allocation concealment : Yes

Metadata

Nutrition Evidence keywords : Glutenfree ; Coeliacdisease ; Glutenalternatives ; Triticummonococcum