Plain language summary
Individuals with overweight and obesity are exposed to weight stigmatization in many domains of life, for example, in employment, in educational and health care settings, in the media as well as in interpersonal relationships. The aim of this study was to compare the psychometric properties and predictive values for health outcomes of two different self-report questionnaires (the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire and the Weight Bias Internalization Scale). This study was part of a larger project that investigated the impact of body contouring surgery after bariatric surgery on psychosocial aspects. It is a cross-sectional study which included all data of a subsample consisting of N = 78 patients prior bariatric surgery. Results indicate that both measures did not differ with respect to overall convergent validity and predictive values for multiple psychosocial health outcomes. Findings also showed that the Weight Bias Internalization Scale has better internal consistency compared to the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire. Authors suggest that clinical practice and research might give preference to the Weight Bias Internalization Scale in bariatric surgery samples because of the marginally better reliability, convergent validity, and greater predictive power.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internalized weight stigma has gained growing interest due to its association with multiple health impairments in individuals with obesity. Especially high internalized weight stigma is reported by individuals undergoing bariatric surgery. For assessing this concept, two different self-report questionnaires are available, but have never been compared: the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) and the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS). The purpose of the present study was to provide and to compare reliability, convergent validity with and predictive values for psychosocial health outcomes for the WSSQ and WBIS. METHODS The WSSQ and the WBIS were used to assess internalized weight stigma in N = 78 prebariatric surgery patients. Further, body mass index (BMI) was assessed and body image, quality of life, self-esteem, depression, and anxiety were measured by well-established self-report questionnaires. Reliability, correlation, and regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS Internal consistency of the WSSQ was acceptable, while good internal consistency was found for the WBIS. Both measures were significantly correlated with each other and body image. While only the WSSQ was correlated with overweight preoccupation, only the WBIS was correlated with appearance evaluation. Both measures were not associated with BMI. However, correlation coefficients did not differ between the WSSQ and the WBIS for all associations with validity measures. Further, both measures significantly predicted quality of life, self-esteem, depression, and anxiety, while the WBIS explained significantly more variance than the WSSQ total score for self-esteem. CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate the WSSQ and the WBIS to be reliable and valid assessments of internalized weight stigma in prebariatric surgery patients, although the WBIS showed marginally more favorable results than the WSSQ. For both measures, longitudinal studies on stability and predictive validity are warranted, for example, for weight-related and psychosocial outcomes.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
