Comparison of the Effectiveness of Lifestyle Modification with Other Treatments on the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in People at High Risk: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Nutrients. 2019;11(6)
Full text from:

Plain language summary

The prevalence of diabetes has been increasing worldwide. The accompanying increase in the prevalence of diabetes-related complications and the occurrence of diabetes are likely to have a substantial impact on healthcare costs. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of lifestyle modifications to other treatments for patients at high risk of type 2 diabetes. The study design is a systemic review of published literature and a network meta-analysis of data from each selected study. Forty-seven interventions were used for the analyses. The results of the meta-analysis highlight the efficacy of lifestyle modification in preventing the onset of type 2 diabetes in high-risk patients in comparison with standard treatment or placebo as well as other treatments. The proportion of patients with onset of type 2 diabetes in the intervention (lifestyle modification) group was approximately twice as low as compared to the control (standard intervention) group. Authors conclude that lifestyle modification is the superior treatment intervention among 12 treatments for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Many clinical trials have been conducted to verify the effects of interventions for prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2D) using different treatments and outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of lifestyle modifications (LM) with other treatments in persons at high risk of T2D by a network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS Searches were performed of PUBMED up to January 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials. The odds ratio (OR) with onset of T2D at 1 year in the intervention group (LM, dietary, exercise, or medication) versus a control group (standard treatments or placebo) were the effect sizes. Frequentist and Bayesian NMAs were conducted. RESULTS Forty-seven interventions and 12 treatments (20,113 participants) were used for the analyses. The OR in the LM was approximately 0.46 (95% CI: 0.33 to 0.61) times lower compared to the standard intervention by the Bayesian approach. The effects of LM compared to other treatments by indirect comparisons were not significant. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis further strengthened the evidence that LM reduces the onset of T2D compared to standard and placebo interventions and appears to be at least as effective as nine other treatments in preventing T2D.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Hormonal
Patient Centred Factors : Triggers/Lifestyle modifications
Environmental Inputs : Diet ; Nutrients ; Physical exercise
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition ; Exercise and movement
Functional Laboratory Testing : Not applicable

Methodological quality

Allocation concealment : Not applicable

Metadata