Efficacy of a 2-Month Very Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet (VLCKD) Compared to a Standard Low-Calorie Diet in Reducing Visceral and Liver Fat Accumulation in Patients With Obesity.

Frontiers in endocrinology. 2020;11:607
Full text from:

Plain language summary

Excess fat in the liver, known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), has been shown to increase the risk of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes. Standard treatment regimens consist of low-calorie (LC) diets and exercise, however these may be ineffective at reversing fat accumulation in the liver. A very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) has been proposed as an alternative treatment for NAFLD. This randomised control pilot study of 39 individuals with obesity aimed to compare LC diet and VLCKD on fat accumulation and indicators for NAFLD for two months. The results showed greater weight loss, abdominal fat reduction, liver fat reduction and improvements in liver function with VLCKD compared to the LC diet. Cholesterol was significantly reduced by both diets. However liver stiffness remained unchanged. The authors concluded that VLCKD was more successful at reducing liver fat and abdominal fat accumulation than current standard therapy and has the potential to improve NAFLD. Health care professionals could use this study to improve liver and abdominal fat loss in patients with obesity to improve NAFLD, when standard therapy has been inadequate.

Abstract

Background: Currently the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is based on weight loss through lifestyle changes, such as exercise combined with calorie-restricted dieting. Objectives: To assess the effects of a commercially available weight loss program based on a very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) on visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and liver fat content compared to a standard low-calorie (LC) diet. As a secondary aim, we evaluated the effect on liver stiffness measurements. Methods: Open, randomized controlled, prospective pilot study. Patients were randomized and treated either with an LC or a VLCKD and received orientation and encouragement to physical activity equally for both groups. VAT, liver fat fraction, and liver stiffness were measured at baseline and after 2 months of treatment using magnetic resonance imaging. Paired t-tests were used for comparison of continuous variables between visits and unpaired test between groups. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2-test. Pearson correlation was used to assess the association between VAT, anthropometric measures, and hepatic fat fraction. A significance level of the results was established at p < 0.05. Results: Thirty-nine patients (20 with VLCKD and 19 with LC) were evaluated at baseline and 2 months of intervention. Relative weight loss at 2 months was -9.59 ± 2.87% in the VLCKD group and -1.87 ± 2.4% in the LC group (p < 0.001). Mean reductions in VAT were -32.0 cm2 for VLCKD group and -12.58 cm2 for LC group (p < 0.05). Reductions in liver fat fraction were significantly more pronounced in the VLCKD group than in the LC group (4.77 vs. 0.79%; p < 0.005). Conclusion: Patients undergoing a VLCKD achieved superior weight loss, with significant VAT and liver fat fraction reductions when compared to the standard LC diet. The weight loss and rapid mobilization of liver fat demonstrated with VLCKD could serve as an effective alternative for the treatment of NAFLD. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04322110.

Lifestyle medicine

Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Obesity
Environmental Inputs : Diet
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition ; Exercise and movement
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood ; Urine

Methodological quality

Jadad score : 3
Allocation concealment : No

Metadata

Nutrition Evidence keywords : Obesity ; Low-calorie diet ; Cholesterol ; Weight loss