Plain language summary
Athletes who do endurance exercise sometimes experience low energy availability which can affect their performance. Low energy availability may lead to a syndrome called Relative energy deficiency in sports. This cross-sectional controlled study assessed the pre-race energy availability in twelve lean, healthy endurance athletes without pre-existing signs of relative energy deficiency. Results showed that two-thirds of the participants had low mean energy availability. Lower energy availability was associated with higher energy expenditure. Participants in the study deliberately restricted their energy intake to achieve an optimal body composition. This may have led to energy conservation in participants. However, the study failed to show any associations between energy conservation and energy availability. There is a need for more robust studies to determine the true cut-off value of energy availability in male endurance athletes. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the need for eating behaviour screening to reduce disordered eating in endurance athletes and the clinical applicability of energy conservation assessment.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low energy availability in male athletes has gained a lot of attention in recent years, but direct evidence of its effects on health and performance is lacking. The aim of this research was to objectively measure energy availability (EA) in healthy male endurance athletes without pre-existing relative energy deficiency signs during pre-race season. METHODS Twelve trained endurance athletes (performance level 3, 4, and 5) participated in the cross-sectional controlled laboratory study. Fat-free mass, exercise energy expenditure, and energy intake were measured to calculate EA. Resting energy expenditure was measured and estimated to assess energy conservation. Three specific performance tests were used to assess endurance, agility, and explosive strength performance. For psychological evaluation, the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire and a short Well-being questionnaire were completed. RESULTS Mean EA was 29.5 kcal/kg FFM/day. The majority (66.6%) had EA under the threshold for low EA in females. Critical cognitive restraint (≥13) was reported by 75% of participants. There were no differences in performance, blood values, or psychological evaluation when subjects were divided into two groups divided by EA = 30 kcal/kg FFM/day. Cognitive restraint was negatively associated with measured resting energy expenditure and energy conservation (r = -.578, p = .025 and r = -.549, p = .032, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The mean EA measured in this study supports the theory that the threshold for low EA in endurance male athletes might be under the threshold for females. In addition, we confirmed cognitive restraint could be useful for early detection of energy conservation. The high cognitive restraint as measured in our sample stressed the need of eating behavior screening in endurance athletes in order to reduce risk of any disordered eating patterns.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
