Plain language summary
Exercise-induced hormonal responses are controlled by the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis, a key regulator of homeostasis, which responds to stress by triggering a series of endocrine changes resulting in the release of testosterone (T) and cortisol (C). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between daily resting heart rate variability (HRV) and pre-exercise T:C ratio and evaluate the clinical utility (i.e., diagnostic validity and reliability) of daily HRV assessment in classifying atypical T:C ratio changes throughout a nine-week high-intensity functional training (HIFT) intervention. This study is a secondary analysis of a subset of participants from a larger study. Eight recreationally active men and women ages 18-35 were recruited for participation. Following 14 days of baseline HRV assessments, participants were randomized to either the treatment or control condition. Results show a statistically significant negative relationship between HRVdaily and the T:C ratio throughout 9-weeks of HIFT. Additionally, there was no significant relationship found between C and HRVdaily and neither sex nor group were significant factors. Authors conclude that their findings emphasize the potential of HRV for the guidance of training, however, as hormonal responses to training are highly individual, the creation of individual autonomic nervous systems and hormonal profiles would increase the accuracy of training stress modulation.
Abstract
The study purpose was to determine the relationship of resting heart rate variability (HRV) and testosterone to cortisol (T:C) ratio, along with the diagnostic ability of HRV to assess changes in T:C ratio during a 9-week high-intensity functional training intervention. Eight recreationally-active men (n = 4, age 24.25 ± 1.75 yrs, height 181.25 ± 3.86 cm, weight 79.68 ± 11.66 kg) and women (n = 4, age 26 ± 3.6 yrs, height 164.25 ± 3.3, weight 73.4 ± 8.42) completed daily HRV measurements (HRVdaily) using photoplethysmography via a commercially-available smartphone application along with weekly saliva samples. Saliva samples were analyzed for concentrations of testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Upon study completion 72 data points were available, due to participant compliance and inadequate saliva sample, 67 matched pairs of HRV and T:C ratio were analyzed. A statistically significant negative relationship (n = 67, r = -.315, p < 0.05) was found between HRVdaily and saliva T:C ratio concentrations within aggregate data. Individual participant relationships showed considerable variability (r = -0.101 - 0.665, p = 0.103 to 0.829 The model which best explained the data resulted in AIC = 130.247 with factors HRVdaily (β = -0.218, 95%CI = -0.391, -0.044, t = -2.46, p < 0.05), Sex (β = 0.450, 95%CI = -0.214, 1.114, t = 1.113, p = 0.242), and Group (β = -0.394, 95%CI = -1.089, 0.302, t = -1.11, p = 0.311). Diagnostically, HRVdaily demonstrates excellent sensitivity (95%), but poor specificity (5%) for detecting meaningful changes in T:C ratio. Assessment of HRVdaily may be a clinically valid proxy measure for monitoring hormonal changes throughout a training intervention.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
3
Allocation concealment
:
Yes
