EMG breakpoints for detecting anaerobic threshold and respiratory compensation point in recovered COVID-19 patients.

Laboratory of Physical Training Studies Applied to Health, Physical Education Department, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB, Brazil; Associate Graduate Programme in Physical Education UPE/UFPB, PB, Brazil; Lauro Wanderley University Hospital, UFPB, PB, Brazil; CLINAR - Exercise Physiology, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil. Electronic address: murillo.frazao@gmail.com.Clinical Physiology and Technological Innovation FICTI-CNPq, Brasília, DF, Brazil.Intervent - Infectology and Phyiotherapy, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.CLINAR - Exercise Physiology, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.Intervent - Infectology and Phyiotherapy, Aracaju, SE, Brazil; Unimed, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.Laboratory of Physical Training Studies Applied to Health, Physical Education Department, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB, Brazil; Associate Graduate Programme in Physical Education UPE/UFPB, PB, Brazil.Laboratory of Physical Training Studies Applied to Health, Physical Education Department, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB, Brazil; Associate Graduate Programme in Physical Education UPE/UFPB, PB, Brazil.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology. 2021;:102567

Abstract

INTRODUCTION A huge number of COVID-19 patients should be referred to rehabilitation programmes. Individualizing the exercise intensity by metabolic response provide good physiological results. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of EMG as a non-invasive determinant of the anaerobic threshold and respiratory compensation point, for more precise exercise intensity prescription. METHODS An observational cross-sectional study with 66 recovered COVID-19 patients was carried out. The patients underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test with simultaneous assessment of muscle electromyography in vastus lateralis. EMG breakpoints were analyzed during the ramp-up protocol. The first and second EMG breakpoints were used for anaerobic threshold and respiratory compensation point determination. RESULTS EMG and gas exchange analysis presented strong correlation in anaerobic threshold (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001) and respiratory compensation point detection (r = 0.99, p < 0.0001) detection. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a bias = -4.7 W (SD = 6.2 W, limits of agreement = -16.9 to 7.6) for anaerobic threshold detection in EMG compared to gas exchange analysis. In respiratory compensation point detection, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a bias = -2.1 W (SD = 4.5 W, limits of agreement = -10.9 to 6.6) in EMG compared to gas exchange analysis. EMG demonstrated a small effect size compared to gas exchange analysis in oxygen uptake and power output at anaerobic threshold and respiratory compensation point detection. CONCLUSIONS EMG analysis detects anaerobic threshold and respiratory compensation point without clinical significant difference than gas exchange analysis (gold standard method) in recovered COVID-19 patients.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Observational Study

Metadata