Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a global epidemic. Although it is a complex disease, it is mainly driven by weight gain. The benefits of weight loss for T2D are well known, but patients and healthcare practitioners do not have clear guidance as to which dietary strategies may be effective to achieve and to maintain weight loss. The aim of this study is to review a number of studies of weight loss diets in T2D patients to see which ones are the most effective. Also, to see which dietary patterns support type 2 diabetes remission. Greatest weight loss was reported with very low energy diets including formula meal replacements. Low-carbohydrate diets were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets. High-protein, Mediterranean, high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid, vegetarian and low-glycaemic-index diets all achieved minimal or no difference from control diets. Diets for weight management in people with type 2 diabetes do not support any particular macronutrient profile or style over others. Very low energy diets and formula meal replacements appear to be the most effective. Programmes including a hypocaloric formula ‘total diet replacement’ induction phase were most effective for type 2 diabetes remission. Further research is needed to assess longer-term impacts on weight, glycaemic control, clinical outcomes and diabetes complications.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Authors highlight current evidence on diets for T2D remission is limited but believe remission can be achieved if sufficient weight loss is maintained. The main contributor to HbA1c reduction and remission appears to be weight loss, irrespective of diet type
- Nice Guidelines highlight the remission of diabetes occurs when a patient no longer satisfies the diagnostic criteria, without receiving glucose-lowering medication. By 2019 in one UK GP practice 27% of the practice population with T2D who followed a LCD for 23 months, lost weight and lowered their HbA1c to 48 mmol/mol (NICE target range) in conjunction with prescribed medication
- This review highlights an opportunity for Nutritional Therapy Practitioners to successfully work with LCD approaches to support weight loss and improved HbA1c.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- 19 meta-analyses (MA) on weight-loss diets, involving 23 primary trials were assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2. Findings were synthesised by diet type and study quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies – of Interventions [ROBINS-I]) with GRADE applied
- Weight loss diets in the review included: Formula meal replacements (high quality, GRADE moderate) achieved 2.4 kg (95% CI −3.3, −1.4) greater weight loss over 12–52 weeks. Low-carbohydrate diets were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets (high quality, GRADE high). High-protein, Mediterranean, high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid, vegetarian and low-glycaemic-index diets all achieved minimal (0.3– 2 kg) or no difference from control diets (low to critically low quality, GRADE very low/moderate)
- Greatest weight loss was reported with very low energy diets (VLED), (400–500 kcal). However, this study found that low-carbohydrate diets (LCD) (21–70g of carbohydrate daily from1000–1500 kcal) were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets
- Time period of diets / length of observation / intervention: (1) Formula meal replacements (>12–52 wk), (2) LCDs ranged between (>8 wk to 4 years), (3) Very low energy diets (>8–12 wk), (4) High- protein (>4->8 wks), Mediterranean (>4->8 wk), high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid (>2wk), vegetarian (≥3wk) and low-glycaemic-index diets (≥6mo)
- Authors highlight weight reduction is fundamental for T2D management and remission
- This MA found that VLED and formula meal replacement appear the most effective approaches for weight management with T2D by providing less energy than self-administered food-based diets
- Potential pathophysiological mechanisms highlighted by authors are HbA1c reduction and remission which appear to be from weight loss, with only small differences between diet types assessed over 3–12 months, irrespective of diet type
- Study limitations: Many meta-analyses were of ‘low’ and ‘critically low’ AMSTAR 2 quality, predominantly through ‘no protocol reported’ (despite clear and sound methods) and no assessment of publication bias
- Most studies included European participants, such that findings may not be equally applicable to other ethnic and/or deprived communities. Durations of interventions varied, where weight regain is frequent over a longer period. Authors highlight evidence from clinical practice is needed to identify safe and effective approaches to achieve and maintain weight loss
- Authors highlight primary studies should use an RCT design, with data analyses conducted ‘blind’. They should define the intervention clearly (e.g., diets, physical activity, and behavioural and psychological support), and address separately the induction (usually 3–6 months) and maintenance (≥12 months)
- This research received no funding
- The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
- While this study found a variety of dietary compositions can be used effectively for weight management with T2D, VLED was successfully used to achieve remission for T2D
- Programmes with a ’total diet replacement’ induction phase were the most effective dietary approach for T2D remission (up to 61% of participants at 1 year).
Considerations for future research:
- Authors state future research should provide implementation with optimal support in real-life settings for weight loss, prevention of weight regain and remissions, rather than seek subtle differences from macronutrient compositions
- Future studies should report sufficient detail about macronutrient or micronutrient contents, or prescribed and reported energy intakes, including energy intake of nutrient-restricted diets.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Weight reduction is fundamental for type 2 diabetes management and remission, but uncertainty exists over which diet type is best to achieve and maintain weight loss. We evaluated dietary approaches for weight loss, and remission, in people with type 2 diabetes to inform practice and clinical guidelines. METHODS First, we conducted a systematic review of published meta-analyses of RCTs of weight-loss diets. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, up to 7 May 2021. We synthesised weight loss findings stratified by diet types and assessed meta-analyses quality with A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2. We assessed certainty of pooled results of each meta-analysis using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) (PROSPERO CRD42020169258). Second, we conducted a systematic review of any intervention studies reporting type 2 diabetes remission with weight-loss diets, in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, up to 10 May 2021. Findings were synthesised by diet type and study quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions [ROBINS-I]), with GRADE applied (PROSPERO CRD42020208878). RESULTS We identified 19 meta-analyses of weight-loss diets, involving 2-23 primary trials (n = 100-1587), published 2013-2021. Twelve were 'critically low' or 'low' AMSTAR 2 quality, with seven 'high' quality. Greatest weight loss was reported with very low energy diets, 1.7-2.1 MJ/day (400-500 kcal) for 8-12 weeks (high-quality meta-analysis, GRADE low), achieving 6.6 kg (95% CI -9.5, -3.7) greater weight loss than low-energy diets (4.2-6.3 MJ/day [1000-1500 kcal]). Formula meal replacements (high quality, GRADE moderate) achieved 2.4 kg (95% CI -3.3, -1.4) greater weight loss over 12-52 weeks. Low-carbohydrate diets were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets (high quality, GRADE high). High-protein, Mediterranean, high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid, vegetarian and low-glycaemic-index diets all achieved minimal (0.3-2 kg) or no difference from control diets (low to critically low quality, GRADE very low/moderate). For type 2 diabetes remission, of 373 records, 16 met inclusion criteria. Remissions at 1 year were reported for a median 54% of participants in RCTs including initial low-energy total diet replacement (low-risk-of-bias study, GRADE high), and 11% and 15% for meal replacements and Mediterranean diets, respectively (some concerns for risk of bias in studies, GRADE moderate/low). For ketogenic/very low-carbohydrate and very low-energy food-based diets, the evidence for remission (20% and 22%, respectively) has serious and critical risk of bias, and GRADE certainty is very low. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION Published meta-analyses of hypocaloric diets for weight management in people with type 2 diabetes do not support any particular macronutrient profile or style over others. Very low energy diets and formula meal replacement appear the most effective approaches, generally providing less energy than self-administered food-based diets. Programmes including a hypocaloric formula 'total diet replacement' induction phase were most effective for type 2 diabetes remission. Most of the evidence is restricted to 1 year or less. Well-conducted research is needed to assess longer-term impacts on weight, glycaemic control, clinical outcomes and diabetes complications.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
