Fit4Surgery for cancer patients during covid-19 lockdown - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands. Electronic address: tvgestel@diakhuis.nl.Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center Location VU, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Honorary Professor, Hull York Medical School and Teesside University, UK.Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center Location VU, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2022;(6):1189-1197

Abstract

BACKGROUND Prehabilitation is a promising method to enhance postoperative recovery, especially in patients suffering from cancer. Particularly during times of social distancing, providing home-based programmes may have become a suitable solution to increase compliance and effectiveness. METHODS In line with the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted including trials that investigated the effect of home-based prehabilitation (HBP) in patients undergoing surgery for cancer. The primary outcome was postoperative functional capacity (6 min walk test, 6MWT). Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and compliance. RESULTS Five randomized controlled trials were included with 351 patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer, oesophagogastric cancer, bladder cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. Three studies presented results of significant progress after eight weeks. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement of the 6MWT in the prehabilitation group compared to the control group preoperatively (MD 35.06; 95% CI 11.58 to 58.54; p = .003) and eight weeks postoperatively (MD 44.91; 95% CI 6.04 to 83.79; p = .02) compared to baseline. Compliance rate varied from 63% to 83% with no significant difference between prehabilitation and control groups. These data must be interpreted with caution because of a high amount of heterogeneity and small sample sizes. DISCUSSION In conclusion, HBP may enhance overall functional capacity of patients receiving oncological surgery compared to standard of care. This could be a promising alternative to hospital-based prehabilitation regarding the current pandemic and further digitalization in the future. In order to increase accessibility and effectiveness of prehabilitation, home-based solutions should be further investigated.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Meta-Analysis ; Review

Metadata