Long Term Weight Loss Diets and Obesity Indices: Results of a Network Meta-Analysis.

Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:821096
Full text from:

Other resources

Plain language summary

Obesity is associated with a decreased lifetime expectancy of 5–20 years, depending on the severity and the presence of comorbidities. Diet therapy remains one of the cornerstones of the multi-disciplinary approach to weight management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of long-term dietary interventions, categorised using the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges, with changes in weight parameters. This study is a systematic review and network meta-analysis of fifty studies. Results indicate that compared with the usual diet, all dietary interventions allow a sustained modest weight loss during the follow-up of 12 months and beyond. Diets did not differ among each other, with the exception of the high-fat low-carbohydrate diet that was slightly better than the low-carbohydrate, low-fat, and moderate macronutrients diet, with a larger weight loss (of 0.8 kg) and body mass index loss (0.4 kg/m2 ). Authors conclude that even though their findings apply to the general population of patients with overweight/obesity, the long-term impact of dietary approaches on patients with chronic diseases should be further investigated.

Abstract

Background: Scientists have been investigating efficient interventions to prevent and manage obesity. This network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the effect of different diets [moderate macronutrients (MMs), low fat/high carbohydrate (LFHC), high fat/low carbohydrate (HFLC), and usual diet (UD)] on weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC) changes at ≥12 months. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, PubMed databases, and the Cochrane Library. We systematically assessed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating dietary interventions on adults (mean BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) receiving active dietary counseling for ≥12 months. We pooled the data using a random-effect NMA. We assessed the quality of the included RCTs using the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool. Results: We included 36 trials, 14 of which compared HFLC with MM diets. Compared with UD, all diets were associated with a significant weight loss (WL) at ≥12 months, HFLC [mean difference in kg (95% CI): -5.5 (-7.6; -3.4)], LFHC [-5.0 (-7.1; -2.9)] and MM [-4.7 (-6.8; -2.7)]. HFLC, compared with MM diet, was associated with a slightly higher WL (of -0.77 kg) and drop in BMI (of -0.36 kg/m2), while no significant difference was detected in other dietary comparisons. WC was lower with all diets compared to UD, with no significant difference across specific diets. There was no significant interaction of the results with the pre-specified sub-groups. The ROB was moderate to high, mostly related to unclear allocation concealment, high dropout rate and unclear or lack of blinding of participants, providers, and outcome assessors. Conclusion: Dietary interventions extending over ≥12 months are superior to UD in inducing weight, BMI and WC loss. HFLC might be associated with a slightly higher WL compared with MM diets. Systematic Trial Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=103116, PROSPERO (CRD42018103116).

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Structural
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Obesity
Environmental Inputs : Diet
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition
Functional Laboratory Testing : Not applicable

Methodological quality

Jadad score : Not applicable
Allocation concealment : Not applicable
Publication Type : Systematic Review

Metadata