Article - Efficacy of diet restriction with or without probiotic for treatment of patients with IBS-D: Phase I-II clinical trial.

Expert Review

Reviewer: Karin Elgar

15th Feb 2024

Conflict of interest

None

Take home message

For individuals with IBDS-D:

Establish IgG intolerances to foods and ensure an elimination diet remains nutritionally balanced
Consider combining elimination diet with a Bifidobacterium supplement.

Evidence category

A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)

Summary review

Introduction

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional intestinal disorder, affecting 5-20% of the population and diet is likely a major factor in its development as well as in its management. The aim of this study was to compare 3 dietary interventions and the use of a probiotic supplement in patients with IBS-diarrhoea dominant (IBS-D).

Methods

The study was conducted in 2 phases. The first was a 12-week 2 × 2 factorial design, randomised dietary intervention and included 224 patients (214 completed) with IBS-D. The diets were an Eastern/Chinese restriction diet, avoiding cold/raw, spicy and fried foods (CSF), the second avoided common allergens as determined by an IgG test (IgG diet, 14 foods tested), the third a combination of the two, whilst the control group continued their usual (Eastern/Chinese) diet.

The second phase was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the CSF + IgG diet plus placebo with the CSF + IgG diet plus a 2 billion Bifidobacterium adolescentis supplement; this part included 202 patients of whom 169 completed the study.

The primary outcomes under observation were a reduction in IBS-D symptom severity Score (IBS-D-SSS) and IgG antibody titre (TigG).

Results

Phase 1: The IBS-D-SSS improved in all four groups from baseline (p<0.001), with the intervention groups improving significantly more than the control group (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the IgG and the IgG + CSF groups, although the authors considered there to be a synergistic effect. Statistically significant (p<0.001) reductions in TIgG were seen in all interventions, but not the control group.

Part 2: Significant (p<0.001) improvements in IBS-D-SSS were seen with both placebo and Bifidobacterium, although this was greater in the probiotic group (p<0.001). Improvements in TIgG were seen in both groups (p<0.001), with no difference between groups.

Conclusion

The authors concluded that the best intervention for patients with IBD-D is an IgG food elimination diet together with a Bifidobacterium probiotic supplement.

Clinical practice applications

Consider an elimination diet based on IgG testing for clients with IBS-D
Consider combining elimination diet with a Bifidobacterium supplement. The dose used in this study was 4x 0.5 billion capsules of Bifidobacterium adolescentis
Eliminating cold/raw, spicy and fried food could be an alternative to IgG elimination if the latter is not suitable for the client.

Considerations for future research

45% and 35% of screened patients, respectively in the 2 phases of the study, were IgG negative. Screening for more potential food intolerances may extend the suitability of the approach to more patients
Only a single strain probiotic was tested. Further research could evaluate other or combinations of Bifidobacteria strains in combination with an IgG elimination diet
The mechanism(s) by which probiotics may affect symptoms of IBS-D are unknown. Adding stool microbiome analyses may shed further light on the effect of the intervention on the composition and function of the microbiome.

Expert reviews are written by nutrition professionals and academics with advanced qualifications to provide a critical appraisal of the article and implications for practice. Each review is peer-reviewed by a member of the NED Editorial Board. Find out more about our NED Expert Reviewers here.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Diet is a major contributor to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and is also a powerful tool for treatment of IBS. This study compared two diets and explored the effectiveness of the diets when combined with a probiotic for treatment of IBS-D patients.

METHODS

Phase I, patients were randomized into groups; control, cold/spicy/fried restricted diet (CSF res diet), IgG positive restricted diet (IgG res diet), and a combination both diets (CSF + IgG res diet). Phase II, patients were randomized into IgG res diet + placebo and IgG res diet + probiotic. Both interventions were 12 weeks in duration. Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-D-SSS) and IgG titer were assessed at the beginning and the end of the study.

RESULTS

Totals of 214 and 167 patients completed the two parts of the study, respectively. After intervention, IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade were significantly improved compared to baseline, with results similar to the control group. In general, there were decreases in IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade that were significantly different among the groups. There were exceptions; no differences were observed for IBS-D-SSS between the IgG res diet and CSF + IgG res diet, or TIgG grade between the CSF res diet, IgG res diet, and CSF + IgG res diet. However, the CSF res diet and IgG res diet had a synergistic effect that decreased IBS-D-SSS and TIgG titer, with a greater contribution by the IgG res diet. Therefore, we evaluated the IgG res diet with either placebo or probiotic and found that IBS-D-SSS and TIgG grade decreased from baseline. There was a significant decrease in IBS-D-SSS with the probiotic but TIgG grade was not significantly different between the IgG diet + placebo and IgG diet + probiotic diet.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the CSF res diet and IgG res diet improved IBS symptoms and demonstrated synergy, although the IgG res diet had a greater contribution. Further, when intolerant foods cannot be eliminated from a diet, avoiding uncooked, cold, spicy, fried, and alcoholic foods is a superior choice. The IgG res diet combined with Bifidobacteria was the best dietary choice and may function though a non-IgG pathway.