Effect of dark chocolate/ cocoa consumption on oxidative stress and inflammation in adults: A GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Mehrdad Behzadi, Mohammad Vesal Bideshki, Maryam Ahmadi-Khorram, Meysam Zarezadeh, Alireza Hatami

Journal: Complementary therapies in medicine 2024;84():103061

PMID: 38925412

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Oxidative stress and inflammation have been indicated to be involved in the development of non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and some cancers. Chocolate has been reported to have anti-inflammatory properties and may be associated with a decreased risk of type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease. However, many studies which investigate these relationships are often poorly designed. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 studies aimed to determine the potential effects of dark chocolate (DC)/cocoa on oxidative stress and inflammation in adults. The results showed that DC/cocoa intake resulted in a trend towards a reduction in inflammation according to three different markers (P= 0.12, P=0.66, and P=0.69) and a reduction in oxidative stress according to two different markers (P=0.005, P=<0.001). It was concluded that DC/cocoa may be of benefit in reducing oxidative stress, but there is uncertainty on its effects on inflammation. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that DC/cocoa may have antioxidant effects, however it should be noted that this trial did not ascertain whether this will have any clinical benefit.

Expert Review

Reviewer: Mays Al-Ali
24th Apr 2025
plain language summary logo

Conflict of interest

None

Take home message

This meta-analysis found DC/cocoa intake has beneficial effects on the systemic oxidative status by reducing MDA and increasing NO.

Evidence category

A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)

Summary review

Introduction

This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the controlled trials (CTs) examining the effects of dark chocolate (DC)/cocoa on oxidative stress and inflammation biomarkers in adults.

Methods

Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, were searched for relevant studies through April 2024. The method was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were selected on the following inclusion criteria:

  • Results from controlled trials (CTs)
  • Interventions using DC or cocoa with duration of at least two weeks
  • Adult participants (18 ≤ years old)
  • Studies assessing C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), P-selectin, E-selectin and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in adults were included.

Based on the random-effects model, weighted mean differences (WMDs), standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Sensitivity, sub-group, meta-regression and dose-response analyses were also conducted.

Results

  • Thirty-three eligible CTs with 1379 participants were included.
  • Trials were conducted on participants with cardiovascular disease (CVD), overweight and obesity, T2DM, hemodialysis, cancer, metabolic syndrome, HIV, and hypercholesterolemia.
  • DC/cocoa significantly reduced MDA (SMD: −0.69, 95 %CI: −1.17, −0.2, p = 0.005) and increased NO levels (SMD: 2.43, 95 %CI: 1.11,3.75, p < 0.001).
  • No significant effects on the other outcomes were found.
  • Greater anti-inflammatory effects occurred at higher flavonoid doses (>450 mg/day) and for shorter durations (≤4 weeks), in the non-healthy participants.
  • Non-linear dose-response relationships between cocoa dosage and CRP level and also between flavonoid dosage and IL-6 level.

Conclusion

DC/cocoa may improve systemic oxidative status and inflammation in adults. However, further studies should be performed to determine its benefits.

Limitations

  • The main limitation was the heterogeneity of enrolled studies.
  • Differences in duration of trials ranged from 2-12 weeks and type of cocoa supplementation, as well as the preparation method used, content and compositions.
  • Age, gender, pharmaceuticals management, genetic and population lifestyle variation, may have influenced the results and should be considered when interpreting them.

Clinical practice applications

  • While, anti-inflammatory effects were observed in the higher dosages (> 450 mg/d) and shorter duration (≤ 4 weeks), the number of studies were not enough to draw conclusions and the certainty of evidence was not high for most outcomes.

Considerations for future research

  • Future studies should assess the side effects/toxicity of cocoa and its products in high dosages.
  • More high-quality future trials with appropriate design (considering randomisation, blinding assessment and independent testing for purity and potency) and larger sample sizes are needed to indicate the effect of DC/ cocoa on inflammation and oxidative stress.
plain language summary logo
Expert reviews are written by nutrition professionals and academics with advanced qualifications to provide a critical appraisal of the article and implications for practice. Each review is peer-reviewed by a member of the NED Editorial Board. Find out more about our NED Expert Reviewers here.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oxidative stress and inflammation play critical roles in the pathogenesis of many chronic diseases. Dark chocolate (DC)/cocoa, as a rich source of polyphenols like flavonoids, has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties that may confer health benefits, but findings in this context are inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the controlled trials (CTs) that have examined the effects of DC/cocoa on oxidative stress and inflammation biomarkers in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, were searched for relevant studies through April 2024.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessed C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), P-selectin, E-selectin and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in adults were included.

DATA ANALYSIS

Based on the random-effects model, we calculated WMDs, SMDs and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity, sub-group, meta-regression and dose-response analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

Thirty-three eligible CTs with 1379 participants were included. All studies reported the intervention types (cocoa powder, beverages and chocolate bars) and dosage. However, sixteen studies didn't do/report testing for purity and potency by independent groups. Also, none of the studies mentioned the risk of contamination with heavy metals. Another limitation was the lack of blinding assessment in studies. DC/cocoa significantly reduced MDA (SMD: -0.69, 95 %CI: -1.17, -0.2, p = 0.005) and increased NO levels (SMD: 2.43, 95 %CI: 1.11,3.75, p < 0.001); However, it has no significant effects on the other outcomes. Greater anti-inflammatory effects occurred at higher flavonoid doses (>450 mg/day) and for shorter durations (≤4 weeks) in the non-healthy participants. Non-linear dose-response relationships between cocoa dosage and CRP level and also between flavonoid dosage and IL-6 level were observed. Based on the GRADE evaluation, just CRP and MDA results were considered as high certainty evidence and the other outcomes results were categorized as very low to moderate certainty.

CONCLUSIONS

DC/cocoa may improve systemic oxidative status and inflammation in adults. However, further studies should be performed to determine its benefits.

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Address: Student Research Committee, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.; Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Department of Biochemistry and Diet Therapy, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.; Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.; Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Nutrition Research Center, Department of Biochemistry and Diet Therapy, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.; Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Electronic address: [email protected].

Patient Centred Factor

Clinical Imbalances

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors

Bioactive Substances

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.