-
1.
Effects of Oral Iron Supplementation on Blood Iron Status in Athletes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Šmid, AN, Golja, P, Hadžić, V, Abazović, E, Drole, K, Paravlic, AH
Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 2024;54(5):1231-1247
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Iron deficiency is common in physically active individuals and particularly exacerbated in professional athletes. Athletes are prone to iron loss due to prolonged physical activity, which puts high physiological demands on their bodies. This study aimed to determine the extent to which oral iron supplementation (OIS) affects blood iron parameters and physical performance in healthy adult athletes. This study was systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials. It included thirteen studies with a total of 449 participants. Results showed that OIS significantly increased serum ferritin concentration. However, although increases in blood haemoglobin concentration were observed, they were not significant. Similarly, a non-significant decrease in serum transferrin concentration and a moderate trend towards higher transferrin saturation were observed. Authors concluded that their findings highlight the importance of individualised iron supplementation strategies for athletes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Iron deficiency in athletes is initially treated with a nutritional intervention. If negative iron balance persists, oral iron supplementation (OIS) can be used. Despite the recent proposal for a refinement of treatment strategies for iron-deficient athletes, there is no general consensus regarding the actual efficiency, dosage, or optimal regimen of OIS. OBJECTIVE The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate to what extent OIS affects blood iron parameters and physical performance in healthy adult athletes. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane were searched from inception to 2 November 2022. Articles were eligible if they satisfied the following criteria: recruited subjects were healthy, adult and physically active individuals, who used exclusively OIS, irrespective of sex and sports discipline. EXCLUSION CRITERIA simultaneous supplementation with iron and any other micronutrient(s), intravenous iron supplementation or recent exposure to altitude acclimatisation. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed with the PEDro scale, the completeness of intervention reporting with the TIDieR scale, while the GRADE scale was used for quality of evidence synthesis. The present study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO online registry (ID: CRD42022330230). RESULTS From 638 articles identified through the search, 13 studies (n = 449) were included in the quantitative synthesis. When compared to the control group, the results demonstrated that OIS increases serum ferritin (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.27, 95% CI 0.44-2.10, p = 0.006), whereas blood haemoglobin (SMD = 1.31, 95% CI - 0.29 to 2.93, p = 0.099), serum transferrin receptor concentration (SMD = - 0.74, 95% CI - 1.89 to 0.41, p = 0.133), and transferrin saturation (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI - 0.84 to 2.22, p = 0.330) remained unaltered. Following OIS, a trend of small positive effect on VO2max (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI - 0.09 to 1.07, p = 0.086) was observed in young healthy athletes. The quality of evidence for all outcomes ranged from moderate to low. CONCLUSIONS Increase in serum ferritin concentration after OIS was evident in subjects with initial pre-supplementation serum ferritin concentration ≤ 12 µg/l, while only minimal, if any effect, was observed in subjects with higher pre-supplementation serum ferritin concentration. The doses of OIS, that induced a beneficial effect on hematological parameters differed from 16 to 100 mg of elementary iron daily, over the period between 6 and 8 weeks. Shorter supplementation protocols have been shown to be ineffective.
-
2.
The dose-dependent effect of caffeine supplementation on performance, reaction time and postural stability in CrossFit - a randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial.
Główka, N, Malik, J, Podgórski, T, Stemplewski, R, Maciaszek, J, Ciążyńska, J, Zawieja, EE, Chmurzynska, A, Nowaczyk, PM, Durkalec-Michalski, K
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2024;21(1):2301384
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Caffeine (CAF) is a substance with a long history of performance-enhancing usage. In terms of the impact of CAF in sport, it is noteworthy that its potential may be linked to the specificity of the efforts performed. In this respect, particular attention is drawn to CrossFit/High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT), which incorporates functional, multi-modal movements, which are performed at high intensity and may improve general physical fitness. This study aimed to assess the acute effects of three different doses of caffeine (3, 6, and 9 mg/kg body mass) compared to a placebo on performance, reaction time, postural stability, heart rate, and perceived exertion in moderately trained CrossFit practitioners. This study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. The study involved 26 moderately trained CrossFit athletes who participated in five separate testing sessions. Each session included pre-exercise supplementation with one of the three caffeine doses or a placebo. Results showed that supplementation with 6 mg/kg body mass of caffeine showed clinically noticeable improvements in Fight Gone Bad test (FGB) [type of workout] total results, reaction time, and pre-exercise motor time. However, no significant differences were observed between any caffeine dose and placebo in terms of heart rate, perceived exertion, postural stability and reaction time. Whereas, in terms of biochemical markers, lactate concentrations were higher before and after exercise in all caffeine doses compared to placebo. Authors concluded that their findings do not confirm dose-dependent effect of CAF supplementation in moderately trained CrossFit/HIFT participants.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caffeine (CAF) ingestion improves performance in a broad range of exercise tasks. Nevertheless, the CAF-induced, dose-dependent effect on discipline-specific performance and cognitive functions in CrossFit/High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) has not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acute supplementation of three different doses of CAF and placebo (PLA) on specific performance, reaction time (RTime), postural stability (PStab), heart rate (HR) and perceived exertion (RPE). METHODS In a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover design, acute pre-exercise supplementation with CAF (3, 6, or 9 mg/kg body mass (BM)) and PLA in 26 moderately trained CrossFit practitioners was examined. The study protocol involved five separate testing sessions using the Fight Gone Bad test (FGB) as the exercise performance evaluation and biochemical analyses, HR and RPE monitoring, as well as the assessment of RTime and PStab, with regard to CYP1A2 (rs762551) and ADORA2A (rs5751876) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). RESULTS Supplementation of 6 mgCAF/kgBM induced clinically noticeable improvements in FGBTotal results, RTime and pre-exercise motor time. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences between any CAF doses and PLA in FGBTotal, HRmax, HRmean, RPE, pre/post-exercise RTime, PStab variables or pyruvate concentrations. Lactate concentration was higher (p < 0.05) before and after exercise in all CAF doses than in PLA. There was no effect of CYP1A2 or ADORA2A SNPs on performance. CONCLUSIONS The dose-dependent effect of CAF supplementation appears to be limited to statistically nonsignificant but clinically considered changes on specific performance, RTime, PStab, RPE or HR. However, regarding practical CAF-induced performance implications in CrossFit/HIFT, 6 mgCAF/kgBM may be supposed as the most rational supplementation strategy.
-
3.
Efficacy of probiotic treatment as post-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19: A double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized trial.
Wischmeyer, PE, Tang, H, Ren, Y, Bohannon, L, Jiang, D, Bergens, M, Ramirez, ZE, Andermann, TM, Messina, JA, Sung, JA, et al
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2024;43(1):259-267
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection, continues to pose a unique and novel challenge to global health. Ongoing research is showing a potentially significant role of the microbiome and dysbiosis in COVID-19 disease severity and development of Long-Covid. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) as post-exposure prophylaxis against COVID-19. This study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomised to receive LGG or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Results showed that the participants randomised to LGG had fewer symptoms and prolonged time to development of COVID-19 compared to those receiving placebo. Additionally, probiotic supplementation also reduced symptomatic disease, and changed the gut microbiome structure. Authors conclude that their findings lend credence to the notion that symbiotic microbes may be valuable partners in the fight against COVID-19 and potentially other future pandemic diseases.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose unprecedented challenges to worldwide health. While vaccines are effective, additional strategies to mitigate the spread/severity of COVID-19 continue to be needed. Emerging evidence suggests susceptibility to respiratory tract infections in healthy subjects can be reduced by probiotic interventions; thus, probiotics may be a low-risk, low-cost, and easily implementable modality to reduce risk of COVID-19. METHODS In this initial study, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across the United States testing probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) as postexposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in 182 participants who had household exposure to someone with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed within ≤7 days. Participants were randomized to receive oral LGG or placebo for 28 days. The primary outcome was development of illness symptoms within 28 days of COVID-19 exposure. Stool was collected to evaluate microbiome changes. RESULTS Intention-to-treat analysis showed LGG treatment led to a lower likelihood of developing illness symptoms versus placebo (26.4 % vs. 42.9 %, p = 0.02). Further, LGG was associated with a statistically significant reduction in COVID-19 diagnosis (log rank, p = 0.049) via time-to-event analysis. Overall incidence of COVID-19 diagnosis did not significantly differ between LGG and placebo groups (8.8 % vs. 15.4 %, p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS This data suggests LGG is associated with prolonged time to COVID-19 infection, reduced incidence of illness symptoms, and gut microbiome changes when used as prophylaxis ≤7 days post-COVID-19 exposure, but not overall incidence. This initial work may inform future COVID-19 prevention studies worldwide, particularly in developing nations where Lacticaseibacillus probiotics have previously been utilized to reduce other non-COVID infectious-morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04399252, Date: 22/05/2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04399252.
-
4.
Prebiotic diet changes neural correlates of food decision-making in overweight adults: a randomised controlled within-subject cross-over trial.
Medawar, E, Beyer, F, Thieleking, R, Haange, SB, Rolle-Kampczyk, U, Reinicke, M, Chakaroun, R, von Bergen, M, Stumvoll, M, Villringer, A, et al
Gut. 2024;73(2):298-310
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
It is thought that there is a connection between the gut microbiota and the brain and that prebiotics which fuel these gut microbiota may be able to affect mood and decision making. This randomised control trial of 59 individuals with overweight aimed to determine if supplementation of prebiotic fibre in the form of inulin could affect the desire for food. The results showed that compared to placebo individuals given inulin had a lower desire towards high caloric foods in conjunction with a change in the composition of the gut microbiota, especially Bifidobacteriaceae. It was concluded that prebiotics may be able to alter food-related decision making and alter the composition of the gut microbiota. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that individuals who are overweight may choose unhealthy foods due to an imbalance in their gut microbiota. These individuals may benefit from prebiotic fibre to help aid microbiota changes and empowerment over food choices.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Animal studies suggest that prebiotic, plant-derived nutrients could improve homoeostatic and hedonic brain functions through improvements in microbiome-gut-brain communication. However, little is known if these results are applicable to humans. Therefore, we tested the effects of high-dosed prebiotic fibre on reward-related food decision-making in a randomised controlled within-subject cross-over study and assayed potential microbial and metabolic markers. DESIGN 59 overweight young adults (19 females, 18-42 years, body mass index 25-30 kg/m2) underwent functional task MRI before and after 14 days of supplementary intake of 30 g/day of inulin (prebiotics) and equicaloric placebo, respectively. Short chain fatty acids (SCFA), gastrointestinal hormones, glucose/lipid and inflammatory markers were assayed in fasting blood. Gut microbiota and SCFA were measured in stool. RESULTS Compared with placebo, participants showed decreased brain activation towards high-caloric wanted food stimuli in the ventral tegmental area and right orbitofrontal cortex after prebiotics (preregistered, family wise error-corrected p <0.05). While fasting blood levels remained largely unchanged, 16S-rRNA sequencing showed significant shifts in the microbiome towards increased occurrence of, among others, SCFA-producing Bifidobacteriaceae, and changes in >60 predicted functional signalling pathways after prebiotic intake. Changes in brain activation correlated with changes in Actinobacteria microbial abundance and associated activity previously linked with SCFA production, such as ABC transporter metabolism. CONCLUSIONS In this proof-of-concept study, a prebiotic intervention attenuated reward-related brain activation during food decision-making, paralleled by shifts in gut microbiota. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03829189.
-
5.
Synbiotic as an ameliorating factor in the health-related quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. A randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Hariri, Z, Yari, Z, Hoseini, S, Abhari, K, Sohrab, G
BMC women's health. 2024;24(1):19
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), as a chronic endocrine disorder, can affect many aspects of young women’s lives. Apart from physical complications, women with polycystic ovary syndrome are more likely to suffer from mental and behavioural disorders. The aim of this study was to examine whether synbiotic supplementation could improve the health quality of life of women with PCOS. This study was a triple-blind, randomised clinical trial which recruited women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Participants were randomly divided into synbiotic or placebo groups for 12 weeks. Results showed that synbiotic supplementation improved the scores of emotional, body hair, weight and infertility domains of PCOSQ-26 compared to placebo group. Authors concluded that 12-week supplementation with synbiotics could noticeably improve the emotional, body hair, weight, infertility and general physical health status of women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are complicated mechanisms that link the disruption of the gut microbiome to the symptoms and complications of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In this study, an attempt was made to assess the effects of synbiotics on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in women with PCOS . METHODS Fifty-six women with PCOS were enrolled in a triple-blind controlled trial for 12 weeks. They were randomly assigned to receive a daily 2-gram synbiotic sachets (containing Bacillus coagulans (GBI-30), Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus helveticus, and fructooligosaccharide) (n = 28) or placebo (n = 28). To evaluate the impact on the HRQoL, participants were required to fill 26-Item Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (PCOSQ-26), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) pre and post the intervention. RESULTS Finally, statistical analyses were performed on 52 participants who finished the trial. Synbiotic supplementation improved the scores of emotional (P = 0.044), body hair (P = 0.016), weight (P = 0.033) and infertility domains (P = 0.027) of PCOSQ-26 compared to placebo group. The physical score within SF-12 also had a significant enhancement (P = 0.035). No significant improvement was seen in the PSS-10 score at the end of the trial. CONCLUSION This study illustrated the advantageous effects of synbiotics on the health-related quality of life in women with PCOS. Further studies are required to confirm our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION http://www.irct.ir : IRCT20211108053007N1; date of registration: 14/02/2023.
-
6.
A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet may lead to improvement of intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in more conditions than irritable bowel syndrome and congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency.
Roth, B, Ohlsson, B
Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.). 2024;117:112254
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Studies have shown that a starch and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD) leads to considerable improvements of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The purpose of this pilot study was to see if a SSRD would be beneficial in other conditions with similar symptoms. Two people took part in the study. A man with functional diarrhoea and a woman with microscopic colitis. The SSRD consists of low intakes of sugar-rich products, but continued or increased intakes of all meats and fish, fat, natural dairy products, eggs, berries, fruits, nuts, seeds, and vegetables low in starch. Fiber-rich bread and pasta and raw or wild rice were recommended instead of white bread and more processed rice and pasta. During the 4-week intervention, the participants lost weight and waist circumference reduced. The degree of satiety after a meal was increased and the sweet cravings were strongly reduced. The gastrointestinal symptoms improved in the participant with diarrhoea but was unaffected in the participant with microscopic colitis. Reductions of diarrhoea and of bloating and flatulence were most pronounced in both patients. The psychological well-being was improved during the intervention. Extraintestinal symptoms were also reduced during the SSRD, especially urinary urgency and belching. This is a small intervention study and therefore not possible to make generalised claims or recommendations. However, healthcare practitioners could look at SSRD when working with IBS patients as a therapeutic dietary option.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet has been found to improve gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome, as well as reduce weight and improve psychological well-being. Our hypothesis was that a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet would also be beneficial in other conditions with similar symptoms. The aim of the present research letter was to describe the role of a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet in a pilot project in patients with diarrhea having varying causes. METHODS One man, age 36 y, suffering from functional diarrhea and one woman, 56 y, suffering from microscopic colitis, were randomized to a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet for 4 wk. At baseline, dietary information was given, and blood samples collected. Weight and waist circumference were measured. The participants completed the irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system for evaluating specific gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms and visual analog scale for irritable bowel syndrome for evaluation of specific gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological well-being. The degrees of satiety and sweet craving were measured on visual analog scales. After 4 wk, all procedures were repeated. RESULTS Weight, body mass index, and waist circumference were decreased during the intervention. The total amount of gastrointestinal symptoms was decreased in the participants with functional diarrhea, and diarrhea and bloating were decreased in both participants. Both had reduced extraintestinal symptoms and improved psychological well-being. Blood levels had mainly unchanged or slightly increased values of measurements reflecting nutrient intake. CONCLUSIONS A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet may lead to weight reduction, reduced symptoms, and improved well-being in several patient categories, not only in patients suffering from irritable bowel syndrome. Future randomized trials should be done.
-
7.
Oral compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life for patients with lung cancer during chemotherapy: A randomized placebo-controlled study.
Wei, H, Yue, Z, Han, J, Chen, P, Xie, K, Sun, Y, Zhu, J
Thoracic cancer. 2024;15(2):182-191
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy occupies an important role in the management of lung cancer; however, there are treatment-associated side effects. These symptoms may deteriorate the quality of life for patients undergoing chemotherapy, and even necessitate dose reduction or discontinuation. The aim of this study was to determine whether oral compound probiotic supplements can reduce chemotherapy-related adverse effects and improve lung cancer patients' quality of life during chemotherapy. This study was a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical study. A total of 100 lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy where enrolled for the study. They were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: intervention (probiotics) vs placebo. Results showed that the participants receiving probiotic supplements were significantly better in various dimensions of the overall quality of life, role function, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhoea relative to the placebo group. Authors concluded that compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life and relieve platinum-based doublet chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal adverse reactions for lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy is an important approach for lung cancer patients. The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of the compound probiotic supplements in improving the quality of life for lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled chemotherapy-naive patients with lung cancer who were scheduled to receive platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. All eligible patients were randomly administered (1:1) compound probiotic supplements (group BP-1) or placebo (group C) for two chemotherapy cycles. The EORTC QLQ C30 questionnaire scores were evaluated before the first, second, and third cycles of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in the EROTC QLQ C30 questionnaire score between the two groups after two cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS A total of 110 patients were recruited from March 2021 to January 2022. After undergoing two cycles of chemotherapy, group BP-1 were significantly better in various dimensions of the overall quality of life, role function, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea relative to group C (76.90 ± 18.31 vs. 58.89 ± 17.17; 93.33 ± 11.58 vs. 85.93 ± 15.06; 0.00 ± 0.00 vs. 27.04 ± 29.15; 6.67 ± 13.53 vs. 22.22 ± 18.80; 0.95 ± 5.63 vs. 28.15 ± 22.42; 2.86 ± 9.47 vs. 15.56 ± 16.82; p < 0.05, respectively). The incidence of nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea in group BP-1 was significantly lower than in group C (0% vs. 71.43%, 16.67% vs. 57.14%, 2.38% vs. 63.27%, and 7.14% vs. 42.86%, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compound probiotic supplements can improve the quality of life and relieve chemotherapy-related gastrointestinal side effects for lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1800019269).
-
8.
Daily skin-to-skin contact alters microbiota development in healthy full-term infants.
Eckermann, HA, Meijer, J, Cooijmans, K, Lahti, L, de Weerth, C
Gut microbes. 2024;16(1):2295403
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The gut microbiome develops in early life and is influenced by several different factors. Skin-to-skin contact (SSC), whereby an infant and mother have bare skin contact, has been shown to be associated with improved brain and heart development, decreased anxiety and stress, and longer breast-feeding duration. In animals, SSC has also been shown to alter the infants gut microbiota, but this has not been investigated in humans. This study of 116 infant-mother pairs aimed to determine the effect of SSC compared to normal care on the infant gut microbiome and the gut-brain connection. The results showed that there was an overall difference in microbiota diversity between SSC and normal care infants in early but not late infancy. The development of the gut microbiota was also affected in early and late infancy. In SSC infants there was a lower abundance of Faecalibacterium, Eubacterium hallii, and Rothia and higher abundance of Flavonifractor, Lacticaseibacillus, Bacteroides and Megasphaera compared to the normal care infants. Some gut-brain communication pathways differed between the two groups including those associated with anxiety and stress. It was concluded that SSC may influence gut microbiota development. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that SSC can alter the infants gut microbiome, however further studies are required to determine the significance of this.
Abstract
The gut microbiota is vital for human body development and function. Its development in early life is influenced by various environmental factors. In this randomized controlled trial, the gut microbiota was obtained as a secondary outcome measure in a study on the effects of one hour of daily skin-to-skin contact (SSC) for five weeks in healthy full-term infants. Specifically, we studied the effects on alpha/beta diversity, volatility, microbiota maturation, and bacterial and gut-brain-axis-related functional abundances in microbiota assessed thrice in the first year. Pregnant Dutch women (n = 116) were randomly assigned to the SSC or care-as-usual groups. The SSC group participants engaged in one hour of daily SSC from birth to five weeks of age. Stool samples were collected at two, five, and 52 weeks and the V4 region was sequenced. We observed significant differences in the microbiota composition, bacterial abundances, and predicted functional pathways between the groups. The SSC group exhibited lower microbiota volatility during early infancy. Microbiota maturation was slower in the SSC group during the first year and our results suggested that breastfeeding duration may have partially mediated this relation. Our findings provide evidence that postpartum SSC may influence microbiota development. Replication is necessary to validate and generalize these results. Future studies should include direct stress measurements and extend microbiota sampling beyond the first year to investigate stress as a mechanism and research SSC's impact on long-term microbiota maturation trajectories.
-
9.
Treatment of functional bowel disorders in an integrative medicine clinic resulting in improved digestive tract symptoms.
Wagner, LE, Bridges, KM, Hinman, JM, He, J, Buckles, D, Dunn, W, Drisko, J, Sullivan, DK, Carlson, SE
JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2024;8(1):e13022
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Functional bowel disorders (FBDs), including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), are conditions without a physically identifiable cause and as a result, are difficult to treat, require more physician time and impact patients' quality of life. They are linked to disordered gut-brain interactions, and diagnosis is based on patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms in the absence of detectable physical abnormalities. The holistic approach of integrative medicine (IM) presents an interesting avenue for FBD management. This retrospective review assessed the outcome of 57 IM clinic patients, who were diagnosed with FBDs (constipation or diarrhoea-dominant IBS, mixed IBS, functional diarrhoea/constipation/ bloating). Characteristic of IM approaches the interventions were tailored specifically to the individual needs, deploying a group of therapies, including elimination diets, vitamin or mineral supplementation, magnesium supplementation, GI-related supplementation, fermented foods, hydration, non-diet lifestyle modification, referrals and GI-related medication. Symptoms were measured using a medical symptom questionnaire (MSQ). Post-intervention (average 8.75 months) most patients (75.4%) experienced an improvement in digestive symptoms. The most common intervention was an elimination diet (predominantly gluten, grains, dairy or casein), followed by supplementation. The findings suggest that IM interventions, particularly dietary changes, can effectively alleviate symptoms in FBD patients, especially for diarrhoea-dominant conditions. They also showed that less strict elimination diets may be equally effective and easier to adhere to than a low FODMAP diet. Limitations of the study included its retrospective nature, small sample size, and difficulty in comparing interventions due to their individualised nature. In addition, self-paying patients may have been more motivated to comply. A small number of patients did not experience changes and possible reasons are discussed, acknowledging that organic GI diseases were not ruled out. Future research should explore the effectiveness of dietary interventions further and consider using more IBS-specific measuring tools, as an interdisciplinary approach may be beneficial in managing FBDs effectively.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Functional bowel disorders (FBDs), including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and others, are conditions without a physically identifiable etiology that, as a result, are difficult to treat. Alternatives to traditional medical interventions are needed because IBS patients require more of physician time and higher healthcare spending. The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of alternative lifestyle interventions for patients with FBDs seen in an integrative medicine (IM) clinic at an academic medical center. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review to determine whether patients with FBDs had improvement in symptoms following predominantly nutrition-based IM interventions that included recommendations for dietary supplements and elimination diets. We measured symptoms before and after intervention (average time between measurements 8.75 months) using a medical symptoms questionnaire (MSQ) commonly used to quantify symptom change in IM clinics. RESULTS Digestive tract symptoms, as measured by the MSQ, improved significantly in patients (n = 57) with FBDs following IM intervention. The MSQ Digestive Tract subtotal for FBD patients decreased from 10.2 (SD, 5.4) to 7.2 (SD, 5.2) (P < 0.001) after IM intervention. CONCLUSIONS Patients in an IM clinic had improved digestive tract symptoms scores following IM intervention. Because nutrition-based interventions were the primary intervention recommended by IM providers, primary care physicians and gastroenterologists may wish to consider referring FBD patients to registered dietitian-nutritionists (RDNs) skilled in implementing elimination diets.
-
10.
Exploration of differential responses to FODMAPs and gluten in people with irritable bowel syndrome- a double-blind randomized cross-over challenge study.
Nordin, E, Landberg, R, Hellström, PM, Brunius, C
Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society. 2024;20(2):21
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a complex condition characterized by recurrent abdominal pain associated with abnormal bowel habits. Diet is considered a main cause of symptoms in IBS, and fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) are of major concern. The aim of this study was to unravel determinants of differential IBS responses to FODMAP and gluten provocation interventions from molecular data. This study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled three-way crossover study. Participants were randomised in blocks of 12 into the sequences CBA, ACB, and BAC (A=FODMAPs, B=Gluten, and C=Placebo). Results showed that despite a comprehensive set of methods applied to explore IBS responses, including both regression and classification, predictors of differential response could not be established. Authors concluded by encouraging the application of molecular subtyping methodologies in future studies due to the differential responses to treatment.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is large variation in response to diet in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and determinants for differential response are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES Our aim was to investigate differential clinical and molecular responses to provocation with fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) and gluten in individuals with IBS. METHODS Data were used from a crossover study with week-long interventions with either FODMAPs, gluten or placebo. The study also included a rapid provocation test. Molecular data consisted of fecal microbiota, short chain fatty acids, and untargeted plasma metabolomics. IBS symptoms were evaluated with the IBS severity scoring system. IBS symptoms were modelled against molecular and baseline questionnaire data, using Random Forest (RF; regression and clustering), Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC), and univariate methods. RESULTS Regression and classification RF models were in general of low predictive power (Q2 ≤ 0.22, classification rate < 0.73). Out of 864 clustering models, only 2 had significant associations to clusters (0.69 < CR < 0.73, p < 0.05), but with no associations to baseline clinical measures. Similarly, PARAFAC revealed no clear association between metabolome data and IBS symptoms. CONCLUSION Differential IBS responses to FODMAPs or gluten exposures could not be explained from clinical and molecular data despite extensive exploration with different data analytical approaches. The trial is registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS gov as NCT03653689 31/08/2018.