-
1.
Global epidemiological features and impact of osteosarcopenia: A comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review.
Chen, S, Xu, X, Gong, H, Chen, R, Guan, L, Yan, X, Zhou, L, Yang, Y, Wang, J, Zhou, J, et al
Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. 2024;15(1):8-20
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Osteosarcopenia is defined as the concurrent occurrence of osteopenia/osteoporosis and sarcopenia. Patients who have osteoporosis or osteopenia have lower bone mineral density and are more likely to fracture. The aim of this study was to determine the global prevalence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of osteosarcopenia. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66 observational population-based studies (including cross-sectional and cohort designs) involving 64,404 participants with a mean age ranging from 46.6 to 93 years. Results showed that: - Overall, the pooled prevalence of osteosarcopenia was 18.5%, with variations by sex (15.3% in men and 19.4% in women). - Risk factors associated with osteosarcopenia included frailty, malnutrition, female sex, and higher age. Authors concluded that osteosarcopenia is a significant health concern, and understanding its prevalence and risk factors is crucial for prevention and treatment strategies.
Abstract
Osteosarcopenia is defined as the concurrent occurrence of osteopenia/osteoporosis and sarcopenia. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the global prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes of osteosarcopenia. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022351229). PubMed, Cochrane, Medline and Embase were searched from inception to February 2023 to retrieve eligible observational population-based studies. Pooled osteosarcopenia prevalence was calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI), and subgroup analyses were performed. The risk factor of osteosarcopenia and its association with clinical outcomes were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR), respectively. Heterogeneity was estimated using the I2 test. Study quality was assessed using validated instruments matched to study designs. The search identified 55 158 studies, and 66 studies (64 404 participants, mean age from 46.6 to 93 years) were analysed in the final analysis, including 48 cross-sectional studies, 17 cohort studies and 1 case-control study. Overall, the pooled prevalence of osteosarcopenia was 18.5% (95% CI: 16.7-20.3, I2 = 98.7%), including 15.3% (95% CI: 13.2-17.4, I2 = 97.6%) in men and 19.4% (95% CI: 16.9-21.9, I2 = 98.5%) in women. The prevalence of osteosarcopenia diagnosed using sarcopenia plus osteopenia/osteoporosis was 20.7% (95% CI: 17.1-24.4, I2 = 98.55%), and the prevalence of using sarcopenia plus osteoporosis was 16.1% (95% CI: 13.3-18.9, I2 = 98.0%). The global osteosarcopenia prevalence varied in different regions with 22.9% in Oceania, 21.6% in Asia, 20.8% in South America, 15.7% in North America and 10.9% in Europe. A statistically significant difference was found in the subgroups of the study population between the hospital (24.7%) and community (12.9%) (P = 0.001). Frailty (OR = 4.72, 95% CI: 2.71-8.23, I2 = 61.1%), malnutrition (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.62-3.40, I2 = 50.0%), female sex (OR = 5.07, 95% CI: 2.96-8.69, I2 = 73.0%) and higher age (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06-1.15, I2 ==86.0%) were significantly associated with a higher risk for osteosarcopenia. Meta-analysis of cohort studies showed that osteosarcopenia significantly increased the risk of fall (HR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.20-1.97; I2 = 1.0%, three studies), fracture (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.61-2.81; I2 = 67.8%, seven studies) and mortality (HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.34-2.28; I2 = 0.0%, five studies). Despite the heterogeneity arising from varied definitions and criteria, our findings highlight a significant global prevalence of osteosarcopenia and its negative impact on clinical health. Standardizing diagnostic criteria for osteosarcopenia would be advantageous in the future, and early detection and management should be emphasized in this patient population.
-
2.
Autoimmune diseases and female-specific cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fischer, S, Meisinger, C, Freuer, D
Journal of autoimmunity. 2024;144:103187
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Autoimmune diseases are characterised by chronic inflammation, and having an autoimmune condition increases the risk of developing some cancers. Previous studies have shown an association between psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis and an increased or decreased risk of developing specific cancers. Due to the hormonal changes that affect the immune system in women during their lifetime, women are generally susceptible to developing autoimmune diseases. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the presence of autoimmune conditions such as psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis in women and how it increases the risk of developing female site-specific cancers such as breast, ovarian, uterine, cervical, vulvar and vaginal cancers. The results of this study indicated that there is a negative relationship between rheumatoid arthritis and breast and uterine cancers. It was also found that psoriasis can elevate the risk of developing breast cancer. Additionally, a subgroup analysis demonstrated a connection between geographical location and the risk of developing specific cancers in women with rheumatoid arthritis. The differences in cancer susceptibility in various geographical locations may be due to lifestyle factors, environmental influences, and genetic predisposition. Healthcare professionals can use the evidence from this study to understand the impact of female hormones on the regulation of inflammation and immunity. The study also highlights how changes in hormone levels can increase the risk of female-specific cancers. Further robust studies are needed to investigate the potential therapeutic effects and mechanisms underlying the increased risk of cancers associated with female hormones.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Among the over 80 different autoimmune diseases, psoriasis (PsO), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are common representatives. Previous studies indicated a potential link with cancer risk, but suffered often from low statistical power. Thus, we aimed to synthesize the evidence and quantify the association to different female-specific cancer sites. METHODS The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A search string was developed for the databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase. Results were screened independently by two investigators and the risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool. Meta-analyses were performed using inverse variance weighted random-effects models. Statistical between-study heterogeneity was quantified by calculating Cochran's Q, τ2, and Higgins' I2 statistics. Sources of heterogeneity were analyzed and adjusted for within an intensive bias assessment in the form of meta-regression, outlier, influential, and subgroup analyses. A range of methods were used to test and adjust for publication bias. RESULTS Of 10,096 records that were originally identified by the search strategy, 45 were included in the meta-analyses. RA was inversely associated with both breast and uterine cancer occurrence, while PsO was associated with a higher breast cancer risk. Outlier-adjusted estimates confirmed these findings. Bias assessment revealed differences in geographic regions, particularly in RA patients, with higher estimates among Asian studies. An additional analysis revealed no association between psoriatic arthritis and breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS RA seems to reduce the risk of breast and uterine cancers, while PsO appears to increase breast cancer risk. Further large studies are required to investigate potential therapy-effects and detailed biological mechanisms.
-
3.
Glycemic variability assessed using continuous glucose monitoring in individuals without diabetes and associations with cardiometabolic risk markers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hjort, A, Iggman, D, Rosqvist, F
Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2024;43(4):915-925
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Chronic hyperglycaemia, assessed by HbA1c, is a risk factor for complications in individuals with diabetes. However, HbA1c does not reflect short-term fluctuations in blood glucose, which can vary a lot between individuals despite similar HbA1c. Glycaemic variability (GV) is a term used to describe such fluctuations, reflecting both hypoglycaemic events and postprandial spikes as well as fluctuations that are repeated at the same time on different days. The aim of this study was to assess whether GV is associated with cardiometabolic risk markers or outcomes in individuals without diabetes. Researchers examined data from continuous glucose monitoring studies. This study was a systematic review of 71 studies, primarily cross-sectional in design. Results showed that GV measures were higher in individuals with prediabetes compared to those without, potentially related to beta cell dysfunction. However, GV was not clearly associated with insulin sensitivity, adiposity, blood lipids, or blood pressure. Interestingly, GV may predict coronary atherosclerosis development and cardiovascular events, as well as type 2 diabetes. Authors concluded that although GV is elevated in prediabetes, its association with traditional risk factors remains less clear. Prospective studies are needed to explore GV’s predictive power in relation to incident disease.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Continuous glucose monitors are widely available. They could help nutritionists and nutritional therapists to personalise nutrition plans and reduce risk factors for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes when working with a qualified health care practitioner.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Glycaemic variability (GV) has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). It is not known whether there are similar risks for individuals without T2D. Continuous blood glucose monitors (CGM) measure short-term GV and may be a potential tool for assessing these risks.
Methods
- 71 worldwide studies with diverse populations were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Most studies were cross sectional and included CGM use for 24 hours or longer.
- Measurement data included: standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of GV, mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE), mean of daily differences (MODD), continuous overlapping net glycaemic action (CONGA), M-value, lability index (L-index), J-index or glycaemic risk assessment in diabetes equation (GRADE).
- Outcome measurements were any associated with cardiometabolic risk markers.
Results
- Adults with prediabetes had greater SD (p <0.0001), CV (p =0.008) and MAGE (p<0.0001) values. SD, MODD, and MAGE were also higher in individuals with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and a previous history of gestational diabetes.
- SD was higher in children and adolescents with prediabetes. SD and CV were also higher in adolescents with cystic fibrosis. An inverse association was found in adolescents for MAGE and soluble receptor of advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) (P=<0.05).
- 6 studies found measures of beta-cell function were inversely associated with GV.
- Higher levels of MAGE were positively associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular events (p=0.004), higher C-reactive protein and PAI-1 (p<0.001).
- No differences were found in GV between obese, overweight and normal weight individuals, nor correlations with body composition for all populations (p>0.05 for all).
Conclusion
This study found that GV is elevated in adults with prediabetes compared to individuals with NGT and may be linked with beta-cell dysfunction. The evidence for children and adolescents was less clear. GV was also positively associated with the development of atherosclerosis and an increased risk of cardiovascular events. GV may therefore be an effective proxy for cardiovascular risk in adults without diabetes.
Clinical practice applications:
- There is a large variability in postprandial response between individuals consuming the same foods.
- HbA1C does not include short term variability in blood glucose levels.
- CGMs are widely available and easily accessible and could help nutritionists and nutritional therapists to provide personalised nutrition plans.
- This study found that changes in GV were not associated with HbA1c, fasting glucose, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance or oral glucose tolerance test-derived measures.
- GV was also not associated with adiposity, blood pressure, blood fatty liver disease, blood lipid profile or oxidative stress.
Considerations for future research:
- Limitations of this study were the inclusion of mainly cross-sectional data as well as the heterogeneity between outcome measures, study durations, populations and sample sizes.
- Further prospective studies are needed in healthy individuals.
- Future studies should focus on measurements that specifically assess GV and cardiometabolic risk markers.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides data on short-term glycemic variability (GV). GV is associated with adverse outcomes in individuals with diabetes. Whether GV is associated with cardiometabolic risk in individuals without diabetes is unclear. We systematically reviewed the literature to assess whether GV is associated with cardiometabolic risk markers or outcomes in individuals without diabetes. METHODS Searches were performed in PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane from inception through April 2022. Two researchers were involved in study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. Studies evaluating GV using CGM for ≥24 h were included. Studies in populations with acute and/or critical illness were excluded. Both narrative synthesis and meta-analyzes were performed, depending on outcome. RESULTS Seventy-one studies were included; the majority were cross-sectional. Multiple measures of GV are higher in individuals with compared to without prediabetes and GV appears to be inversely associated with beta cell function. In contrast, GV is not clearly associated with insulin sensitivity, fatty liver disease, adiposity, blood lipids, blood pressure or oxidative stress. However, GV may be positively associated with the degree of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events in individuals with coronary disease. CONCLUSION GV is elevated in prediabetes, potentially related to beta cell dysfunction, but less clearly associated with obesity or traditional risk factors. GV is associated with coronary atherosclerosis development and may predict cardiovascular events and type 2 diabetes. Prospective studies are warranted, investigating the predictive power of GV in relation to incident disease. GV may be an important risk measure also in individuals without diabetes.
-
4.
Continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jancev, M, Vissers, TACM, Visseren, FLJ, van Bon, AC, Serné, EH, DeVries, JH, de Valk, HW, van Sloten, TT
Diabetologia. 2024;67(5):798-810
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, but its effects on glycaemic control remain unclear. Fingerstick-based self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been the most used method for measuring daily glucose levels. However, this method does not provide continuous data about glucose levels, and, thus, may miss asymptomatic hypo- or hyperglycaemia and does not provide information about the direction of change in glucose levels. The aim of this study was to give an up-to-date comprehensive overview of the effect of CGM (rtCGM or isCGM) comparison with SMBG on glycaemic control, as quantified by HbA1c, in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with or without insulin. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis, analysing randomised controlled trials comparing real-time CGM or intermittently scanned CGM with SMBG in adults with type 2 diabetes. Results showed that: - CGM use (rtCGM or isCGM) led to a modest reduction in HbA1c (mean difference of −3.43 mmol/mol or −0.31%). - CGM also improved time in range and reduced time below range, time above range and glycaemic variability. Authors concluded that CGM shows promise in improving glycaemic control for adults with type 2 diabetes.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, but the effects on glycaemic control are unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive overview of the effect of CGM on glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS We performed a systematic review using Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until 2 May 2023. We included RCTs investigating real-time CGM (rtCGM) or intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in adults with type 2 diabetes. Studies with an intervention duration <6 weeks or investigating professional CGM, a combination of CGM and additional glucose-lowering treatment strategies or GlucoWatch were not eligible. Change in HbA1c and the CGM metrics time in range (TIR), time below range (TBR), time above range (TAR) and glycaemic variability were extracted. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2. Data were synthesised by performing a meta-analysis. We also explored the effects of CGM on severe hypoglycaemia and micro- and macrovascular complications. RESULTS We found 12 RCTs comprising 1248 participants, with eight investigating rtCGM and four isCGM. Compared with SMBG, CGM use (rtCGM or isCGM) led to a mean difference (MD) in HbA1c of -3.43 mmol/mol (-0.31%; 95% CI -4.75, -2.11, p<0.00001, I2=15%; moderate certainty). This effect was comparable in studies that included individuals using insulin with or without oral agents (MD -3.27 mmol/mol [-0.30%]; 95% CI -6.22, -0.31, p=0.03, I2=55%), and individuals using oral agents only (MD -3.22 mmol/mol [-0.29%]; 95% CI -5.39, -1.05, p=0.004, I2=0%). Use of rtCGM showed a trend towards a larger effect (MD -3.95 mmol/mol [-0.36%]; 95% CI -5.46 to -2.44, p<0.00001, I2=0%) than use of isCGM (MD -1.79 mmol/mol [-0.16%]; 95% CI -5.28, 1.69, p=0.31, I2=64%). CGM was also associated with an increase in TIR (+6.36%; 95% CI +2.48, +10.24, p=0.001, I2=9%) and a decrease in TBR (-0.66%; 95% CI -1.21, -0.12, p=0.02, I2=45%), TAR (-5.86%; 95% CI -10.88, -0.84, p=0.02, I2=37%) and glycaemic variability (-1.47%; 95% CI -2.94, -0.01, p=0.05, I2=0%). Three studies reported one or more events of severe hypoglycaemia and macrovascular complications. In comparison with SMBG, CGM use led to a non-statistically significant difference in the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.15, 3.00, p=0.57, I2=0%) and macrovascular complications (RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.42, 5.72, p=0.52, I2=29%). No trials reported data on microvascular complications. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION CGM use compared with SMBG is associated with improvements in glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. However, all studies were open label. In addition, outcome data on incident severe hypoglycaemia and incident microvascular and macrovascular complications were scarce. REGISTRATION This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42023418005).
-
5.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Metrics and Hypoglycemia Duration in Insulin-Experienced Individuals With Long-standing Type 2 Diabetes Switched From a Daily Basal Insulin to Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec: Post Hoc Analysis of ONWARDS 2 and ONWARDS 4.
Bajaj, HS, Ásbjörnsdóttir, B, Carstensen, L, Laugesen, C, Mathieu, C, Philis-Tsimikas, A, Battelino, T
Diabetes care. 2024;47(4):729-738
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
This study’s aim was to assess CGM-based metrics and hypoglycaemia duration with once-weekly insulin icodec [a basal insulin analog in clinical development with a mean half-life of 1 week, allowing for once weekly dosing] versus once-daily basal insulin analogs in insulin-experienced individuals with long-standing type 2 diabetes from two 26-week phase 3a trials ONWARDS 2 (n=525) and ONWARDS 4 (n=582). This study was a post hoc analysis of data from ONWARDS 2 and ONWARDS 4. Results showed that: - in insulin-experienced participants with long-standing type 2 diabetes, compared with once-daily basal insulin analogs, switching from daily basal insulin to once-weekly icodec was associated with similar mean percentages of CGM-based time in range and time above range when assessed across three separate time periods in ONWARDS 2 and ONWARDS 4. - mean CGM based time below range remained within the recommended targets in both arms in both trials. - the duration of CGM-derived overall hypoglycaemic episodes (sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L) was comparable for icodec versus once-daily basal insulins, with median duration of about 40 min. Authors concluded that their findings are relevant to clinical practice, where reduced injection burden and greater treatment satisfaction could contribute to improved adherence to basal insulin treatment.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This post hoc analysis assessed continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based metrics and hypoglycemia duration with once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily basal insulin analogs in insulin-experienced individuals with long-standing type 2 diabetes from two 26-week phase 3a trials (ONWARDS 2 and ONWARDS 4). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Time in range (TIR) (3.9-10.0 mmol/L), time above range (TAR) (>10.0 mmol/L), and time below range (TBR) (<3.9 mmol/L and <3.0 mmol/L) were assessed during three CGM time periods (switch [weeks 0-4], end of treatment [weeks 22-26], and follow-up [weeks 27-31]) for icodec versus comparators (ONWARDS 2, insulin degludec [basal regimen]; ONWARDS 4, insulin glargine U100 [basal-bolus regimen]) using double-blind CGM data. CGM-derived hypoglycemic episode duration (<3.9 mmol/L) was assessed. RESULTS In both trials, there were no statistically significant differences in TIR, TAR, or TBR (<3.0 mmol/L) for icodec versus comparators across all time periods. In the end-of-treatment period, mean TIR was 63.1% (icodec) vs. 59.5% (degludec) in ONWARDS 2 and 66.9% (icodec) vs. 66.4% (glargine U100) in ONWARDS 4. Mean TBR <3.9 mmol/L and <3.0 mmol/L remained within recommended targets (<4% and <1%, respectively) across time periods and treatment arms. Hypoglycemic episode duration (<3.9 mmol/L) was comparable across time periods and treatment arms (median duration ≤40 min). CONCLUSIONS In insulin-experienced participants with long-standing type 2 diabetes, CGM-based TIR, TAR, and CGM-derived hypoglycemia duration (<3.9 mmol/L) were comparable for icodec and once-daily basal insulin analogs during all time periods. TBR remained within recommended targets.
-
6.
Effect of cinnamon spice on continuously monitored glycemic response in adults with prediabetes: a 4-week randomized controlled crossover trial.
Zelicha, H, Yang, J, Henning, SM, Huang, J, Lee, RP, Thames, G, Livingston, EH, Heber, D, Li, Z
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2024;119(3):649-657
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Cinnamon contains polyphenols, which may improve glucose homeostasis, but studies of its influence on glucose changes have had mixed results. This study’s aim was to evaluate the effects of cinnamon consumption on glucose changes throughout the day in participants with prediabetes and obesity. This study was a 4-week randomised, controlled, double-blind crossover trial using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The study enrolled participants (n = 18 adults) with obesity and prediabetes who were randomly assigned to one of the two groups, daily cinnamon supplementation (4 g) or placebo, for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week washout period, and then crossover to the other intervention. Results showed that: - compared to placebo, 24-hour glucose concentrations were significantly lower when cinnamon was administered. - cinnamon supplementation led to lower glucose peaks and increased glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations. Authors concluded that cinnamon spice supplementation may have beneficial effects on glycaemic response in adults with prediabetes. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous clinical studies showing that cinnamon spice lowers blood glucose concentrations had inconsistent results. OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of daily cinnamon spice supplementation in an amount commonly used for seasoning on glucose concentrations in adults with obesity and prediabetes. METHODS Following a 2-wk run-in period of maintaining a low polyphenol/fiber diet, 18 participants with obesity and prediabetes underwent a 10-wk randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover trial (mean age 51.1 y; mean fasting plasma glucose 102.9 mg/dL). The participants were randomly assigned to take cinnamon (4 g/d) or placebo for 4-wk, followed by a 2-wk washout period, and then crossed over to the other intervention for an additional 4-wk. Glucose changes were measured with continuous glucose monitoring. Oral glucose tolerance testing immediately following ingestion of cinnamon or placebo was performed at 4-time points to assess their acute effects both at the baseline and end of each intervention phase. Digestive symptom logs were obtained daily. RESULTS There were 694 follow-up days with 66,624 glucose observations. When compared with placebo, 24-h glucose concentrations were significantly lower when cinnamon was administered [mixed-models; effect size (ES) = 0.96; 95 % confidence interval (CI): -2.9, -1.5; P < 0.001]. Similarly, the mean net-area-under-the-curve (netAUC) for glucose was significantly lower than for placebo when cinnamon was given (over 24 h; ES = -0.66; 95 % CI: 2501.7, 5412.1, P = 0.01). Cinnamon supplementation resulted in lower glucose peaks compared with placebo (Δpeak 9.56 ± 9.1 mg/dL compared with 11.73 ± 8.0 mg/dL; ES = -0.57; 95 % CI: 0.8, 3.7, P = 0.027). Glucose-dependent-insulinotropic-polypeptide concentrations increased during oral glucose tolerance testing + cinnamon testing (mixed-models; ES = 0.51; 95 % CI: 1.56, 100.1, P = 0.04), whereas triglyceride concentrations decreased (mixed-models; ES = 0.55; 95 % CI: -16.0, -1.6, P = 0.02). Treatment adherence was excellent in both groups (cinnamon: 97.6 ± 3.4 % compared with placebo: 97.9 ± 3.7 %; ES = -0.15; 95 % CI: -1.8, 0.2, P = 0.5). No differences were found in digestive symptoms (abdominal pain, borborygmi, bloating, excess flatus, and stools/day) between cinnamon and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS Cinnamon, a widely available and low-cost supplement, may contribute to better glucose control when added to the diet in people who have obesity-related prediabetes. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04342624.
-
7.
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Feedback in the Subsequent Development of Gestational Diabetes: A Pilot, Randomized, Controlled Trial in Pregnant Women.
Quah, PL, Tan, LK, Lek, N, Tagore, S, Chern, BSM, Ang, SB, Wright, A, Thain, SPT, Tan, KH
American journal of perinatology. 2024;41(S 01):e3374-e3382
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were shown to have higher glycemic variability which refers to fluctuations in blood glucose, compared to non-GDM women. This study's aim was to examine the effects of receiving glucose feedback from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) by intermittent scanning (unblinded group) versus masked feedback (blinded group) in the subsequent development of GDM. This study was a prospective randomised controlled trial which enrolled 206 pregnant women who were in their first trimester of pregnancy. Participants were randomly divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Results showed: - no significant differences in GDM outcomes or plasma glucose concentrations between study arms. - that the unblinded group had higher percentage time-in-range during pregnancy compared to the blinded group. - that CGM feedback, coupled with better glycaemic control, indicates its potential use for promoting better glucose control during pregnancy. Authors conclude that CGM feedback may enhance glucose management in pregnant women, but further research is needed to validate these findings.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the effects of receiving glucose feedback from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) by intermittent scanning (unblinded group), and CGM with masked feedback (blinded group) in the subsequent development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective, single-center, pilot, randomized controlled trial including n = 206 pregnant women in the first trimester of pregnancy with no prior diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The participants were randomized into the unblinded group or blinded group and wore the CGM in the first trimester of pregnancy (9-13 weeks), the second trimester of pregnancy (18-23 weeks), and late-second to early-third trimester (24-31 weeks). The primary outcome was GDM rate as diagnosed by the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24 to 28 weeks. RESULTS Over 47 months, 206 pregnant women were enrolled at 9 to 13 weeks. The unblinded group had a higher prevalence of women who developed GDM (21.5 vs. 14.9%; p > 0.05), compared to the blinded group. In the unblinded group compared to the blinded group, plasma glucose values were higher at 1 hour (median 7.7 [interquartile range {IQR}: 6.3-9.2] vs. 7.5 [6.3-8.7]) and 2 hours (6.3 [5.8-7.7] vs. 6.2 [5.3-7.2]), but lower at 0 hour (4.2 [4.0-4.5] vs. 4.3 [4.1-4.6]; p > 0.05). All these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Glucose feedback from CGM wear in the first to the third trimester of pregnancy without personalized patient education failed to alter GDM rate. KEY POINTS · Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is feasible for use in pregnant women.. · No significant difference in gestational diabetes rates with or without CGM feedback.. · Future clinical trials should incorporate CGM education and personalized guidance to enhance study outcomes..
-
8.
Exercise-induced improvement of glycemic fluctuation and its relationship with fat and muscle distribution in type 2 diabetes.
Liu, D, Zhang, Y, Wu, Q, Han, R, Cheng, D, Wu, L, Guo, J, Yu, X, Ge, W, Ni, J, et al
Journal of diabetes. 2024;16(4):e13549
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Exercise plays a crucial role in managing type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, the impact of exercise on blood glucose fluctuation and its relationship with body fat and muscle distribution remains an area of interest. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of combined aerobic and resistance exercise training on blood glucose fluctuation in type 2 diabetes patients and explore the predictors of exercise-induced glycaemic response. This study was a two-arm randomised controlled trial with an exercise group and a control group. The study included 50 patients with T2DM. Results showed that: - exercise training led to decreased 24-hour blood glucose fluctuations in the exercise group. - baseline visceral fat area and mid-thigh muscle area were significant predictors of glycaemic variability changes. Authors concluded that acute combined aerobic and resistance exercise training could improve glycemic fluctuation in T2D patients, and baseline fat and muscle distribution play a role in this effect.
Abstract
AIMS: Management of blood glucose fluctuation is essential for diabetes. Exercise is a key therapeutic strategy for diabetes patients, although little is known about determinants of glycemic response to exercise training. We aimed to investigate the effect of combined aerobic and resistance exercise training on blood glucose fluctuation in type 2 diabetes patients and explore the predictors of exercise-induced glycemic response. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty sedentary diabetes patients were randomly assigned to control or exercise group. Participants in the control group maintained sedentary lifestyle for 2 weeks, and those in the exercise group specifically performed combined exercise training for 1 week. All participants received dietary guidance based on a recommended diet chart. Glycemic fluctuation was measured by flash continuous glucose monitoring. Baseline fat and muscle distribution were accurately quantified through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS Combined exercise training decreased SD of sensor glucose (SDSG, exercise-pre vs exercise-post, mean 1.35 vs 1.10 mmol/L, p = .006) and coefficient of variation (CV, mean 20.25 vs 17.20%, p = .027). No significant change was observed in the control group. Stepwise multiple linear regression showed that baseline MRI-quantified fat and muscle distribution, including visceral fat area (β = -0.761, p = .001) and mid-thigh muscle area (β = 0.450, p = .027), were significantly independent predictors of SDSG change in the exercise group, as well as CV change. CONCLUSIONS Combined exercise training improved blood glucose fluctuation in diabetes patients. Baseline fat and muscle distribution were significant factors that influence glycemic response to exercise, providing new insights into personalized exercise intervention for diabetes.
-
9.
Feasibility of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes at two district hospitals in Neno, Malawi: a randomised controlled trial.
Gomber, A, Valeta, F, Coates, MM, Trujillo, C, Ferrari, G, Boti, M, Kumwenda, K, Mailosi, B, Nakotwa, D, Drown, L, et al
BMJ open. 2024;14(5):e075554
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a severe autoimmune condition which leads to hyperglycaemia and a lifelong insulin dependency. The majority of people living with type 1 diabetes (PLWT1D) in low-income countries struggle to access high-quality care and lack technologies like continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which are standard in resource-rich settings. This study’s aim was to assess CGM feasibility and clinical outcomes among 45 PLWT1D in rural Malawi. This study was a 3-month, 2:1 open-randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to either Dexcom G6 CGM (n=30) or usual care (UC) (n=15) with Safe-Accu glucose monitors and strips. Both groups received diabetes education. Results showed that: - participants tolerated CGM well, but self-sensor changes were challenging, leading to increased clinic visits in the CGM arm. - skin rashes were uncommon, and participants in the CGM arm had more dose adjustments and lifestyle change suggestions. - CGM wear time averaged 63.8%, while UC arm participants brought logbooks to clinic 75% of the time. - Hospitalisations occurred only in the CGM arm but were unrelated to the intervention. Authors concluded that CGM was feasible and appropriate among PLWT1D coming from a rural low-income region. However, the inability of participants to change their own sensor is the biggest challenge, thus it remains crucial to address this challenge.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the feasibility and change in clinical outcomes associated with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use among a rural population in Malawi living with type 1 diabetes. DESIGN A 2:1 open randomised controlled feasibility trial. SETTING Two Partners In Health-supported Ministry of Health-run first-level district hospitals in Neno, Malawi. PARTICIPANTS 45 people living with type 1 diabetes (PLWT1D). INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly assigned to Dexcom G6 CGM (n=30) use or usual care (UC) (n=15) consisting of Safe-Accu glucose monitors and strips. Both arms received diabetes education. OUTCOMES Primary outcomes included fidelity, appropriateness and severe adverse events. Secondary outcomes included change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), acceptability, time in range (CGM arm only) SD of HbA1c and quality of life. RESULTS Participants tolerated CGM well but were unable to change their own sensors which resulted in increased clinic visits in the CGM arm. Despite the hot climate, skin rashes were uncommon but cut-out tape overpatches were needed to secure the sensors in place. Participants in the CGM arm had greater numbers of dose adjustments and lifestyle change suggestions than those in the UC arm. Participants in the CGM arm wore their CGM on average 63.8% of the time. Participants in the UC arm brought logbooks to clinic 75% of the time. There were three hospitalisations all in the CGM arm, but none were related to the intervention. CONCLUSIONS This is the first randomised controlled trial conducted on CGM in a rural region of a low-income country. CGM was feasible and appropriate among PLWT1D and providers, but inability of participants to change their own sensors is a challenge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PACTR202102832069874.
-
10.
Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and childhood asthma: a European collaborative analysis.
Eijkemans, M, Mommers, M, Harskamp-van Ginkel, MW, Vrijkotte, TGM, Ludvigsson, J, Faresjö, Å, Bergström, A, Ekström, S, Grote, V, Koletzko, B, et al
BMJ open respiratory research. 2024;11(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Asthma is the most common non-communicable chronic disease in childhood. Among lifestyle risk factors, obesity and physical inactivity have received particular attention. The primary aim was to investigate the associations between physical activity and sedentary behaviour in early childhood and the prevalence of asthma and lung function in later childhood. This study was a large collaborative meta-analysis involving data from 26 cohorts across Europe. It includes longitudinal data on physical activity, sedentary behaviour, asthma, and lung function from birth to age 18 years. Results showed that children engaged in sedentary behaviour for 2.7 hours per day on average over all age groups. At age 9–14 years sedentary behaviour peaked, whereas children aged 0–2 years were reported to spend the least amount of time engaging in sedentary behaviour (ie, screen time). Additionally, no association was found between physical activity at ages 0–2 years or 3–5 years and the presence of asthma at age 6–18 years. Authors concluded that their findings do not show any indication of a relation between physical activity and sedentary behaviour in early childhood and asthma in later childhood.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the associations of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour in early childhood with asthma and reduced lung function in later childhood within a large collaborative study. DESIGN Pooling of longitudinal data from collaborating birth cohorts using meta-analysis of separate cohort-specific estimates and analysis of individual participant data of all cohorts combined. SETTING Children aged 0-18 years from 26 European birth cohorts. PARTICIPANTS 136 071 individual children from 26 cohorts, with information on PA and/or sedentary behaviour in early childhood and asthma assessment in later childhood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Questionnaire-based current asthma and lung function measured by spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/forced vital capacity) at age 6-18 years. RESULTS Questionnaire-based and accelerometry-based PA and sedentary behaviour at age 3-5 years was not associated with asthma at age 6-18 years (PA in hours/day adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04; sedentary behaviour in hours/day adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.07). PA was not associated with lung function at any age. Analyses of sedentary behaviour and lung function showed inconsistent results. CONCLUSIONS Reduced PA and increased sedentary behaviour before 6 years of age were not associated with the presence of asthma later in childhood.