0
selected
-
1.
Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM
PROBIOTICS DATABASE, OptiBac Probiotics
2020
Abstract
Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM® is a very well-researched strain - certainly the most researched strain of the acidophilus species - which has been extensively tested in vitro, and also in both animal studies and in human clinical trials. There are actually over 45 clinical trials on this strain, a fact which confirms its position as one of the best probiotic strains in the world, with a well-deserved and a secure place in this database of the most well-researched probiotics on the planet. It has been used in a broad range of studies focusing on its potential to support many areas of gastrointestinal and general health, including immune function, antibiotic-associated gut disturbances, and the symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). The L. acidophilus NCFM® strain was first identified when isolated from a human source back in the early 1970's. Its strain name, NCFM®, is derived from an abbreviation of the “North Carolina Food Microbiology”, which is the name of the research laboratory at North Carolina State University (NCSU) where the strain was first discovered. You may also see Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM® referred to as Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 700396, NCK56, N2 as well as NCFM®. This strain is often used in clinical trials in combination with Bifidobacterium lactis Bi-07.
-
2.
Probiotic Lactobacillus casei: Effective for Managing Childhood Diarrhea by Altering Gut Microbiota and Attenuating Fecal Inflammatory Markers.
Lai, HH, Chiu, CH, Kong, MS, Chang, CJ, Chen, CC
Nutrients. 2019;11(5)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Acute diarrhoea caused by pathogens may induce gastroenteritis (inflammation of the stomach and intestines), bloody stool, or severe intra-abdominal infections that establish disease and increase the economic burden, especially among infantile and childhood populations. The aim of the study was to determine whether probiotics (Lactobacilluscasei) inhibited gastrointestinal infection and reduced the associated inflammatory response. The study is a prospective, randomized, case-controlled study which enrolled 81 children aged between 6 months and 6 years. The participants were divided into 2 groups (Lactobacilluscasei variety rhamnosus treatment and a no probiotic control). Study results indicate that probiotics can reduce the severity and duration of diarrhoea. Furthermore, probiotic colonisation improved bowel habits and reduced abdominal pain or colic and bloating. Authors conclude that the efficacy of probiotic preparations for the treatment of acute childhood diarrhoea is related to individual bacteria strains. Thus, the population and modulation of intestinal gut/probiotic bacteria can be restored through the reduction of intestinal inflammatory reactions.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute diarrhea is a major cause of childhood morbidity and an economic burden for families. The aim of this study is to explore the effect of probiotics on clinical symptoms, intestinal microbiota, and inflammatory markers during childhood diarrhea. METHODS Children (n = 81) aged six months to six years (mean age 2.31 years) hospitalized for acute diarrhea were randomized to receive probiotics (Lactobacillus casei variety rhamnosus; n = 42) or no probiotics (n = 39) orally twice daily for seven days. Feces samples were also collected to evaluate microbial content using a traditional agar plate and next-generation sequencing. Immunoglobulin A (IgA), lactoferrin, and calprotectin were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compared in different groups. Other clinical symptoms or signs, including fever, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloated abdomen, daily intake, appetite, and body weight were also assessed. RESULTS Data were collected from 81 individuals across three different time points. Total fecal IgA levels in fecal extracts of the probiotics group were higher than those in the control group, reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05). Concentrations of fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin were significantly downregulated in patients with probiotic Lactobacillus casei variety rhamnosus (Lc) consumption compared to those of the control (p < 0.05). Probiotic Lc administration may be beneficial for gut-microbiota modulation, as shown by the data collected at one week after enrollment. Counts of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus species were elevated in stool culture of the probiotic group. Appetite and oral intake, body-weight gain, abdominal pain, bloating, as well as bowel habits (diarrhea) were much better in children receiving probiotics compared with those in the control group. CONCLUSION Fecal IgA increased during acute diarrhea under Lc treatment; in contrast, fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin were downregulated during acute diarrhea under Lc treatment. Probiotic Lc may be a useful supplement for application in children during acute diarrhea to reduce clinical severity and intestinal inflammatory reaction.
-
3.
Exposure to Different Amounts of Dietary Gluten in Patients with Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): An Exploratory Study.
Roncoroni, L, Bascuñán, KA, Vecchi, M, Doneda, L, Bardella, MT, Lombardo, V, Scricciolo, A, Branchi, F, Elli, L
Nutrients. 2019;11(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-coeliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is characterised by adverse gastrointestinal symptoms related to ingestion of gluten-containing foods and amelioration of symptoms when gluten is removed from the diet. It is currently unclear whether gluten sensitivity is a permanent condition. The aim of this exploratory study was to evaluate the effects of gluten re-introduction in 22 NCGS patients who have been on a strict gluten-free diet for three weeks. Working with a qualified nutritionist, participants began incrementally introducing gluten each week for three weeks. Gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. When adverse symptomology was reported, participants returned to the gluten-level before symptoms started. This study found mixed results with gluten reintroduction. Of the 22 participants, 8 were able to return to a normal gluten-containing diet, and the remaining participants had differing levels of tolerance for gluten consumption. Based on these results, the authors conclude further controlled studies are required to assess the clinical response of reintroducing dietary gluten in patients with NCGS.
Abstract
It is unclear whether patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) can tolerate gluten. We have evaluated the changes of both gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life for NCGS patients after the re-introduction of dietary gluten. Twenty-two NCGS patients reporting functional gastroenterological symptoms and on gluten-free diet (GFD) for the previous three weeks were exposed to incremental gluten-containing diets. Three groups were compared at baseline (immediately after 3-weeks on GFD) and immediately after the return of symptomatology: (i) a group tolerating a low-gluten diet (3.5 g gluten/day, week 1, n = 8), (ii) a group tolerating a mid-gluten diet (8 g gluten/day, week 2, n = 6), and (iii) a group tolerating a high-gluten diet (13 g gluten/day, week 3, n = 8). Their gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. The most common symptoms were: constipation (46%), abdominal pain (50%) and dyspepsia (38%). A decrease in several short form health survey (SF-36) sub-scores (all p < 0.03) after gluten re-introduction was only observed in the group tolerating the low-gluten diet; the same group showed a lower post-intervention role-emotional SF-36 score (p = 0.01). Most gastrointestinal symptoms remained similar after gluten re-introduction. However, a decrease in the general perception of well-being was only found after gluten re-introduction in the group tolerating a low-gluten diet (p = 0.01); the same was true when comparing the post-intervention general well-being perception among the three groups (p = 0.050). In conclusion, dissimilar responses from patients with NCGS were observed after the re-introduction of gluten, with gluten at a low dosage affecting the quality of life and general well-being of a group of patients, whereas others tolerate even higher doses of dietary gluten.
-
4.
Effect of a Preparation of Four Probiotics on Symptoms of Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Association with Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.
Leventogiannis, K, Gkolfakis, P, Spithakis, G, Tsatali, A, Pistiki, A, Sioulas, A, Giamarellos-Bourboulis, EJ, Triantafyllou, K
Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins. 2019;11(2):627-634
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common functional gut disorder with symptoms primarily of bloating and diarrhea. Recently these symptoms have been associated with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), which occurs when bacteria from the colon resides in the small intestine. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of probiotics in improvement of symptoms of IBS patients with SIBO. In this prospective trial, five patients with IBS and SIBO and 21 patients with IBS without SIBO were given probiotic capsules twice a day for 30 days. Participants completed an IBS severity questionnaire at three visits throughout the trial. At the end of the trial, a 71.3% decrease of the total IBS score was detected in patients with IBS and SIBO, compared with those without SIBO. This study found there are clinical benefits from probiotic supplementation in IBS patients with SIBO. Based on these findings, the authors conclude larger, randomised studies be undertaken based on this prospective design.
Abstract
The effect of probiotics on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has never been studied so far. In this prospective trial, five patients with IBS and SIBO and 21 patients with IBS without SIBO were administered an oral capsule containing Saccharomyces boulardii, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lactobacillus plantarum (Lactolevure®) every 12 h for 30 days. SIBO was defined by quantitative culture of the third part of the duodenum; IBS was defined by the Rome III criteria. Severity of symptoms was graded by the IBS severity scoring system (SSS). The primary study endpoint was the efficacy of probiotics in improvement of symptoms of IBS in patients with SIBO. Thirty days after the end of treatment, a 71.3% decrease of the total IBS score was detected in patients with IBS and SIBO compared to 10.6% in those without SIBO (p 0.017). A similar decrease was achieved among patients with constipation-predominant IBS without SIBO. Post-treatment satisfaction from bowel function was greater in patients with SIBO. Similar satisfaction improvement was found among patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS irrespective from SIBO; pain intensity score decreased in patients with constipation-predominant IBS irrespective from SIBO. The benefit of probiotics was greater among patients with a pro-inflammatory cytokine pattern in the duodenal fluid. This is the first study that prospectively demonstrated superior clinical efficacy of probiotics in patients with IBS with SIBO. Analysis also showed considerable benefit from probiotic intake regarding certain symptoms of patients with diarrhea-predominant and constipation-predominant IBS.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02204891.
-
5.
Systematic review: probiotics in the management of lower gastrointestinal symptoms - an updated evidence-based international consensus.
Hungin, APS, Mitchell, CR, Whorwell, P, Mulligan, C, Cole, O, Agréus, L, Fracasso, P, Lionis, C, Mendive, J, Philippart de Foy, JM, et al
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2018;47(8):1054-1070
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The role of the gut microbiota in health and disease is far reaching and there is a growing body of evidence on the therapeutic potential of probiotics in gastrointestinal (GI) disease. Patients with GI disease present with a variety of symptoms and current evidence suggests probiotics may play a role in ameliorating these adverse symptoms. The purpose of this review is to update the previous systematic review and incorporate new findings on the role of probiotics in adult patients presenting with a variety of GI symptoms. Based on the updated evidence, this study confirms the finding that specific probiotics are beneficial for certain lower GI problems. According to this review, the author deems this study useful for clinicians when recommending probiotics to patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2013, a systematic review and Delphi consensus reported that specific probiotics can benefit adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other gastrointestinal (GI) problems. AIM: To update the consensus with new evidence. METHODS A systematic review identified randomised, placebo-controlled trials published between January 2012 and June 2017. Evidence was graded, previously developed statements were reassessed by an 8-expert panel, and agreement was reached via Delphi consensus. RESULTS A total of 70 studies were included (IBS, 34; diarrhoea associated with antibiotics, 13; diarrhoea associated with Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, 7; other conditions, 16). Of 15 studies that examined global IBS symptoms as a primary endpoint, 8 reported significant benefits of probiotics vs placebo. Consensus statements with 100% agreement and "high" evidence level indicated that specific probiotics help reduce overall symptom burden and abdominal pain in some patients with IBS and duration/intensity of diarrhoea in patients prescribed antibiotics or H. pylori eradication therapy, and have favourable safety. Statements with 70%-100% agreement and "moderate" evidence indicated that, in some patients with IBS, specific probiotics help reduce bloating/distension and improve bowel movement frequency/consistency. CONCLUSIONS This updated review indicates that specific probiotics are beneficial in certain lower GI problems, although many of the new publications did not report benefits of probiotics, possibly due to inclusion of new, less efficacious preparations. Specific probiotics can relieve lower GI symptoms in IBS, prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics and H. pylori eradication therapy, and show favourable safety. This study will help clinicians recommend/prescribe probiotics for specific symptoms.
-
6.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 in irritable bowel syndrome: An individual subject meta-analysis.
Cayzeele-Decherf, A, Pélerin, F, Leuillet, S, Douillard, B, Housez, B, Cazaubiel, M, Jacobson, GK, Jüsten, P, Desreumaux, P
World journal of gastroenterology. 2017;23(2):336-344
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a digestive disorder with various symptoms, affecting a significant number of the population. Gut bacteria are known to play a role in triggering the syndrome and research is exploring the manipulation of the gut microbiome in treating and managing symptoms. One yeast strain of interest is Saccharomyces Cerevisiae CNCM-I 3856. This meta-analysis of 2 randomised controlled trial, including 579 patients diagnosed with IBS, aimed to confirm previous conclusions on the effectiveness of supplementation of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae on typical IBS-C (constipation predominant IBS) symptoms. The pooled results showed a statistically significant improvement in abdominal pain, bloating and stool consistency when compared to placebo, after 2 months. It is important to note that positive effects were not reported after 1 month, but required 2 months of supplementation. When compiling nutrition protocols for IBS patients, Nutrition Practitioners need to take account of the length of intervention required to have the desired impact, as well as the choice of protocol itself.
Abstract
AIM: To confirm previous conclusions on Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) CNCM I-3856 for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) management. METHODS An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed on two randomized clinical trials studying the effect of S. cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 supplementation on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in IBS subjects. A total of 579 IBS subjects were included. Outcomes were the daily Likert scale scores of abdominal pain/discomfort and bloating [area under the curve (AUC) and weekly means], responder status, and bowel movements (stool frequency and consistency). Statistical analyses were conducted in Intent to Treat (ITT) population, IBS-C subjects and IBS-C subjects with an abdominal pain/discomfort score higher than or equal to 2 at baseline ("IBS-C ≥ 2 subpopulation"). RESULTS S. cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 significantly improved abdominal pain/discomfort and bloating during the second month of supplementation [AUC (W5-W8)] with improvement up to the minimal clinically relevant threshold of 10%: a 12.3% reduction of abdominal pain/discomfort in the ITT population compared to the Placebo group (P = 0.0134) has been observed. In the IBS-C ≥ 2 subpopulation, there were a 13.1% reduction of abdominal pain/discomfort and a 14.9% reduction of bloating compared to the Placebo group (P = 0.0194 and P = 0.0145, respectively). GI symptoms significantly decreased during supplementation but no statistical differences were reported between groups at the end of the supplementation period. Responder status was defined as a subject who experienced a decrease of 1 arbitrary unit (a.u.) or 50% of the abdominal discomfort score from baseline for at least 2 wk out of the last 4 wk of the study. A significant difference between groups was reported in the ITT population, when considering the first definition: subjects in the Active group had 1.510 higher odds to be a responder (reduction of 1 a.u. of abdominal pain/discomfort) compared with subjects in the Placebo group (P = 0.0240). At the end of supplementation period, stool consistency in the Active group of the ITT population was significantly improved and classified as "normal" compared to Placebo (respectively 3.13 ± 1.197 a.u. vs 2.58 ± 1.020 a.u., P = 0.0003). Similar results were seen in the IBS-C ≥ 2 subpopulation (Active group: 3.14 ± 1.219 a.u. vs Placebo group: 2.59 ± 1.017 a.u., P = 0.0009). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis supports previous data linking S. cerevisiae I-3856 and improvement of GI symptoms, in IBS overall population and in the IBS-C and IBS-C ≥ 2 subpopulations.