-
1.
Nutrition and Men's Health - NED Infobite
BANT's scientific NED InfoBites are designed to provide key elements of the latest research using plain language. They provide quick overviews on particular health issues and nutrition topics for a speedy introduction to the science. Visually attractive and easily shareable with clients and social media followers.
2024
Abstract
This NED Infobite focuses on some of the science related to men's health. It includes randomised controlled trials looking at time-restricted feeding, the impact of including apples in the daily diet and the outcomes of lower carbohydrate versus mixed carbohydrate diets on weight loss.
-
2.
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Diet and Remission - NED Infobite
BANT's scientific NED InfoBites are designed to provide key elements of the latest research using plain language. They provide quick overviews on particular health issues and nutrition topics for a speedy introduction to the science. Visually attractive and easily shareable with clients and social media followers.
2024
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes has become a worldwide health burden with a global prevalence of 300 million. The evidence is building in relation to the positive impacts of diet and lifestyle changes, including the ability to reverse Type 2 diabetes status. This collection of articles looks at the science of ketogenic and low/very low carbohydrate diets and their ability to achieve Type 2 diabetes remission.
-
3.
The NED Journal - Male Health, ADHD and Neurodiversity, Stress and Adrenals
Issue 2_December 2023 Peer-reviewed expert reviews and clinical insights from the Nutrition Evidence Editorial Board and Expert Review Panel
2024
Abstract
In this 2nd edition of the NED Journal, you can read some of the latest expert insights on male health, ADHD and neurodiversity, and stress and adrenals. This NED Journal transforms the science to enable individualised science-based clinical decision making, with 14 peer-reviewed expert reviews. The NED Journal supports BANT members and other integrative and personalised medicine practitioners with their evidence-based practice.
-
4.
Restricting sugar or carbohydrate intake does not impact physical activity level or energy intake over 24 h despite changes in substrate use: a randomised crossover study in healthy men and women.
Hengist, A, Davies, RG, Rogers, PJ, Brunstrom, JM, van Loon, LJC, Walhin, JP, Thompson, D, Koumanov, F, Betts, JA, Gonzalez, JT
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(2):921-940
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Diets high in carbohydrates especially when consumed in sugar-sweetened food and beverages has been shown to result in increased energy intakes in the diet. However, diets low in sugar and carbohydrates have been shown to have a limited effect on changes in body mass and weight loss. In this instance, some other mechanism is preventing weight loss. Diets low in carbohydrates have been shown to decrease physical activity levels and energy expenditure, which may be responsible for the limited weight loss seen with carbohydrate restricted diets. This randomised control trial of 25 individuals aimed to determine whether carbohydrate restriction would reduce physical activity energy expenditure over a 24-hour period compared to diets higher in sugar and/or carbohydrates. Individuals with a low dietary intake of sugar and carbohydrates and moderate intake of sugar all showed similar physical activity energy expenditure levels. Interestingly low carbohydrate intake resulted in the highest 24 hour increase in low density lipoprotein concentrations and decreased satiety hormones. It was concluded that when energy density is controlled, restricting sugar or carbohydrates has no effect on physical activity levels over a 24-hour period. This study could be used by healthcare professionals that in the very short-term low sugar and carbohydrate diets have no effect on physical activity levels but does affect metabolic changes. However studies need to be performed to determine long-term effects.
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the effects of dietary sugar or carbohydrate restriction on physical activity energy expenditure, energy intake, and physiological outcomes across 24 h. METHODS In a randomized, open-label crossover design, twenty-five healthy men (n = 10) and women (n = 15) consumed three diets over a 24-h period: moderate carbohydrate and sugar content (MODSUG = 50% carbohydrate [20% sugars], 15% protein, 35% fat); low sugar content (LOWSUG = 50% carbohydrate [< 5% sugars], 15% protein, 35% fat); and low carbohydrate content (LOWCHO = 8% carbohydrate [< 5% sugars], 15% protein, 77% fat). Postprandial metabolic responses to a prescribed breakfast (20% EI) were monitored under laboratory conditions before an ad libitum test lunch, with subsequent diet and physical activity monitoring under free-living conditions until blood sample collection the following morning. RESULTS The MODSUG, LOWSUG and LOWCHO diets resulted in similar mean [95%CI] rates of both physical activity energy expenditure (771 [624, 919] vs. 677 [565, 789] vs. 802 [614, 991] kcal·d-1; p = 0.29] and energy intake (2071 [1794, 2347] vs. 2195 [1918, 2473] vs. 2194 [1890, 2498] kcal·d-1; P = 0.34), respectively. The LOWCHO condition elicited the lowest glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to breakfast (P < 0.01) but the highest 24-h increase in LDL-cholesterol concentrations (P < 0.001), with no differences between the MODSUG and LOWSUG treatments. Leptin concentrations decreased over 24-h of consuming LOWCHO relative to LOWSUG (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION When energy density is controlled for, restricting either sugar or total dietary carbohydrate does not modulate physical activity level or energy intake over a 24-h period (~ 19-h free-living) despite substantial metabolic changes. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION ID NCT03509610, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03509610.
-
5.
Dietary Interventions to Treat Type 2 Diabetes in Adults with a Goal of Remission: An Expert Consensus Statement from the American College of Lifestyle
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine (AJLM) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly resource for practitioners seeking to incorporate lifestyle practices into clinical medicine. AJLM provides commentaries and research reviews on nutrition and diet, physical activity, behavior change, cardiovascular disease, obesity, anxiety and depression, sleep problems, metabolic disease, and more. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The Official Journal of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine.
2022
Abstract
The objective of this Expert Consensus Statement is to assist clinicians in achieving remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in adults using diet as a primary intervention. Expert consensus was achieved for 69 statements pertaining to diet and remission of T2D, dietary specifics and types of diets, adjuvant and alternative interventions, support, monitoring, adherence to therapy, weight loss, and payment and policy. Clinicians can use these statements to improve quality of care, inform policy and protocols, and identify areas of uncertainty.
-
6.
The Effect of Dietary Carbohydrate and Fat Manipulation on the Metabolome and Markers of Glucose and Insulin Metabolism: A Randomised Parallel Trial.
McCullough, D, Harrison, T, Boddy, LM, Enright, KJ, Amirabdollahian, F, Schmidt, MA, Doenges, K, Quinn, K, Reisdorph, N, Mazidi, M, et al
Nutrients. 2022;14(18)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Insulin resistance is a complex metabolic disorder that increases the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and is integral to cardiometabolic disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of an ad libitum 8-week low-carbohydrate high fat (LCHF) diet compared with a high-carbohydrate low-fat (HCLF) diet (current UK guidelines) on cardiometabolic risk factors, the plasma metabolome, and markers of glucose and insulin metabolism in adults with a slightly elevated cardiometabolic risk. This is a parallel randomised design study where participants were randomly assigned to either a HCLF (n = 8), or a LCHF (n = 8) diet for 8 weeks. Results show that both the LCHF and HCLF diets exerted benefits on markers of insulin resistance and metabolic risk. Both diets had no effect on fasting glucose levels, but insulin concentrations significantly decreased comparably with both diets. Authors conclude that following either a LCHF or HCLF diet may reduce the risk of developing T2D by reducing markers of insulin resistance.
Abstract
High carbohydrate, lower fat (HCLF) diets are recommended to reduce cardiometabolic disease (CMD) but low carbohydrate high fat (LCHF) diets can be just as effective. The effect of LCHF on novel insulin resistance biomarkers and the metabolome has not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of an ad libitum 8-week LCHF diet compared with a HCLF diet on CMD markers, the metabolome, and insulin resistance markers. n = 16 adults were randomly assigned to either LCHF (n = 8, <50 g CHO p/day) or HCLF diet (n = 8) for 8 weeks. At weeks 0, 4 and 8, participants provided fasted blood samples, measures of body composition, blood pressure and dietary intake. Samples were analysed for markers of cardiometabolic disease and underwent non-targeted metabolomic profiling. Both a LCHF and HCLF diet significantly (p < 0.01) improved fasting insulin, HOMA IR, rQUICKI and leptin/adiponectin ratio (p < 0.05) levels. Metabolomic profiling detected 3489 metabolites with 78 metabolites being differentially regulated, for example, an upregulation in lipid metabolites following the LCHF diet may indicate an increase in lipid transport and oxidation, improving insulin sensitivity. In conclusion, both diets may reduce type 2 diabetes risk albeit, a LCHF diet may enhance insulin sensitivity by increasing lipid oxidation.
-
7.
Dietary carbohydrate restriction augments weight loss-induced improvements in glycaemic control and liver fat in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.
Thomsen, MN, Skytte, MJ, Samkani, A, Carl, MH, Weber, P, Astrup, A, Chabanova, E, Fenger, M, Frystyk, J, Hartmann, B, et al
Diabetologia. 2022;65(3):506-517
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The carbohydrate restricted diet has been shown to be beneficial for Type 2 diabetes (T2D) management and reducing cardiovascular disease risk. This open-label, parallel randomised controlled trial involved Type 2 diabetic patients taking antidiabetic medications who restricted their energy intake by following either a carbohydrate-reduced high protein diet or a conventional diabetic diet. Participants in both groups had a 5.9% reduction in body weight, similar changes in fasting NEFA, apoB, apoA-1, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and non-HDL cholesterol, and a significant reduction in fasting glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and HOMA2-IR after 6 weeks of intervention. Carbohydrate-reduced high protein diet group showed a greater reduction in HbA1c and diurnal mean glucose, glycaemic variability, fasting triacylglycerol concentration and liver fat content. Carbohydrate-reduced high protein diet caused an adverse reaction in some patients, and those following a carbohydrate-reduced high protein diet excreted more urea than those eating a conventional diabetic diet. To confirm the results of this study, long-term robust studies are needed. This study can assist healthcare professionals in understanding the benefits of following a carbohydrate-reduced high protein diet in improving glycaemic control, triglyceride levels, and reducing body weight in Type 2 diabetes patients.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Lifestyle modification and weight loss are cornerstones of type 2 diabetes management. However, carbohydrate restriction may have weight-independent beneficial effects on glycaemic control. This has been difficult to demonstrate because low-carbohydrate diets readily decrease body weight. We hypothesised that carbohydrate restriction enhances the beneficial metabolic effects of weight loss in type 2 diabetes. METHODS This open-label, parallel RCT included adults with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c 48-97 mmol/mol (6.5-11%), BMI >25 kg/m2, eGFR >30 ml min-1 [1.73 m]-2 and glucose-lowering therapy restricted to metformin or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Participants were randomised by a third party and assigned to 6 weeks of energy restriction (all foods were provided) aiming at ~6% weight loss with either a carbohydrate-reduced high-protein diet (CRHP, percentage of total energy intake [E%]: CH30/P30/F40) or a conventional diabetes diet (CD, E%: CH50/P17/F33). Fasting blood samples, continuous glucose monitoring and magnetic resonance spectroscopy were used to assess glycaemic control, lipid metabolism and intrahepatic fat. Change in HbA1c was the primary outcome; changes in circulating and intrahepatic triacylglycerol were secondary outcomes. Data were collected at Copenhagen University Hospital (Bispebjerg and Herlev). RESULTS Seventy-two adults (CD 36, CRHP 36, all white, 38 male sex) with type 2 diabetes (mean duration 8 years, mean HbA1c 57 mmol/mol [7.4%]) and mean BMI of 33 kg/m2 were enrolled, of which 67 (CD 33, CRHP 34) completed the study. Body weight decreased by 5.8 kg (5.9%) in both groups after 6 weeks. Compared with the CD diet, the CRHP diet further reduced HbA1c (mean [95% CI] -1.9 [-3.5, -0.3] mmol/mol [-0.18 (-0.32, -0.03)%], p = 0.018) and diurnal mean glucose (mean [95% CI] -0.8 [-1.2, -0.4] mmol/l, p < 0.001), stabilised glucose excursions by reducing glucose CV (mean [95% CI] -4.1 [-5.9, -2.2]%, p < 0.001), and augmented the reductions in fasting triacylglycerol concentration (by mean [95% CI] -18 [-29, -6]%, p < 0.01) and liver fat content (by mean [95% CI] -26 [-45, 0]%, p = 0.051). However, pancreatic fat content was decreased to a lesser extent by the CRHP than the CD diet (mean [95% CI] 33 [7, 65]%, p = 0.010). Fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA2-IR and cholesterol concentrations (total, LDL and HDL) were reduced significantly and similarly by both diets. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION Moderate carbohydrate restriction for 6 weeks modestly improved glycaemic control, and decreased circulating and intrahepatic triacylglycerol levels beyond the effects of weight loss itself compared with a CD diet in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Concurrent differences in protein and fat intakes, and the quality of dietary macronutrients, may have contributed to these results and should be explored in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03814694. FUNDING The study was funded by Arla Foods amba, The Danish Dairy Research Foundation, and Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg.
-
8.
The effect of periodic ketogenic diet on newly diagnosed overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes.
Li, S, Lin, G, Chen, J, Chen, Z, Xu, F, Zhu, F, Zhang, J, Yuan, S
BMC endocrine disorders. 2022;22(1):34
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Currently, the ketogenic diet is gaining popularity in managing Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Ketogenic diets replace carbohydrates with fat and include limited carbohydrates and adequate protein. This randomised controlled trial evaluated the effects of the 12-week ketogenic diet on sixty overweight or obese T2D patients. Both the ketogenic and control diabetes diet groups achieved significant reductions in weight, body mass index, waist circumference, triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, and HbA1c. However, the ketogenic group showed significantly greater reductions in body mass, blood lipids, and blood glucose than the control group. In the ketogenic diet group, serum uric acid levels were higher than those in the control diet group. It was found that the control diet group adhered to the diet for a longer period than the ketogenic diet group, whose willingness to adhere to the diet long-term was weaker. More robust long-term studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects of a ketogenic diet. In this study, more patients who followed the ketogenic diet experienced hypoglycaemic events during the first four weeks. Healthcare providers should exercise caution when recommending a short term therapeutic ketogenic diet.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ketogenic diet (KD) is characterized by fat as a substitute of carbohydrates for the primary energy source. There is a large number of overweight or obese people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), while this study aims to observe periodic ketogenic diet for effect on overweight or obese patients newly diagnosed as T2DM. METHODS A total of 60 overweight or obese patients newly diagnosed as T2DM were randomized into two groups: KD group, which was given ketogenic diet, and control group, which was given routine diet for diabetes, 30 cases in each group. Both dietary patterns lasted 12 weeks, and during the period, the blood glucose, blood lipid, body weight, insulin, and uric acid before and after intervention, as well as the significance for relevant changes, were observed. RESULTS For both groups, the weight, BMI(body mass index), Waist, TG (triglyceride), TC(cholesterol), LDL (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol), HDL (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), FBG (fasting glucose), FINS (fasting insulin), HbA1c (glycosylated hemoglobin) were decreased after intervention (P < 0.05), while the decrease rates in the KD group was more significant than the control group. However, UA(serum uric acid) in the KD group showed an upward trend, while in the control group was not changed significantly (P > 0.05).The willingness to adhere to the ketogenic diet over the long term was weaker than to the routine diet for diabetes. CONCLUSION Among the overweight or obese patients newly diagnosed as type 2 diabetes mellitus, periodic ketogenic diet can not only control the body weight, but also control blood glucose and lipid, but long-term persistence is difficult.
-
9.
The potential prolonged effect at one-year follow-up after 18-month randomized controlled trial of a 90 g/day low-carbohydrate diet in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Chen, CY, Huang, WS, Ho, MH, Chang, CH, Lee, LT, Chen, HS, Kang, YD, Chie, WC, Jan, CF, Wang, WD, et al
Nutrition & diabetes. 2022;12(1):17
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A low carbohydrate diet (LCD) could be an effective dietary strategy for managing Type 2 Diabetes and body weight. This follow-up of a randomised controlled study evaluated the effect of moderate LCD after 18 months of 90 g/day LCD in 85 poorly controlled Type 2 Diabetic patients and compared it with Traditional Diabetic Diet (TDD). Those who followed the LCD diet ate significantly fewer carbohydrates and more protein and fat at the follow up between 18 and 30 months compared to those who followed the TDD group. The LCD group also showed significant improvements in serum HbA1C, two-hour serum glucose, serum alanine aminotransferase and Medication Effect Score in comparison with the TDD group. However, the level of triglycerides increased, and HDL levels decreased significantly in the LCD group from 18 to 30 months. There was however no significant difference between the groups in the improvement of HbA1C, fasting serum glucose, 2 h serum glucose, as well as serum cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, ALT, creatinine, and urine microalbumin. To confirm the benefits of LCD on glycaemic control, further robust studies are needed. Results of this study can help healthcare professionals gain a better understanding of the prolonged effects of LCD on glycaemic control, liver function, and medication effect scores.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect at a one-year follow-up after an 18-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 90 gm/day low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Eighty-five poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients with an initial HbA1c ≥ 7.5% who have completed an 18-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) on 90 g/day low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) were recruited and followed for one year. A three-day weighted food record, relevant laboratory tests, and medication effect score (MES) were obtained at the end of the previous trial and one year after for a total of 30 months period on specific diet. RESULTS 71 (83.5%) patients completed the study, 35 were in TDD group and 36 were in LCD group. Although the mean of percentage changes in daily carbohydrate intake was significantly lower for those in TDD group than those in LCD group (30.51 ± 11.06% vs. 55.16 ± 21.79%, p = 0.0455) in the period between 18 months and 30 months, patients in LCD group consumed significantly less amount of daily carbohydrate than patients in TDD group (131.8 ± 53.9 g vs. 195.1 ± 50.2 g, p < 0.001). The serum HbA1C, two-hour serum glucose, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and MES were also significantly lower for the LCD group patients than those in the TDD group (p = 0.017, p < 0.001, p = 0.017, and p = 0.008 respectively). The mean of percentage changes of HbA1C, fasting serum glucose, 2 h serum glucose, as well as serum cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein, ALT, creatinine, and urine microalbumin, however, were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The one-year follow-up for patients on 90 g/d LCD showed potential prolonged and better outcome on glycaemic control, liver function and MES than those on TDD for poorly controlled diabetic patients.
-
10.
Diets for weight management in adults with type 2 diabetes: an umbrella review of published meta-analyses and systematic review of trials of diets for diabetes remission.
Churuangsuk, C, Hall, J, Reynolds, A, Griffin, SJ, Combet, E, Lean, MEJ
Diabetologia. 2022;65(1):14-36
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a global epidemic. Although it is a complex disease, it is mainly driven by weight gain. The benefits of weight loss for T2D are well known, but patients and healthcare practitioners do not have clear guidance as to which dietary strategies may be effective to achieve and to maintain weight loss. The aim of this study is to review a number of studies of weight loss diets in T2D patients to see which ones are the most effective. Also, to see which dietary patterns support type 2 diabetes remission. Greatest weight loss was reported with very low energy diets including formula meal replacements. Low-carbohydrate diets were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets. High-protein, Mediterranean, high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid, vegetarian and low-glycaemic-index diets all achieved minimal or no difference from control diets. Diets for weight management in people with type 2 diabetes do not support any particular macronutrient profile or style over others. Very low energy diets and formula meal replacements appear to be the most effective. Programmes including a hypocaloric formula ‘total diet replacement’ induction phase were most effective for type 2 diabetes remission. Further research is needed to assess longer-term impacts on weight, glycaemic control, clinical outcomes and diabetes complications.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Authors highlight current evidence on diets for T2D remission is limited but believe remission can be achieved if sufficient weight loss is maintained. The main contributor to HbA1c reduction and remission appears to be weight loss, irrespective of diet type
- Nice Guidelines highlight the remission of diabetes occurs when a patient no longer satisfies the diagnostic criteria, without receiving glucose-lowering medication. By 2019 in one UK GP practice 27% of the practice population with T2D who followed a LCD for 23 months, lost weight and lowered their HbA1c to 48 mmol/mol (NICE target range) in conjunction with prescribed medication
- This review highlights an opportunity for Nutritional Therapy Practitioners to successfully work with LCD approaches to support weight loss and improved HbA1c.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
- 19 meta-analyses (MA) on weight-loss diets, involving 23 primary trials were assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2. Findings were synthesised by diet type and study quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies – of Interventions [ROBINS-I]) with GRADE applied
- Weight loss diets in the review included: Formula meal replacements (high quality, GRADE moderate) achieved 2.4 kg (95% CI −3.3, −1.4) greater weight loss over 12–52 weeks. Low-carbohydrate diets were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets (high quality, GRADE high). High-protein, Mediterranean, high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid, vegetarian and low-glycaemic-index diets all achieved minimal (0.3– 2 kg) or no difference from control diets (low to critically low quality, GRADE very low/moderate)
- Greatest weight loss was reported with very low energy diets (VLED), (400–500 kcal). However, this study found that low-carbohydrate diets (LCD) (21–70g of carbohydrate daily from1000–1500 kcal) were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets
- Time period of diets / length of observation / intervention: (1) Formula meal replacements (>12–52 wk), (2) LCDs ranged between (>8 wk to 4 years), (3) Very low energy diets (>8–12 wk), (4) High- protein (>4->8 wks), Mediterranean (>4->8 wk), high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid (>2wk), vegetarian (≥3wk) and low-glycaemic-index diets (≥6mo)
- Authors highlight weight reduction is fundamental for T2D management and remission
- This MA found that VLED and formula meal replacement appear the most effective approaches for weight management with T2D by providing less energy than self-administered food-based diets
- Potential pathophysiological mechanisms highlighted by authors are HbA1c reduction and remission which appear to be from weight loss, with only small differences between diet types assessed over 3–12 months, irrespective of diet type
- Study limitations: Many meta-analyses were of ‘low’ and ‘critically low’ AMSTAR 2 quality, predominantly through ‘no protocol reported’ (despite clear and sound methods) and no assessment of publication bias
- Most studies included European participants, such that findings may not be equally applicable to other ethnic and/or deprived communities. Durations of interventions varied, where weight regain is frequent over a longer period. Authors highlight evidence from clinical practice is needed to identify safe and effective approaches to achieve and maintain weight loss
- Authors highlight primary studies should use an RCT design, with data analyses conducted ‘blind’. They should define the intervention clearly (e.g., diets, physical activity, and behavioural and psychological support), and address separately the induction (usually 3–6 months) and maintenance (≥12 months)
- This research received no funding
- The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
- While this study found a variety of dietary compositions can be used effectively for weight management with T2D, VLED was successfully used to achieve remission for T2D
- Programmes with a ’total diet replacement’ induction phase were the most effective dietary approach for T2D remission (up to 61% of participants at 1 year).
Considerations for future research:
- Authors state future research should provide implementation with optimal support in real-life settings for weight loss, prevention of weight regain and remissions, rather than seek subtle differences from macronutrient compositions
- Future studies should report sufficient detail about macronutrient or micronutrient contents, or prescribed and reported energy intakes, including energy intake of nutrient-restricted diets.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Weight reduction is fundamental for type 2 diabetes management and remission, but uncertainty exists over which diet type is best to achieve and maintain weight loss. We evaluated dietary approaches for weight loss, and remission, in people with type 2 diabetes to inform practice and clinical guidelines. METHODS First, we conducted a systematic review of published meta-analyses of RCTs of weight-loss diets. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, up to 7 May 2021. We synthesised weight loss findings stratified by diet types and assessed meta-analyses quality with A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2. We assessed certainty of pooled results of each meta-analysis using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) (PROSPERO CRD42020169258). Second, we conducted a systematic review of any intervention studies reporting type 2 diabetes remission with weight-loss diets, in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, up to 10 May 2021. Findings were synthesised by diet type and study quality (Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions [ROBINS-I]), with GRADE applied (PROSPERO CRD42020208878). RESULTS We identified 19 meta-analyses of weight-loss diets, involving 2-23 primary trials (n = 100-1587), published 2013-2021. Twelve were 'critically low' or 'low' AMSTAR 2 quality, with seven 'high' quality. Greatest weight loss was reported with very low energy diets, 1.7-2.1 MJ/day (400-500 kcal) for 8-12 weeks (high-quality meta-analysis, GRADE low), achieving 6.6 kg (95% CI -9.5, -3.7) greater weight loss than low-energy diets (4.2-6.3 MJ/day [1000-1500 kcal]). Formula meal replacements (high quality, GRADE moderate) achieved 2.4 kg (95% CI -3.3, -1.4) greater weight loss over 12-52 weeks. Low-carbohydrate diets were no better for weight loss than higher-carbohydrate/low-fat diets (high quality, GRADE high). High-protein, Mediterranean, high-monounsaturated-fatty-acid, vegetarian and low-glycaemic-index diets all achieved minimal (0.3-2 kg) or no difference from control diets (low to critically low quality, GRADE very low/moderate). For type 2 diabetes remission, of 373 records, 16 met inclusion criteria. Remissions at 1 year were reported for a median 54% of participants in RCTs including initial low-energy total diet replacement (low-risk-of-bias study, GRADE high), and 11% and 15% for meal replacements and Mediterranean diets, respectively (some concerns for risk of bias in studies, GRADE moderate/low). For ketogenic/very low-carbohydrate and very low-energy food-based diets, the evidence for remission (20% and 22%, respectively) has serious and critical risk of bias, and GRADE certainty is very low. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION Published meta-analyses of hypocaloric diets for weight management in people with type 2 diabetes do not support any particular macronutrient profile or style over others. Very low energy diets and formula meal replacement appear the most effective approaches, generally providing less energy than self-administered food-based diets. Programmes including a hypocaloric formula 'total diet replacement' induction phase were most effective for type 2 diabetes remission. Most of the evidence is restricted to 1 year or less. Well-conducted research is needed to assess longer-term impacts on weight, glycaemic control, clinical outcomes and diabetes complications.