-
1.
Micronutrients, Phytonutrients, and Mental Health
As the pioneer and global leader of Functional Medicine, the Institute of Functional Medicine leads and catalyses the efforts of a large and expanding Functional Medicine ecosystem, including providers, educators, payers, industry leaders, regulators, and influencers.
2022
Abstract
The IFM provides some food for thought around the topic of micronutrient deficiency in the population today and how this is having a detrimental impact on our mental health. The many avenues of micronutrient depletion are explored including stress and the link between the coronavirus pandemic and the rise in mental health issues across the globe. They shine a spotlight specifically on magnesium and B vitamins where low levels have been linked to increased risk of depression, plus the importance of anti-inflammatory dietary phytonutrients and antioxidants such as vitamins A, C, D and E which have been associated with reduced levels of stress, anxiety and depression. Besides the evidence for a varied and nutrient dense diet, we are reminded that strategies for managing stress should also be considered with respect to both the direct impact on our mental and physical health, and the risk of micronutrient depletion.
-
2.
HOMEFOOD randomised trial - Six-month nutrition therapy improves quality of life, self-rated health, cognitive function, and depression in older adults after hospital discharge.
Blondal, BS, Geirsdottir, OG, Halldorsson, TI, Beck, AM, Jonsson, PV, Ramel, A
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2022;48:74-81
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
It is well known that older people are at a higher risk for nutritional inadequacy which is accompanied by depression, impaired cognitive function, and poor overall health. In this secondary analysis of a randomised controlled assessor-blinded dietary intervention trial, the authors examined the effects of six months of nutritional therapy on quality of life, self-rated health, cognitive function, and depression in elderly patients aged 65 years and over. The participants in the intervention group received nutritional therapy (HOMEFOOD) education to overcome malnutrition, which included dietary recommendations to ensure an adequate nutritional intake of energy and protein through diet and additional supplemental protein and energy-rich foods. After six months of nutritional therapy, the intervention group showed improvement in cognitive function, self-rated health, depression score, and quality of life scores, as well as improvements in measures related to weight gain. Further studies need to be conducted in order to determine if nutritional therapy provides additional benefits to older people. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to better understand how nutritional therapy can improve the quality of life and health of older people in comparison to standard care, so they can better advise their patients.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Malnutrition is common among older adults and is related to quality of life, cognitive function, and depression. To what extent nutrition interventions can improve these outcomes remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of nutrition therapy on health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), self-rated health, cognitive function, and depression in community dwelling older adults recently discharged from hospital. METHODS Participants (>65 years) were randomised into an intervention (n = 53) and a control group (n = 53). The intervention group received individualised nutrition therapy based on the nutrition care process including 5 home visits and 3 phone calls, in combination with freely delivered energy- and protein-rich foods and oral nutrition supplements for six months after hospital discharge. EQ-5D, self-rated health, Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE), and the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression - IOWA (CES-D) scale were measured at baseline and at endpoint. RESULTS Two subjects dropped out, one from each arm. The control group experienced an increase in depressive symptoms and a decrease in self-rated health during the study period, while the intervention group experienced increases in cognitive function, self-rated health, and EQ-5D resulting in significant endpoint differences between the groups: EQ-5D (0.102, P = 0.001); self-rated health: 15.876 (P < 0.001); MMSE 1.701 (P < 0.001); depressive symptoms: - 3.072 (P < 0.001); all in favour of the intervention group. Improvements during the intervention in MMSE, self-rated health, and CES-D were significantly related to body weight gain in a linear way. CONCLUSION Cognitive function and mental well-being worsen or stagnate in older adults who receive standard care after hospital discharge. However, a six-month nutrition therapy improves these outcomes leading to statistically and clinically significant endpoint differences between the groups. As improvements were related to body weight gain after hospital discharge, we conclude that the increase in dietary intake, with focus on energy and protein density, and changes in body weight might have contributed to better cognitive function and mental well-being in older adults after the intervention.
-
3.
Low omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids predict reduced response to standard antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder.
Cussotto, S, Delgado, I, Oriolo, G, Kemper, J, Begarie, D, Dexpert, S, Sauvant, J, Leboyer, M, Aouizerate, B, Martin-Santos, R, et al
Depression and anxiety. 2022
-
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability, and antidepressant drug treatment is only effective in over half of patients with a high prevalence of treatment resistance. The importance of nutrition in mental health is gaining recognition. Omega-3 is an essential polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) vital for anti-inflammatory processes and brain integrity. In the absence of the body's ability to make Omega-3, it or its precursors must be acquired from the diet. Yet altered metabolic pathways can hamper the process and the adequate balance with PUFA Omega‐6 is also crucial, as elevated levels of Omega-6 are linked to several diseases. An extensive amount of research suggests that higher Omega-3 levels reduce the occurrence of depression. Yet results using just Omega-3s for depression have been varied. This European-wide study sought to investigate how the PUFA status could affect the clinical response to treatment with antidepressants. 60-adults with an average age of 41 with major depressive disorders received antidepressive treatment. Their red blood cell fatty acids content was determined, and at the end of the 8-week trial treatment responders and non-responders were identified. Findings affirmed the existing knowledge that depressive symptoms are strongly associated with PUFA status. Patients who did not respond to treatment showed low levels of Omega-3 and an unfavourable ratio of Omega-3 to Omega-6 at the start of treatment. Higher levels of Omega-3 fatty acid of DHA seemed to produce a better clinical response to treatments than the Omega-3 of EPA. The authors discussed some potential mechanisms and suggested that PUFA intake and metabolism could be a potential tool for the management of treatment-unresponsive patients with depression. This review highlights the clinical importance of considering PUFA status and metabolism in the support of major depressive disorders.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Healthy eating such as that with low omega-6 diets has more than a physiological result on the human body and carries significant biochemical consequences when the omega-6 to omega-3 ratio is deemed to be ‘high’.
- The result of this research has pharmaceutical implications - if the findings could be imparted to the general public in layman’s terms, practitioners could empower individuals to take greater control of their mental health through more naturalistic means, i.e., optimised nutrition.
- There are wider cognitive considerations of healthy eating beyond that of treating Major Depressive Disorder due to implicated blood-brain-barrier effects, as concluded in this study.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
X
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Sixty adults suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) were recruited into a multicenter study assessing the impact of baseline polyunsaturated (PUFA) levels on responsiveness to antidepressants. Neuropsychiatric evaluations producing MADRS (Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) scores at baseline, four weeks and again at eight weeks, were performed. The pre-recorded baseline PUFA levels were then used as an associative and predictive indicator when viewing the end point scoring of participants, thus categorising into responsive and nonresponsive strata.
Of those with low omega-3 and high omega-6 to omega-3 ratio at baseline, there was increased association with ‘non-responsive’ classification at end point (week 8). Participants were deemed ‘non-responsive’ to anti-depressant treatment when scores at week 8 failed to demonstrate ≥50% reduction in MADRS scoring.
Clinical practice applications:
- Clinicians could monitor MDD within at-risk-groups, such as those who are overweight (mean BMI of ALL study participants was 24.20 kg/m2 with a standard deviation of 4.21) or those experiencing an inflammatory state with blood-brain-barrier involvement, as part of a mental ill-health prevention programme.
- When presenting with symptoms of major depressive disorder and prescribing antidepressants, clinicians could recommend increasing consumption of foods high in omega-3 and/or querying the patient about their dietary habits.
- Article supports recommendations for an increase in the consumption of omega-3 rich foods amongst the general population to prevent or intervene in cases of major depressive disorder.
- Wider cognitive implications beyond major depressive disorder in the presence of low omega-3, such as cognitive decline as seen with dementia, theorised due to altered blood-brain-barrier (Cussotto et al., 2022; Gustafson et al., 2020).
Considerations for future research:
- Repeated studies, with normalised distribution of antidepressant and sample size by country, with greater geographic inclusion, along with age categorisation. The broader geographic inclusion is necessary to rule out cultural diets as a confounding variable. An example of how different cultural diets could influence the results, which has potentially been highlighted in this study, is the more predominant consumption of a Mediterranean diet which may have been the case for the participants from Spain or, as could also be the case, an underlying vitamin D deficiency of the participants from Germany.
- Novel studies for assessing diet against mood could be beneficial to fully apply the findings of this study to clinical practice applications and that of the practice of nutritional therapists. The thinking here is the potential for anti-inflammatory foods inducing better mood results through gut-brain axis links and resultant influence on microbiome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by a high rate of treatment resistance. Omega (ω)-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) were shown to correlate with depressive phenotype both in rodents and in humans. However, few studies to date have investigated the role of PUFAs in antidepressant response. The primary aim of this study was to assess the link between baseline PUFA composition and changes in depressive symptoms as well as antidepressant response in a multicenter study of depressed patients. METHODS Sixty depressed adults who met criteria for MDD according to DSM-IV-TR were recruited. Neuropsychiatric evaluations occurred at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment with standard antidepressants, including escitalopram (N = 45), sertraline (N = 13) and venlafaxine (N = 2). At study endpoint, patients were stratified into responders (R) or non-responders (NR) based on their MADRS (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) score. Baseline PUFA levels were assessed and their association with clinical response was determined. RESULTS Lower ω-3 PUFA levels were associated to worse baseline symptomatology. Baseline levels of PUFAs were significantly different between R and NR, with R exhibiting lower docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and ω-3 index; and higher ω-6/ω-3 ratio than NR before the start of antidepressant treatment. DHA levels as well as the ω-3 index and ω-6/ω-3 ratio significantly predicted response to antidepressants at study endpoint. CONCLUSIONS These results show that baseline levels of PUFAs predict later response to standard antidepressants in depressed subjects. They suggest that PUFA intake and/or metabolism represent a novel modifiable tool for the management of unresponsive depressed patients.
-
4.
Effect of internet-based counselling with a cognitive-behavioural approach on premenstrual syndrome.
Borji-Navan, S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, S, Esmaeilpour, K, Mirghafourvand, M
BMC research notes. 2022;15(1):324
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
About 20% of women of reproductive age suffer from premenstrual syndrome (PMS). The syndrome leads to various consequences, including physical, psychological, behavioural, and social complications. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of internet-based counselling with a cognitive-behavioural approach on symptom severity of women with PMS and their quality of life during the perimenstrual and late follicular phases of the menstrual cycle. This study is based on data that was gathered for a randomised controlled trial with two-parallel arms carried out on 92 female university students aged 18–35 years. Authors conclude that the results cannot be generalised to all women suffering from PMS since the study recruited only medical students. Furthermore, the long-term effectiveness of the intervention is unknown because the participants were only followed for two menstrual cycles after the end of the intervention.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of internet-based counselling with a cognitive-behavioural approach on symptom severity of women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and their quality of life during the perimenstrual and late follicular phases of the menstrual cycle. Moreover, the PMS-related disability and attitude toward menstruation were investigated as secondary outcomes. DATA DESCRIPTION We provide data generated in a randomized controlled trial with two-parallel arms carried out on 92 female university students aged 18-35 years who had moderate to severe PMS, residing at halls of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. PMS severity was assessed during two menstrual cycles before intervention (baseline) and during two cycles just after ending the two-month intervention using Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) and the quality of life using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) on days 1-2 and 11-13 of the menstrual cycle at the baseline and post-intervention. Also, the PMS-related disability was assessed using Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and attitude toward menstruation using Menstrual Attitude Questionnaire (MAQ) at the baseline and post-intervention. Participant satisfaction and views on intervention effectiveness were also assessed using a single Likert question.
-
5.
A Systematic Review of the Impact of the First Year of COVID-19 on Obesity Risk Factors: A Pandemic Fueling a Pandemic?
Daniels, NF, Burrin, C, Chan, T, Fusco, F
Current developments in nutrition. 2022;6(4):nzac011
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is one of the most serious infectious disease outbreaks in recent history. Among the factors that can increase the risk of obesity, some seem to play a more prominent role than others such as depression, emotional eating, sedentary lifestyle and the socioeconomic status. The aim of this study was to explore the indirect effects of the first year of COVID-19 on obesity and its risk factors. This study is a systematic review of 87 studies with over 350,000 participants. Results show that: - overall, there was a general trend of weight gain during the pandemic. - there were differences in dietary changes, with some studies showing an improvement in diet. - some beneficial effects were observed in the dieting domain, such as higher consumption of home-cooked meals and healthy food (e.g., vegetables). However, there was an increasing trend in the overall food and alcohol consumption. - financial hardship and job loss were unavoidable consequences of the pandemic lockdown. However, although the impact of the countermeasures used to curb the COVID-19 pandemic was evident on obesity risk factors, none of the studies included in the research explored the direct impact of the risk factors on obesity itself. Authors conclude by pointing out the need for future research that aims at strengthening the link between stressful circumstances and a rise in risk factors for obesity and weight gain.
Abstract
Obesity is increasingly prevalent worldwide. Associated risk factors, including depression, socioeconomic stress, poor diet, and lack of physical activity, have all been impacted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This systematic review aims to explore the indirect effects of the first year of COVID-19 on obesity and its risk factors. A literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 to identify relevant studies pertaining to the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (PROSPERO; CRD42020219433). All English-language studies on weight change and key obesity risk factors (psychosocial and socioeconomic health) during the COVID-19 pandemic were considered for inclusion. Of 805 full-text articles that were reviewed, 87 were included for analysis. The included studies observed increased food and alcohol consumption, increased sedentary time, worsening depressive symptoms, and increased financial stress. Overall, these results suggest that COVID-19 has exacerbated the current risk factors for obesity and is likely to worsen obesity rates in the near future. Future studies, and policy makers, will need to carefully consider their interdependency to develop effective interventions able to mitigate the obesity pandemic.
-
6.
Consumption of 85% cocoa dark chocolate improves mood in association with gut microbial changes in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Shin, JH, Kim, CS, Cha, L, Kim, S, Lee, S, Chae, S, Chun, WY, Shin, DM
The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2022;99:108854
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Disturbances in a person’s mood interrupts their personal well-being and the ability to participate in social interactions, leading to physical health problems such as chronic diseases. The role of diet as a mood regulator has received a great deal of interest. Certain dietary components have been shown to reduce anxiety and depression and improve quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of dark chocolate intake on mood in everyday life, with special emphasis on the gut-brain axis. This study is a randomized controlled trial. Participants who met the criteria for eligibility were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) control group (CON, n=14); 2) 85% cocoa chocolate group (DC85, n=18); and 3) 70% cocoa chocolate group (DC70, n=16). Results show that daily intake of dark chocolate significantly reduced negative affect in the DC85, but not in the DC70. Furthermore, gut microbial diversity was significantly higher in DC85 than the CON. Authors conclude that dark chocolate has prebiotic effects by restructuring the diversity and composition of the gut microbiome, which may in turn improve mood via the gut-brain axis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- To highlight the potential benefits of high cocoa content dark chocolate in relation to mental states
- To promote more awareness of how dietary habits may impact emotional wellbeing
- To emphasise the importance of microbiota and the gut-brain axis regarding dietary habits.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
The authors highlight that dark chocolate has been continually identified for its effects on mood. However, there is a dearth of evidence concerning the emotional impact of daily consumption of dark chocolate. Hence, the impact of dark chocolate consumption on daily mood, focusing on the gut-brain axis, is being investigated in this study.
Objectives
- To evaluate the correlation between the effect on emotional state after consuming dark chocolate and the gut microbiota in healthy adults
- To identify alterations in the composition and diversity of the microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract on account of dark chocolate intake.
Study Design
A randomised controlled trial was performed at Seoul National University from July to December 2017, This involved. consumption of two types of dark chocolate (70% and 85% cocoa content). Subjects in the treatment groups were blinded although investigators and the control cohort were unblinded.
Participants
117 individuals were screened. However, 48 healthy males and females aged 20-30 years were eligible at baseline.
Interventions
- Subjects (n=16): Consumed 30g/day of 70% cocoa chocolate for 3 weeks
- Participants (n=18): Consumed 30g/day of 85% cocoa chocolate for 3 weeks
- Participants (n=14): The control group consumed no chocolate for 3 weeks.
Main Health Outcomes Measured
- Mood states were quantified via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule in tandem with Microbiota analysis pre- and post-experiment
- Body composition analysis and dietary assessment were also conducted pre- and post-intervention
- Faecal 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of bacterial genomic DNA was conducted for the cohort who consumed 85% cocoa chocolate and the control arm to evaluate the association between the mood-altering effects of dark chocolate and the gut microbiota
- Statistical tests were performed based on intention-to-treat analysis. The Chi-squared test, Kruskal-Wallis test, one-way ANOVA, unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were employed for inter-group analysis. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to assess the association between gut microbiota composition and mood scores and P<.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
- Daily intake of dark chocolate substantially diminished negative emotional states in the cohort consuming 85% cocoa content, but not in the 70% cocoa treatment arm
- Gut microbial diversity was substantially greater in the 85% cacao cohort than the control group (P<.05)
- Blautia obeum levels were significantly elevated and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels were decreased in the 85% cacao cohort than the control arm (P<.05).
- Furthermore, it was observed that changes in negative affect scores were inversely correlated with diversity and relative abundance of Blautia obeum (P<.05).
Conclusions
The observations suggest that consumption of dark chocolate with a higher cocoa content may induce prebiotic effects due to its capacity to restructure the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota. Furthermore, consuming dark chocolate with a higher cocoa might exert a positive effect on negative emotional states through the gut-brain axis.
Clinical practice applications:
- To inform practitioners of the benefits of 30g/day high (85%) cocoa chocolate consumption and its potential positive impact on mood through the gut-brain axis
- To educate clients regarding the potential benefits of daily high cocoa content chocolate consumption and its possible favourable effect on emotional states associated with gut microbiota.
Considerations for future research:
- More extensive research could investigate interventions of a longer period
- Further studies could evaluate if any difference exists between cocoa and cacao consumption and emotional states via the gut-brain axis, and the strength of any associations
- Interventions could investigate which strains of bacteria that high cocoa content dark chocolate may affect.
Abstract
Dark chocolate has long been recognized for its mood-altering properties; however, the evidence regarding the emotional effects of daily dark chocolate intake is limited. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of dark chocolate intake on mood in everyday life, with special emphasis on the gut-brain axis. Two different dark chocolates (85% and 70% cocoa content) were tested in this study. In a randomized controlled trial, healthy adults (20-30 y) consumed either 30 g/d of 85% cocoa chocolate (DC85, n=18); 70% cocoa chocolate (DC70, n=16); or no chocolate (control group, CON; n=14); for 3 weeks. Mood states were measured using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Daily consumption of dark chocolate significantly reduced negative affect in DC85, but not in DC70. To assess the association between the mood-altering effects of dark chocolate and the gut microbiota, we performed fecal 16S rRNA sequencing analysis for the DC85 and CON groups. Gut microbial diversity was significantly higher in DC85 than CON (P<.05). Blautia obeum levels were significantly elevated and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii levels were reduced in DC85 compared to CON (P<.05). Furthermore, we found that the observed changes in negative affect scores were negatively correlated with diversity and relative abundance of Blautia obeum (P<.05). These findings indicate that dark chocolate exerts prebiotic effects, as evidenced by its ability to restructure the diversity and abundance of intestinal bacteria; thus, it may improve negative emotional states via the gut-brain axis.
-
7.
Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
Lane, MM, Gamage, E, Travica, N, Dissanayaka, T, Ashtree, DN, Gauci, S, Lotfaliany, M, O'Neil, A, Jacka, FN, Marx, W
Nutrients. 2022;14(13)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Poor dietary quality is well established as a potentially modifiable risk factor for mental disorders. The NOVA food classification system was recently developed to enable the categorisation of food items based on distinctive levels of processing. The aim of this study was to synthesise and provide quantitative analyses of the most up-to-date evidence assessing associations between consumption of ultra-processed food, as defined by the NOVA food classification system, and mental disorders. This study is systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 studies with a total of 385,541 participants. The studies were 15 cross-sectional and 2 prospectively designed studies. Results show that ultra-processed food consumption is bidirectionally associated with adverse mental health. In fact, greater intake of ultra-processed food was associated with increased odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms, both when these outcomes were assessed together as well as separately. Authors conclude that further prospective and experimental studies are required to better determine directionality and causality and ensure that global preventative and treatment strategies are efficacious and appropriate.
Abstract
Since previous meta-analyses, which were limited only to depression and by a small number of studies available for inclusion at the time of publication, several additional studies have been published assessing the link between ultra-processed food consumption and depression as well as other mental disorders. We aimed to build on previously conducted reviews to synthesise and meta-analyse the contemporary evidence base and clarify the associations between the consumption of ultra-processed food and mental disorders. A total of 17 observational studies were included (n = 385,541); 15 cross-sectional and 2 prospective. Greater ultra-processed food consumption was cross-sectionally associated with increased odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms, both when these outcomes were assessed together (common mental disorder symptoms odds ratio: 1.53, 95%CI 1.43 to 1.63) as well as separately (depressive symptoms odds ratio: 1.44, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.82; and, anxiety symptoms odds ratio: 1.48, 95%CI 1.37 to 1.59). Furthermore, a meta-analysis of prospective studies demonstrated that greater ultra-processed food intake was associated with increased risk of subsequent depression (hazard ratio: 1.22, 95%CI 1.16 to 1.28). While we found evidence for associations between ultra-processed food consumption and adverse mental health, further rigorously designed prospective and experimental studies are needed to better understand causal pathways.
-
8.
The Dose-Response Associations of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake with the Risk of Stroke, Depression, Cancer, and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.
Wang, Y, Zhao, R, Wang, B, Zhao, C, Zhu, B, Tian, X
Nutrients. 2022;14(4)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is high in today's society, which may lead to weight gain, inflammation, and a number of obesity-associated diseases. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the associations and causal links between the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and cancer, stroke, depression, and cause-specific mortality. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages significantly increased the risk of cancer, strokes, depression, and cause-specific mortality when compared with the consumption of low or no-sugar-sweetened beverages. As little as a 250ml increment of sugar-sweetened beverages was associated with an increase in risk. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of ischemic stroke by 10%, CVD-caused mortality by 13%, and cancer-caused mortality by 6.0% compared to those who consume less or no sugar-sweetened beverages. These findings can be used by healthcare professionals to understand the clinical significance of intervention strategies that reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. It is imperative to conduct additional robust studies as there is an insufficient amount of evidence at present to establish a causal connection between the consumption of sugary beverages and the risk of depression, stroke, cancer, and cause-specific mortality.
Abstract
The associations between sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption and the risk of stroke, depression, cancer, and cause-specific mortality have not been determined, and the quantitative aspects of this link remain unclear. This meta-analysis therefore conducted a systematic review and dose-response analysis to determine their causal links. The database searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science up to 10 November 2021. The intervention effects were evaluated by relative risk (RR) with 95% confidences (CI). Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Higher levels of SSB consumption significantly increased the risk of stroke (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.23), depression (1.25, 1.11-1.41), cancer (1.10, 1.03-1.17), and all-cause mortality (1.08, 1.05-1.11) compared with none or lower SSB intake. The associations were dose-dependent, with per 250 mL increment of SSB intake daily increasing the risk of stroke, depression, cancer, and all-cause mortality by RR 1.09 (1.03-1.15), 1.08 (1.06-1.10), 1.17 (1.04-1.32), and 1.07 (1.03-1.11), respectively. The link was curved for depression and cancer risk (pnon-linear < 0.05). Subgroup analysis suggested that higher SSB intake increased ischemic stroke by 10%, CVD-caused mortality by 13%, and cancer-caused mortality by 6.0% than none or lower SSB consumption. It is suggested that SSB accounts for a leading risk factor of stroke, depression, cancer, and mortality, and that the risk rises in parallel with the increment of SSB intake (and is affected by participant characteristics).
-
9.
Effects of a multicomponent resistance-based exercise program with protein, vitamin D and calcium supplementation on cognition in men with prostate cancer treated with ADT: secondary analysis of a 12-month randomised controlled trial.
Mundell, NL, Owen, PJ, Dalla Via, J, Macpherson, H, Daly, RM, Livingston, PM, Rantalainen, T, Foulkes, S, Millar, J, Murphy, DG, et al
BMJ open. 2022;12(6):e060189
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for local and advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is effective at reducing androgens, and thus inhibiting tumour progression. However, testosterone reduces the production of a highly neurotoxic protein (amyloid beta peptide 40), which is linked with the development of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a multi-component resistance-based exercise programme with daily protein, vitamin D and calcium supplementation on cognitive function compared with usual care in PCa survivors treated with ADT. This study is a secondary analysis of a 12-month single-blinded, two-arm randomised controlled trial. Participants (n = 70) were randomised (1:1 ratio) to either: (a) multi-component exercise intervention including progressive resistance training, body-weight impact and balance exercises, as well as a daily nutritional supplement containing whey protein, calcium and vitamin D, or (b) usual care control receiving 1000 IU vitamin D only. Results show that a multicomponent exercise training and nutritional supplementation intervention did not improve cognitive function in men treated with ADT for PCa compared with usual care. Authors conclude that cognitive decline associated with ADT may mechanistically differ to that of general age-related cognitive declines, thus it is important that future studies also examine other intervention modalities.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this preplanned secondary analysis of a 12-month randomised controlled trial was to investigate the effects of a multicomponent exercise programme combined with daily whey protein, calcium and vitamin D supplementation on cognition in men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). DESIGN 12-month, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. SETTING University clinical exercise centre. PARTICIPANTS 70 ADT-treated men were randomised to exercise-training plus supplementation (Ex+ Suppl, n=34) or usual care (control, n=36). INTERVENTION Men allocated to Ex + Suppl undertook thrice weekly resistance training with weight-bearing exercise training plus daily whey protein (25 g), calcium (1200 mg) and vitamin D (2000 IU) supplementation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Cognition was assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months via a computerised battery (CogState), Trail-making test, Rey auditory-verbal learning test and Digit span. Data were analysed with linear mixed models and an intention-to-treat and prespecified per-protocol approach (exercise-training: ≥66%, nutritional supplement: ≥80%). RESULTS Sixty (86%) men completed the trial (Ex + Suppl, n=31; control, n=29). Five (7.1%) men were classified as having mild cognitive impairment at baseline. Median (IQR) adherence to the exercise and supplement was 56% (37%-82%) and 91% (66%-97%), respectively. Ex + Suppl had no effect on cognition at any time. CONCLUSIONS A 12-month multicomponent exercise training and supplementation intervention had no significant effect on cognition in men treated with ADT for prostate cancer compared with usual care. Exercise training adherence below recommended guidelines does not support cognitive health in men treated with ADT for prostate cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12614000317695, registered 25/03/2014) and acknowledged under the Therapeutic Goods Administration Clinical Trial Notification Scheme (CT-2015-CTN-03372-1 v1).
-
10.
Mental health in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional analyses from a community cohort study
BMJ Open is a medical journal. Its aim is to provide a home for all properly conducted medical research to be fully reported, after a rigorous and transparent peer-review process. The focus is on research that is relevant to patients and clinicians. It does not publish studies conducted in animals, laboratory studies not linked to patient outcomes, papers reporting solely physiological or biomechanical results from healthy participants, anatomy, cell biology, or non-clinical psychology.
2021
Abstract
This paper aims to provide evidence from a large community cohort (3097 adults aged 18 and older) on the impact that the Covid-19 pandemic has had on the mental health status of people in the UK. Anxiety, depression, and stress levels were assessed via an online survey, while cortisol levels were measured by analysing hair samples provided by the participants. Modifiable and non-modifiable variables were also analysed, and these included age, gender, ethnicity, key worker status, living alone, positive mood, worry about contracting COVID-19 and perceived loneliness and risk of COVID-19. Early evidence from this paper shows that women, young people and individuals in recognised Covid-19 risk groups may be at particular risk for mental health difficulties.