-
1.
Dietary Interventions to Treat Type 2 Diabetes in Adults with a Goal of Remission: An Expert Consensus Statement from the American College of Lifestyle
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine (AJLM) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly resource for practitioners seeking to incorporate lifestyle practices into clinical medicine. AJLM provides commentaries and research reviews on nutrition and diet, physical activity, behavior change, cardiovascular disease, obesity, anxiety and depression, sleep problems, metabolic disease, and more. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The Official Journal of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine.
2022
Abstract
The objective of this Expert Consensus Statement is to assist clinicians in achieving remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in adults using diet as a primary intervention. Expert consensus was achieved for 69 statements pertaining to diet and remission of T2D, dietary specifics and types of diets, adjuvant and alternative interventions, support, monitoring, adherence to therapy, weight loss, and payment and policy. Clinicians can use these statements to improve quality of care, inform policy and protocols, and identify areas of uncertainty.
-
2.
Nutritional intervention for diabetes mellitus with Alzheimer's disease.
Li, Z, Li, S, Xiao, Y, Zhong, T, Yu, X, Wang, L
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:1046726
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) affects more than 463 million people worldwide. Similarly, the number of deaths related to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has increased by 145%. There are several common risk factors for Type 2 Diabetes and AD, including obesity, insulin resistance, and ageing, as well as common pathological mechanisms, including altered insulin signalling, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, formation of glycated proteins and metabolic syndrome. This review aims to summarize the therapeutic effects of different nutritional therapy strategies on the reduction of DM and AD risk. Controlling blood sugar levels and reducing calorie intake is crucial to preventing diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. The low-carbohydrate, ketogenic, and Mediterranean diets have been found to improve glucose control in people with Type 2 diabetes (T2D). In addition, MIND (Mediterranean-DASH Diet Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) and a ketogenic diet may improve cognition in AD patients. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium probiotics, and prebiotics, such as inulin, may inhibit the progression of T2D and AD diseases by suppressing inflammation and modulating gut microbes. In addition, vitamins A, C, D, E, B6, B12, folate, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, zinc, magnesium, and polyphenols may improve cognitive decline, homocysteine levels, and insulin resistance in AD and T2D patients. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this review to understand the beneficial effects of dietary strategies and multi-nutrient supplementation on DM and AD. However, further robust studies are required to investigate the risk factors and underlying mechanisms behind DM-combined AD progression.
Abstract
The combined disease burden of diabetes mellitus (DM) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasing, and the two diseases share some common pathological changes. However, the pharmacotherapeutic approach to this clinical complexity is limited to symptomatic rather than disease-arresting, with the possible exception of metformin. Whether nutritional intervention might extend or synergize with these effects of metformin is of interest. In particular, dietary patterns with an emphasis on dietary diversity shown to affect cognitive function are of growing interest in a range of food cultural settings. This paper presents the association between diabetes and AD. In addition, the cross-cultural nutritional intervention programs with the potential to mitigate both insulin resistance (IR) and hyperglycemia, together with cognitive impairment are also reviewed. Both dietary patterns and nutritional supplementation showed the effects of improving glycemic control and reducing cognitive decline in diabetes associated with AD, but the intervention specificity remained controversial. Multi-nutrient supplements combined with diverse diets may have preventive and therapeutic potential for DM combined with AD, at least as related to the B vitamin group and folate-dependent homocysteine (Hcy). The nutritional intervention has promise in the prevention and management of DM and AD comorbidities, and more clinical studies would be of nutritional scientific merit.
-
3.
Effect of a multi-domain lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk in older people: the FINGER trial.
Lehtisalo, J, Rusanen, M, Solomon, A, Antikainen, R, Laatikainen, T, Peltonen, M, Strandberg, T, Tuomilehto, J, Soininen, H, Kivipelto, M, et al
European heart journal. 2022;43(21):2054-2061
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Older people are at high risk of cardiovascular disease, and 90% of the risk factors can be modified, including an unhealthy diet, poor physical activity, obesity, smoking, and obesity-related comorbidities. This randomised controlled trial examined a multifactorial approach combining several lifestyle modifications in 1259 older adults between 60 and 77 years of age to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Participants were randomly assigned to intensive multi-domain lifestyle intervention or regular health advice control groups. The multifactorial lifestyle intervention incorporated dietary counselling, exercise training, cognitive training, and managing CVD and metabolic risk factors. Dietary interventions included tailored strategies that considered increased consumption of fruits, berries, vegetables, whole grains, margarine, oil, and fish. Physical exercise interventions included strength training, balance exercises, and aerobic exercises. Cognitive interventions and intensive strategies to manage metabolic factors were also implemented. In the multifactorial lifestyle intervention group, cerebrovascular events were lower after two years than in the control group. In addition, cardiovascular disease and stroke incidence were lower in the elderly with a history of cardiovascular disease. Healthcare professionals can use the results from this study to understand the benefits of multifactorial lifestyle interventions on cardiovascular disease. However, there is a need for longer-term robust studies since the evidence is sparse.
Abstract
AIMS: Joint prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and dementia could reduce the burden of both conditions. The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) demonstrated a beneficial effect on cognition (primary outcome) and we assessed the effect of this lifestyle intervention on incident CVD (pre-specified secondary outcome). METHODS AND RESULTS FINGER enrolled 1259 individuals aged 60-77 years (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01041989). They were randomized (1:1) to a 2-year multi-domain intervention with diet, physical and cognitive activity, and vascular monitoring (n = 631), or general health advice (n = 628). National registries provided data on CVD including stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), or coronary heart event. During an average of 7.4 years, 229 participants (18%) had at least one CVD diagnosis: 107 in the intervention group and 122 in the control group. The incidence of cerebrovascular events was lower in the intervention than the control group: hazard ratio (HR) for combined stroke/TIA was 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.99] after adjusting for background characteristics. Hazard ratio for coronary events was 0.84 (CI: 0.56-1.26) and total CVD events 0.80 (95% CI: 0.61-1.04). Among those with history of CVD (n = 145), the incidence of both total CVD events (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.90) and stroke/TIA (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20-0.81) was lower in the intervention than the control group. CONCLUSION A 2-year multi-domain lifestyle intervention among older adults was effective in preventing cerebrovascular events and also total CVD events among those who had history of CVD.
-
4.
Improving health-related quality of life in women with breast, blood, and gynaecological Cancer with an eHealth-enabled 12-week lifestyle intervention: the women's wellness after Cancer program randomised controlled trial.
Seib, C, Anderson, D, McGuire, A, Porter-Steele, J, McDonald, N, Balaam, S, Sapkota, D, McCarthy, AL
BMC cancer. 2022;22(1):747
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Aging populations and the increased prevalence of other cancer risk factors have led to an increased incidence of cancer in women globally. Cancer treatments often leave women with a range of residual physical and psychological side effects. Comprehensive cancer rehabilitation can reduce symptom burden and health service utilisation, whilst generally improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The primary aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a multimodal, digitised lifestyle intervention on HRQOL of women treated for cancer. This study is a multi-centre, single-blinded, randomised controlled 12-week trial. Fifty-one women previously treated for breast, blood or gynaecological cancer were randomly assigned to either an intervention or usual care arm. Results indicate improvements in many HRQoL domains and in component summary scores. Particularly notable were the improvements in general health and bodily pain, vitality, mental health, and global physical and mental health summary scores among women in the intervention group. Authors conclude that the complex and synergistic effects of many modifiable health behaviours emphasise the need for bundled health behaviour interventions to optimise women’s health and wellbeing after completion of active cancer treatment.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The residual effects of cancer and its treatment can profoundly affect women's quality of life. This paper presents results from a multisite randomized controlled trial that evaluated the clinical benefits of an e-health enabled health promotion intervention (the Women's Wellness after Cancer Program or WWACP) on the health-related quality of life of women recovering from cancer treatment. METHODS Overall, 351 women previously treated for breast, blood or gynaecological cancers were randomly allocated to the intervention (WWACP) or usual care arms. The WWACP comprised a structured 12-week program that included online coaching and an interactive iBook that targeted physical activity, healthy diet, stress and menopause management, sexual wellbeing, smoking cessation, alcohol intake and sleep hygiene. Data were collected via a self-completed electronic survey at baseline (t0), 12 weeks (post-intervention, t1) and 24 weeks (to assess sustained behaviour change, t2). The primary outcome, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), was measured using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS Following the 12-week lifestyle program, intervention group participants reported statistically significant improvements in general health, bodily pain, vitality, and global physical and mental health scores. Improvements were also noted in the control group across several HRQoL domains, though the magnitude of change was less. CONCLUSIONS The WWACP was associated with improved HRQoL in women previously treated for blood, breast, and gynaecological cancers. Given how the synergy of different lifestyle factors influence health behaviour, interventions accounting for the reciprocity of multiple health behaviours like the WWACP, have real potential for immediate and sustainable change. TRIAL REGISTRATION The protocol for this randomised controlled trial was submitted to the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 15/07/2014 and approved on 28/07/2014 ( ACTRN12614000800628 ).
-
5.
Quantifying dementia prevention potential in the FINGER randomized controlled trial using the LIBRA prevention index.
Deckers, K, Köhler, S, Ngandu, T, Antikainen, R, Laatikainen, T, Soininen, H, Strandberg, T, Verhey, F, Kivipelto, M, Solomon, A
Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2021;17(7):1205-1212
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Lifestyle interventions are being increasingly recognised to delay or prevent the onset of dementia. Scientific research targeting one lifestyle factor has continually failed to show any benefits and therefore interventions targeting several lifestyle factors, before disease onset may be more beneficial. The Lifestyle for BRAin Health (LIBRA) score is a tool which assesses peoples risk of dementia based on several lifestyle factors and this trial used this tool to determine the dementia risk of individuals who entered The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER). This study was the first randomised control trial showing benefits to cognition following multi-domain lifestyle interventions. The results showed that higher LIBRA score at the start of the trial was associated with poorer brain function over time and that the multi-domain lifestyle intervention was effective at decreasing LIBRA score, regardless of the risk at the start of the trial. It was concluded that LIBRA may be a useful tool to determine risk of dementia and that the FINGER intervention was of benefit to individuals regardless of their risk of dementia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Individuals in early dementia prevention trials may differ in how much they benefit from interventions depending on their initial risk level. Additionally, modifiable dementia risk scores might be used as surrogate/intermediate outcomes. METHODS In the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER), we investigated in post hoc analyses (N = 1207) whether the cognitive benefits of the 2-year multi-domain lifestyle intervention differed by baseline dementia risk measured with the "LIfestyle for BRAin Health" (LIBRA) score. We also investigated intervention effects on change in LIBRA score over time. RESULTS Overall, higher baseline LIBRA was related to less cognitive improvement over time. This association did not differ between the intervention and control groups. The intervention was effective in decreasing LIBRA scores over time, regardless of baseline demographics or cognition. DISCUSSION The cognitive benefit of the FINGER intervention was similar across individuals with different LIBRA scores at baseline. Furthermore, LIBRA may be useful as a surrogate/intermediate endpoint and surveillance tool to monitor intervention success during trial execution.
-
6.
Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Intervention in Primary Care That Addresses Patients with Diabetes Mellitus with Two or More Unhealthy Habits, Such as Diet, Physical Activity or Smoking: Multicenter Randomized Cluster Trial (EIRA Study).
Represas-Carrera, F, Couso-Viana, S, Méndez-López, F, Masluk, B, Magallón-Botaya, R, Recio-Rodríguez, JI, Pombo, H, Leiva-Rus, A, Gil-Girbau, M, Motrico, E, et al
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021;18(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Life habits such as smoking, physical activity, and diet affect glycaemic control. The objective of this multicentre randomised cluster trial (EIRA study) was to evaluate the effectiveness of multicomponent educational interventions on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetic patients. Interventions in multicomponent individual, group and community settings included smoking cessation, the Mediterranean diet and physical activity, as well as an assessment of the quality of life. Participants had unhealthy lifestyles prior to the intervention. The study was conducted in 26 primary healthcare centres in seven health departments in Spain over a period of 12 months. A brief intervention aimed to change the habits of the participants, including increasing physical activity, quitting smoking and adhering to the Mediterranean diet. After 12 months of intervention, there were no statistically significant improvements in glycaemic control, physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, smoking, or quality of life. However, adherence to the Mediterranean diet was statistically significant. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of multicomponent interventions in improving glycaemic control. The clinical applicability of multicomponent interventions to tackle type 2 diabetes, obesity, and unhealthy lifestyles should be considered by healthcare providers.
Abstract
Introduction: We evaluated the effectiveness of an individual, group and community intervention to improve the glycemic control of patients with diabetes mellitus aged 45-75 years with two or three unhealthy life habits. As secondary endpoints, we evaluated the inverventions' effectiveness on adhering to Mediterranean diet, physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, smoking and quality of life. Method: A randomized clinical cluster (health centers) trial with two parallel groups in Spain from January 2016 to December 2019 was used. Patients with diabetes mellitus aged 45-75 years with two unhealthy life habits or more (smoking, not adhering to Mediterranean diet or little physical activity) participated. Centers were randomly assigned. The sample size was estimated to be 420 people for the main outcome variable. Educational intervention was done to improve adherence to Mediterranean diet, physical activity and smoking cessation by individual, group and community interventions for 12 months. Controls received the usual health care. The outcome variables were: HbA1c (main), the Mediterranean diet adherence score (MEDAS), the international diet quality index (DQI-I), the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ), sedentary lifestyle, smoking ≥1 cigarette/day and the EuroQuol questionnaire (EVA-EuroQol5D5L). Results: In total, 13 control centers (n = 356) and 12 intervention centers (n = 338) were included with similar baseline conditions. An analysis for intention-to-treat was done by applying multilevel mixed models fitted by basal values and the health center: the HbA1c adjusted mean difference = -0.09 (95% CI: -0.29-0.10), the DQI-I adjusted mean difference = 0.25 (95% CI: -0.32-0.82), the MEDAS adjusted mean difference = 0.45 (95% CI: 0.01-0.89), moderate/high physical activity OR = 1.09 (95% CI: 0.64-1.86), not living a sedentary lifestyle OR = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.55-1.73), no smoking OR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.54-1.06), EVA adjusted mean difference = -1.26 (95% CI: -4.98-2.45). Conclusions: No statistically significant changes were found for either glycemic control or physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, smoking and quality of life. The multicomponent individual, group and community interventions only showed a statistically significant improvement in adhering to Mediterranean diet. Such innovative interventions need further research to demonstrate their effectiveness in patients with poor glycemic control.
-
7.
Effect of a family and interdisciplinary intervention to prevent T2D: randomized clinical trial.
Vargas-Ortiz, K, Lira-Mendiola, G, Gómez-Navarro, CM, Padilla-Estrada, K, Angulo-Romero, F, Hernández-Márquez, JM, Villa-Martínez, AK, González-Mena, JN, Macías-Cervantes, MH, Reyes-Escogido, ML, et al
BMC public health. 2020;20(1):97
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes, lifestyle interventions rather than medication have been more successful in preventing development of the disease, however the benefits of lifestyle strategies diminishes over time due to possible adherence issues. Prolonged lifestyle changes may be affected by lack of family support, but research on family support during lifestyle changes in individuals prior to diabetes is lacking. This parallel randomised control trial of 122 patients with prediabetes and 101 of their family members aimed to assess the impact of family supported diet and exercise changes compared to self-motivation on individuals with prediabetes. At 6 months, body measurements and markers of prediabetes improved in both groups. Lipids were significantly improved in the group with family support compared to having no support. At 12 months there were a high number of dropouts due to lack of patient interest. Benefits shown at 6 months in both groups were only maintained or improved upon with family support and the lipid profile of the individual intervention group actually worsened in comparison to when participants entered the trial. After 12 months the incidence rate of type 2 diabetes was similar in both groups. Individuals with prediabetes who had family support whilst undergoing a diet and exercise regime were more successful at maintaining improvements of factors contributing to diabetes, compared to individuals without support. However this did not affect the occurrence of type 2 diabetes. Clinicians could use this paper to communicate the importance of family support during lifestyle changes in patients at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, although close monitoring may be required to ensure compliance.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lifestyle changes can reduce the risk of T2D; however, no study has evaluated the effect of a lifestyle intervention involving patients´ family. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of an interdisciplinary family (FI) Vs individual intervention (II) on glucose metabolism, insulin resistance (IR), pancreatic β-cell function and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with prediabetes, as well as to measure the impact on their families' metabolic risk. METHODS Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to compare the impact of FI and II on IR and pancreatic β-cell function in subjects with prediabetes. There were 122 subjects with prediabetes (and 101 family members) randomized to FI or II. Data were collected in 2015-2016 and analyzed in 2017-2018. FI group had the support of their family members, who also received personalized diet and exercise recommendations; patients and their family members attended monthly a lifestyle enhancement program. II group received personalized diet and exercise recommendations. The follow-up was for 12 months. Glucose, IR, pancreatic β-cell function and secondary outcomes (body composition and lipid profile) were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS FI group improved area under the glucose curve (AUC) (from 18,597 ± 2611 to 17,237 ± 2792, p = 0.004) and the Matsuda index (from 3.5 ± 2.3 to 4.7 ± 3.5, p = 0.05) at 12 months. II group improved Disposition Index (from 1.5 ± 0.4 to 1.9 ± 0.73, p < .0001) at 12 months. The improvements achieved in weight and lipids at 6 months, were lost in II group at 12 moths, whereas in FI persisted. Adherence up to 12 months was not different between the study groups (FI 56% Vs II 60%). CONCLUSIONS FI intervention was more effective by improving glucose AUC, insulin sensitivity and lipid profile, besides that, metabolic risk in family members of the FI group was maintained, while the risk of II group was increased. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov on December 15, 2015 (NTC026365646).
-
8.
Nutritional Interventions to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Rinninella, E, Fagotti, A, Cintoni, M, Raoul, P, Scaletta, G, Quagliozzi, L, Miggiano, GAD, Scambia, G, Gasbarrini, A, Mele, MC
Nutrients. 2019;11(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Ovarian cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and it has the highest mortality rate of all gynaecologic cancers. The aim of the study was to examine the impact of several types of nutrition interventions on clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer patients. The study is a systemic review of fourteen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on nutritional interventions during chemotherapy or during the perioperative period. The majority of RCTs reported improved clinical outcomes after nutritional interventions. Most RCTs show a reduction in length of hospital stay and ameliorated intestinal recovery after surgery. Authors conclude that it is important to find nutritional interventions in order to improve patient’s survival since the ovarian mortality rate is one of the highest among malignancies.
Abstract
Among all gynaecological neoplasms, ovarian cancer has the highest rate of disease-related malnutrition, representing an important risk factor of postoperative mortality and morbidity. Hence, the importance of finding effective nutritional interventions is crucial to improve ovarian cancer patient's well-being and survival. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims at assessing the effects of nutritional interventions on clinical outcomes such as overall survival, progression-free survival, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications following surgery and/or chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Three electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were used to conduct a systematic literature search based on fixed inclusion and exclusion criteria, until December 2018. A total of 14 studies were identified. Several early postoperative feeding interventions studies (n = 8) were retrieved mainly demonstrating a reduction in LOS and an ameliorated intestinal recovery after surgery. Moreover, innovative nutritional approaches such as chewing gum intervention (n = 1), coffee consumption (n = 1), ketogenic diet intervention (n = 2) or fruit and vegetable juice concentrate supplementation diet (n = 1) and short-term fasting (n = 1) have been shown as valid and well-tolerated nutritional strategies improving clinical outcomes. However, despite an acceptable number of prospective trials, there is still a lack of homogeneous and robust endpoints. In particular, there is an urgent need of RCTs evaluating overall survival and progression-free survival during ovarian oncology treatments. Further high-quality studies are warranted, especially prospective studies and large RCTs, with more homogeneous types of intervention and clinical outcomes, including a more specific sampling of ovarian cancer women, to identify appropriate and effective nutritional strategies for this cancer, which is at high risk of malnutrition.
-
9.
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Lifestyle Modification with Other Treatments on the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in People at High Risk: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Yamaoka, K, Nemoto, A, Tango, T
Nutrients. 2019;11(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The prevalence of diabetes has been increasing worldwide. The accompanying increase in the prevalence of diabetes-related complications and the occurrence of diabetes are likely to have a substantial impact on healthcare costs. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of lifestyle modifications to other treatments for patients at high risk of type 2 diabetes. The study design is a systemic review of published literature and a network meta-analysis of data from each selected study. Forty-seven interventions were used for the analyses. The results of the meta-analysis highlight the efficacy of lifestyle modification in preventing the onset of type 2 diabetes in high-risk patients in comparison with standard treatment or placebo as well as other treatments. The proportion of patients with onset of type 2 diabetes in the intervention (lifestyle modification) group was approximately twice as low as compared to the control (standard intervention) group. Authors conclude that lifestyle modification is the superior treatment intervention among 12 treatments for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many clinical trials have been conducted to verify the effects of interventions for prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2D) using different treatments and outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of lifestyle modifications (LM) with other treatments in persons at high risk of T2D by a network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS Searches were performed of PUBMED up to January 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials. The odds ratio (OR) with onset of T2D at 1 year in the intervention group (LM, dietary, exercise, or medication) versus a control group (standard treatments or placebo) were the effect sizes. Frequentist and Bayesian NMAs were conducted. RESULTS Forty-seven interventions and 12 treatments (20,113 participants) were used for the analyses. The OR in the LM was approximately 0.46 (95% CI: 0.33 to 0.61) times lower compared to the standard intervention by the Bayesian approach. The effects of LM compared to other treatments by indirect comparisons were not significant. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis further strengthened the evidence that LM reduces the onset of T2D compared to standard and placebo interventions and appears to be at least as effective as nine other treatments in preventing T2D.
-
10.
The Effect of a Pilot Dietary Intervention on Pain Outcomes in Patients Attending a Tertiary Pain Service.
Brain, K, Burrows, TL, Rollo, ME, Hayes, C, Hodson, FJ, Collins, CE
Nutrients. 2019;11(1)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
A recent link between dietary intake and chronic pain has led to increased research in the role of nutrition in pain management. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the impact of dietary consultations with or without nutritional supplement on pain levels and quality of life among 42 adults experiencing chronic pain. Participants were randomised to one of four combinations of intervention components – dietary consultation or waitlist controls and supplement fruit juice or placebo fruit juice. A questionnaire encompassing pain, quality of life and dietary intake were completed at baseline and six weeks upon completion of the intervention. This study found all groups had significant improvements in outcomes of pain level and quality of life. The dietary consultation groups had clinically important improvements in pain outcomes compared to the waitlist control group. Based on these results, the authors conclude a dietitian-delivered dietary intervention can improve pain scores, quality of life and dietary intake among people experiencing chronic pain and warrant the need for a larger scale study.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a six-week 2 × 2 design on pain scores, quality of life, and dietary intake in patients attending an Australian tertiary pain clinic. The two intervention components were (1) personalized dietary consultations or waitlist control, and (2) active or placebo dietary supplement (fruit juice). Sixty participants were randomized into one of four groups at baseline (68% female, mean age 49 ± 15 years) with 42 completing the study (70% retention). All groups had statistically significant improvements in three of five pain outcomes. The personalized dietary consultation groups had clinically important improvements in three of five pain outcomes compared to the waitlist control groups. All groups had a statistically significant improvement in six of eight quality-of-life categories post intervention. All groups increased percentage energy from nutrient-dense foods (+5.2 ± 1.4%, p < 0.001) with a significant group-by-time effect for percentage energy from total fat (p = 0.024), with the personalized dietary consultations plus placebo fruit juice reporting the largest reduction (-5.7 ± 2.3%). This study indicates that dietitian-delivered dietary intervention can improve pain scores, quality of life, and dietary intake of people experiencing chronic pain. Future research should evaluate efficacy in a full-powered randomized control trial.