0
selected
-
1.
Efficacy and Safety of Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract in the Treatment of Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.
Zeng, L, Yang, T, Yang, K, Yu, G, Li, J, Xiang, W, Chen, H
Frontiers in immunology. 2022;13:891822
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Arthritic disease is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting one or more joints. Over 100 different forms of arthritis have been identified. Despite their different causes (i.e. degenerative, autoimmune), they share common symptoms such as joint pain, swelling, stiffness, and reduced mobility, which can be disabling in many cases. Drug treatment focuses mainly on limiting the progression of the disease, reducing joint inflammation and managing pain. However, these drugs are associated with many side effects. The rhizome of Curcuma longa (CL), also known as turmeric, has longstanding use as an anti-inflammatory in traditional Asian medicines. Research has affirmed its anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties. Evidence from multiple clinical trials suggests that curcumin, one of the active compounds of CL, can reduce the subjective experience of pain in some conditions and can also improve the symptoms and inflammation associated with arthritis. Hence this systematic review sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CL-extract in 5 types of arthritis (including Ankylosing Spondylitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Osteoarthritis, Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and gout). The review included 29 randomized controlled trials involving 2396 participants, with dosages ranging from 120 mg to 1500 mg for a period of 4-36 weeks. Overall, curcumin and CL extract appeared to improve inflammation and pain levels in arthritic subjects whilst demonstrating safety with no increases in adverse effects. CL and its active constituents appeared to favourably change immune and inflammatory responses, as well as serum uric acid levels in the reviewed forms of arthritis. However, due to the small sample numbers in the trials and some lower quality studies, the authors advocate to interpret the results with caution until more solid evidence is available.
Abstract
Background: Modern pharmacological research found that the chemical components of Curcuma longa L. are mainly curcumin and turmeric volatile oil. Several recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that curcumin improves symptoms and inflammation in patients with arthritis. Methods: Pubmed, Cochran Library, CNKI, and other databases were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Then, the risk of bias of RCTs were assessed and data of RCTs were extracted. Finally, RevMan 5.3 was utilized for meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-nine (29) RCTs involving 2396 participants and 5 types of arthritis were included. The arthritis included Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Osteoarthritis (OA), Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and gout/hyperuricemia. Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract were administered in doses ranging from 120 mg to 1500 mg for a duration of 4-36 weeks. In general, Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract showed safety in all studies and improved the severity of inflammation and pain levels in these arthritis patients. However, more RCTs are needed in the future to elucidate the effect of Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract supplementation in patients with arthritis, including RA, OA, AS and JIA. Conclusion: Curcumin and Curcuma longa Extract may improve symptoms and inflammation levels in people with arthritis. However, due to the low quality and small quantity of RCTs, the conclusions need to be interpreted carefully.
-
2.
Selenium, antioxidants, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Jenkins, DJA, Kitts, D, Giovannucci, EL, Sahye-Pudaruth, S, Paquette, M, Blanco Mejia, S, Patel, D, Kavanagh, M, Tsirakis, T, Kendall, CWC, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2020;112(6):1642-1652
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Oxidative damage is a shared characteristic in chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, cancer and ageing. Antioxidants mitigate the impact of oxidants and have been widely investigated in ageing and disease. However, the evidence for supplementary antioxidants has been mixed and some authorities have advised against the use of certain single nutrients for the prevention of CVD or cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis focused on selenium due to its vital role in the antioxidant system and associations of low selenium blood levels with increased risk of CVD, cancers and death. The study included 43 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of supplemental selenium and antioxidants with or without selenium and their impact on CVD risk, cancer and all-cause mortality. Overall supplemental selenium or antioxidants alone did not seem to be associated with CVD outcomes, cancer, CVD and cancer mortality, or all-cause mortality. On close examination, a decreased risk was seen for CVD mortality when antioxidants were combined with selenium, whilst antioxidant mixtures without selenium demonstrated an increased risk in all-cause mortality. The findings did not seem to be influenced by dietary selenium intake. The authors suggested that inclusion of selenium as part of an antioxidant mix could be key for an antioxidant associated risk reduction. However, in the absence of further long term studies, a balanced antioxidant-rich diet was advocated as the safest approach. In clinical practice, where antioxidant support beyond diet is warranted, supplemental antioxidant use should be concurrent with adequate selenium supplementation, with dose benefits of 50-200mcg observed.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antioxidants have been promoted for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction and for the prevention of cancer. Our preliminary analysis suggested that only when selenium was present were antioxidant mixtures associated with reduced all-cause mortality. OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effect of selenium supplementation alone and of antioxidant mixtures with or without selenium on the risk of CVD, cancer, and mortality. METHODS We identified studies using the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase for potential CVD outcomes, cancer, and all-cause mortality following selenium supplementation alone or after antioxidant supplement mixtures with and without selenium up to June 5, 2020. RCTs of ≥24 wk were included and data were analyzed using random-effects models and classified by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS The meta-analysis identified 9423 studies, of which 43 were used in the final analysis. Overall, no association of selenium alone or antioxidants was seen with CVD and all-cause mortality. However, a decreased risk with antioxidant mixtures was seen for CVD mortality when selenium was part of the mix (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.97; P = 0.02), with no association when selenium was absent. Similarly, when selenium was part of the antioxidant mixture, a decreased risk was seen for all-cause mortality (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.98; P = 0.02) as opposed to an increased risk when selenium was absent (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.13; P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION The addition of selenium should be considered for supplements containing antioxidant mixtures if they are to be associated with CVD and all-cause mortality risk reduction. This trial was registered at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ as CRD42019138268.
-
3.
Inflammaging and Oxidative Stress in Human Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Novel Treatments.
Zuo, L, Prather, ER, Stetskiv, M, Garrison, DE, Meade, JR, Peace, TI, Zhou, T
International journal of molecular sciences. 2019;20(18)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced during normal metabolic processes or can be induced by environmental factors. High levels of ROS in the cell can lead to oxidation causing cellular damage and a subsequent increase in inflammation, which is a significant contributor to disease. Age-associated increases in such chronic, low-grade inflammation is also referred to as inflammaging. This review summarizes how inflammaging plays a role in various age-related health conditions. Described are the mechanisms of how ROS and the age-related decline in cellular turn-over and immune activation contribute to the pathology of cardiovascular disease, cancer, neurodegeneration concerning Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, the authors discuss potential treatments that could assist in the management of such inflammaging-related diseases. These include vaccines to stimulate immune activity, stem cell intervention, drugs like metformin, nutritional and nutraceutical supplements like zinc, vitamin E, vitamins C, D, carotenoids, polyphenols and flavonoids like resveratrol, red algae extract and melatonin. Addressed are also general dietary concepts like calorie restriction, the benefits of the Mediterranean diet or a whole foods diet, and the potential of specific plant derived compounds like baicalin and sulforaphanes. The authors also briefly highlight the importance of the gut microbiome, as a poor gut microbiota has been associated with unfavourable age-related immune alterations and overall inflammaging. This review provides a comprehensive resource, detailing the effects and mechanisms of oxidative damage and its contribution to age-related diseases, including a list of interventions to consider when navigating the impact and risks associated with inflammaging.
Abstract
It has been proposed that a chronic state of inflammation correlated with aging known as inflammaging, is implicated in multiple disease states commonly observed in the elderly population. Inflammaging is associated with over-abundance of reactive oxygen species in the cell, which can lead to oxidation and damage of cellular components, increased inflammation, and activation of cell death pathways. This review focuses on inflammaging and its contribution to various age-related diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis. Recently published mechanistic details of the roles of reactive oxygen species in inflammaging and various diseases will also be discussed. Advancements in potential treatments to ameliorate inflammaging, oxidative stress, and consequently, reduce the morbidity of multiple disease states will be explored.
-
4.
The effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress in among coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Jorat, MV, Tabrizi, R, Kolahdooz, F, Akbari, M, Salami, M, Heydari, ST, Asemi, Z
Inflammopharmacology. 2019;27(2):233-248
-
-
Plain language summary
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress significantly contribute to the narrowing of the blood supply to the heart leading to coronary artery disease (CAD). Increased levels of several markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF- α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), appear to be indicative of heart attack risk. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is a naturally occurring nutrient made in the body but can also be found in some foods or taken via supplements. It is an antioxidant that protects cell membranes and mitochondria against oxidative damage and also does so in the heart by preventing endothelial damage and the associated narrowing of blood vessels. Several trials investigated the effects of CoQ10 on inflammation and oxidative stress, with some noteworthy results and yet also some conflicting evidence. Hence this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to shed some light on the controversial findings regarding coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) supplementation on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress amongst patients with CAD. The authors included 13 clinical randomised controlled trials, amounting to 364 cardiac patients in the intervention groups. The treatment duration ranged from 4 to 48 weeks, and the dosage of CoQ10 varied between 60 to 300 mg/day. In conclusion, the meta-analysis showed that CoQ10 supplementation increased antioxidant markers of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), and decreased the oxidative stress marker malondialdehyde (MDA) and its derivative forms. There was no consistent effect on inflammatory markers of CRP, TNF-α, IL-6 or the levels of the antioxidant glutathione peroxidase. The discrepancies amongst the different studies may be a result of the divergent study designs, different population characteristics, the dosage of CoQ10 used and the duration of intervention.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress significantly contribute in developing coronary artery disease (CAD). This systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to determine the effects of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) supplementation on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress among patients with CAD. METHODS The electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched until Oct 2018. The quality assessment and heterogeneity of the selected randomized clinical Trials (RCTs) were examined using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool, and Q and I2 tests, respectively. Given the presence of heterogeneity, random-effects model or fixed-effect model were used to pool standardized mean differences (SMDs) as summary effect sizes. RESULTS A total of 13 clinical RCTs of 912 potential citations were found to be eligible for the current meta-analysis. The pooled findings for biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress demonstrated that CoQ10 supplementation significantly increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) (SMD 2.63; 95% CI, 1.17, 4.09, P < 0.001; I2 = 94.5%) and catalase (CAT) levels (SMD 1.00; 95% CI, 0.57, 1.43, P < 0.001; I2 = 24.5%), and significantly reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD - 4.29; 95% CI - 6.72, - 1.86, P = 0.001; I2 = 97.6%) and diene levels (SMD - 2.40; 95% CI - 3.11, - 1.68, P < 0.001; I2 = 72.6%). We did not observe any significant effect of CoQ10 supplementation on C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD - 0.62; 95% CI - 1.31, 0.08, P = 0.08; I2 = 87.9%), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (SMD 0.22; 95% CI - 1.07, 1.51, P = 0.73; I2 = 89.7%), interleukin-6 (IL-6) (SMD - 1.63; 95% CI - 3.43, 0.17, P = 0.07; I2 = 95.2%), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) levels (SMD 0.14; 95% CI - 0.77, 1.04, P = 0.76; I2 = 78.7%). CONCLUSIONS Overall, this meta-analysis demonstrated CoQ10 supplementation increased SOD and CAT, and decreased MDA and diene levels, but did not affect CRP, TNF-α, IL-6, and GPx levels among patients with CAD.
-
5.
The Effects of 52 Weeks of Soccer or Resistance Training on Body Composition and Muscle Function in +65-Year-Old Healthy Males--A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Andersen, TR, Schmidt, JF, Pedersen, MT, Krustrup, P, Bangsbo, J
PloS one. 2016;11(2):e0148236
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Aging adversely impacts muscular structure and function, and sedentary subjects have an increased risk of developing lifestyle-related disease. Physical activity in aging subjects has repeatedly been shown to counteract these adverse effects, and in particular, the health benefits of recreational soccer have been investigated. The aim of this randomised trial was to examine the long-term effects of soccer training compared to resistance training on a range of musculo-skeletal structural and functional variables. Twenty-seven healthy elderly males aged 63-74 were randomly assigned to participate in either a soccer training group, a resistance training group or inactive control group for 52-weeks. Participants performed a one-hour training session twice per week for the first 16 weeks, and three times a week for the following 36 weeks. This study showed that 52 weeks of regular soccer training lead to decreases in BMI, improved skeletal muscle anti-oxidative potential, and favourably altered glucose control when compared with resistance training in elderly men.
Abstract
The effects of 52 weeks of soccer or resistance training were investigated in untrained elderly men. The subjects aged 68.1±2.1 yrs were randomised into a soccer (SG; n = 9), a resistance (RG; n = 9) and a control group (CG; n = 8). The subjects in SG and RG, respectively, trained 1.7±0.3 and 1.8±0.3 times weekly on average during the intervention period. Muscle function and body composition were determined before and after 16 and 52 weeks of the intervention period. In SG, BMI was reduced by 1.5% and 3.0% (p<0.05) after 16 and 52 weeks, respectively, unchanged in RG and 2% higher (p<0.05) in CG after 52 weeks of the intervention period. In SG, the response to a glucose tolerance test was 16% lower (p<0.05) after 16 wks, but not after 52 wks, compared to before the intervention period, and unchanged in RG and CG. In SG, superoxide dismutase-2 expression was 59% higher (p<0.05) after 52 wks compared to before the intervention period, and unchanged in RG and CG. In RG, upper body lean mass was 3 and 2% higher (p<0.05) after 16 and 52 wks, respectively, compared to before the intervention period, and unchanged in SG and CG. In RG, Akt-2 expression increased by 28% (p<0.01) and follistatin expression decreased by 38% (p<0.05) during the 52-wk intervention period, and was unchanged in SG and CG. Thus, long-term soccer training reduces BMI and improves anti-oxidative capacity, while long-term resistance training impacts muscle protein enzyme expression and increases lean body mass in elderly men. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01530035.