-
1.
Weight Stigmatisation - NED Infobite
BANT's scientific NED InfoBites are designed to provide key elements of the latest research using plain language. They provide quick overviews on particular health issues and nutrition topics for a speedy introduction to the science. Visually attractive and easily shareable with clients and social media followers.
2024
Abstract
Weight stigma is defined as the social rejection and devaluation that accrues to those who do not comply with prevailing social norms of adequate body weight and shape. This BANT Infobite highlights some of the latest research on weight stigma and how and why weight stigma may be a driver of obesity.
-
2.
Nutrition and Men's Health - NED Infobite
BANT's scientific NED InfoBites are designed to provide key elements of the latest research using plain language. They provide quick overviews on particular health issues and nutrition topics for a speedy introduction to the science. Visually attractive and easily shareable with clients and social media followers.
2024
Abstract
This NED Infobite focuses on some of the science related to men's health. It includes randomised controlled trials looking at time-restricted feeding, the impact of including apples in the daily diet and the outcomes of lower carbohydrate versus mixed carbohydrate diets on weight loss.
-
3.
Autoimmune Skin Disease - NED Infobite
BANT's scientific NED InfoBites are designed to provide key elements of the latest research using plain language. They provide quick overviews on particular health issues and nutrition topics for a speedy introduction to the science. Visually attractive and easily shareable with clients and social media followers.
2024
Abstract
Psoriasis is an autoimmune inflammatory condition, affecting skin, nails and joints. This NED Infobite highlights research on the role of oral and gut microbiomes, including use of probiotics and synbiotics, key nutrients to employ and the importance of weight management.
-
4.
Acute feeding with almonds compared to a carbohydrate-based snack improves appetite-regulating hormones with no effect on self-reported appetite sensations: a randomised controlled trial.
Carter, S, Hill, AM, Buckley, JD, Tan, SY, Rogers, GB, Coates, AM
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(2):857-866
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Long-term regulation of body weight is controlled by balancing energy intake with energy expenditure. Understanding the role of specific food items and their impact on energy intake may assist in promoting weight reduction and weight loss maintenance for people with obesity. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of eating almonds or a carbohydrate-based snack on appetite-regulating hormones, self-reported appetite ratings, and short-term energy intake. This study is based on data obtained from a parallel arm randomised controlled trial. Participants were males and females, aged between 25 and 65 years who were randomly assigned to either the almond or the snack bar treatment groups based on age, sex and body mass index. Results show that the consumption of almonds resulted in a smaller C-peptide response and a larger glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [pancreatic hormone], glucagon-like peptide 1 [peptide hormone] (timepoint comparisons only), glucagon and pancreatic polypeptide response compared to consuming an isocaloric carbohydrate-rich snack bar. Furthermore, although not significant, the almond group consumed 300 kJ less energy in the meal challenge, 270 kJ of which came from discretionary foods, which may be a clinically important benefit in weight management. Authors conclude that foods that promote satiety help to regulate energy balance and may assist with weight management. However, future studies should consider testing food dose and composition carefully as the volume of food, its sensory qualities, and the acceptance of the food respective of usual meal patterns, may be important in eliciting a feeling of fullness and satisfaction.
Abstract
PURPOSE Early satiety has been identified as one of the mechanisms that may explain the beneficial effects of nuts for reducing obesity. This study compared postprandial changes in appetite-regulating hormones and self-reported appetite ratings after consuming almonds (AL, 15% of energy requirement) or an isocaloric carbohydrate-rich snack bar (SB). METHODS This is a sub-analysis of baseline assessments of a larger parallel-arm randomised controlled trial in overweight and obese (Body Mass Index 27.5-34.9 kg/m2) adults (25-65 years). After an overnight fast, 140 participants consumed a randomly allocated snack (AL [n = 68] or SB [n = 72]). Appetite-regulating hormones and self-reported appetite sensations, measured using visual analogue scales, were assessed immediately before snack food consumption, and at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min following snack consumption. A sub-set of participants (AL, n = 49; SB, n = 48) then consumed a meal challenge buffet ad libitum to assess subsequent energy intake. An additional appetite rating assessment was administered post buffet at 150 min. RESULTS Postprandial C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) response was 47% smaller with AL compared to SB (p < 0.001). Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon and pancreatic polypeptide AUC responses were larger with AL compared to SB (18%, p = 0.005; 39% p < 0.001; 45% p < 0.001 respectively). Cholecystokinin, ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-1, leptin and polypeptide YY AUCs were not different between groups. Self-reported appetite ratings and energy intake following the buffet did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION More favourable appetite-regulating hormone responses to AL did not translate into better self-reported appetite or reduced short-term energy consumption. Future studies should investigate implications for longer term appetite regulation. ANZCTR REFERENCE NUMBER ACTRN12618001861246 2018.
-
5.
Effects of Morning Vs. Evening exercise on appetite, energy intake, performance and metabolism, in lean males and females.
Mode, WJA, Slater, T, Pinkney, MG, Hough, J, James, RM, Varley, I, James, LJ, Clayton, DJ
Appetite. 2023;182:106422
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Long-term weight management is notoriously difficult, with many people experiencing progressive weight gain throughout adult life. The aim of this study was to assess the acute effects of morning and evening cycling exercise on appetite, post-exercise ad-libitum energy intake, substrate metabolism, voluntary performance, and subjective responses to exercise, in young, healthy males and females. Sixteen healthy participants (eight males and eight females) were recruited to the study. Each participant completed two preliminary trials, followed by two experimental trials which involved exercising at 10:30 or 18:30. Results show that: - post-exercise energy intake was greater after acute cycling exercise performed in the evening compared to the morning, despite no post-exercise differences in subjective appetite. - there wasn’t any difference in exercise performance between morning and evening exercise. - exercise timing did not affect performance during a 15-min all-out performance test. Authors conclude that their findings demonstrate a disconnect between subjective appetite and ad-libitum energy intake but provide some evidence that exercise can offset circadian-related appetite profiles.
Abstract
Exercise is an important component of a weight management strategy. However, little is known about whether circadian variations in physiological and behavioural processes can influence the appetite and energy balance responses to exercise performed at different times of the day. This study compared the effects of morning and evening exercise on appetite, post-exercise energy intake, and voluntary performance. In randomised, counterbalanced order, 16 healthy males and females (n = 8 each) completed two trials, performing morning exercise at 10:30 (AMEx) or evening exercise at 18:30 (PMEx). Exercise consisted of 30 min steady-state cycling (60% V˙ O2peak), and a 15-min performance test. A standardised meal (543 ± 86 kcal) was consumed 2-h before exercise and ad-libitum energy intake was assessed 15 min after exercise, with subjective appetite measured throughout. Absolute ad-libitum energy intake was 152 ± 126 kcal greater during PMEx (P < 0.001), but there was no differences in subjective appetite between trials immediately pre-exercise, or immediately before the post-exercise meal (P ≥ 0.060). Resting energy expenditure (P < 0.01) and carbohydrate oxidation (P < 0.05) were greater during AMEx, but there were no differences in substrate oxidation or energy expenditure during exercise (P ≥ 0.155). Exercise performance was not different between trials (P = 0.628). In conclusion, acute morning and evening exercise prompt similar appetite responses, but post-exercise ad-libitum energy intake is greater following evening exercise. These findings demonstrate discordant responses between subjective appetite and ad-libitum energy intake but suggest that exercise might offset circadian variations in appetite. Longer-term studies are required to determine how exercise timing affects adherence and weight management outcomes to exercise interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04742530, February 8, 2021.
-
6.
Evidence of lifestyle interventions in a pregnant population with chronic hypertension and/or pre-existing diabetes: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.
Goddard, L, Patel, R, Astbury, NM, Tucker, K, McManus, RJ
Pregnancy hypertension. 2023;31:60-72
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Chronic hypertension complicates ≤5 % of pregnancies, and those entering pregnancy with a pre-existing diagnosis of diabetes has a global prevalence of between 0.5 % and 2.6 %. The aim of this study was to collate the evidence around lifestyle interventions during pregnancy for women with chronic hypertension and/or pre-existing diabetes (type 1 and type 2). This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine randomised controlled trials. Results show lack of clarity and data on the effect of lifestyle interventions in pregnant women with chronic hypertension and/or pre-existing diabetes, thereby exposing key gaps in the literature. Authors conclude that there is a shortage of primary interventional studies examining the effect of lifestyle interventions in high-risk pregnant populations who enter pregnancy with chronic conditions.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant people with chronic hypertension, pre-existing diabetes or both are at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Lifestyle interventions play an important role in disease management in non-pregnant populations. AIM: To review the existing evidence of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that examine lifestyle interventions in pregnant people with chronic hypertension and/or pre-existing diabetes. METHODS A systematic review and narrative synthesis was conducted. Five electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2021 for RCTs evaluating antenatal lifestyle interventions in people with chronic hypertension and/or pre-existing diabetes with outcomes to include weight or blood pressure change. RESULTS Nine randomised controlled trials including 7438 pregnant women were eligible. Eight studies were mixed pregnant populations that included women with chronic hypertension and/or pre-existing diabetes. One study included only pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes. Intervention characteristics and procedures varied and targeted diet, physical activity and/or gestational weight. All studies reported weight and one study reported blood pressure change. Outcome data were frequently unavailable for the subset of women of interest, including subgroup data on important pregnancy and birth complications. Eligibility criteria were often ambiguous and baseline data on chronic hypertension was often omitted. CONCLUSION A lack of primary interventional trials examining the effect of lifestyle interventions on weight and blood pressure outcomes in pregnant populations with chronic hypertension and/or pre-existing diabetes was evident. Lifestyle modification has the potential to alter disease progression. Future trials should address the ambiguity and frequent exclusion of these important populations.
-
7.
Impact of energy density on energy intake in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Klos, B, Cook, J, Crepaz, L, Weiland, A, Zipfel, S, Mack, I
European journal of nutrition. 2023;62(3):1059-1076
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Consumption of energy-dense food (ED) is a significant contributor to obesity and overweight. To manage weight, reducing portion size and ED of food is a critical strategy. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of thirty-eight randomised controlled trials to determine the effect of ED manipulation on energy intake. The results indicated that lower ED interventions were more effective than higher ED interventions in reducing energy intake. A positive linear relationship was observed between ED and energy intake, regardless of age, meal type, or intervention duration. The study findings can be used by healthcare professionals to understand the benefits of ED manipulation in weight management. However, further rigorous studies are necessary to validate these results.
Abstract
PURPOSE The energy density (ED) of a diet can be leveraged to prevent weight gain or treat overweight and obesity. By lowering the ED of the diet, energy intake can be reduced while maintaining portion size. However, a reliable meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is missing. Therefore, this meta-analysis synthesized the evidence of ED manipulation on energy intake in RCTs. METHODS The systematic literature search of multiple databases according to PRISMA criteria considered RCTs investigating the objectively measured energy intake from meals with different ED (lower ED (median 1.1 kcal/g) versus higher ED (median 1.5 kcal/g)) under controlled conditions. Subgroup analyses for age (children versus adults), meal type (preload versus entrée design), and intervention length (1 meal versus > 1 meal) were performed to achieve the most homogeneous result. RESULTS The meta-analysis of 38 included studies demonstrated that lowering ED considerably reduced energy intake - 223 kcal (95% CI: - 259.7, - 186.0) in comparison to the higher ED interventions. As heterogeneity was high among studies, subgroup analyses were conducted. Heterogeneity decreased in subgroup analyses for age and meal type combined, strengthening the results. An extended analysis showed a positive linear relationship between ED and energy intake. Dietary ED did not affect the amount of food intake. CONCLUSION Manipulating ED substantially affects energy intake whereas food intake remains constant. Thus, this approach can be regarded as a powerful tool for weight management through nutrition therapy. Registration on 08/08/2021: CRD42021266653.
-
8.
Distribution of energy intake across the day and weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Young, IE, Poobalan, A, Steinbeck, K, O'Connor, HT, Parker, HM
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2023;24(3):e13537
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity increases an individual's risk of metabolic disease, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders such as osteoarthritis, and some cancers. “Chrononutrition” relates to the timing of meals and distribution of total energy intake across the day. Evidence is building chrononutrition as a potential target in both weight loss and metabolic disease interventions. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of earlier versus later distribution of total daily energy intake on weight loss, and to evaluate the potential for utilizing altered energy distribution as a tool in weight loss interventions. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine clinical studies. Total number of participants was 485 (earlier distributed total energy intakes: n = 244, later distributed total energy intakes; n = 241). Results show that energy intakes with a focus on earlier distribution resulted in significantly greater weight loss when compared with similarly energy-restricted diets with individuals consuming a larger proportion of their total energy intake later in the day and into the evening. Authors conclude that earlier energy intakes may be a promising tool to be used in conjunction with other weight loss strategies such as energy restriction to enhance weight loss. However, further research is required to elucidate the additional positive impacts that earlier distributed total energy intakes may have on weight and metabolic health.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
Implementing a dietary strategy where a higher proportion of energy is consumed earlier in the day may offer additional benefits to an energy restricted diet for weight loss, blood glucose, improve markers of insulin resistance, increase satiety and improve hunger management. Based on the findings, earlier distribution of energy intake may serve as an effective component of a weight loss protocol.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Background
Chrononutrition refers to the timing and distribution of total daily energy intake across the day. It has been proposed that consuming a greater proportion of total daily energy intake earlier in the day as opposed to the evening may be beneficial for weight loss and metabolic health.
Aims
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of earlier versus later distribution of total daily energy intake on weight loss.
Results
A total of 9 randomised controlled trials involving 485 participants were included in this analysis. The study durations ranged from 5-16 weeks. All of the studies included in this analysis applied energy-restricted diets to both intervention arms. The mean percentages of energy intake in 8 of the 9 studies per meal were:
- Earlier distributed intakes: breakfast: 34% ± 16%, lunch: 38% ± 7%, dinner: 20% ± 6%.
- Later distributed intakes: breakfast: 19% ± 6%, lunch: 30% ± 10%, dinner; 40% ± 11%.
One of the studies advised percentage of energy intakes as either:
- Earlier: 70% for breakfast, morning tea and lunch and 30% for afternoon tea and dinner
- Late: 55% for breakfast, morning tea and lunch and 45% for afternoon tea and dinner.
The earlier distributed energy intake groups demonstrated significantly greater weight loss when compared with later distributed energy intake groups ( Mean Difference (MD) −1.23 kg; 95% CI −2.40, −0.06, p = 0.04;
I2 = 98%).
The earlier energy intake groups also displayed lower fasting and bedtime glucose levels (fasting: −0.83 vs. −0.27 mmol/L, p = 0.001; before sleep: −1.70 vs. −0.28 mmol/L, p = 0.009).
A random-effects model demonstrated that the earlier intake groups displayed greater reductions in LDL (MD: −0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI −0.14, −0.07, p < 0.01), fasting glucose (MD: 0.15 mmol/L, 95% CI −0.23, −0.06, p < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (MD: −0.38; 95% CI −0.64, −0.11, p = 0.005).
One study reported that earlier distribution energy intake also led to a greater reduction in medications following the intervention for type 2 diabetics (31% vs. 0%, P=0.002).
Two of the studies assessed both appetite and hunger and identified that earlier distribution of energy led to improvements in their urge to eat, preoccupation with food and cravings for sweets and fats.
Clinical practice applications:
Earlier distribution of energy intake may be beneficial for:
- Weight loss
- Improve fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, fasting glucose and HbA1c
- Reducing LDL
- Improving satiety and hunger management
- Supporting the reduction of medications for individuals with type 2 diabetes
- Improving regularity of sleep and waking times
Considerations for future research:
As the included studies only ranged from 5-16 weeks, longer duration studies would be useful to identify the effect of earlier distribution of energy intake on body weight, metabolic health and appetite over a longer period of time. There was a high degree of heterogeneity between the studies and a lack of uniformity in the distributions of energy intake across the day. Further studies with more uniformity of energy distribution would be needed to identify the optimal distribution of energy across the day to improve body weight and metabolic health.
Abstract
Consuming a greater proportion of total energy intake earlier in the day rather than in the evening is proposed to positively influence weight loss and health, potentially due to greater synchronization of human body circadian rhythms. This systematic review provides an update on existing evidence regarding earlier distributed eating patterns in weight loss interventions. Using a robust search strategy in five electronic databases, nine randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of energy intake distribution on weight loss were identified. Following critical appraisal, a random-effects meta-analyses found that, in the context of an energy-reduced diet, distributing energy intake with a focus on earlier intake resulted in significantly greater weight loss (-1.23 kg; 95% CI 2.40, -0.06, p = 0.04). Improvements in HOMA-IR, fasting glucose, and LDL cholesterol were also seen. The current study provides a timely update on the evidence linking distribution of total daily energy intake and health, showing that a focus on earlier intakes can result in greater short-term weight loss compared with later intakes. Future studies are needed to elucidate the impact that earlier intakes may have on weight management and metabolic health.
-
9.
Influence of water-based exercise on energy intake, appetite, and appetite-related hormones in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Grigg, MJ, Thake, CD, Allgrove, JE, King, JA, Thackray, AE, Stensel, DJ, Owen, A, Broom, DR
Appetite. 2023;180:106375
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Exercise is an effective way to improve mental and physical health and can influence weight management due to the energy expenditure. Energy balance is influenced by day-to-day variations in energy intake and expenditure. The aim of this study was to address whether water-based exercise influences energy intake, appetite, and appetite related hormones differently to land based exercise in adults. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies which include randomised crossover ( 7 trials), semi-random (1 trial) (water-trial was required prior to iso-energetically matched water trial) and independent group (1 trial) (used in the 12-week study) designs. Results show that post-exercise energy intake is higher after water-based exercise versus a resting control. However, there wasn’t any difference in energy intake when water-based exercise was compared with land-based exercise. Furthermore, when different water temperatures were analysed, post-exercise energy intake was higher in cold water versus neutral water. Additionally, cycling and swimming did not alter fasting plasma concentrations of appetite regulating hormones (ghrelin and leptin), insulin or total peptide YY [gut hormone] but contributed to body mass loss. Authors conclude that if body mass management is a person’s primary focus, it is important to be mindful of the tendency to eat more in the subsequent hours after water-based exercise, as energy intake may be increased when compared to a no exercise control.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- The only type of exercise reporting an increase in energy intake was in water-based activities, where the temperature was between 18-20• C. However, this was only when explored in comparison to a resting control. No difference was reported in energy intake when water-based exercise was compared with land-based exercise.
- Any form of exercise, whether land or water-based should be considered where appropriate to reduce the risks of sedentary behaviour.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction:
Exercise is effective for weight-management alongside other physical and mental health benefits. Changes in appetite-regulating hormones may affect energy balance, e.g. some exercise may suppress appetite, known as exercise-induced anorexia. This review evaluated differences in energy intake, appetite and appetite-related hormones in land-based versus water-based exercise.
Methods:
The meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO. Literature searching resulted in eight studies published between 1991 and 2021, which met the inclusion criteria (water v control), 5 studies (water v land) and 2 studies (water at different temperatures). Risk of Bias was assessed using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias for randomised trials.
Results:
Data were analysed in RevMan 5.4.1 using fixed effects, generic inverse variance method on energy intake. High heterogeneity prevented analysis on appetite and appetite-related hormones. Standard deviation was inputted based on estimated values for missing data. Heterogeneity was calculated using the I2 index. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05 and analyses based on two-tailed Z tests.
All participants had a healthy BMI, were aged 19-39 and ranged from well-trained to non-exercisers. A single bout of water-based exercise increased ad-libitum energy intake compared to a non-exercise control (mean difference [95% CI]: 330 [118, 542] kJ, P = 0.002) but no difference was identified between water and land-based exercise (78 [-176, 334] kJ, P = 0.55). Cold water exercise (18–20 •C) increased energy intake more than neutral water (27–33 •C) temperature (719 [222, 1215] kJ; P < 0.005). One 12-week study reported cycling and swimming did not alter fasting plasma concentrations of total ghrelin, insulin, leptin or total PYY but contributed to body mass loss 87.3 (5.2) to 85.9 (5.0) kg and 88.9 (4.9) to 86.4 (4.5) kg (P < 0.05) respectively.
Conclusion:
Despite limitations, this review may provide preliminary evidence on energy intake and appetite for water-based activities. If weight management is a primary focus, then water temperature needs to be considered, particularly if sub 20•C .
Clinical practice applications:
Although this study suggests cold water exercise may cause an increase in energy intake, 95% confidence intervals for individual studies are very large so results should be interpreted cautiously. Those preferring exercise in cold water, should be encouraged, providing they are mindful of the tendency to eat more post-exercise.
It is not possible to draw any robust conclusions about the ratings of hunger in response to different types of exercise due to limited data. However, according to the review, five studies demonstrated that hunger was suppressed more than control prior at the start of water-based exercise, and during and immediately after exercise.
Considerations for future research:
Most participants were of healthy weight and physically active, however since appetite signals may be dysregulated in obesity, including all weight categories and different activity levels may generate a more comprehensive overview.
Further research recommendations include:
- Measuring the effects of water- based activities on appetite, appetite related hormones and energy intake at different time points following exercise in order to provide recommendations for effective weight management strategies and in a range of different temperatures.
- Using a ‘no exercise’ water immersion control. Evidence suggests that immersion in cold water alone may increase energy expenditure
- Evaluating the effect of a water-based activity, such as swimming performed in a ‘fasted’ and ‘non-fasted’ state to investigate the impact on appetite, appetite related hormones and energy intake.
Abstract
Single bouts of land-based exercise suppress appetite and do not typically alter energy intake in the short-term, whereas it has been suggested that water-based exercise may evoke orexigenic effects. The primary aim was to systematically review the available literature investigating the influence of water-based exercise on energy intake in adults (PROSPERO ID number CRD42022314349). PubMed, Medline, Sport-Discus, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL and Public Health Database were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English from 1900 to May 2022. Included studies implemented a water-based exercise intervention versus a control or comparator. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane 'Risk of bias tool for randomised trials' (RoB 2.0). We identified eight acute (same day) exercise studies which met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects generic inverse variance method on energy intake (8 studies (water versus control), 5 studies (water versus land) and 2 studies (water at two different temperatures)). Appetite and appetite-related hormones are also examined but high heterogeneity did not allow a meta-analysis of these outcome measures. We identified one chronic exercise training study which met the inclusion criteria with findings discussed narratively. Meta-analysis revealed that a single bout of exercise in water increased ad-libitum energy intake compared to a non-exercise control (mean difference [95% CI]: 330 [118, 542] kJ, P = 0.002). No difference in ad libitum energy intake was identified between water and land-based exercise (78 [-176, 334] kJ, P = 0.55). Exercising in cold water (18-20 °C) increased energy intake to a greater extent than neutral water (27-33 °C) temperature (719 [222, 1215] kJ; P < 0.005). The one eligible 12-week study did not assess whether water-based exercise influenced energy intake but did find that cycling and swimming did not alter fasting plasma concentrations of total ghrelin, insulin, leptin or total PYY but contributed to body mass loss 87.3 (5.2) to 85.9 (5.0) kg and 88.9 (4.9) to 86.4 (4.5) kg (P < 0.05) respectively. To conclude, if body mass management is a person's primary focus, they should be mindful of the tendency to eat more in the hours after a water-based exercise session, particularly when the water temperature is cold (18-20 °C).
-
10.
Effect of Targeted vs. Standard Fortification of Breast Milk on Growth and Development of Preterm Infants (≤32 Weeks): Results from an Interrupted Randomized Controlled Trial.
Seliga-Siwecka, J, Fiałkowska, J, Chmielewska, A
Nutrients. 2023;15(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Preterm birth results in a high risk of mortality and is a cause of several morbidities, including extrauterine growth restriction. Despite numerous proven benefits, the concentration of some nutrients in human milk may be too low to meet the high nutritional needs of premature infants. Thus, to ensure optimal growth and development, human milk fortification is recommended for all very low birth weight babies. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether tailored compared to the standard fortification of enteral nutrition improved weight gain velocity in preterm infants born at ≤32 weeks of gestation. This study is a randomised observer- and patient-blinded controlled multicentre superiority trial, with two parallel groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Due to shortage of staff, two out of three centres failed to randomise patients. Patients were assigned to standard or tailored enteral nutrition fortification groups. Results show that there is no statistically significant difference in the velocity of weight gain during the supplementation period in infants born before 32 weeks of gestation who received targeted fortification compared to those who received standard fortification. Changes in length and head circumference did not differ between the groups. Authors conclude that targeted milk modification is a strategy that may allow for the optimisation of growth in premature infants; however, feasibility and poor tolerance of feeds may be important obstacles in introducing this strategy to neonatal intensive care unit clinical practice.
Abstract
Human milk is recommended for very low birth weight infants. Their nutritional needs are high, and the fortification of human milk is a standard procedure to optimize growth. Targeted fortification accounts for the variability in human milk composition. It has been a promising alternative to standard fixed-dose fortification, potentially improving short-term growth. In this trial, preterm infants (≤32 weeks of gestation) were randomized to receive human milk after standard fortification (HMF, Nutricia) or tailored fortification with modular components of proteins (Bebilon Bialko, Nutricia), carbohydrates (Polycal, Nutricia), and lipids (Calogen, Nutricia). The intervention started when preterms reached 80 mL/kg/day enteral feeds. Of the target number of 220 newborns, 39 were randomized. The trial was interrupted due to serious intolerance in five cases. There was no significant difference in velocity of weight gain during the supplementation period (primary outcome) in the tailored vs. standard fortification group: 27.01 ± 10.19 g/d vs. 25.84 ± 13.45 g/d, p = 0.0776. Length and head circumference were not significantly different between the groups. We found the feasibility of targeted fortification to be limited in neonatal intensive care unit practice. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT:03775785.